• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

Compare TV's or Monitors size

Joined
Jun 13, 2009
Messages
1,528 (0.49/day)
Likes
324
Location
Canada/Québec/Montreal
System Name Main PC
Processor PII 925 @3.724GHz (266x14) 1.525v NB 2660 1.425v
Motherboard Gigabyte AM3 GA-890XA-UD3 (790x+SB850)
Cooling Scythe Mugen 2 rev.B
Memory Hyperx 8GB (2x4) 1600@1418 8-7-7-20-27-1t
Video Card(s) Sapphire 6850 Stock (Max Overclock 1030/1200)
Storage 1x1TB WD Green / 1x1TB Seagate
Display(s) LCD Samsung 24" 16:9
Case Cooler Master HAF 912
Audio Device(s) On-Board HD
Power Supply CM 750w GX |3.3v@25a|5v@25a|12v@60a
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
Benchmark Scores later...
#1
While searching for monitors size comparison (aspect ratio & size) i came across a good site that shows you the difference between size , anyways i thought i share this with you all

Just choose the aspect ratio & write down the size number & click compare

--> http://www.displaywars.com/24-inch-16x9-vs-27-inch-16x9
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2009
Messages
620 (0.19/day)
Likes
156
Location
Michigan, USA
System Name Black Box
Processor Intel i7 3770K
Motherboard AsRock z77 Extreme 6
Cooling Thermalright Venemous X
Memory 2 x 8GB Crucial Ballistix
Video Card(s) 2 x GTX 480
Storage A-Data 128GB SSD, Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB
Display(s) HANNspree 25" 1080p 2ms
Case Lian Li PC-9F
Audio Device(s) Creative XFI
Power Supply PC Power & Cooling Silencer MKII 750w
Software Win 7 pro x64
#2
While searching for monitors size comparison (aspect ratio & size) i came across a good site that shows you the difference between size , anyways i thought i share this with you all

Just choose the aspect ratio & write down the size number & click compare

--> http://www.displaywars.com/24-inch-16x9-vs-27-inch-16x9
Neat.

Great avatar BTW! Love the interceptor. :toast:

Funny thing is, it still looks awesome today and the design is 27 years old. (or thereabouts)
 
Joined
Jun 13, 2009
Messages
1,528 (0.49/day)
Likes
324
Location
Canada/Québec/Montreal
System Name Main PC
Processor PII 925 @3.724GHz (266x14) 1.525v NB 2660 1.425v
Motherboard Gigabyte AM3 GA-890XA-UD3 (790x+SB850)
Cooling Scythe Mugen 2 rev.B
Memory Hyperx 8GB (2x4) 1600@1418 8-7-7-20-27-1t
Video Card(s) Sapphire 6850 Stock (Max Overclock 1030/1200)
Storage 1x1TB WD Green / 1x1TB Seagate
Display(s) LCD Samsung 24" 16:9
Case Cooler Master HAF 912
Audio Device(s) On-Board HD
Power Supply CM 750w GX |3.3v@25a|5v@25a|12v@60a
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
Benchmark Scores later...
#3
Neat.

Great avatar BTW! Love the interceptor. :toast:

Funny thing is, it still looks awesome today and the design is 27 years old. (or thereabouts)
Yeah! it's a great looking car the name was Dodge M4S (Turbo Interceptor) a prototype designed in the 1980s , 0-60 in 4.1 sec. :respect:

I just love the car & the movie The Wraith was & still is a good movie
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2009
Messages
620 (0.19/day)
Likes
156
Location
Michigan, USA
System Name Black Box
Processor Intel i7 3770K
Motherboard AsRock z77 Extreme 6
Cooling Thermalright Venemous X
Memory 2 x 8GB Crucial Ballistix
Video Card(s) 2 x GTX 480
Storage A-Data 128GB SSD, Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB
Display(s) HANNspree 25" 1080p 2ms
Case Lian Li PC-9F
Audio Device(s) Creative XFI
Power Supply PC Power & Cooling Silencer MKII 750w
Software Win 7 pro x64
#4
Yeah! it's a great looking car the name was Dodge M4S (Turbo Interceptor) a prototype designed in the 1980s , 0-60 in 4.1 sec. :respect:

I just love the car & the movie The Wraith was & still is a good movie
Yeah man, that was one of my favorite movies growing up. :)

Too bad Dodge never built it. Maybe it would've saved them from the dreaded K-Car. :banghead:
 

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
14,554 (3.97/day)
Likes
8,061
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K at stock (hits 5 gees+ easily)
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (4 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme Edition
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Green 4TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2720Z | Asus VG278HE (both 27", 144Hz, 3D Vision 2, 1080p)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX 850W v1
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
#5
Handy site. It clearly shows you how as you make the screen wider, you actually get less screen area to view and hence see less of the scene being viewed not more, which is a common misconception. To compare, set the screen size the same for both. Also, it helps to understand it by comparing 4:3 to 2.35:1 as it's the most extreme difference on there. Ultimately, you would maximise your viewing area and hence the scene by having a square 1:1 screen, but this aspect ratio isn't used, because it wouldn't be comfortable to view. I like 16:10 best, which is the Golden Ratio.

Note that screen size means the same thing as the leading diagonal and goes from the bottom left corner to the top right corner, or vice versa.
 
Joined
Jun 13, 2009
Messages
1,528 (0.49/day)
Likes
324
Location
Canada/Québec/Montreal
System Name Main PC
Processor PII 925 @3.724GHz (266x14) 1.525v NB 2660 1.425v
Motherboard Gigabyte AM3 GA-890XA-UD3 (790x+SB850)
Cooling Scythe Mugen 2 rev.B
Memory Hyperx 8GB (2x4) 1600@1418 8-7-7-20-27-1t
Video Card(s) Sapphire 6850 Stock (Max Overclock 1030/1200)
Storage 1x1TB WD Green / 1x1TB Seagate
Display(s) LCD Samsung 24" 16:9
Case Cooler Master HAF 912
Audio Device(s) On-Board HD
Power Supply CM 750w GX |3.3v@25a|5v@25a|12v@60a
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
Benchmark Scores later...
#6
Handy site. It clearly shows you how as you make the screen wider, you actually get less screen area to view and hence see less of the scene being viewed not more, which is a common misconception. To compare, set the screen size the same for both. Also, it helps to understand it by comparing 4:3 to 2.35:1 as it's the most extreme difference on there. Ultimately, you would maximise your viewing area and hence the scene by having a square 1:1 screen, but this aspect ratio isn't used, because it wouldn't be comfortable to view. I like 16:10 best, which is the Golden Ratio.

Note that screen size means the same thing as the leading diagonal and goes from the bottom left corner to the top right corner, or vice versa.
Well i wouldn't take the 4:3 aspect ratio on that site as accurate but the 16:9 vs 16:10 ratio seems accurate enough

-An example is when i compare an 21" 4:3 vs 24" 16:9 on that site it will show the 21" much higher in height...
http://www.displaywars.com/24-inch-16x9-vs-21-inch-4x3

I still have my old Sun 21" 4:3 monitor & if i measure against my Samsung 24" 16:9 they are both the exact same size in height only the width is a bit more then 4" wider on my 24" monitor

-Here if i measure an 22" 16:10 vs 21.5" 16:9 (my sister monitor vs my dad) it is pretty much accurate...
http://www.displaywars.com/21,5-inch-16x9-vs-22-inch-16x10

-But if you go 22" on both then you'll see that the 16:9 is a bit wider then an 16:10 monitor...
http://www.displaywars.com/22-inch-16x9-vs-22-inch-16x10

As far as i can tell this site seems accurate when compare the size & aspect ratio 16:9 vs 16:10 but not so much about 4:3 ratio but then again it could only depends on the brand of the monitor , i guess?
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,281 (5.51/day)
Likes
10,380
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 4790K@4.6GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR3-1866 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX960 STRIX @ 1500/1900
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Corsair 650D Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#7
Actually, that is correct, a 21" 4:3 monitor will be about 1" taller. Remember this is comparing the screen size only, not the actual height of the monitor. If the 21" has a shorter base, then it could be overall the same height as the 24", however the screen is actually ~1" taller.

If you don't believe it do the math.

16.8^2 + 12.6^2 = 21^2

and

16.8 / 4 = 12.6 / 3

Their numbers are accurate.
 
Joined
Jun 13, 2009
Messages
1,528 (0.49/day)
Likes
324
Location
Canada/Québec/Montreal
System Name Main PC
Processor PII 925 @3.724GHz (266x14) 1.525v NB 2660 1.425v
Motherboard Gigabyte AM3 GA-890XA-UD3 (790x+SB850)
Cooling Scythe Mugen 2 rev.B
Memory Hyperx 8GB (2x4) 1600@1418 8-7-7-20-27-1t
Video Card(s) Sapphire 6850 Stock (Max Overclock 1030/1200)
Storage 1x1TB WD Green / 1x1TB Seagate
Display(s) LCD Samsung 24" 16:9
Case Cooler Master HAF 912
Audio Device(s) On-Board HD
Power Supply CM 750w GX |3.3v@25a|5v@25a|12v@60a
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
Benchmark Scores later...
#8
Actually, that is correct, a 21" 4:3 monitor will be about 1" taller. Remember this is comparing the screen size only, not the actual height of the monitor. If the 21" has a shorter base, then it could be overall the same height as the 24", however the screen is actually ~1" taller.

If you don't believe it do the math.

16.8^2 + 12.6^2 = 21^2

and

16.8 / 4 = 12.6 / 3

Their numbers are accurate.
I always measured the viewing screen only (inside the edge) & my 21' CRT is the exact same height as my 24" LCD , 11" 7/8 to be exact
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,281 (5.51/day)
Likes
10,380
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 4790K@4.6GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR3-1866 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX960 STRIX @ 1500/1900
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Corsair 650D Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#9
I always measured the viewing screen only (inside the edge) & my 21' CRT is the exact same height as my 24" LCD , 11" 7/8 to be exact
Then it isn't really a 21" CRT, more like a 19.75".
 
Joined
Jun 13, 2009
Messages
1,528 (0.49/day)
Likes
324
Location
Canada/Québec/Montreal
System Name Main PC
Processor PII 925 @3.724GHz (266x14) 1.525v NB 2660 1.425v
Motherboard Gigabyte AM3 GA-890XA-UD3 (790x+SB850)
Cooling Scythe Mugen 2 rev.B
Memory Hyperx 8GB (2x4) 1600@1418 8-7-7-20-27-1t
Video Card(s) Sapphire 6850 Stock (Max Overclock 1030/1200)
Storage 1x1TB WD Green / 1x1TB Seagate
Display(s) LCD Samsung 24" 16:9
Case Cooler Master HAF 912
Audio Device(s) On-Board HD
Power Supply CM 750w GX |3.3v@25a|5v@25a|12v@60a
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
Benchmark Scores later...
#10
Then it isn't really a 21" CRT, more like a 19.75".
Here is the monitor -->http://www.computerdisplays.co.uk/21 inch monitors/sun gdm.htm

So yes! , i agree it looks more like what an ~20".5 than a real 21" CRT as i checked the measurement in diagonal & it is 19".75 rather than 20" as it should be for an 21" 4:3 , so it all depends on the make/model of the monitor

Widescreen LCD's (16:10/16:9) things should be different if you buy an 24" monitor it should be 24" diagonal & not ~23".6 like i've seen on some LCD model

Anyhow my 24" LCD is really 24" in diagonal as it should be & that's the way i like it
 
Last edited:

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,281 (5.51/day)
Likes
10,380
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 4790K@4.6GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR3-1866 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX960 STRIX @ 1500/1900
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Corsair 650D Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#11
Here is the monitor -->http://www.computerdisplays.co.uk/21 inch monitors/sun gdm.htm

So yes! , i agree it looks more like what an ~20".5 than a real 21" CRT as i checked the measurement in diagonal & it is 19".75 rather than 20" as it should be for an 21" 4:3 , so it all depends on the make/model of the monitor

Widescreen LCD's (16:10/16:9) things should be different if you buy an 24" monitor it should be 24" diagonal & not ~23".6 like i've seen on some LCD model

Anyhow my 24" LCD is really 24" in diagonal as it should be & that's the way i like it
Most LCDs I've seen use actual dimensions(or make a very clear note of the actual dimension).

CRT manufacturers uses all types of sizes and rounded them up to the nearest "class". This site uses actual measurements. Which is nice for people that still have CRTs that are looking to upgrade.
 
Joined
Jun 13, 2009
Messages
1,528 (0.49/day)
Likes
324
Location
Canada/Québec/Montreal
System Name Main PC
Processor PII 925 @3.724GHz (266x14) 1.525v NB 2660 1.425v
Motherboard Gigabyte AM3 GA-890XA-UD3 (790x+SB850)
Cooling Scythe Mugen 2 rev.B
Memory Hyperx 8GB (2x4) 1600@1418 8-7-7-20-27-1t
Video Card(s) Sapphire 6850 Stock (Max Overclock 1030/1200)
Storage 1x1TB WD Green / 1x1TB Seagate
Display(s) LCD Samsung 24" 16:9
Case Cooler Master HAF 912
Audio Device(s) On-Board HD
Power Supply CM 750w GX |3.3v@25a|5v@25a|12v@60a
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
Benchmark Scores later...
#12
Most LCDs I've seen use actual dimensions(or make a very clear note of the actual dimension).

CRT manufacturers uses all types of sizes and rounded them up to the nearest "class". This site uses actual measurements. Which is nice for people that still have CRTs that are looking to upgrade.
Sure is it's a great link for anybody looking for an upgrade for either CRT or LCD

As for CRT measurement i think what happens is , that the class itself may actually be 21" diagonal but since parts of it hide inside a plastic case which hold the class tube in place you end up "loosing" anywhere from 3/4 to 1.25" on CRT's because of this

Anyhow i just which i could buy 30-32" monitor but i can't so ill go with an 27" on my next buy in about 2 months from now , time to save money as i like to paid everything cash & have no debts...
 

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
14,554 (3.97/day)
Likes
8,061
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K at stock (hits 5 gees+ easily)
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (4 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme Edition
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Green 4TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2720Z | Asus VG278HE (both 27", 144Hz, 3D Vision 2, 1080p)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX 850W v1
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
#13
Well i wouldn't take the 4:3 aspect ratio on that site as accurate but the 16:9 vs 16:10 ratio seems accurate enough
Yes, as NT said, the numbers are accurate. However, what's not so good is the presentation and the fact that there's no explanation anywhere to clarify what you're looking at. It took me a while fiddling around with it to get it. All this "4:3 as 16:9" or "16:9 as 2.35:1" stuff is quite confusing, because it's not clarified what's meant by that. It just means that cutting off the "extra bit" of the other aspect ratio and showing you how one fits into the other (I'd need to use a diagram to explain this properly). To be honest, I'm not really sure how useful that info is, anyway.

To experiment, try some easy values, such as having a screen size (leading diagonal) of 10 (inches/cm don't matter) on both sides, then put both sides as the same aspect ratio - try a couple of different ones - and look at the numbers.

Then, keep those diagonals the same, but compare different aspect ratios and hopefully the thing should become clear. As I said, it's confusing to look at and still makes my head hurt a bit. Still a handy site though and it's staying in my bookmarks.