1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

ASUS Introduces PB298Q Ultrawide 21:9 Panoramic Monitor

Discussion in 'News' started by Sin, Aug 9, 2013.

  1. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    3,099 (1.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    852
    I'd just say everyone is different and it doesn't need name calling even if it's targeted to abstract/fictitious people.

    To chime in I can honestly tell you that at a normal monitor distance anything above 110-120PPI would be wasted (for many people around).

    In my honest opinion and experience 2560x1440 would be the ideal resolution for let's say a 24 incher.

    I would love, for example, a 39" 3840x2160 display, it basically would make a perfect 3Dstudio + Photoshop "blackboard".
     
  2. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,323 (6.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,778
    Eh, at least it's better than 1920x1080.
     
  3. buggalugs

    buggalugs

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2008
    Messages:
    1,101 (0.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    214
    Location:
    Australia
    I so agree with you. Resolutions and ratios is a personal preference. There is no right or wrong choice. People have different needs and preferences.

    People who say more resolution is always better doesn't understand the market. If you ask the average person who knows nothing about computers, many don't like high-res monitors because it "makes everything look small". Now I know there are scaling options in some cases but the average person doesn't want to muck around with that, and it doesn't work in every situation.

    I know an older guy who was convinced on a forum to buy an expensive 27" Dell 1440p monitor, only to return it a few weeks later because he had trouble seeing things that used to be bigger on his old monitor. There is a reason 1080p is a mainstream resolution. Its adequate for most uses and cheap, and you don't need an expensive graphics card to run it.

    Personally I think the more options the better. More aspect ratios, more resolutions is a good thing....
     
  4. erixx

    erixx

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Messages:
    4,005 (1.71/day)
    Thanks Received:
    687
    So happy to see that some of the relativism I put forth is melting down the initial bipartisanism.

    And I also can confirm that numerous times people I visited had not set up their monitors correctly. That must be the reason why MS moved the "Resolution" configuration from the "Display properties" to the more immediate desktop Context Menu. But then you still have people in the woods that are unaware of the "right click", hehe....
     
  5. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    3,099 (1.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    852
    I still think that so much horizontal space and such limited vertical space is pointless :p

    Like, you can have both. I can set my 30" to 2560x1080 without having to sacrifice for good the 1600p portion of my monitor.
     
  6. Slomo4shO

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2013
    Messages:
    137 (0.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    15
    Still waiting on a 5670x1080, 5670x2160, 7680x1440, or 7680x2880 display so I can replace my 3 monitors for a bezzle free display :roll:
     
  7. Octavean

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    977 (0.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    112
    I hear you but something like this is still fairly nice:

    http://hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=1039801131&postcount=163

    Honestly my triple monitor 5760x1080 setup has a wider bezzle then what is shown in the link above but the bezzle doesn't bother me. I honestly don't even notice it when I am gaming. So much of this stuff IMO is simply mental and personal preference.
     
  8. Slomo4shO

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2013
    Messages:
    137 (0.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    15
    I would rather not have bezzles if I can help it. I was simply expressing my personal preferences :toast:.
     
  9. Octavean

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    977 (0.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    112
    Oh I hear you brother,....:toast:

    I was only saying I can take it or leave it. I don't feel it hinders my overall experience and these sort of things are kind of up to the individual and their tolerances.

    Sort of like how some people can tolerate the existence of 1080 products and others freak out at the mere mention of them,....which is kind of their cross to bear,...
     
  10. Prima.Vera

    Prima.Vera

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    3,035 (1.68/day)
    Thanks Received:
    507
    This is neat!
    [​IMG]
     
  11. Octavean

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    977 (0.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    112
    Yes indeed that is neat,.....too,.... ;)

    If I buy a Seiki Digital SE39UY04 39-Inch 4K Ultra HDTV (~$699 USD) as an upgrade for my Wife's 27" 2560x1440 monitor I can then repurpose her 2560x1440 (and one other) monitor into a 5x 27" setup at 3240x1920 in portrait mode. She doesn't game so it should be a fairly decent upgrade for her too,....

    If I were to do that then I would definitely need some serious GPU power to push that quasi 4K resolution. That single GTX 670 certainly wont cut it,...
     
  12. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    3,099 (1.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    852
    Couple 780/Titan would be fine, though.

    Beware that the Seiki is 30Hz, I wouldn't game on that.
     
  13. Octavean

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    977 (0.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    112
    Quite right,...

    If I bought the Seiki 39" 4K as a desktop display it would be for my Wife and her telecommuting system not for me. She uses a VPN to access her work iMac (2560x1440) and it takes up her local 2560x1440 screen. It would be beneficial for her to have a higher local resolution and 3840x2160 would fit the bill nicely. She doesn't game or use any graphically intensive stuff so 30Hz shouldn't be an issue. For a developer / programer it should be a great match!

    I would definitely game on the subsequent 5x27" setup at 3240x1920 that I could build using her current 2560x1440 monitor if I bought her the Seiki though,.....

    I'd like a couple of GTX780 cards but I might try and get by with a couple of HD 7970 if I were to go for it,....
     
  14. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    3,099 (1.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    852
    What do you mean for 5x27"?
     
  15. Octavean

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    977 (0.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    112
    I mean five 27" displays rotated to portrait mode.

    So instead of the three 27" landscape screens at 5760x1080 it would be five 27" displays in portrait mode at 5400x1920.

    I messed up the math earlier when I said 3240x1920 because that would be for only three monitors not five,....
     
  16. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    3,099 (1.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    852
    Okay, that's what was bugging me :)

    For that kind of setup you would need an Eyefinity setup because as far as I am aware Nvidia Surround does not support more than 3 monitors :)
     
  17. erixx

    erixx

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Messages:
    4,005 (1.71/day)
    Thanks Received:
    687
    3 in surround mode and 1 more for... logging LOL
     
  18. Player433 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2013
    Messages:
    1 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Interested in 21:9

    I am very much interested in a 21:9 ratio, but I wish they would increase the size to at least 32 inches or an equivalent 27" with extra wings.
     
  19. Prima.Vera

    Prima.Vera

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    3,035 (1.68/day)
    Thanks Received:
    507
    Yeah, those monitors are just to damn small.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)