- Joined
- Feb 20, 2019
- Messages
- 2,014 (2.86/day)
System Name | Flavour of the month. I roll through hardware like it's not even mine (it often isn't). |
---|---|
Processor | 3900X, 3600XT, 2700U |
Motherboard | Aorus X570 Elite, B550 DS3H |
Cooling | Alphacool CPU+GPU soft-tubing loop (Laing D5 360mm+140mm), AMD Wraith Prism |
Memory | 32GB Patriot 3600CL17, 32GB Corsair LPX 3200CL16, 16GB HyperX 2400CL14 |
Video Card(s) | 2070S, 5700XT, Vega10 |
Storage | 1TB WD S100G, 2TB Adata SX8200 Pro, 1TB MX500, 500GB Hynix 2242 bastard thing, 16TB of rust + backup |
Display(s) | Dell SG3220 165Hz VA, Samsung 65" Q9FN 120Hz VA |
Case | NZXT H440NE, Silverstone GD04 (almost nothing original left inside, thanks 3D printer!) |
Audio Device(s) | CA DacMagic+ with Presonus Eris E5, Yamaha RX-V683 with Q Acoustics 3000-series, Sony MDR-1A |
Power Supply | BeQuiet StraightPower E9 680W, Corsair RM550, and a 45W Lenovo DC power brick, I guess. |
Mouse | G303, MX Anywhere 2, Another MX Anywhere 2. |
Keyboard | CM QuickFire Stealth (Cherry MX Brown), Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all) |
Software | W10 |
Benchmark Scores | I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000. |
This is an impressive card for sure, but it serves to remind us how little headroom there actually is these days. I love how excited W1zzard is to see a 16% overclock because that's so unusually high. Back in the old days you'd change a 66MHz bus speed to 100MHz and get 50% more without even changing the cooling 
One thing I'm curious about is the way this is cooled. Sure, I get that it's easier to use a generic pump/block combo but then they had to spend extra costs tooling and designing a blower shroud and investment casting a custom coldplate that lines up with all the board components. Given this is a relatively low-volume part and it has an almost ridiculous 38% price premium, I'd be expecting a full-coverage waterblock to be a cost-competitive option to manufacture. It would certainly look nicer and lets face it, looks are a big part of why people buy these, given that the actual performance increase from your 38% price premium is just 10%!

One thing I'm curious about is the way this is cooled. Sure, I get that it's easier to use a generic pump/block combo but then they had to spend extra costs tooling and designing a blower shroud and investment casting a custom coldplate that lines up with all the board components. Given this is a relatively low-volume part and it has an almost ridiculous 38% price premium, I'd be expecting a full-coverage waterblock to be a cost-competitive option to manufacture. It would certainly look nicer and lets face it, looks are a big part of why people buy these, given that the actual performance increase from your 38% price premium is just 10%!
@W1zzard has already answered this but another valuable point is because then the results are comparable to all the other GPUs in the charts. Any reviewer worth their salt will keep the base platform the same to provide us readers with (much appreciated) context data for as long as possible, and they generally only update their platform when the new platform is found to be holding back the review product by any significant margin.Why are you still using 9900K platform for benchmarking? despite having significantly inferior performance relative to 10900K and 5950X, also lacking PCIE Gen4 that could impact modern graphics cards performance!