- Joined
- Jun 20, 2007
- Messages
- 3,937 (0.64/day)
System Name | Widow |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 7600x |
Motherboard | AsRock B650 HDVM.2 |
Cooling | CPU : Corsair Hydro XC7 }{ GPU: EK FC 1080 via Magicool 360 III PRO > Photon 170 (D5) |
Memory | 32GB Gskill Flare X5 |
Video Card(s) | GTX 1080 TI |
Storage | Samsung 9series NVM 2TB and Rust |
Display(s) | Predator X34P/Tempest X270OC @ 120hz / LG W3000h |
Case | Fractal Define S [Antec Skeleton hanging in hall of fame] |
Audio Device(s) | Asus Xonar Xense with AKG K612 cans on Monacor SA-100 |
Power Supply | Seasonic X-850 |
Mouse | Razer Naga 2014 |
Software | Windows 11 Pro |
Benchmark Scores | FFXIV ARR Benchmark 12,883 on i7 2600k 15,098 on AM5 7600x |
Anyone familiar with the finer details of telecoms and broadband or fibre?
Is the overhead and speed loss (due to distance, quality of cabling etc), a static figure or dynamic based on the service type?
If for example you have broadband and sync half the speed that your line is rated at (e.g. 10mb down instead of 20mb down (which would be maximum)), would you experience the same 10mb loss with a faster service that offered 50mb down?; resulting in only 40mb down? Or would it still be roughly 50% loss?
Is the overhead and speed loss (due to distance, quality of cabling etc), a static figure or dynamic based on the service type?
If for example you have broadband and sync half the speed that your line is rated at (e.g. 10mb down instead of 20mb down (which would be maximum)), would you experience the same 10mb loss with a faster service that offered 50mb down?; resulting in only 40mb down? Or would it still be roughly 50% loss?