• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

Axle GeForce GT 220 1 GB DDR3

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
17,021
Likes
17,869
Processor Core i7-4790K
Memory 16 GB
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 7
#1
While Axle is not the most well-known graphics card manufacturer, their GeForce GT 220 can score. It comes with a silent Arctic Cooling heatsink making it the quietest GT 220 we tested so far - great for HTPCs. It also offers low temperature levels which means overclocking is easy to do. We saw an 31% overclock on the GPU core clock and 18% on the memory.

Read the whole review here
 
Last edited:

Mussels

Moderprator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
46,094
Likes
13,520
Location
Australalalalalaia.
System Name Daddy Long Legs
Processor Ryzen R7 1700, 3.9GHz 1.375v
Motherboard MSI X370 Gaming PRO carbon
Cooling Fractal Celsius S24 (Silent fans, meh pump)
Memory 16GB 2133 generic @ 2800
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X (BIOS modded to Gaming Z - faster and solved black screen bugs!)
Storage 1TB Intel SSD Pro 6000p (60TB USB3 storage)
Display(s) Samsung 4K 40" HDTV (UA40KU6000WXXY) / 27" Qnix 2K 110Hz
Case Fractal Design R5. So much room, so quiet...
Audio Device(s) Pioneer VSX-519V + Yamaha YHT-270 / sennheiser HD595/518 + bob marley zion's
Power Supply Corsair HX 750i (Platinum, fan off til 300W)
Mouse Logitech G403 + KKmoon desk-sized mousepad
Keyboard Corsair K65 Rapidfire
Software Windows 10 pro x64 (all systems)
Benchmark Scores Laptops: i7-4510U + 840M 2GB (touchscreen) 275GB SSD + 16GB i7-2630QM + GT 540M + 8GB
#2
for a brand new card to be so soundly trashed by a 9600GT is a sad state indeed.

and with that cooler taking up 3 slots (one for card, one for heatsink, one for fan/intake for fan) its huge as well
 
Joined
Jul 24, 2009
Messages
299
Likes
34
#3
Not sure, but 8600 was same as 9600 .. eg. its beaten by two or three generation old cards? :D

nVidia - way to be absurd!
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
19,188
Likes
4,793
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
#5
no offense, but this card performs like garbage even on the resolution it was designed for (1024x768) i give this 2 thumbs down. even the 4670 which is older tech beats it easily. If someone needed a DX10 board as a igp replacement i wouldn't recommend this.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2007
Messages
5,105
Likes
1,249
Location
Kansas
Processor Core i5 3570K
Motherboard AsRock z77 Pro4
Cooling Zalman CNPS10X Extreme
Memory 2x4GB GSkill Sniper
Video Card(s) MSI GTX970 Gaming
Storage 240GB OCZ ARC 100, Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB
Display(s) LG 23" 1920x1080
Case Antec P100
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Antec Edge 750W
Software Windows 8.1 Pro 64
#6
Not sure, but 8600 was same as 9600 .. eg. its beaten by two or three generation old cards? :D

nVidia - way to be absurd!
The 8600 and 9600 were not the same card.
 

Binge

Overclocking Surrealism
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
6,979
Likes
1,734
Location
PA, USA
System Name Molly
Processor i5 3570K
Motherboard Z77 ASRock
Cooling CooliT Eco
Memory 2x4GB Mushkin Redline Ridgebacks
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 680
Case Coolermaster CM690 II Advanced
Power Supply Corsair HX-1000
#7
no offense, but this card performs like garbage even on the resolution it was designed for (1024x768) i give this 2 thumbs down. even the 4670 which is older tech beats it easily. If someone needed a DX10 board as a igp replacement i wouldn't recommend this.
Agreed. I defend NV a lot because I want to see good things from them, but they F*cked up! MESSED UP, screwed up, everything with the low end 200 cards. To a loyalist it's got to sting more than to someone who's willing to go either ATI or NV.
 
Joined
Mar 9, 2009
Messages
471
Likes
77
System Name AMD Black Dragon
Processor AMD Phenom II X4 940 Black Edition
Motherboard Gigabyte MA790X-UD4P
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212+
Memory 4GB OCZ PC2-6400 Platinum (2x2GB)
Video Card(s) ATi Radeon HD4870 512MB GDDR5 w AC Twin Turbo
Storage Crucial C300 64GB SSD, 500GB and 2TB Drives
Display(s) Samsung 2494hm, Dell (Samsung?) 1907FP
Case Lancool (Lian-Li on a budget) K7
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek ALC889A, M-Audio Fast Tracks
Power Supply OCZ Mod-X-Stream Pro 600W
Software Windows 7 Home Premium x64, XP Pro
#8
Well guys it's only a 220 after all. I mean it's the second lowest card of the 200 series! There is nothing wrong with the performance considering where it stands and it has some pretty low specs. The problem is the price as it costs more than the mid range cards from previous generations that can still smack it around! That is crazy. These things should be like $50 tops.

Also yeah 8600GT and 9600GT not the same thing at all! Double the stream processing cores, double the memory bus and pretty much double the performance! I think you meant 8800GT and 9800GT is the same thing witch is true for the most part.
 
Last edited:

lism

New Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
138
Likes
10
#9
My 9500 beat it by a big margin only whit a PII 720 and a little overclock:nutkick:
http://img.techpowerup.org/091207/9500gtop.jpg
Why did i read Pentium II at 720 Mhz... lol

Anyway, its nothing new. You should blame the maker of the card for flooding the market. They dont add new things, and its basicly a sugar for the Fermi in Q1 / 2010 soon.

The 310 / 210 is also garbage, even tho its being sold at OEM market only.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2008
Messages
61
Likes
6
System Name Master & Blaster
Processor FX 6300 4.4 GHz | Xeon E5440 3.85 GHz
Motherboard M5A97 | P35C-DS3R
Cooling CM Hyper 212 Plus | Themis
Memory 8 GB DDR3-1333
Video Card(s) XFX R9 270X 2 GB
Storage OCZ ARC 100 240GB | Patriot Blast 240 GB
Case Arcadia
#11
Today I saw something really tragic, there was a customer at a pc store that was going to buy
a new vga for his son for about 50~80€ to play games. The employee of the store told him to buy a GT220 1GB DDR2 for 70€ !!!!!! :wtf:! I was telling the employee why not buy a 9800GT/8800GT(store has them at 75€) and he said it's a better deal getting a GT220! DAMN! When he said what about a card at 90€ the employee suggest him to buy a GT240 for 90€!!!
Then I went berserk ... and told him why not buy a GTS250 512 MB at 90€ ??? And he told again it's a better deal ... damn worthless noobs. Man it's 2 times faster what a stupid buy ...
I'm sure he's gonna regret the purchase he made. All these nv gt220,240 cards sucks for their price.
 
Joined
Dec 7, 2009
Messages
1,793
Likes
276
System Name Old Skool
Processor E6750 @ 3.6 ghz
Motherboard GA P35 DS3L
Cooling Xigmatek Dark Knight S1283v
Memory 4gb Kingston DDR2 @ 900mhz
Video Card(s) XFX 9800GT 512MB
Storage SAMSUNG 320gb
Display(s) VIEWSONIC vx2260wm
Case HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Realtek (on board) + Logitech x540
Power Supply CM 550w
Software W7 Ultimate 64
#12
I hate it when such employees try to con people... Countless times i ve seen them prey on them poor souls, but heck, what can we do? Most of the time the customers will just tell you to mind your own business anyway.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
19,188
Likes
4,793
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
#13
Today I saw something really tragic, there was a customer at a pc store that was going to buy
a new vga for his son for about 50~80€ to play games. The employee of the store told him to buy a GT220 1GB DDR2 for 70€ !!!!!! :wtf:! I was telling the employee why not buy a 9800GT/8800GT(store has them at 75€) and he said it's a better deal getting a GT220! DAMN! When he said what about a card at 90€ the employee suggest him to buy a GT240 for 90€!!!
Then I went berserk ... and told him why not buy a GTS250 512 MB at 90€ ??? And he told again it's a better deal ... damn worthless noobs. Man it's 2 times faster what a stupid buy ...
I'm sure he's gonna regret the purchase he made. All these nv gt220,240 cards sucks for their price.
That's when you pull up specs of both cards, and performance numbers at 1280x1024-1600x1200 (or widescreen formats) for a slew of games. Fact of the cards lower number means its inferior in the lineup.

Agreed. I defend NV a lot because I want to see good things from them, but they F*cked up! MESSED UP, screwed up, everything with the low end 200 cards. To a loyalist it's got to sting more than to someone who's willing to go either ATI or NV.
I still say you get a better deal with a 4670 with 1GB ram
 

MKmods

Case Mod Guru
Joined
Feb 26, 2008
Messages
5,697
Likes
1,735
Location
Nevada
System Name Crossflow III
Processor AMD 965 (4.04Ghz)
Motherboard Asus Crosshair III
Cooling Air
Memory 4 gigs Mushkin 7-7-7-20@1T
Video Card(s) single 9800GT
Storage Raptor 150's in Raid0
Display(s) LG Flatron 24"
Case Custom
Audio Device(s) AuzenTech X-Raider W/OP637
Power Supply Custom modded Corsair 750HX
Software Win 7 64/Solaris Utility
Benchmark Scores 3DMark06--21963 so far
#14
Not sure, but 8600 was same as 9600 .. eg. its beaten by two or three generation old cards? :D

nVidia - way to be absurd!
The 9600GT was a lot better than the 8600 series (the numbers were similar but nothing else)
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
19,188
Likes
4,793
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
#15
The 9600GT was a lot better than the 8600 series (the numbers were similar but nothing else)
true, thats where NV did something right. Course my card being as old as it is, still ate up the 8600 series and , 2600 series.
 

MKmods

Case Mod Guru
Joined
Feb 26, 2008
Messages
5,697
Likes
1,735
Location
Nevada
System Name Crossflow III
Processor AMD 965 (4.04Ghz)
Motherboard Asus Crosshair III
Cooling Air
Memory 4 gigs Mushkin 7-7-7-20@1T
Video Card(s) single 9800GT
Storage Raptor 150's in Raid0
Display(s) LG Flatron 24"
Case Custom
Audio Device(s) AuzenTech X-Raider W/OP637
Power Supply Custom modded Corsair 750HX
Software Win 7 64/Solaris Utility
Benchmark Scores 3DMark06--21963 so far
#16
even today a pair of 9600GTs in SLI are a great value (especially if you were lucky enough to get them for $39 when they were on sale)

Its gonna be interesting to see comparisons of the new cards against the old ones and see if there is an improvement.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2008
Messages
61
Likes
6
System Name Master & Blaster
Processor FX 6300 4.4 GHz | Xeon E5440 3.85 GHz
Motherboard M5A97 | P35C-DS3R
Cooling CM Hyper 212 Plus | Themis
Memory 8 GB DDR3-1333
Video Card(s) XFX R9 270X 2 GB
Storage OCZ ARC 100 240GB | Patriot Blast 240 GB
Case Arcadia
#17
Is memory bandwidth wrong ? If not then holy crap ! ... Houston we 've got problem ...

 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
17,021
Likes
17,869
Processor Core i7-4790K
Memory 16 GB
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 7
#18
128 (bits) * 4 (bytes per clock gddr5) * 2065 (mhz) / 8 (bits per byte) = 132G
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2008
Messages
61
Likes
6
System Name Master & Blaster
Processor FX 6300 4.4 GHz | Xeon E5440 3.85 GHz
Motherboard M5A97 | P35C-DS3R
Cooling CM Hyper 212 Plus | Themis
Memory 8 GB DDR3-1333
Video Card(s) XFX R9 270X 2 GB
Storage OCZ ARC 100 240GB | Patriot Blast 240 GB
Case Arcadia
#19
Must be some kind of gpu-z error can't be 132gb bandwidth ,,, maybe it's 1700x2 or 850x4 for ddr5, check it out. On official specs it says "900 MHz (3.6 GHz QDR)" = 57 Gb/sec. Or it's an NVIDIA fake mem boost hack ...
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
17,021
Likes
17,869
Processor Core i7-4790K
Memory 16 GB
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 7
#20
you are looking at the wrong specs. your specs are for a 900 mhz card. the gpuz screenshot is for a 2065 mhz card. do the math. and yes your 2065 mhz are 8 ghz qdr
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2008
Messages
61
Likes
6
System Name Master & Blaster
Processor FX 6300 4.4 GHz | Xeon E5440 3.85 GHz
Motherboard M5A97 | P35C-DS3R
Cooling CM Hyper 212 Plus | Themis
Memory 8 GB DDR3-1333
Video Card(s) XFX R9 270X 2 GB
Storage OCZ ARC 100 240GB | Patriot Blast 240 GB
Case Arcadia
#21
you are looking at the wrong specs. your specs are for a 900 mhz card. the gpuz screenshot is for a 2065 mhz card. do the math. and yes your 2065 mhz are 8 ghz qdr
Dude I know you've done thousands or reviews but here is an gpu-z error, for GT240 axle states that card is 850 MHz DDR5 (3400 QDR) check it out. Bandwidth should be ~55gb/sec.
Nvidia here http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_geforce_gt_240_us.html says that bandwidth is 57gb/sec. They made memory info look like the memory speed is 1700(850x2) x 2, or to look like a ddr3 speed. Anyway it can't be 8000 MHz DDR5 chips equiped on these trashy cards. Nvidia specs below:

850 MHz (3,400 MHz effective) GDDR5 = 57gb/sec
1,000 MHz (2,000 MHz effective) DDR3 = 32gb/sec
 
Last edited:

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
19,188
Likes
4,793
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
#22
Ok I'm going to say this right now, are you seriously planning on buying the board??? If not, who gives a flying f*** what the memory bandwidth is. You've seen the tests the board has had and it's not better than a GF 9800. It's a Low end card with DX10.1 capabilities that ATI has had since the Radeon 3000 Series.


end rant
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
17,021
Likes
17,869
Processor Core i7-4790K
Memory 16 GB
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 7
#23


that's from the nvidia reviewer guide.
gddr3: 1000 mhz * 128 bit / 8 bit * 2 (ddr3) = 32,000 <-> nvidia 32.0 .. looks right
gddr5: 1700 mhz * 128 bit / 8 bit * 4 (gddr5) = 108,800 <-> nvidia 54.4 .. something wrong here?
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2008
Messages
61
Likes
6
System Name Master & Blaster
Processor FX 6300 4.4 GHz | Xeon E5440 3.85 GHz
Motherboard M5A97 | P35C-DS3R
Cooling CM Hyper 212 Plus | Themis
Memory 8 GB DDR3-1333
Video Card(s) XFX R9 270X 2 GB
Storage OCZ ARC 100 240GB | Patriot Blast 240 GB
Case Arcadia
#24
http://img.techpowerup.org/091223/Capture353.jpg

that's from the nvidia reviewer guide.
gddr3: 1000 mhz * 128 bit / 8 bit * 2 (ddr3) = 32,000 <-> nvidia 32.0 .. looks right
gddr5: 1700 mhz * 128 bit / 8 bit * 4 (gddr5) = 108,800 <-> nvidia 54.4 .. something wrong here?
It' a glitch of the Gpu-z with nvidia gt240 cards i think. I've seen it on another review, when it's stock it says 1700 ddr5 but it multiplies it x4 but it should be x2, also in this review ... "you write that, check memory specs"
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/MSI/GeForce_GT_240/4.html it says 2000x2. And finally
here http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/MSI/GeForce_GT_240/33.html bandwidth calculation is faulty, at stock and then at oc. Gpuz should count bandwidth in this card as 1700x2x16(128bit) and not as 1700x4x16(128bit). We haven't seen any 8Ghz ddr5 yet and if we did it shouldn't be from gt240. So with current gpu-z on gt240 "bandwidth shown / 2"
Also check msi card with msi afterburner utility. It starts shown the memory at 1700 (it's already multiplied x2) and then gpu-z multiplies it X4 ... but should do it x2.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 14, 2008
Messages
976
Likes
82
Location
Cincinnati, Ohio
Processor AMD Ryzen 1700 @ 3.825ghz 1.36v
Motherboard ASRock x370 Taichi
Cooling Noctua NH-C14s
Memory Corsair Vengeance RGB 16gb 3200
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1080 ti
Display(s) LG 4k IPS
Case Be Quiet Pure Base 600 + more fans
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply EVGA P2 750w
Mouse G900
Keyboard G810
Software Windows 10 Pro
#25
GT 220 is basically the GT 240M. Just got a Lenovo Y550P with a GT 240M and a I7-720QM. Trying to squeeze more out of it already with overclocking. Considering it has more shader cores then previous generations, but still slower, what do you think is the main bottleneck? Just clocks or memory speeds specifically? I mean comparing with 9500GT and other cards with 128bit memory interface.