Yea? light years? i mean power wise yes but game wise, what game has come out that is so amazing on PC that it can't be done on consoles (and do NOT say crysis obviously there making crysis 2 for both),
Its not the fact that it can't be done. I never said there are games that can't run on Consoles cause there on PC.
This is where i stopped upgrading my computer because its not worth it? why spend a lot of money on a machine that gets poorly ported games from its console foe? In other words they do not make enough PC exclusive games to the point where its like "i can't find this game on console so i'll get a PC" and if they do make the PC version the only thing that is usually better is the graphics, (aside from all the bugs and crashes etc.)
Not every game turns out like Saints Row 2. I could care less if its a ported game to the PC, it's really all pushed down to the devs to really bring out the best in all platforms and not filter out the quality of the game when ported to different platforms. I do agree that theirs not a lot of PC exclusives, but i have high hopes for the multi plat games that are coming to PC.(which are a whole lot), also you don't need at all to spend a whole of money on pc hardware to make it run well(probably one of the oldest console noob arguments), the variety in hardware allows for everyone to pick and choose the best component for them, not every needs the ''ub3r 1337 rig'', hell i recently got a 4870 for $150 and at my res i know i will be able to play basically any game now and to come out at med-high settings(with some AA goodness
). And lucky for you i am to tired to argue about the whole noob ''teh pc crashes and teh bugs are so many!1''.
It's not worth it anymore to have a PC that can crush benchmarks because what games really need that much power when 95% of the games that come out on PC are just mediocre. Just for the eyecandy? is the money really worth just better eyecandy.
Not everyone benchmarks(i don't, a lot of gamers don't. Unless its on a separate rig dedicated to doing that), and also a lot of people that do benchmark do other things(fold/crunch/really intensive things), its not like they wake up one day and say 'hmm i just got this game, i wonder what my benchmarks will say about my rig in terms of playing it'. Also, saying that the majority of PC games are mediocre is very strange to say the least, i mean the majority of games coming out are for all platforms(except Wii), the fact that it has better eyecandy is irrelevant and just another plus to the wonders of PC gaming.
Not when a system will only cost 200-250 to get the same experience but usually better (I.E console versions hardly crash if ever and they release minimal patches for games)
Of course as stated my erocker, they don't start out at those prices.(it's taken 4 years to get to those prices) Also for that price do you get, the ability to upgrade parts, mods, free online(don't even mention the shitty PS3's service, that shit is so stripped down i would actually pay to go with Xbox live, if all those damn 360's didn't die on me). Like i said , im not going to go into the whole ''all PC games crash argument'', if you really think that, you really haven't been a PC gamer for very long or don't actually have a lot of experience with computers(which i assume you do if you work at a tech shop). Also, not every game is perfect, there are
always bugs in games,(yes everywhere, consoles, PC) there is not one piece of software written to perfection. So what the PC allows you to do is DL patches for games to fix some of those really annoying bugs, which is just another huge advantage for the PC gamer.