• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

Bulldozer sucks and upgrade itch is driving me mental.

Status
Not open for further replies.

MatTheCat

New Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2008
Messages
883 (0.25/day)
Likes
129
System Name Bitch
Processor Intel i7 2600K @4.6Ghz
Motherboard MSI Z68A-GD80 (G3)
Cooling Noctua nh-u12p se2
Memory 8GB Corsair Vengeance 1866MHz 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) POWERCOLOR HD 7970 3GB
Storage OCZ Vertex 2 240GB SSD / 2*320GB WDC RAID 0
Display(s) Samsung 226BW 21" 1650*1080
Case Lian Li PC B-25
Audio Device(s) Creative X-FI Professional PCI
Power Supply OCZ PC Power & Cooling 860W
Software Windows 7 x64
#1
I have been wanting to upgrade for about a year now. My upgrade philosophy is to get an as powerful a machine (within reason) for the era as i possibly can as i will not be upgrading the CPU/mobo/RAM base for a very long time afterwards. I started out looking at the i7 950, but decided to wait for Sandybridge. When Sandybridge came, the performance was not too far ahead of the i7 950. But Bulldozer was scheduled to be launched in April 2011, so I waited again. Now that the official benchmarks are here, it seems that Bulldozer is not going to be the way to go. However, SB-E is now 'just around the corner'.

So my dilemna is this.

If SB-E is a head and shoulders winner beyond the i72600K series, then it is clearly worth the wait and upgrading to a 2600K when I could have done this 10 months ago, would piss me off a bit (waited for no reason). However, in an article posted on this forum I have read that the first batch of SB-E CPUs have problems which will not be fixed on release, thus the wise investor will wait until Q1 2012 for the proper finsihed article (with BF3 knocking at the door, this is totally out of the question). I have also read in the few 'leaked' SB-E previews, that for gaming performance SB-E barely outpaces its i72600K counterpart, even although these chips will be twice as expensive.

The final consideration is that I want a rig that can play BF3 more or less maxed out, with a consistent 60FPS. Since I am still playing and enjoying BF2 after more than 6 years, I cannot stress the importance of maxing BF3 out enough. I know that the BF3 beta scaled very poorly but this was also the case with the BFBC2 beta and so I expect performance figures to jump up on the full release of the game. My gfx card upgrade (I am only interested in single GPU) will be defo be postponed until AMD/ATI 7000 series release in Q1 2012.

Any advice from those of you well-informed in all things regarding CPU, would be well appreciated.
 

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
14,554 (3.97/day)
Likes
8,061
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K at stock (hits 5 gees+ easily)
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (4 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme Edition
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Green 4TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2720Z | Asus VG278HE (both 27", 144Hz, 3D Vision 2, 1080p)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX 850W v1
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
#2
I think you should just go 2500K and be done with it. I'm considering this myself now that Bulldozer is such a disappointment and SB-E is so far out.
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2010
Messages
2,193 (0.83/day)
Likes
633
Location
Marlow, ENGLAND
System Name Chachamaru-III | Retro Battlestation
Processor Intel Core i7 3770K | Intel Pentium II 450MHz
Motherboard BIOSTAR TZ77XE4 (Intel Z77 Chipset) | MSI MS-6116 (Intel 440BX chipset)
Cooling Thermaltake CLW0217 Water 2.0 Extreme, case fully populated
Memory 16GB G.Skill Ares 1600MHz (2x8GB) [30 10-10-10] | 512MB PC133 SDRAM
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce 1070 Gaming Z, Intel HD 4000 (for secondary monitors) | MSI nVIDIA Vanta 16MB
Storage 250GB SK hynix SSD (OS), Seagate 3TB (Storage), Toshiba 3TB (Steam), Samsung 1TB (Personal Files)
Display(s) Samsung 2443BWT-1 24" @1920x1200, Dell 1708fp 17" @1280x1024 & Eizo FlexScan L887 20" @1600x1200
Case Coolermaster HAF 922 | Beige box
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z (Speakers), Sound Blaster Audigy 2 (Headphones) | Yamaha Audician 32 Plus
Power Supply EVGA Supernova 750 G2 | 250W ASETEC
Mouse Microsoft Wireless Laser Mouse 6000 v2.0 | Microsoft Serial Mouse v2.0A
Keyboard UNICOMP Classic | Dell AT102W
Software Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit | Microsoft Windows 98SE
#3
I know how you feel, man.

When I put this rig together last christmas, I was intending to upgrade to Bulldozer in the summer. Which of course I can't do, having an nForce 980a AM3 board...
So I then decided to look at the Nehalem i7's, as performance was still way better than the Phenom II and the prices were dropping in anticipation of Bulldozer, but when Bulldozer failed to materialise, and reviews considtently showed it as being behind Intel, the prices got jacked up again.
Decided to go Sandybridge i5 2500k after that, but had other financial commitments to take care of, so that got put off. Now Bulldozer is finally on sale and the reviews are less than promising, which affirms my decision to go Intel, but now Sandybridge-E and Ivybridge are around the corner, so upgrading now just seems kinda pointless.

My advice: wait for Ivybridge. You'll be waiting till then to upgrade your GPU, anyways.
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
2,944 (1.13/day)
Likes
1,379
System Name The Sheriff / The Deputy
Processor 2500K / G4560
Motherboard ASRock P67Extreme4 / Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3 DDR3
Cooling CM Hyper TX3 / Intel stock
Memory 16 GB Kingston HyperX / 8 GB Kingston HyperX
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 960 SSC / Gigabyte GTX 1050 Ti LP
Storage SSD, some WD and lots of Samsungs
Display(s) BenQ GW2470 / Samsung SyncMaster T220
Case Cooler Master CM690 II Advanced / Thermaltake Core v31
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar D1/Denon PMA500AE/Wharfedale D 10.1/Senn HD518
Power Supply Corsair TX650 / Corsair TX650M
Mouse Steelseries Rival 100/ Mionix Avior 7000
Keyboard Sidewinder
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10 Pro
#4
From what I see in your sig the E8400 is not suitable for BF3. The game will be out in a few weeks and you have to play it. Now, SB-E will bring maybe 10-15% more performance in gaming but for more money, considerably more. BF3 needs a strong GPU so your 5850 is not enough. For BF3 and all the other games out there the 2500K is the best bang/buck CPU out there. It's been this way since 9 months and will be the same until Ivy will be out - many months away considering Intel has no competition whatsoever - So go with the 2500K, it's very cheap for the performance it offers and get a powerful GPU (or 2)
 
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
504 (0.15/day)
Likes
87
Processor 2500k
Motherboard Asrock Extreme3 Gen3
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 16G Corsair Vengence
Video Card(s) XFX 390 DD BE
Storage OCZ Agility3 / F1 1tb
Display(s) Hazro HZ27WC 2560x1440 / x3 BenQ G2222HDL Eyefinity - 5760x1080
Case Fractal Design Define XL
Audio Device(s) Onboard / Edifier RT1600
Power Supply Cooler Master Silent Pro Gold 700W
#5
a preview of sb-e from toms
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/core-i7-3960x-x79-performance,3026.html
you can have a look now to make your mind up now =D

i was also waiting for bulldozer but after checking reviews this morning just ordered another gpu for crossfire to be ready for bf3 myself lol
i could only get smooth gameplay on beta with low settings but hey thats eyefinity lol
 

MatTheCat

New Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2008
Messages
883 (0.25/day)
Likes
129
System Name Bitch
Processor Intel i7 2600K @4.6Ghz
Motherboard MSI Z68A-GD80 (G3)
Cooling Noctua nh-u12p se2
Memory 8GB Corsair Vengeance 1866MHz 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) POWERCOLOR HD 7970 3GB
Storage OCZ Vertex 2 240GB SSD / 2*320GB WDC RAID 0
Display(s) Samsung 226BW 21" 1650*1080
Case Lian Li PC B-25
Audio Device(s) Creative X-FI Professional PCI
Power Supply OCZ PC Power & Cooling 860W
Software Windows 7 x64
#6
From what I see in your sig the E8400 is not suitable for BF3. The game will be out in a few weeks and you have to play it. Now, SB-E will bring maybe 10-15% more performance in gaming but for more money, considerably more. BF3 needs a strong GPU so your 5850 is not enough. For BF3 and all the other games out there the 2500K is the best bang/buck CPU out there. It's been this way since 9 months and will be the same until Ivy will be out - many months away considering Intel has no competition whatsoever - So go with the 2500K, it's very cheap for the performance it offers and get a powerful GPU (or 2)
I have looked at the other single GPU's and barring the GTX 580, no current single GPU gfx card delivers a huge performance increase over the 5850. Since the GTX 580 costs around £400 in the uk, I would consider the performance increase simply not worth it.

As far as GPU is concerned, I will be waiting for Cayman islands and make do with turning down a few BF3 settings for now. I know that the E8400 is not suitable for BF3, but then it isn't meant to be suitable for BFBC2 either, but it runs that game pretty smooth (although not without frame rate drops in crowded multiplayer maps).
 

AsRock

TPU addict
Joined
Jun 23, 2007
Messages
15,315 (4.00/day)
Likes
4,724
Location
US
Processor 2500k \ 3770k
Motherboard ASRock Z68 \ Z77
Memory Samsung low profile 1600
Video Card(s) XFX 6770 \ XFX R9 290X
Storage Intel 80Gb (SATA2) WD 250Gb \ Team SSD+Samsung Evo 250Gb+500Gb+ 2xCorsair Force+WD250GbHDD
Display(s) Samsung 1080P \ Toshiba HDTV 1080P
Case HTPC400 \ Thermaltake Armor case ( original ), With Zalman fan controller ( wattage usage ).
Audio Device(s) Yamaha RX-V475 \ Marantz SR5008 Tannoy Mercury MKII Paradigm 5SE + Tannoy Mercury F4
Power Supply PC&Power 750w \ Seasonic 750w MKII
Mouse MS intelimouse \ Logitech G700s + Steelseries Sensei wireless
Keyboard Logitech K120 \ ROCCAT MK Pro ( modded amber leds )
Benchmark Scores Meh benchmarks.
#7
Wait longer lol.. There is no real need to jump on the current stuff wait till next year i might be waiting till 2013 depending on what Intel bring performance wise next year but i am running a quad and not my old e8400.
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
2,944 (1.13/day)
Likes
1,379
System Name The Sheriff / The Deputy
Processor 2500K / G4560
Motherboard ASRock P67Extreme4 / Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3 DDR3
Cooling CM Hyper TX3 / Intel stock
Memory 16 GB Kingston HyperX / 8 GB Kingston HyperX
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 960 SSC / Gigabyte GTX 1050 Ti LP
Storage SSD, some WD and lots of Samsungs
Display(s) BenQ GW2470 / Samsung SyncMaster T220
Case Cooler Master CM690 II Advanced / Thermaltake Core v31
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar D1/Denon PMA500AE/Wharfedale D 10.1/Senn HD518
Power Supply Corsair TX650 / Corsair TX650M
Mouse Steelseries Rival 100/ Mionix Avior 7000
Keyboard Sidewinder
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10 Pro
#8
OK, wait for Caymans - next year I suppose but I strongly suggest going with the 2500K now. Believe me, I went from the same 8400 to the 2500K with the same GPU at the time, OCed GTX275 (maybe 5-10% slower than your 5850) and the performance jump in FPS was like 30-40%.
 
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
1,940 (0.62/day)
Likes
409
Location
Singapore
System Name penguin
Processor i3-4160
Motherboard Asus H81 Mini-ITX
Cooling Stock
Memory 2x4GB Kingston 1600MHz
Video Card(s) Saphire Radeon 7850 2GB
Storage Plextor M5S 120GB+1TB Seagate
Display(s) 23' Dell
Case CM Elite 130
Audio Device(s) stock
Power Supply Corsair CX430m
Software W7/Lubuntu
#9
get a C2Q from ebay and stick with it till ivy. You have a decent mobo. No point to change platform right now...
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Messages
2,442 (1.00/day)
Likes
1,866
#11
I have been wanting to upgrade for about a year now. My upgrade philosophy is to get an as powerful a machine (within reason) for the era as i possibly can as i will not be upgrading the CPU/mobo/RAM base for a very long time afterwards. I started out looking at the i7 950, but decided to wait for Sandybridge. When Sandybridge came, the performance was not too far ahead of the i7 950. But Bulldozer was scheduled to be launched in April 2011, so I waited again. Now that the official benchmarks are here, it seems that Bulldozer is not going to be the way to go. However, SB-E is now 'just around the corner'.

So my dilemna is this.

If SB-E is a head and shoulders winner beyond the i72600K series, then it is clearly worth the wait and upgrading to a 2600K when I could have done this 10 months ago, would piss me off a bit (waited for no reason). However, in an article posted on this forum I have read that the first batch of SB-E CPUs have problems which will not be fixed on release, thus the wise investor will wait until Q1 2012 for the proper finsihed article (with BF3 knocking at the door, this is totally out of the question). I have also read in the few 'leaked' SB-E previews, that for gaming performance SB-E barely outpaces its i72600K counterpart, even although these chips will be twice as expensive.

The final consideration is that I want a rig that can play BF3 more or less maxed out, with a consistent 60FPS. Since I am still playing and enjoying BF2 after more than 6 years, I cannot stress the importance of maxing BF3 out enough. I know that the BF3 beta scaled very poorly but this was also the case with the BFBC2 beta and so I expect performance figures to jump up on the full release of the game. My gfx card upgrade (I am only interested in single GPU) will be defo be postponed until AMD/ATI 7000 series release in Q1 2012.

Any advice from those of you well-informed in all things regarding CPU, would be well appreciated.

Patient sucker, aren't you.

Please don't take that as an insult, I'm currently in the same boat with a core 2 quad processor.

As I see it, there is very little hope for a break-out solution in the near future. Bulldozer is the same overhyped excuse that I thought it was going to be after the second set of delays. Sandy Bridge E is being pushed out early, to the tune of losing virtualization features. The coming 7xxx series of graphics cards is at best a potentially good situation, in a year...


That said, here's my planning:

I encode a lot. I play games with some frequency, but most of them can be run on a laptop. Those that cannot will need a heavy hitting CPU and plenty of PCI-e lanes for a good complement of graphics cards. As per the encoding, I need drive space.

This said, I can have 8 or more SATA ports (SATA II for mechanical drives and optical drives, SATA III for the limited number of SSDs I may someday have) with SB-E. I get two full x16 PCI-e version 2.0 lanes with SB-E. I can get 6 physical cores, with hyperthreading. I get better energy consumption that with Bulldozer. I can overclock mildly later, and considering SB performance the overclock may well stretch the system's life to 6 years.



If you're willing to spend the money on a SB-E set-up, knowing that hardware virtualization support will not be there, then do like I am. If you're absolutely itching for an upgrade, and can't wait the three more months for Ivy Bridge, then wait until the new SB processors come out (Intel trying to completely destroy AMD). They may push the price of a 2500k down, and make it an unquestionable buy.

Waiting for the 7xxx series of GPU is foolish. If you're going for a single GPU, then splurge on a 69xx series GPU. They are more than adequate to run anything you can throw at them, or at least anything that isn't heavily modded (I'm looking at you non-optimized Oblivion mods). In a few months when the 7xxx series comes out pick-up a discounted 69xx series GPU and crossfire the things so you can play in the highest realm of eyecandy for the next several years. Otherwise, the progression of GPU development will lead you to always want the next video card iteration...
 

MatTheCat

New Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2008
Messages
883 (0.25/day)
Likes
129
System Name Bitch
Processor Intel i7 2600K @4.6Ghz
Motherboard MSI Z68A-GD80 (G3)
Cooling Noctua nh-u12p se2
Memory 8GB Corsair Vengeance 1866MHz 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) POWERCOLOR HD 7970 3GB
Storage OCZ Vertex 2 240GB SSD / 2*320GB WDC RAID 0
Display(s) Samsung 226BW 21" 1650*1080
Case Lian Li PC B-25
Audio Device(s) Creative X-FI Professional PCI
Power Supply OCZ PC Power & Cooling 860W
Software Windows 7 x64
#12
As I see it, there is very little hope for a break-out solution in the near future. Bulldozer is the same overhyped excuse that I thought it was going to be after the second set of delays. Sandy Bridge E is being pushed out early, to the tune of losing virtualization features. The coming 7xxx series of graphics cards is at best a potentially good situation, in a year...


That said, here's my planning:

I encode a lot. I play games with some frequency, but most of them can be run on a laptop. Those that cannot will need a heavy hitting CPU and plenty of PCI-e lanes for a good complement of graphics cards. As per the encoding, I need drive space.

This said, I can have 8 or more SATA ports (SATA II for mechanical drives and optical drives, SATA III for the limited number of SSDs I may someday have) with SB-E. I get two full x16 PCI-e version 2.0 lanes with SB-E. I can get 6 physical cores, with hyperthreading. I get better energy consumption that with Bulldozer. I can overclock mildly later, and considering SB performance the overclock may well stretch the system's life to 6 years.



If you're willing to spend the money on a SB-E set-up, knowing that hardware virtualization support will not be there, then do like I am. If you're absolutely itching for an upgrade, and can't wait the three more months for Ivy Bridge, then wait until the new SB processors come out (Intel trying to completely destroy AMD). They may push the price of a 2500k down, and make it an unquestionable buy.

Waiting for the 7xxx series of GPU is foolish. If you're going for a single GPU, then splurge on a 69xx series GPU. They are more than adequate to run anything you can throw at them, or at least anything that isn't heavily modded (I'm looking at you non-optimized Oblivion mods). In a few months when the 7xxx series comes out pick-up a discounted 69xx series GPU and crossfire the things so you can play in the highest realm of eyecandy for the next several years. Otherwise, the progression of GPU development will lead you to always want the next video card iteration...
What is this 'virtualisation support'? And should I decide to buy an early SB-E CPU without said virtualisation support, is the nature of the problem one that can be fixed through firmware updates, or can the issue only be addressed through new hardware (mobo/cpu)?

Also, I would say that your advice on the GPU is a little bit questionable. considering I already have a hefty stable overclock on my 5850, there is no way in the world would it make sense for me to upgrade to any single GPU 6*** series card. The performance increase is like 10-15% if even that. When I upgraded my old 4870 to my current 5850, in some games it was basically a frame rate doubler. This is more the sort of performance that I am looking for in a GPU upgrade.

get a C2Q from ebay and stick with it till ivy. You have a decent mobo. No point to change platform right now...
I have considered that but wouldnt be keen on taking a 2nd hand CPU from someone I dont know, and the cheapest i could find a C2Q 9600 Quad for is the best part of 300 quid! Now this really would be money down the toilet.
 

Frick

Fishfaced Nincompoop
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
14,884 (3.45/day)
Likes
5,414
System Name A dancer in your disco of fire
Processor i3 4130 3.4Ghz
Motherboard MSI B85M-E45
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo
Memory 4 x 4GB Crucial Ballistix Sport 1400Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 760 DCU2OC 2GB
Storage Crucial BX100 120GB | WD Blue 1TB x 2
Display(s) BenQ GL2450HT
Case AeroCool DS Cube White
Power Supply Cooler Master G550M
Mouse Intellimouse Explorer 3.0
Keyboard Dell SK-3205
Software Windows 10 Pro
#13
I have considered that but wouldnt be keen on taking a 2nd hand CPU from someone I dont know, and the cheapest i could find a C2Q 9600 Quad for is the best part of 300 quid! Now this really would be money down the toilet.
Here you can usually find lower end quads for about €100. I'm still not sure it's worth it.
 

MatTheCat

New Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2008
Messages
883 (0.25/day)
Likes
129
System Name Bitch
Processor Intel i7 2600K @4.6Ghz
Motherboard MSI Z68A-GD80 (G3)
Cooling Noctua nh-u12p se2
Memory 8GB Corsair Vengeance 1866MHz 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) POWERCOLOR HD 7970 3GB
Storage OCZ Vertex 2 240GB SSD / 2*320GB WDC RAID 0
Display(s) Samsung 226BW 21" 1650*1080
Case Lian Li PC B-25
Audio Device(s) Creative X-FI Professional PCI
Power Supply OCZ PC Power & Cooling 860W
Software Windows 7 x64
#14
Here you can usually find lower end quads for about €100. I'm still not sure it's worth it.
No.

Anything other than a Q9600, Q9650 would in many respects be a downgrade due to the inevitably lower clock speeds and the great number of still only single or double threaded games/applications.

But even for a Q9600, I would only be looking to pay about 100 quid cos it simply aint worth more than that to me. As for fleabay, I have negative experiences of that place. It is an emporium of thrift and avarice, populated by scavengers scouring it for the inevitable bargain and generally looking to buy things for way below the market rate, whilst everyone who is trying to sell something are all looking to get paid way beyond what might be considered a reasonable price.

Here is an example of someone trying to sell thier 2nd hand Q9600!

Bids starting at £200! WTF? :laugh:
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Messages
2,442 (1.00/day)
Likes
1,866
#15
What is this 'virtualisation support'? And should I decide to buy an early SB-E CPU without said virtualisation support, is the nature of the problem one that can be fixed through firmware updates, or can the issue only be addressed through new hardware (mobo/cpu)?

Also, I would say that your advice on the GPU is a little bit questionable. considering I already have a hefty stable overclock on my 5850, there is no way in the world would it make sense for me to upgrade to any single GPU 6*** series card. The performance increase is like 10-15% if even that. When I upgraded my old 4870 to my current 5850, in some games it was basically a frame rate doubler. This is more the sort of performance that I am looking for in a GPU upgrade.
I missed the GPU. If you've got a 5850 and a decent overclock the only things that the 69xx series offers are better power consumption, eyefinity, and app support. If these things aren't a game changer then the money would be better saved. My error.

Virtualization... the easiest way to describe it is that a gaming rig generally won't do it. Virtualization allows you to run multiple remote computers from one physical one (a vast oversimplification). If your rig is only for gaming then it will not influence you.

That said, the reports indicate this is a hardware failure. Firmware changes won't fix hardware.


This said, the lack of virtualization is only for hardware virtualization. If you really wanted virtualization then there's still software support.
 

MatTheCat

New Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2008
Messages
883 (0.25/day)
Likes
129
System Name Bitch
Processor Intel i7 2600K @4.6Ghz
Motherboard MSI Z68A-GD80 (G3)
Cooling Noctua nh-u12p se2
Memory 8GB Corsair Vengeance 1866MHz 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) POWERCOLOR HD 7970 3GB
Storage OCZ Vertex 2 240GB SSD / 2*320GB WDC RAID 0
Display(s) Samsung 226BW 21" 1650*1080
Case Lian Li PC B-25
Audio Device(s) Creative X-FI Professional PCI
Power Supply OCZ PC Power & Cooling 860W
Software Windows 7 x64
#16
@lilhasslhoffer.

Since you have stated that you already decided that you are going to go with SB-e when it comes, what is your opinion on the 'leaked' benchmarks which show that gaming performance is only slightly in front of the 2600K?
 
Joined
Oct 13, 2007
Messages
7,693 (2.07/day)
Likes
1,772
Location
Chicago
System Name DarkStar
Processor i5 3570K 4.4Ghz
Motherboard Asrock Z77 Extreme 3
Cooling Apogee HD White/XSPC Razer blocks
Memory 8GB Samsung Green 1600
Video Card(s) 2 x GTX 670 4GB
Storage 2 x 120GB Samsung 830
Display(s) 27" QNIX
Case Enthoo Pro
Power Supply Seasonic Platinum 760
Mouse Steelseries Sensei
Keyboard Ducky Pro MX Black
Software Windows 8.1 x64
#17
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
4,294 (1.11/day)
Likes
509
Processor Intel Core i9 7900X delidded @ 4.7Ghz 1.2v
Motherboard ASUS Rampage VI Extreme
Cooling EK-Supremacy EVO, EK-CoolStream PE 360, EK-CoolStream PE 240, EK-DDC Pump/X-RES 100
Memory Corsair Vengeance RED LED 32GB(8GBx4) DDR4 3400MHz
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FE ( EK 1080TI Waterblock./ Backplate )
Storage Samsung 950 Pro NVME 512GB, 2x 850 Evos 1TB, WD Black 1TB
Display(s) Samsung S27B970 27" Wide PLS Monitor - 2560 x 1440
Case Corsair Carbide Air 540
Power Supply Cooler Master Vanguard Series 1000W
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores http://www.3dmark.com/fs/12778735
#18
get a C2Q from ebay and stick with it till ivy. You have a decent mobo. No point to change platform right now...
Don't bother with a C2Q there slow as crap i picked one up for a friend to replace his C2D 3ghz chip and after seeing it didn't help performance much at all he upgrade to a i7 a month later, Go for the 2600k you wont be disappointed with the performance boost.
 

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
14,554 (3.97/day)
Likes
8,061
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K at stock (hits 5 gees+ easily)
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (4 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme Edition
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Green 4TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2720Z | Asus VG278HE (both 27", 144Hz, 3D Vision 2, 1080p)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX 850W v1
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
#19
@MatTheCat

You can now get GTX 580's for around £330-£350 if you look out for deals and "own brand" versions. As a 580 owner I can tell you, the performance is well worth it. :)
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Messages
2,442 (1.00/day)
Likes
1,866
#20
@lilhasslhoffer.

Since you have stated that you already decided that you are going to go with SB-e when it comes, what is your opinion on the 'leaked' benchmarks which show that gaming performance is only slightly in front of the 2600K?
My opinion is that the benchmarks are real.

I base my opinion on the following:
1) They have the exact same architecture as SB.
2) Most gaming programs utilize one, or at most a couple of threads.
3) Tests indicate that visual performance with a bridge repeater chip (multi-GPU without enough PCI-e lanes) is similar to (there is a hit) having enough lanes.
4) Intel does not have to compete with AMD.

*Have put opinion in italics because all of this is specualtion from the peanut gallery, and not based on any reasonable facts.*


AMD's bulldozer is underwhelming in its current configuration. Intel, without direct competition, generally languishes. They're looking at Ivy Bridge, and only releasing the SB-E to satisfy the limited number of people who would be willing to pay for such an expensive system with the impending release of IB. SB-E will be somewhat pushed to the side, but I believe this might make the pricing somewhat more reasonable.

Gaming aside, the enthusiast platform caters to a different set of users. It will process video like a champ (extra instruction sets, more cores and threads), have the extra slots for GPU based computing, have a boat load of RAM slots, and enough storage options to make most servers blush. It has my name on it, but most people won't see the benefits above the current SB offerings.

In short, SB-E offers more than gaming. If gaming is all you're looking for, then get current SB and save your money. If you want a computer that can actually do some amazing work, the SB-E. If you're very patient, skip both and get IB.
 
Joined
Aug 2, 2009
Messages
4,014 (1.31/day)
Likes
1,832
System Name Abacus
Processor i5 2500K
Motherboard ASRock p67 Extreme4 Gen3
Cooling Swiftech MCP35X, EK HF Copper, 2.120 rad, 3.120 rad
Memory 2x4GB G.Skill Sniper 1600
Video Card(s) 2 Zotac GTX 770 4GB w/ FC EK Blocks
Storage WD 640BG x2/WD 250GB/Samsung 2TB
Display(s) QNIX 27" PLS
Case Corsair 700D
Audio Device(s) X-Fi XtremeGamer
Power Supply EVGA G2 750W
Mouse Logitech G500
Keyboard Corsair K70 RGB MX Brown
Software Windows 10
#21
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
22,400 (5.82/day)
Likes
8,922
Location
'Merica. The Great SOUTH!
System Name The Mailbox 4.5
Processor Intel i7 2600k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77X-UP5 TH Intel LGA 1155
Cooling Scythe Katana 4
Memory G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 1866: 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) MSI 1080 "Duke" with 8Gb of RAM. Boost Clock 1847 MHz
Storage 256Gb M4 SSD, 500Gb WD (7200) 128Gb Agelity 4 SSD
Display(s) LG 29" Class 21:9 UltraWide® IPS LED Monitor 2560 x 1080
Case Cooler Master 922 HAF
Audio Device(s) SupremeFX X-Fi with Bose Companion 2 speakers.
Power Supply SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei (RAW) and a Wacom Intuos 4 tablet.
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow
Software Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Benchmark Scores Benching is for bitches.
#22
I have been wanting to upgrade for about a year now. My upgrade philosophy is to get an as powerful a machine (within reason) for the era as i possibly can as i will not be upgrading the CPU/mobo/RAM base for a very long time afterwards. I started out looking at the i7 950, but decided to wait for Sandybridge. When Sandybridge came, the performance was not too far ahead of the i7 950. But Bulldozer was scheduled to be launched in April 2011, so I waited again. Now that the official benchmarks are here, it seems that Bulldozer is not going to be the way to go. However, SB-E is now 'just around the corner'.

So my dilemna is this.

If SB-E is a head and shoulders winner beyond the i72600K series, then it is clearly worth the wait and upgrading to a 2600K when I could have done this 10 months ago, would piss me off a bit (waited for no reason). However, in an article posted on this forum I have read that the first batch of SB-E CPUs have problems which will not be fixed on release, thus the wise investor will wait until Q1 2012 for the proper finsihed article (with BF3 knocking at the door, this is totally out of the question). I have also read in the few 'leaked' SB-E previews, that for gaming performance SB-E barely outpaces its i72600K counterpart, even although these chips will be twice as expensive.

The final consideration is that I want a rig that can play BF3 more or less maxed out, with a consistent 60FPS. Since I am still playing and enjoying BF2 after more than 6 years, I cannot stress the importance of maxing BF3 out enough. I know that the BF3 beta scaled very poorly but this was also the case with the BFBC2 beta and so I expect performance figures to jump up on the full release of the game. My gfx card upgrade (I am only interested in single GPU) will be defo be postponed until AMD/ATI 7000 series release in Q1 2012.

Any advice from those of you well-informed in all things regarding CPU, would be well appreciated.
Mat I'm gonna say this once.

1. BF3 Beta benchmarks mean JACK. It wasn't DX11 so it wasn't CPU intensive as it will be in the final version.

2. If you are gonna upgrade now to any platform get a 2600k. Don't BS with the 2500k.

3. 580 is shit for the price. You are better off with a 570 if you have to have Nvidia or a 6950 if you want AMD. 2gb or go home.
 

brandonwh64

Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!
Joined
Sep 6, 2009
Messages
19,516 (6.46/day)
Likes
6,937
Location
Chatsworth, GA
System Name The StarCrunch Defender! | X58 Cruncher!
Processor I7 6700K @ STOCK | Intel I7-920
Motherboard Gigabyte Z170X-UD5 | Alienware MS-7543 X58
Cooling Corsair A70 Push/Pull | Corsair H50
Memory Crucial Ballistix DDR4 2400 MHz | Pereema 3x2GB DDR3
Video Card(s) Gigabyte Gaming G1 GTX 1070 | Gigabyte 7970 3GB
Storage 2x Samsung Pro 256GB M.2 SSD's in Raid 0 | 4TB Western Digital SATA drive
Display(s) ViewSonic VG2227wm 1080P | OLD viewsonics
Case NZXT Tempest 410 Elite | NZXT Source 210
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair 750TX | Enermax Liberty 500W
Mouse MX518 | MX502
Keyboard TESORO Mechanical | ANZO Mechanical
Software Windows 10 Pro on both
#23
Mat I'm gonna say this once.

1. BF3 Beta benchmarks mean JACK. It wasn't DX11 so it wasn't CPU intensive as it will be in the final version.

2. If you are gonna upgrade now to any platform get a 2600k. Don't BS with the 2500k.

3. 580 is shit for the price. You are better off with a 570 if you have to have Nvidia or a 6950 if you want AMD.
Mailman speaks good advice!
 
Joined
Oct 19, 2008
Messages
3,046 (0.91/day)
Likes
684
System Name Has and is well
Processor i7 4770K
Motherboard ASUS B85
Cooling Corsair H100
Memory TEAM 1866mhz 8GBx2 16GB
Video Card(s) MSI 980ti Gold Edition
Storage Intel 520 120GB + Seagate 2TB 7200RPM
Display(s) DELL U2713HM 2560x1440 Monitor
Case Corsair 350D
Power Supply EVGA 850W Gold
Software Win 10
#24

MatTheCat

New Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2008
Messages
883 (0.25/day)
Likes
129
System Name Bitch
Processor Intel i7 2600K @4.6Ghz
Motherboard MSI Z68A-GD80 (G3)
Cooling Noctua nh-u12p se2
Memory 8GB Corsair Vengeance 1866MHz 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) POWERCOLOR HD 7970 3GB
Storage OCZ Vertex 2 240GB SSD / 2*320GB WDC RAID 0
Display(s) Samsung 226BW 21" 1650*1080
Case Lian Li PC B-25
Audio Device(s) Creative X-FI Professional PCI
Power Supply OCZ PC Power & Cooling 860W
Software Windows 7 x64
#25
Mat I'm gonna say this once.

1. BF3 Beta benchmarks mean JACK. It wasn't DX11 so it wasn't CPU intensive as it will be in the final version.

2. If you are gonna upgrade now to any platform get a 2600k. Don't BS with the 2500k.

3. 580 is shit for the price. You are better off with a 570 if you have to have Nvidia or a 6950 if you want AMD. 2gb or go home.
Yup.

Decided.

2600K it is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.