1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Channel Vendors Demand Recall of Desktop NVIDIA Products

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Jul 27, 2008.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    33,577 (9.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    17,148
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Lack of proper clarification by NVIDIA on exactly which products have defects that require a recall, certain channel vendors now demand that some of their desktop graphics cards be recalled for a replacement. It had been established that certain discrete graphics processors for the mobile platforms had problems caused due to manufacturing defects and announcements were made on NVIDIA's part that they would recall and replace the faulty parts.

    NVIDIA has commented that the faulty notebook GPU problem only exists in a few specific notebook models made by specific clients. The company contended that desktop-based discrete graphics card products are not affected by the issue.

    Source: DigiTimes
     
  2. robspierre6 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2008
    Messages:
    48 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3
    According to charlie demirjian,All the g84,g86 and g200 chips were manufactured from the same charge of wafer.
    And probably all those chips are defected
     
  3. PVTCaboose1337

    PVTCaboose1337 Graphical Hacker

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2006
    Messages:
    9,501 (2.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,144
    Location:
    Dallas, Texas
    Hint: This is an open invitation to card owners who are affected to OC till their cards explode. (if you have morals you won't but...)
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  4. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    23,830 (5.63/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,978
    Location:
    Indiana, USA
    If nVidia says the desktop GPU's aren't affected, then the case closed.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  5. WarEagleAU

    WarEagleAU Bird of Prey

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,809 (2.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    548
    Location:
    Gurley, AL
    not necessarily newtekie1. Hindsight is 20/20.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  6. Megasty New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Messages:
    1,263 (0.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    82
    Location:
    The Kingdom of Au
    Oh well, time to test till destruction :D
     
  7. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    22,246 (6.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    8,991
    Location:
    'Merica. The Great SOUTH!
    Alas is there any other way? :pimp:
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  8. sam0t New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2007
    Messages:
    99 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4
    All major companies seem to follow the same principal in these matters, deny everything untill the bitter end. Would not be that shocked to see that this news has a truth behind it too.
     
  9. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    33,577 (9.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    17,148
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    It's not wafers that caused it. It's the ball soldering, wafers from the same source go to several companies for ball soldering. Obviously Charlie is 'fabricating'. What's new? :ohwell:
     
  10. INSTG8R

    INSTG8R

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2004
    Messages:
    4,176 (0.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,374
    Location:
    Canuck in Norway
    Hmm might explain why my NV 8600M puked after a few months...
     
    10 Year Member at TPU

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)