• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Compulab Outs AMD-Powered Fit-PC4

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
34,519 (9.18/day)
Likes
17,526
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name MRE-grade Potato
Processor Intel Core i7-4770K
Motherboard ASUS Z97-A
Cooling Xigmatek Aegir CPU Cooler
Memory 2x 8GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3-1866
Video Card(s) 2x ZOTAC GeForce GTX 970
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB + Intel SSD320 120GB + Patriot WildFire 120GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590 28-inch 4K UHD
Case Cooler Master CM690 1st Gen
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX850W
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
#1
Israel-based system builder Compulab announced the fourth generation Fit-PC, the Fit-PC4, which builds on the proven nettop platform. Fit-PC4 comes in two main variants, the $299 Fit-PC4 Value, and the $380 Fit-PC4 Pro. The Value variant runs an AMD A4-1250 APU, with a manageable 8W TDP to speak of. The Pro variant, on the other hand, runs a peppier AMD GX-420CA quad-core SoC, with Radeon HD 8400E graphics.

Both variants feature two DDR3 SO-DIMM slots, which can hold up to 16 GB of memory; an internal 2.5-inch drive bay with SATA 6 Gb/s interface, an mPCIe+mSATA 6 Gb/s slot, and a micro-SDXC card slot, wrapping up the storage department. Display outputs include two HDMI 1.4a ports on both variants, with 7.1-channel digital audio streams. 7.1-channel digital audio is also given out by TOSLINK SPDIF, on both variants. Analog audio outputs include just the stereo headset jacks. Networking includes two gigabit Ethernet interfaces on both variants. While the Value variant offers 802.11 b/g/n WLAN with Bluetooth 3.0, the Pro variant tops that with 802.11 ac and Bluetooth 4.0. The Pro variant measures 16 cm x 19 cm x 3.7 cm; while the Value variant is more compact, at 16 cm x 16 cm x 2.5 cm.



Source: FanlessTech
 
Joined
Oct 4, 2013
Messages
84 (0.05/day)
Likes
15
#2
very expensive, while
ECS KBN-I/2100 AMD E1-2100 Dual Core processor Mini ITX Motherboard/CPU/VGA Combo (duckduckgo it) costs 58$

P.S. you must be joking me with those forum word processors!
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
1,889 (0.99/day)
Likes
742
Location
CZ
System Name TITAN Slayer / CPUCannon / MassFX
Processor i7 5960X @ 4.6Ghz / i7 3960x @5.0Ghz / FX6350 @ 4.?Ghz
Motherboard Rampage V Extreme / Rampage IV Extreme / MSI 970 Gaming
Cooling Phanteks PHTC14PE 2.5K 145mm TRs / Custom waterloop / Phanteks PHTC14PE + 3K 140mm Noctuas
Memory Crucial 2666 11-13-13-25 1.45V / G.skill RipjawsX 2400 10-12-12-34 1.7V / Crucial 2133 9-9-9-27 1.7V
Video Card(s) 3 Fury X in CF / R9 Fury 3840 cores 1145/570 1.3V / Nothing ATM
Storage 500GB Crucial SSD and 3TB WD Black / WD 1TB Black(OS) + WD 3TB Green / WD 1TB Blue
Display(s) LG 29UM67 80Hz/Asus mx299q 2560x1080 @ 84Hz / Asus VX239 1920x1080 @60hz
Case Dismatech easy v3.0 / Xigmatek Alfar (Open side panel)
Audio Device(s) M-audio M-track / realtek ALC 1150
Power Supply EVGA G2 1600W / CoolerMaster V1000 / Seasonic 620 M12-II
Mouse Mouse in review process/Razer Naga Epic 2011/Razer Naga 2014
Keyboard Keyboard in review process / Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 2014/Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 2011
Software Windows 7 Ultimate / Windows 7 ultimate / Windows 7 ultimate
Benchmark Scores cinebench 15.41 3960x @ 5.3ghz Wprime32m 3.352 3960x @ 5.25ghz Super PI 32m: 6m 42s 472ms @5.25ghz
#3
very expensive, while
ECS KBN-I/2100 AMD E1-2100 Dual Core processor Mini ITX Motherboard/CPU/VGA Combo (duckduckgo it) costs 58$
P.S. you must be joking me with those forum word processors!
This thing is smaller than an ITX mother board and packs everything you would need for browsing the internet and storing photos so no your option isn't better.
 
Joined
Oct 4, 2013
Messages
84 (0.05/day)
Likes
15
#4
This thing is smaller than an ITX mother board and packs everything you would need for browsing the internet and storing photos so no your option isn't better.
I am not saying that my option is better.
What I am saying is that a similar board, and one that has to fit in a case (so it has to follow the standard sizes atx μitx e.t.c. and that's why it is bigger) is far cheaper than this.
Suppose that the mobo+cpu costs 60$ in retail or ~75$ for the quad core variant, I see that there is a huge gap between the motherboard+cpu price and this version inside a plastic box.
so what I want to point out here is that this device seems to be expensive for what it offers.
you can get a whole system (laptop) with those specs(or better) + keyboard + touch-pad + 768p screen + DVD+/- R + battery and pay the same amount of money.

edit: this thing is 16x16 = 22.62 cm, a 10.1" laptop is 25.654 cm so there you get an similarly compact system.
edit2: + camera + speakers :D
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 16, 2009
Messages
221 (0.07/day)
Likes
83
Processor Phenom II X4 965 BE @4 GHz | NB @2600 MHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 2x 8GB PC12800 @1600 MHz CL7 1T
Video Card(s) Gigabyte HD 7950
Storage 2 x 500 GB -- HD502HJ & WD5000AACS-00ZUB0
Display(s) Iiyama Prolite E2202WS_WVS
Case Corsair Obsidian 550D
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar D2 w/ Z-5500
Power Supply Seasonic X-750
Mouse Logitech B100
Keyboard Logitech G15 (blue backlight)
Software Windows 7 - SP1 x64
#5
Suppose that the mobo+cpu costs 60$ in retail or ~75$ for the quad core variant, I see that there is a huge gap between the motherboard+cpu price and this version inside a plastic box.
The case is made of aluminum.

so what I want to point out here is that this device seems to be expensive for what it offers.
Before calling it expensive, we should consider how many of those are made. If the numbers are too wide apart between this company and the large companies we all buy from, the comparison does not make sense.

Besides, the board you mentioned doesn't have wifi, bluetooth, "only" has a solitary HDMI port, and no external S/PDIF port.

you can get a whole system (laptop) with those specs(or better) + keyboard + touch-pad + 768p screen + DVD+/- R + battery and pay the same amount of money.

edit: this thing is 16x16 = 22.62 cm, a 10.1" laptop is 25.654 cm so there you get an similarly compact system.
edit2: + camera + speakers :D
Different machines for different purposes.

I don't think you'll find many laptops with a serial port, dual HDMI or dual gigabit LAN (sometimes, the LAN port on laptops isn't even gigabit), from none other than Intel to boot. Then, there's the number of USB ports — I can't say I've ever seen a laptop with more than 4 of those. Also... Laptops with a micro-SIM port? I've seen a few netbooks with one, but they're not comparable to the fit-PC4 in that you can't upgrade many components. Last, but certainly not least, laptops with ECC support (talking specifically about the GX-420ca model here) are not exactly legion.

--- --- --- -- -- - -- -- --- --- ---

tl;dr: Compare what is comparable. What you've been doing so far was overlooking every and each of the fit-PC4's perks.

P.S.: I think the rich text editor rocks.