• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

Bulldozer Shines in 3D Gaming and Rendering: AMD

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
34,335 (9.22/day)
Likes
17,427
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name Long shelf-life potato
Processor Intel Core i7-4770K
Motherboard ASUS Z97-A
Cooling Xigmatek Aegir CPU Cooler
Memory 16GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3-1866
Video Card(s) 2x GeForce GTX 970 SLI
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590D 28-inch 4K
Case Cooler Master CM690 Window
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX850W
Mouse Razer Abyssus 2014
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro Creators Update
#1
Close to two weeks ago, reports surfaced about AMD claiming that its upcoming "Zambezi" 8-core desktop processor based on the company's new Bulldozer architecture is expected to perform 50% faster than Intel's Core i7 and its own Phenom II X6 processors. The slide forming the basis for the older report surfaced, and it's a little more than a cumulative performance estimate.

Show full news post
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
867 (0.29/day)
Likes
207
Location
London, UK
System Name The one under the desk / Media Centre
Processor Xeon X3730@3.6GHZ / Phenom II X4 805E
Motherboard Gigabyte P55M-UD4 / Asus Crosshair III
Cooling Corsair H70 + 2*PWM fan / Arctic Alpine 11
Memory 16GB DRR3-1333 9-9-9-27 / 4GB Crucial DDR3-1333
Video Card(s) Asus DirectCU GTX 680 / Gigabyte 560TI
Storage Kingston V200 128GB, WD6400AAKS, 1TB Seagate 7.2kRPM SSHD / Kingston V200 128GB
Display(s) Samsung 2343BW + Dell Ultrasharp 1600*1200 / 32" TV
Case C'M' Silencio 550 / Some ancient SilverStone brushed aluminium media centre
Audio Device(s) No.
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower XT 675W / EVGA 430W
Mouse Mionix Naos 3200 / Generic PS2
Keyboard Roccat Ryos TKL Pro / Evoluent Mouse Friendly Keyboard (Logitech OEM)
Software Windows 7 Ult x64
Benchmark Scores Nah.
#2
Except that that graph also shows the Phenom x6 to be better in games than the i7 950.

So presumably AMD is looking at games optimised for 6+ cores here.

The one area in which AMD admit that the i7 950 is faster than the Phenom x6 is "media", so presumably that's the single threaded task, as I don't think anybody would claim that a Phenom is faster than an i7 in single threaded tasks at similar clock speeds.

Therefore, contrary to the above article, Bulldozer will be a slight improvement in per core performance and a massive improvement in parallel performance.
 
Joined
Sep 26, 2010
Messages
231 (0.09/day)
Likes
24
System Name Vika
Processor Intel Core i3 2100
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V Gen 3
Cooling Stock Intel
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws X 8GB DDR3
Video Card(s) HIS IceQ X Radeon HD 7970 @ 1100/1550
Storage Crucial M4 SSD 64GB, Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB
Display(s) Viewsonic VX2453MH-LED 23.6in LED
Case Fractal Design Arc Midi
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar DG
Power Supply Antec HCG 620W
Software Windows 7 Premium 64bit
#3
So is that 3d with or without glasses? :rolleyes::p
Anyway its nice to know to these chips can excel at gaming.. especially in the future
 
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
196 (0.07/day)
Likes
32
Location
Serbia
System Name Zverkica
Processor Ryzen 5, 1600
Motherboard Gigabyte AB-350-Gaming 3
Cooling LC Power Cosmo Cool LC-CC-120
Memory 16GB Kingston Hyper X Predator 3200 MHz
Video Card(s) PowercColor 280X TurboDuo
Storage SSD KIngston UV400, 480GB, WD 1002FAEX and some other Samsung drives
Display(s) Samsung U28H750 UHD Quantum Dot and Dell U2312HM eIPS
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Arctic White
Audio Device(s) GENIUS SW-2.1 1800: GENIUS SW-2.1 1250
Power Supply Thermaltake Paris 650 Watt - 80 Plus Gold PSU
Mouse Razer Death Adder Elite
Keyboard ReDragon K577 RGB mechanical keyboard
Software Windows 10 Pro
#4
Can't wait to see some benchmarks... Great thing for me is that I don't have to bye a new processor right away. First I bye a AM3+ mob and put my current AM3 processor on it, and latter, when I had money to spare, get some nice Bulldozer...
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2010
Messages
2,193 (0.83/day)
Likes
633
Location
Marlow, ENGLAND
System Name Chachamaru-III | Retro Battlestation
Processor Intel Core i7 3770K | Intel Pentium II 450MHz
Motherboard BIOSTAR TZ77XE4 (Intel Z77 Chipset) | MSI MS-6116 (Intel 440BX chipset)
Cooling Thermaltake CLW0217 Water 2.0 Extreme, case fully populated
Memory 16GB G.Skill Ares 1600MHz (2x8GB) [30 10-10-10] | 512MB PC133 SDRAM
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce 1070 Gaming Z, Intel HD 4000 (for secondary monitors) | MSI nVIDIA Vanta 16MB
Storage 250GB SK hynix SSD (OS), Seagate 3TB (Storage), Toshiba 3TB (Steam), Samsung 1TB (Personal Files)
Display(s) Samsung 2443BWT-1 24" @1920x1200, Dell 1708fp 17" @1280x1024 & Eizo FlexScan L887 20" @1600x1200
Case Coolermaster HAF 922 | Beige box
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z (Speakers), Sound Blaster Audigy 2 (Headphones) | Yamaha Audician 32 Plus
Power Supply EVGA Supernova 750 G2 | 250W ASETEC
Mouse Microsoft Wireless Laser Mouse 6000 v2.0 | Microsoft Serial Mouse v2.0A
Keyboard UNICOMP Classic | Dell AT102W
Software Microsoft Windows 10 Pro | Microsoft Windows 98SE
#5
The title said "3D gaming" and I was expecting it to be referring to the intergrated GPU!
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2010
Messages
207 (0.07/day)
Likes
46
Location
Houston,TX
System Name About_To_Be_Replaced
Processor AMD Deneb 955 OC to 3.82GHz
Motherboard ASUS M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212+
Memory CORSAIR XMS3 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) SAPPHIRE Vapor-X Radeon HD 5770 (Juniper XT) 1GB
Storage Crucial RealSSD C300 64GB SATA III (SSD)
Display(s) Samsung 2770HD
Case COOLER MASTER HAF 912 Mid Tower
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply CORSAIR Enthusiast Series CMPSU-650TX 650W
Software Win 7 64 Bit Home Edition SP1
Benchmark Scores Build 1: Listed Specs Build 2: Waiting for SteamRoller
#6
Can't seem to wait for this baby - I hope it hold true to the hype. Take this CPU and add dual 6990 cards and you have a nice machine that should do well for at least 3 years. But may need a 850 or higher power supply to keep that setup going. Maybe the AMD guy can give us a better estimate on release of this - I'm hoping by April-June timeframe (or sooner)!

AMD :rockout:
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2009
Messages
238 (0.07/day)
Likes
33
Processor i7 8700K
Motherboard MSI Gaming Z370
Memory 16 GB Adata DDR4 3000 MHz CL16
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 1070 Ti Gaming OC
Display(s) 23" Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo LSL 3230T 1080p
Software Windows 10 x64 Pro
#7
They compared their future octo core with last year quad core from Intel and they're proud of winning?
AMD, wake the hell up, guys!!!
 
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
318 (0.10/day)
Likes
28
Location
New York, NY
System Name The Baconator
Processor Phenom II X4 965 @ 4.00GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-790FX
Cooling Zalman 9900 CPU Cooler
Memory 16Gb DDR3 @ 1600MHz
Video Card(s) ATi Radeon HD 5870
Storage OS: WD 300Gb @ 10,000rpm. Storage: 2 x 1Tb @ 7,200rpm
Display(s) ASUS 27" LED 1080p Monitor
Case Cooler Master Sniper Medium Tower
Audio Device(s) MoBo Integrated
Power Supply Corsair PSU 750W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate x64
#8
I totally like the sound of this. Waiting to upgrade my desktop as soon as Windows 8 is released, possibly next year, and this is the CPU it'll carry.
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
867 (0.29/day)
Likes
207
Location
London, UK
System Name The one under the desk / Media Centre
Processor Xeon X3730@3.6GHZ / Phenom II X4 805E
Motherboard Gigabyte P55M-UD4 / Asus Crosshair III
Cooling Corsair H70 + 2*PWM fan / Arctic Alpine 11
Memory 16GB DRR3-1333 9-9-9-27 / 4GB Crucial DDR3-1333
Video Card(s) Asus DirectCU GTX 680 / Gigabyte 560TI
Storage Kingston V200 128GB, WD6400AAKS, 1TB Seagate 7.2kRPM SSHD / Kingston V200 128GB
Display(s) Samsung 2343BW + Dell Ultrasharp 1600*1200 / 32" TV
Case C'M' Silencio 550 / Some ancient SilverStone brushed aluminium media centre
Audio Device(s) No.
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower XT 675W / EVGA 430W
Mouse Mionix Naos 3200 / Generic PS2
Keyboard Roccat Ryos TKL Pro / Evoluent Mouse Friendly Keyboard (Logitech OEM)
Software Windows 7 Ult x64
Benchmark Scores Nah.
#9
Take this CPU and add dual 6990 cards and you have a nice machine that should do well for at least 3 years.
This setup and dual 6990s would last a lot longer than 3 years. My Pentium dual core has lated 3 years and it's probably be fine for at least a couple more, lol. A high end system like that should last for 5-8 years imo, unless you really NEED cutting edge performance.
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
22,402 (5.82/day)
Likes
8,926
Location
'Merica. The Great SOUTH!
System Name The Mailbox 4.5
Processor Intel i7 2600k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77X-UP5 TH Intel LGA 1155
Cooling Scythe Katana 4
Memory G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 1866: 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) MSI 1080 "Duke" with 8Gb of RAM. Boost Clock 1847 MHz
Storage 256Gb M4 SSD, 500Gb WD (7200) 128Gb Agelity 4 SSD
Display(s) LG 29" Class 21:9 UltraWide® IPS LED Monitor 2560 x 1080
Case Cooler Master 922 HAF
Audio Device(s) SupremeFX X-Fi with Bose Companion 2 speakers.
Power Supply SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei (RAW) and a Wacom Intuos 4 tablet.
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow
Software Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Benchmark Scores Benching is for bitches.
#10
I want to see two things....

1. Benches.
2. Price.

Except that that graph also shows the Phenom x6 to be better in games than the i7 950.

So presumably AMD is looking at games optimised for 6+ cores here.

The one area in which AMD admit that the i7 950 is faster than the Phenom x6 is "media", so presumably that's the single threaded task, as I don't think anybody would claim that a Phenom is faster than an i7 in single threaded tasks at similar clock speeds.

Therefore, contrary to the above article, Bulldozer will be a slight improvement in per core performance and a massive improvement in parallel performance.
This is about gaming and media crunching which the 1090T is very much on par with the i7 950. Nevermind the 1100T.
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
1,675 (0.60/day)
Likes
298
Location
London
System Name Jaspe
Processor i7 3820 4.4Ghz
Motherboard BIOSTAR TPower X79
Cooling Thermalright Archon Rev. A
Memory 16Gb G.Skill Ripjaws 1866mhz
Video Card(s) AMD 290X
Storage Crucial M500 WD 600Gb Velociraptor
Display(s) AOC Q2778VQE
Case In Win GRone
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Antec Signature 650
Software Windows 10 Home
#11
An 8 core cpu is 50% faster than a 4 core cpu :twitch:
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
22,402 (5.82/day)
Likes
8,926
Location
'Merica. The Great SOUTH!
System Name The Mailbox 4.5
Processor Intel i7 2600k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77X-UP5 TH Intel LGA 1155
Cooling Scythe Katana 4
Memory G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 1866: 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) MSI 1080 "Duke" with 8Gb of RAM. Boost Clock 1847 MHz
Storage 256Gb M4 SSD, 500Gb WD (7200) 128Gb Agelity 4 SSD
Display(s) LG 29" Class 21:9 UltraWide® IPS LED Monitor 2560 x 1080
Case Cooler Master 922 HAF
Audio Device(s) SupremeFX X-Fi with Bose Companion 2 speakers.
Power Supply SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei (RAW) and a Wacom Intuos 4 tablet.
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow
Software Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Benchmark Scores Benching is for bitches.
#12
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
1,675 (0.60/day)
Likes
298
Location
London
System Name Jaspe
Processor i7 3820 4.4Ghz
Motherboard BIOSTAR TPower X79
Cooling Thermalright Archon Rev. A
Memory 16Gb G.Skill Ripjaws 1866mhz
Video Card(s) AMD 290X
Storage Crucial M500 WD 600Gb Velociraptor
Display(s) AOC Q2778VQE
Case In Win GRone
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Antec Signature 650
Software Windows 10 Home
#13
Joined
Sep 15, 2004
Messages
1,561 (0.32/day)
Likes
207
Location
Poland,Slask
System Name HAL
Processor Core i5 2500K
Motherboard Asus P8P67 Pro Rev3.1
Cooling stock
Memory 2x4GB Kingston 1600Mhz Blu
Video Card(s) Asus 560Ti DirectCuII TOP
Storage Kingston 120 3K SSD,WD Black WD1502FAEX
Display(s) LG 1440x900
Case Chieftec Mesh Midi
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX750V2
Software w8
#14
He means that adding a core(thead) doesn't mean you get +100% of performance.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2010
Messages
482 (0.18/day)
Likes
29
Location
baghdad/iraq
Processor intel i5 2500k,atom280@1930mhz
Motherboard msi h61
Cooling i have cooler master V8 but now im on stock :P
Memory team group elite 2x2 1600 @1333 7 7 7 20
Video Card(s) sapphere 5850 toxic@900/1250
Storage WD 1TB green 5400 32mb ,WD 250gb 7200/8mb
Display(s) HP 22" 1680x1050 hdmi
Case asus vento
Audio Device(s) creative XFi fatality+creative gigaworksG500 5.1
Power Supply cooler master gx 750
Software win7,64bit
#15
do i see bottle neck here>>>> dual channel
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
867 (0.29/day)
Likes
207
Location
London, UK
System Name The one under the desk / Media Centre
Processor Xeon X3730@3.6GHZ / Phenom II X4 805E
Motherboard Gigabyte P55M-UD4 / Asus Crosshair III
Cooling Corsair H70 + 2*PWM fan / Arctic Alpine 11
Memory 16GB DRR3-1333 9-9-9-27 / 4GB Crucial DDR3-1333
Video Card(s) Asus DirectCU GTX 680 / Gigabyte 560TI
Storage Kingston V200 128GB, WD6400AAKS, 1TB Seagate 7.2kRPM SSHD / Kingston V200 128GB
Display(s) Samsung 2343BW + Dell Ultrasharp 1600*1200 / 32" TV
Case C'M' Silencio 550 / Some ancient SilverStone brushed aluminium media centre
Audio Device(s) No.
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower XT 675W / EVGA 430W
Mouse Mionix Naos 3200 / Generic PS2
Keyboard Roccat Ryos TKL Pro / Evoluent Mouse Friendly Keyboard (Logitech OEM)
Software Windows 7 Ult x64
Benchmark Scores Nah.
#16
Except that that graph also shows the Phenom x6 to be better in games than the i7 950.

So presumably AMD is looking at games optimised for 6+ cores here.

The one area in which AMD admit that the i7 950 is faster than the Phenom x6 is "media", so presumably that's the single threaded task, as I don't think anybody would claim that a Phenom is faster than an i7 in single threaded tasks at similar clock speeds.

Therefore, contrary to the above article, Bulldozer will be a slight improvement in per core performance and a massive improvement in parallel performance.
This is about gaming and media crunching which the 1090T is very much on par with the i7 950. Nevermind the 1100T.
Like I said, nobody would claim that the Phenom is faster per clock in tasks using between 1 and 4 threads (right?). So yes, the 1090t is very much on par with the 950, and even better, in games that use more than 4 logical cores well (the only one I can think of right now is 3d mark, which isn't really a game. I'm probably forgetting something though). As I also explained above, this would appear to be what AMD is suggesting, too.

do i see bottle neck here>>>> dual channel
I think that the superiority of the 1155 CPUs over the old 1366 CPUs has shown that memory bandwith isn't as important as it's sometimes made out to be, even on high end platforms.
 

Over_Lord

News Editor
Joined
Oct 13, 2010
Messages
764 (0.29/day)
Likes
91
Location
Hyderabad
System Name BAH! - - tHE ECo FReAK
Processor Athlon II X4 620 @ 1.15V
Motherboard ASUS 785G EVO
Cooling Stock
Memory Corsair Titanium 4GB DDR3 1600MHz C9
Video Card(s) Sapphire HD5850 @ 1.049v
Storage Seagate 7200.12 500GB
Display(s) BenQ G2220HD
Case Cooler Master Elite 334
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair VX550W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate x64
#17

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
20,927 (6.24/day)
Likes
10,026
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) PowerColor PCS+ 390 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate 6 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
#18
An 8 core cpu is 50% faster than a 4 core cpu :twitch:
That's what I was going to point out. All these Bulldozer charts AMD is releasing are misleading because they are comparing a two year old SMT enabled architecture quad-core to a new architecture octo-core. The performance gap between them should be at least 2, not 1.5. From that information, I can almost guarentee you that existing Gulftown coares are about equal to octo-core Bulldozer in performance and an octo-core Sandy Bridge will bitch slap an octo-core Bulldozer.

All the signs AMD is sending don't look very positive to me. Yes, it has higher IPC than Phenom II but it still behind Intel. :(
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
218 (0.08/day)
Likes
14
#19
if thats what 8 cores do than quad core will not be much better than a phenom
the only thing amd has to give is low price and high overclocking else it will
be a flop ,intel sandy bridge isn't much better also, compare i5 760 to i5 2300
and you get only 20% .both amd and intel are feeding us bread crumbs.
 
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
162 (0.04/day)
Likes
12
System Name lumi
Processor Intel Core i3 3100, 3.1GHz (2/4)
Motherboard MSI Z68A-G43 (B3)
Cooling Stock :O
Memory 16GB DDR3-12800 1600Mhz (4*4GB)
Video Card(s) AMD 270X
Storage 60GB SSD/256GB SSD, 2*3TB HDD's, 1*4TB HDD's
Display(s) acer 24" (1920*1080) H243H.
Case Fractal Design Core 3000
Audio Device(s) Onboard :/
Power Supply 850 watt pretty green thing
Software LM14(arch when i cba) // Win7.64
#20
People sometimes forget something when it comes to custom machine building.

I mean, for gaming people focus too much on the cpu and very little on the gpu( the major decider on graphics capabilities.)

Proving the cpu is powerful enough to feed the gpu being used, gaming benchmarks seem somewhat unimportant. If it were me, despite using my machine as more of a workstation, i'd focus more on multi-tasking performance, i mean the chances are you're going to spend more time with multiple applications open over long periods of time( atypical enthusiast machine).

So really, on a forum like techpowerup, wouldn't the major desire for all enthusiasts be multi-tasking performance?

maybe it's just me, but i figure most people here will use photoshop at some point, or run some distributed computing client in the background, or something similar.

</rant>

Seems like AMD's bulldozer has promise, with some (even if its just a bit) of evidence to say it's gonna tank in multi-tasking :) if these are priced right it would be desired by people looking for home office workstations (freelancers and the such).
 
Joined
Feb 15, 2006
Messages
432 (0.10/day)
Likes
30
Location
NJ
System Name Gaming Rig
Processor Intel Core i7 950 @ 4.2ghz
Motherboard ASUS Rampage III Formula
Cooling Corsair Hydro Series H70 Push/Pull
Memory G.SKILL Ripjaws Series 12GB 8-8-8-21 1.65v
Video Card(s) ASUS R9290-DC2OC-4GD5
Storage Transend TS256GSSD320 / WD 1TB Black 64MB Cache
Display(s) Westinghouse 37" LCD 1920x1080P
Case Corsair Graphite Series 600T Mesh
Audio Device(s) Creative XFI Fatality Pro/Supreme XFI
Power Supply Antec True Power Quattro 1000W PSU
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit
#21
They compared their future octo core with last year quad core from Intel and they're proud of winning?
AMD, wake the hell up, guys!!!
ditto!!!!
 

Fourstaff

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 29, 2009
Messages
9,377 (3.19/day)
Likes
2,101
Location
Home
System Name Asus K50-X5DAB \\ Orange!
Processor Athlon QL-65 2.2Ghz \\ 3570K
Motherboard Laptop \\ ASRock z77 Extreme4
Cooling Laptop \\ H100i
Memory 1x1GB + 1X2GB \\ 2x4Gb 1600Mhz CL9 Corsair XMS3
Video Card(s) Mobility Radeon HD4570 512mb \\ Zotac 660Ti OC 2Gb
Storage 250Gb \\ Samsung 840 250Gb + Toshiba DT01ACA300 3Tb
Display(s) 15.6" 1366x768 \\ LG 22EA53VQ
Case Laptop Chassis \\ NZXT Phantom 410 Black/Orange
Power Supply Power Brick \\ Corsair CXM500w
#22
*puts on stupid thinking cap*
Lets say AMD ranks bulldozer according to the Phenom II. We all know that the Phenom II is maybe 80%(?) the strength of a i7 9xx processor (sans the 6 core monsters), and if they claim that bulldozer is 1.5x the power of Phenom II, then it should be 120% compared to the i7 9xx, and since that the new i2xxx are 10-20%(?) better than the old 9xx, so we have Bulldozer = Sandy Bridge.

All the numbers are obviously not accurate, they are off by at least 10%, but I think its quite a good estimate of the strength of Bulldozer after you strip all the number inflation by AMD to their own bosses.
 
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
162 (0.04/day)
Likes
12
System Name lumi
Processor Intel Core i3 3100, 3.1GHz (2/4)
Motherboard MSI Z68A-G43 (B3)
Cooling Stock :O
Memory 16GB DDR3-12800 1600Mhz (4*4GB)
Video Card(s) AMD 270X
Storage 60GB SSD/256GB SSD, 2*3TB HDD's, 1*4TB HDD's
Display(s) acer 24" (1920*1080) H243H.
Case Fractal Design Core 3000
Audio Device(s) Onboard :/
Power Supply 850 watt pretty green thing
Software LM14(arch when i cba) // Win7.64
#23
The title said "3D gaming" and I was expecting it to be referring to the intergrated GPU!
What integrated gpu... i was under the impression only AMD's apu's had cpu/gpu capabilities.
 
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
162 (0.04/day)
Likes
12
System Name lumi
Processor Intel Core i3 3100, 3.1GHz (2/4)
Motherboard MSI Z68A-G43 (B3)
Cooling Stock :O
Memory 16GB DDR3-12800 1600Mhz (4*4GB)
Video Card(s) AMD 270X
Storage 60GB SSD/256GB SSD, 2*3TB HDD's, 1*4TB HDD's
Display(s) acer 24" (1920*1080) H243H.
Case Fractal Design Core 3000
Audio Device(s) Onboard :/
Power Supply 850 watt pretty green thing
Software LM14(arch when i cba) // Win7.64
#24
*puts on stupid thinking cap*
Lets say AMD ranks bulldozer according to the Phenom II. We all know that the Phenom II is maybe 80%(?) the strength of a i7 9xx processor (sans the 6 core monsters), and if they claim that bulldozer is 1.5x the power of Phenom II, then it should be 120% compared to the i7 9xx, and since that the new i2xxx are 10-20%(?) better than the old 9xx, so we have Bulldozer = Sandy Bridge.

All the numbers are obviously not accurate, they are off by at least 10%, but I think its quite a good estimate of the strength of Bulldozer after you strip all the number inflation by AMD to their own bosses.
If what you say is true, wouldn't that mean they're equal in a large number of tasks, except multi-tasking performance where AMD's octo-core will shine?
 

ROad86

New Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Messages
21 (0.01/day)
Likes
5
Processor AMD Phenom II x4 B55
Motherboard Gigabyte MA790XT-UD4P
Cooling SilverStone Nitrogon NT06 Evolution+Noiseblocker BlackSilentPro
Memory Corsair XMS3 4GB
Video Card(s) Saphire Radeon 4870
Storage WD 640 Black + WD 500 Blue
Case Antec P193
Power Supply Corsair CMPSU-650TX
Software Win 7 Professional 64bit
#25
That's what I was going to point out. All these Bulldozer charts AMD is releasing are misleading because they are comparing a two year old SMT enabled architecture quad-core to a new architecture octo-core. The performance gap between them should be at least 2, not 1.5. From that information, I can almost guarentee you that existing Gulftown coares are about equal to octo-core Bulldozer in performance and an octo-core Sandy Bridge will bitch slap an octo-core Bulldozer.

All the signs AMD is sending don't look very positive to me. Yes, it has higher IPC than Phenom II but it still behind Intel.

We have all seen reviews about Sandybridge. How much faster is the new cpu's? Because your are all talking like the 950 is something very slow. 950 is faster than i5 2500k in most tasks and lacks only from i7 2600K.
And something else everyone are comparing 4 cores(intel) vs 6/8 cores(amd). What matter's is the price. If a processor with 4 cores cost more than one with 6 or 8 why I should buy the 4 core? So the important thing is the price of the cpu's.