• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

ASUS Announces PA249Q ProArt Series LCD Monitor

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
34,333 (9.23/day)
Likes
17,427
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name Long shelf-life potato
Processor Intel Core i7-4770K
Motherboard ASUS Z97-A
Cooling Xigmatek Aegir CPU Cooler
Memory 16GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3-1866
Video Card(s) 2x GeForce GTX 970 SLI
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590D 28-inch 4K
Case Cooler Master CM690 Window
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX850W
Mouse Razer Abyssus 2014
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro Creators Update
#1
ASUS today announced the PA249Q ProArt Series LCD Monitor, a professional 24-inch display that is factory pre-calibrated for uncompromised color precision, straight from the box. The PA249Q ProArt Series LCD Monitor has a native 1920 x 1200 resolution with 16:10 aspect ratio and features AH-IPS (Advanced High-Performance In-Plane Switching) display technology for a bright and vibrant image with 178-degree wide viewing angles. The PA249Q also features ASUS Smart Contrast Ratio, and ASUS QuickFit Virtual Scale and Splendid Video Intelligence technologies for enhanced image quality.

Show full news post
 
Joined
May 21, 2011
Messages
640 (0.27/day)
Likes
139
System Name Tiger1-Workstation
Processor Intel XEON E3-1275V2 / E3-1230V3
Motherboard ASUS SABERTOOTH Z77 / AsRock H87 Performance
Cooling Corsair H80i Watercooling
Memory 32GB Corsair Dominator Platinum 2400
Video Card(s) Inno3D GTX 780 Ti
Storage 2TB SSD(4X OCZ vertex 4 256GB LSI RAID0 + Crucial M550 1TB)
Display(s) 2x Dell U3011 30" IPS
Case Silverstone Raven 03
Audio Device(s) Xonar Essence STX--> Xonar Essence One --> SPL Auditor -->Genelec 8040B
Power Supply Corsair AX860i Platinum
Software Windows 8.1 Enterprise
#2
so tell me what's the difference between the PA208Q I just bought? /pissedoff
 
Joined
Nov 1, 2008
Messages
420 (0.13/day)
Likes
121
System Name It does stuff
Processor AMD FX-8320
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3
Cooling Antec Kuhler 620 + Fans Everywhere
Memory 16GB Crucial 1600Mhz DDR3
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+ 4GB
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, Seagate Barracuda 3TB
Display(s) Viewsonic VX2757, AOC 2243W
Case Antec Three Hundred Version Two
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar DG PCI / Sony MDR-XB500s
Power Supply EVGA 600W
Mouse Redragon Phoenix
Keyboard Steelseries Apex Raw
Software Win10 64 Professional
#3
Wow, 1920x1200. I wonder why no price is given, it'll be massively overpriced due to that extra vertical resolution?
 
Joined
May 21, 2011
Messages
640 (0.27/day)
Likes
139
System Name Tiger1-Workstation
Processor Intel XEON E3-1275V2 / E3-1230V3
Motherboard ASUS SABERTOOTH Z77 / AsRock H87 Performance
Cooling Corsair H80i Watercooling
Memory 32GB Corsair Dominator Platinum 2400
Video Card(s) Inno3D GTX 780 Ti
Storage 2TB SSD(4X OCZ vertex 4 256GB LSI RAID0 + Crucial M550 1TB)
Display(s) 2x Dell U3011 30" IPS
Case Silverstone Raven 03
Audio Device(s) Xonar Essence STX--> Xonar Essence One --> SPL Auditor -->Genelec 8040B
Power Supply Corsair AX860i Platinum
Software Windows 8.1 Enterprise
#4
Wow, 1920x1200. I wonder why no price is given, it'll be massively overpriced due to that extra vertical resolution?
1920x1200 is not a big deal, many 24" (such as Dell U2412M) are at this resolution considering most 23" are 1080p, and this is just slightly taller.

currently PA249Q is selling for 4900 RMB in China, which is around $790 USD
although for comparison's sake PA248Q is selling for 2800 RMB ($450 USD) in China, So im just wondering, what justifies the double in price for essentially identical specs.
 
Joined
May 22, 2012
Messages
34 (0.02/day)
Likes
2
#5
I would be a bit disappointed if they announce a successor to the PB278Q I just bought, but if the only difference is going to be pre-calibration of the colours then I will not be bothered at all. I'm loving the quality of the PB278Q so far. There is almost no noticeable backlight bleed on a black background at all and I love the extra inputs over my old Dell 2407. Gaming on it is a joy too. I just wish the menu system was more intuitively designed as it is pretty awkward to navigate. How hard is it to come up with a simple and fluid method of changing basic settings? You'd think electronics companies in general always give this job to the janitor...
 
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Messages
201 (0.12/day)
Likes
46
Location
Bulgaria /България/
System Name [Ivy Bridge-E + Pascal] desktop, [Broadwell-C + Kepler] HTPC, [Haswell + Kepler] laptop
#6
so tell me what's the difference between the PA208Q I just bought? /pissedoff
PA248Q is weak monitor. This is the successor of the 246Q which is using very nice panel (10bit P-IPS). 28Q is cheap e-IPS. I hope the 29Q is also using WCG-CCFL instead of cheap and weak LED ... if it's not 26Q still will be the BEST from this series. Also I didn't like that they removed the card reader from 29Q...

p.p. Yes, I'm using 246Q.
 
Joined
Feb 23, 2012
Messages
57 (0.03/day)
Likes
3
Location
România
Processor Intel i7 4770K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z87X-UD3H
Cooling Stock
Memory 2x8GB Kingston Beast Series DDR3 2133MHz CL11
Video Card(s) Asus STRIX-GTX960-DC2OC-2GD5
Storage Kingston HyperX 3K, 120GB
Display(s) AOC 2269WM
Audio Device(s) Behringer UCA202 USB
Power Supply Seasonic G Series 550W
Software Win 7 x64
#7
I like the mix of performance and price of the ProArt series but something in me tells me that i would hate that gimmicky scale indented on the border of the screen.

My impression is that when the display would be on the light reflected form that border, being so uneven, would "attract" the sight on that border. And i also imagine that a lot of dust could stick to those ridges.

I look now at my Samsung displays' chamfered border and the light reflects in an even non distracting way.

I guess what display manufacturers should do is take the diameter of the focused field of view of the average eye, centered on the screens' border, at the normal ergonomic distance and make everything in that circle as non distracting as possible. Or in other words make a straight, plain, non glossy border, without crazy colors, LEDs and logos. At least for semi-pro displays and up.

Does this make any sense? It's 6:20 AM and i don't know if i can make myself understood at this hour. :)

P.S. no personal experience with this series of displays, only impressions and imagination :)
 
Joined
Nov 1, 2008
Messages
420 (0.13/day)
Likes
121
System Name It does stuff
Processor AMD FX-8320
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3
Cooling Antec Kuhler 620 + Fans Everywhere
Memory 16GB Crucial 1600Mhz DDR3
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+ 4GB
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, Seagate Barracuda 3TB
Display(s) Viewsonic VX2757, AOC 2243W
Case Antec Three Hundred Version Two
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar DG PCI / Sony MDR-XB500s
Power Supply EVGA 600W
Mouse Redragon Phoenix
Keyboard Steelseries Apex Raw
Software Win10 64 Professional
#8
1920x1200 is not a big deal, many 24" (such as Dell U2412M) are at this resolution considering most 23" are 1080p, and this is just slightly taller.

currently PA249Q is selling for 4900 RMB in China, which is around $790 USD
although for comparison's sake PA248Q is selling for 2800 RMB ($450 USD) in China, So im just wondering, what justifies the double in price for essentially identical specs.
1920x1080 panels are essentially spammed by panel makers so there's no shortage of them. 1920x1200 are so overpriced in comparison that it's ridiculous.

At that price, you might as well just save a few (hundred) dollars and get a korean 2560x1440 monitor with an LG IPS panel.
 
Joined
May 22, 2012
Messages
34 (0.02/day)
Likes
2
#9
Wow, 1920x1200. I wonder why no price is given, it'll be massively overpriced due to that extra vertical resolution?
You need to realise that this ASUS 16:10 monitor and the Dell equivalents are not aimed at the general consumer. They are professional grade monitors. They offer much greater coverage of RGB colour space and superior viewing angles at the expense of response times available on cheaper TN panels. However the response time gap has been narrowing of late. It would be possible to create 1200P budget monitors for around $200 but manufacturers don't do this because 1080P is the industry standard for entertainment media. Movies, games, youtube and all of that. That is what your average consumer is happy with. Professionals who actually use their screens for productivity purposes realise that 16:10 is a more useful aspect ratio when working in various software packages. Therefore 16:10 panels are a niche product that are not going to be mass produced on cheaper components and sold at wal mart any time soon, if ever. If you care to take a look around then you will see that it is perfectly possible to spend a lot of money and pay a premium price for certain 16:9 screens aimed at the "premium consumer" market. So don't confuse the relative higher prices of 1200P screens with being some kind of tax for a little extra vertical space. They are mostly offered as professional grade products and that is why they cost more.
 
Joined
Nov 1, 2008
Messages
420 (0.13/day)
Likes
121
System Name It does stuff
Processor AMD FX-8320
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3
Cooling Antec Kuhler 620 + Fans Everywhere
Memory 16GB Crucial 1600Mhz DDR3
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+ 4GB
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, Seagate Barracuda 3TB
Display(s) Viewsonic VX2757, AOC 2243W
Case Antec Three Hundred Version Two
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar DG PCI / Sony MDR-XB500s
Power Supply EVGA 600W
Mouse Redragon Phoenix
Keyboard Steelseries Apex Raw
Software Win10 64 Professional
#10
You need to realise that this ASUS 16:10 monitor and the Dell equivalents are not aimed at the general consumer. They are professional grade monitors. They offer much greater coverage of RGB colour space and superior viewing angles at the expense of response times available on cheaper TN panels. However the response time gap has been narrowing of late. It would be possible to create 1200P budget monitors for around $200 but manufacturers don't do this because 1080P is the industry standard for entertainment media. Movies, games, youtube and all of that. That is what your average consumer is happy with. Professionals who actually use their screens for productivity purposes realise that 16:10 is a more useful aspect ratio when working in various software packages. Therefore 16:10 panels are a niche product that are not going to be mass produced on cheaper components and sold at wal mart any time soon, if ever. If you care to take a look around then you will see that it is perfectly possible to spend a lot of money and pay a premium price for certain 16:9 screens aimed at the "premium consumer" market. So don't confuse the relative higher prices of 1200P screens with being some kind of tax for a little extra vertical space. They are mostly offered as professional grade products and that is why they cost more.
I think you miss the point of simply getting a 2560x1440 monitor for less instead. Which of course, shows even more than the x1200. And it's not some bargain basement panel, they're high end LG IPS panels. The same ones you'll find in Apple's hilariously overpriced "cinema" displays.
 
Joined
May 22, 2012
Messages
34 (0.02/day)
Likes
2
#11
I didn't miss any point. You are talking about something else now. Yes there is some value to be had from 2560x1440 panels like Catleap. You would still be getting a shorter warranty or lower quality control despite being the same panel. They would make up for the cheaper price somehow. Granted it would not explain the full price difference.
 
Joined
Mar 26, 2012
Messages
231 (0.11/day)
Likes
36
Location
Ohio
System Name Cogito Ergo Switch
Processor i7 3930K @ 4.8Ghz
Motherboard Asus Rampage IV Extreme
Cooling Custom Water (CPU/MB/GPU Blocks, 420+240rads PP)
Memory 16GB G.Skill Ripjaws Z 2133 9-11-10-27 @ 2380 9-10-10-28
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX670 FTW 2GB SLI @ 1344core/7648mem + EVGA 650Ti PhysX
Storage Samsung 830 256GB SSD (Boot) + 1TB WD10EZEX (Games/Apps) + 1TB WD10EALX (Prog) + 2x 320GB WD/HGST
Display(s) Dell U2412HM + U2312HM + 2x P2212Hbe + Viewsonic 21.5" 1680x1050
Case NZXT Switch 810 White - MODDED
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium HD PCI-Express
Power Supply NZXT HALE90 850W - Custom Sleeved Cables (White, No Heatshrink)
Software Windows7 Pro x64
#13
So long as they have tightened up their quality control when it comes to their monitors, I'll definitely be grabbing one of these! The PA246Q was a phenomenal monitor, best in its price range and when calibrated it was more accurate than the U2410 I had sitting next to it, but being the first of its kind from Asus it had teething problems... Nothing major, just annoyances.

The PB248/278-series, however, had a lot more problems and after 3 tries with 3 different PB278Q 2560x1440p PLS panel Monitors, I just switched it for a Dell U2713H instead. I like PLS Panels, but right now unless you go with the Samsung S27A950 WQHD display, which is ~$1k, or you get really lucky with some of the newer Korean "IPS" panels which are actually "overclockable" PLS panels, you're not going to get your hands on one easily...

As much as I love having the 1440p and 1600p (U2713H 1440p 27" IPS and U3014 30" AH-IPS with BG-LED Backlighting for actual 1.07bil colors via 10bit panel/14bit-LUT) monitors for anything from work to gaming, I am wanting to give Surround a shot and do it "my way"... Which is a 30" 1600p panel in the middle in landscape and then on either side a smaller 16:10 panel in portrait. I have already tried with 1680x1050, and some 4:3 1600x1200, but I want to get it set up "perfectly" and I haven't found that yet....
The reason I mention this is because for multi-Monitor gaming, IPS and PLS are PERFECT since there is zero distortion at the angles you're viewing from, while with the TN panels I've used there is ALWAYS color/gamma shift.

I really want to try a new and improved A-MVA/cPVA panel, though... They are my absolute favorite for non-color-critical work, as their blacks are like ink and their whites are brilliant, with contrast ratios that are sky-high... The prior iterations just haven't been able to rid themselves of their "ghost"(ing issue).