- Joined
- Sep 25, 2007
- Messages
- 5,965 (0.99/day)
- Location
- New York
| Processor | AMD Ryzen 9 5950x, Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|
| Motherboard | MSI X570 Tomahawk |
| Cooling | Be Quiet Dark Rock Pro 4(With Noctua Fans) |
| Memory | 32Gb Crucial 3600 Ballistix |
| Video Card(s) | Gigabyte RTX 3080, Asus 6800M |
| Storage | Adata SX8200 1TB NVME/WD Black 1TB NVME |
| Display(s) | Dell 27 Inch 165Hz |
| Case | Phanteks P500A |
| Audio Device(s) | IFI Zen Dac/JDS Labs Atom+/SMSL Amp+Rivers Audio |
| Power Supply | Corsair RM850x |
| Mouse | Logitech G502 SE Hero |
| Keyboard | Corsair K70 RGB Mk.2 |
| VR HMD | Samsung Odyssey Plus |
| Software | Windows 10 |
I'm just looking at texture fillrates on modern cards and is it just me but across generations is it becoming more and more wrong.
especially as cards like fermi are released fermi will have a lower texture fillrate than the HD5870 since it will have only 64 texture units but those texture units are more powerful than on the HD5870 and the GT280 which both have 80, its been wrong since before then but this is just an example
I think we need a new way to calculate it.
especially as cards like fermi are released fermi will have a lower texture fillrate than the HD5870 since it will have only 64 texture units but those texture units are more powerful than on the HD5870 and the GT280 which both have 80, its been wrong since before then but this is just an example
I think we need a new way to calculate it.
