• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Core i5-3570K Graphics 67% Faster Than Core i5-2500K, 36% Slower Than GeForce GT 240

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
34,496 (9.18/day)
Likes
17,519
Location
Hyderabad, India
#1
An Expreview community member ran benchmarks comparing the performance of the Intel HD 4000 graphics embedded into its upcoming 22 nm "Ivy Bridge" Core i5-3570K, comparing it to the integrated graphics of Core i5-2500K, and discrete graphics NVIDIA GeForce GT 240. These tests are endorsed by the site. The suite of benchmarks included games that aren't quite known to be very taxing on graphics hardware by today's standards, yet are extremely popular; games such as StarCraft II, Left4Dead 2, DiRT 3, Street Fighter IV. Some of the slightly more graphics-intensive benchmarks included Far Cry 2 and 3DMark Vantage. All benchmarks were run at 1280 x 720 resolution.

The Intel HD 4000 graphics core beats the HD 3000 hands down, with performance leads as high as 122% in a particular test. The chip produces more than playable frame-rates with Left4Dead 2 and Street Fighter IV, both well above 50 FPS, even DiRT 3 and Far Cry 2 run strictly OK, over 30 FPS. StarCraft II is where it produced under 30 FPS, so the chip might get bogged down in intense battles. A mainstream discrete GeForce or Radeon is a must. On average, the graphics core embedded into the Core i5-3570K was found to be 67.25% faster than the one on the Core i5-2500K.



When pitted against a 2+ year old GeForce GT 240, the Core i5-3570K struggles. In StarCraft II, it's 53.64% slower. On average, the GT 240 emerged 56.25% faster. A decent effort by Intel to cash in on the entry-level graphics. We are hearing nice things about the HD video playback and GPU acceleration capabilities of Intel's HD 4000 core, and so there's still something to look out for. Agreed, comparing the i5-3570K to the i5-2500K isn't a 100% scientific comparison since the CPU performance also factors in, but it was done purely to assess how far along Intel has come with its graphics.

Source: Expreview
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
1,677 (0.59/day)
Likes
300
Location
London
System Name Jaspe
Processor i7 7800X 4.3Ghz
Motherboard MSI X299 Gaming Pro Carbon AC
Cooling Silverstone Tundra Lite
Memory 16Gb Corsair 3200mhz
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1080 SC
Storage PNY M.2 480GB Crucial M500 WD Velociraptor
Display(s) AOC Q2778VQE
Case In Win GRone
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Antec Signature 650
Software Windows 10 Home
#2
Do you think it can play Hard Reset maxed out at 1900x1200?
 
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
1,066 (0.24/day)
Likes
193
Location
Look behind you!!
System Name NEW
Processor Intel 4770 non-K
Motherboard Gigabyte H81M-DS2V
Cooling CM Hyper 212 plus
Memory 16gb Muskin
Video Card(s) XFX 380X 4gb
Storage Sandisk 120gb plus WD blue 1tb
Display(s) AOC 23.5 LED bl
Case XIGMATEK
Audio Device(s) motherboard
Power Supply Cooler Master 500
#4
Why is it being compared to nvidia not AMDs apu?

Doesnt make much sense to me.
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2011
Messages
1,736 (0.70/day)
Likes
206
Location
So. Cal.
#5
67.25% faster than that of a 2007 IGP is good? Then to compare to a 2009 GT240 and probably a DDR3, if it is 36% is adequately respectable now in 2012. So, it’s maybe like a HD5550, which could now almost achieving modern entry leval so not bad.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
1,734 (0.53/day)
Likes
621
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0
Cooling Arctic Freezer Pro 7
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD HD6950 x 2
Storage Kingstone 60gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television)
Case antec 600
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
#6
Why is it being compared to nvidia not AMDs apu?

Doesnt make much sense to me.

maybe those comparisons hurt Intel's ego, I dont know.
 

KRONOSFX

New Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
25 (0.01/day)
Likes
6
#8
btarunr You made a mistake.
On average, the GT 240 emerged 36% faster.
HD4000 is 36% slower than GT240 but on the other hand 100-36=64 -> 100/64=56.25
GT240 is 56.25% faster than HD4000.
 
Joined
Nov 23, 2010
Messages
268 (0.10/day)
Likes
14
#10
The IGP graphics is okay for most office use or internet cafe internet surfing pc / headless server use. It helps if you use webcl.nokia.com and intel webcl software.
Still have no clue why Intel is not involved in some scam with a IGP company to force the use of their IGP's vs Intel wasting time on IGP's.

The best part is when you run a i7 cpu with IGP (no dedicated amd / nvidia gpu's) then the cpu's suck much more.

Example:
Mobile i7-2670 runs 7-zip 8/8 at avg. 12500 where a i7-2630 with nvidia mobile gpu runs at 15244~15384 8/8, same hardware except for gpu used and swapped out cpu for testing. You would expect it to be the opposite results.
 

faramir

New Member
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
203 (0.08/day)
Likes
27
#11
So how does HD4000 compare to A8-3850/3870 graphics then ?

I understand Trinity figures aren't avaliable yet, I can't wait for the rumored performance of Kaveri though, finally a decent enough integrated GPU with absolutely no need for additional GPU, if only they can get the CPU IPC performance up from the 2006 first generation Phenom level ...
 

Yo_Wattup

New Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2012
Messages
789 (0.36/day)
Likes
198
Location
Brisbane, Australia
System Name Desktop/Gamer/Digital Audio Wokstation ||| HTPC
Processor 2500k @ 4.65ghz ||| AMD A8 @ 3.6ghz
Motherboard ASUS P8Z68-V Pro
Cooling Noctua NH-D14 with single Blue Antec Tri-Cool 120mm ||| Stock
Memory 16GB G.Skill Ripjaws X 1600 @1900mhz 8-9-9-24 ||| 8GB G.Skill 1600 CL9
Video Card(s) 2x HIS HD6950 2GB Crossfire, 6970 clocks ||| HD6550D
Storage 120GB Intel 320 series SSD + 2TB storage ||| 1TB Seagate
Display(s) 32" Sony Bravia LCD 1080p ||| 50" Hitachi Plasma 1080p
Case Raidmax Raptor modded to 7 fans ||| A compact HP Case
Audio Device(s) Firewire audio interface + two 9" studio monitors, 450 REAL watts ||| onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 750W ||| generic 400W
Software Win 7 Ultimate + Win 8 consumer preview||| Win 7 Pro
Benchmark Scores Never drops below 60fps Battlefield 3 everything on max, fov 90. :D
#14
Still quite mediocre IMO.
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
2,846 (0.79/day)
Likes
631
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 1600
Motherboard Asrock Taichi
Cooling NH-C14
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 OC 4 GB
Storage 2 * Samsung 1 TB HD103UJ
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Corsair Obsidian 650D
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX750
Mouse Logitech Performance MX
Software Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
#15
So how does HD4000 compare to A8-3850/3870 graphics then ?

I understand Trinity figures aren't avaliable yet, I can't wait for the rumored performance of Kaveri though, finally a decent enough integrated GPU with absolutely no need for additional GPU, if only they can get the CPU IPC performance up from the 2006 first generation Phenom level ...
Since there shouldn't be any review of this available, are there any of A8-38X0 pitted against GeForce GT 240?
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
2,576 (0.64/day)
Likes
510
Processor Mysterious Engineering Prototype
Motherboard Intel 865
Cooling Custom block made in workshop
Memory Corsair XMS 2GB
Video Card(s) FireGL X3-256
Display(s) 1600x1200 SyncMaster x 2 = 3200x1200
Software Windows 2003
#16
Quite impressive. Now if you could JOIN that performance with a budget gaming card, you'd be good to go. What a shame that the company developing that concept left the market. What was it called again?

How about the Xeon dual socket version of this chip. If it could combine combine graphics performance, now that would be decent enough for most people, and every reason for everyone to buy a workstation board and for Intel to sell twice as many CPU chips ;)

In fact, they could go back in time to the 386 and 387 math coprocessor concept. Only this time it would be GPU coprocessor. They could build a sister-chip that had half the CPU cores but double the GPU core/shaders, and it would make a marvellous combination.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
499 (0.22/day)
Likes
119
System Name Multipurpose desktop
Processor AMD Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.75Ghz , NB @ 2.5
Motherboard Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3 (rev 1.0)
Cooling Prolimatech Megahalems Rev. C, 2x120mm CM Blademaster
Memory Corsair Vengeance LP (4x4GB) @1666Mhz 9-9-9-20-24 1T
Video Card(s) ASUS Strix R7-370 4GB OC
Storage 2x WD Caviar Black 500GB Sata III in RAID 0
Display(s) Acer S211HL 21.5" 1920x1080
Case Cooler Master Centurion 534+, 3x 120mm CM Sickle Flow
Power Supply Seasonic X650 Gold
Software Windows 7 x64 Home Premium SP1
#17
2007? Are you joking? HD3000 was launched in 2011 last year.
I think he means 2007 era discrete graphics performance.
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
2,846 (0.79/day)
Likes
631
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 1600
Motherboard Asrock Taichi
Cooling NH-C14
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 OC 4 GB
Storage 2 * Samsung 1 TB HD103UJ
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Corsair Obsidian 650D
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX750
Mouse Logitech Performance MX
Software Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
#18
Since there shouldn't be any review of this available, are there any of A8-38X0 pitted against GeForce GT 240?
Found a review with both an A8-3850 and a GT 240 here

It has mixed results: a GT 240 has performance over the A8-3850 (with the RAM @ 1866) between 91% and 120%.

Would prefer a more comprehensive review for this comparison but was unable to locate one :(

EDIT

With this, it seems that Core i5-3570K Graphics still isn't up to the graphics of an A8-3850. It's a whole new ball game when you factor the CPU portion of the chip.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 18, 2008
Messages
1,837 (0.55/day)
Likes
528
System Name Computer
Processor 1700X
Motherboard CH6
Cooling Custom Loop
Memory G.Skill 32GB
Video Card(s) GTX 1070
Storage 500GB Samsung 850 Evo Msata
Display(s) LG 23" IPS
Power Supply Seasonic 760 Platinum
Software Windows 8.1 64-Bit
#19
Who did they get the design from this time around
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2011
Messages
1,736 (0.70/day)
Likes
206
Location
So. Cal.
#20
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
3,416 (1.22/day)
Likes
1,049
System Name My baby
Processor Athlon II X4 620 @ 3.5GHz, 1.45v, NB @ 2700Mhz, HT @ 2700Mhz - 24hr prime95 stable
Motherboard Asus M4A785TD-V EVO
Cooling Sonic Tower Rev 2 with 120mm Akasa attached, Akasa @ Front, Xilence Red Wing 120mm @ Rear
Memory 16 GB G.Skills 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) ATI ASUS Crossfire 5850
Storage Samsung 1Tb EcoGreen hard drive
Display(s) Hanngs-G 19"
Case Antec VSK 2000 Black Tower Case
Audio Device(s) Onkyo TX-SR309 Receiver, 2x Kef Cresta 1, 1x Kef Center 20c
Power Supply OCZ StealthXstream II 600w, 4x12v/18A, 80% efficiency.
Software Windows Vista X64
#21
What confuses me is, why does AMD put the discrete video cards on the mainstream CPUs. Why don't they put GPUs on the enthusiast range too. Like surely they could put a 6850 on a Bulldozer or Phenom II die if they wanted?
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2010
Messages
24 (0.01/day)
Likes
6
Location
Abrantes\Portugal
Processor C2D E8400 @ 4Ghz 1.25v
Motherboard Asus P5Q SE PLUS
Cooling Titan Fenrir
Memory G.SKILL PC2-8500 2x2Gb PI
Video Card(s) HD4770 795\990 1v
Storage Samsung F1 640GB
Display(s) Acer x223w Q
Case CM 690 II Advanced
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Gigabyte Odin GT 800W
Software Windows 7 Profissional x64
#22
What confuses me is, why does AMD put the discrete video cards on the mainstream CPUs. Why don't they put GPUs on the enthusiast range too. Like surely they could put a 6850 on a Bulldozer or Phenom II die if they wanted?
Its not that simple.
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2011
Messages
1,736 (0.70/day)
Likes
206
Location
So. Cal.
#23
What confuses me is, why does AMD put the discrete video cards on the mainstream CPUs. Why don't they put GPUs on the enthusiast range too. Like surely they could put a 6850 on a Bulldozer or Phenom II die if they wanted?

The Trinity A10 lineup will come with Radeon HD 7660D or something that approaches or betters the current 6570 discrete. Now consider that will perform similar to a 9800GTX 512Mb from 2008, which had a TDP of 168W. Today they combine a CPU and the GPU and keep it under 100W. In 4 years that’s pretty amazing wouldn't you say?

As to why they don't... it comes down to power and heat, most anyone or the OEM's that builds and markets the volume of general use computers have to do it for a price and within "green" efficiency. While at this time cooling would need to be developed and I would consider a prohibitive cost. But give it two years and you'll probably be getting 7770 performance with an APU.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
511 (0.15/day)
Likes
124
System Name Epsilon
Processor A12-9800E 35watts
Motherboard MSI Grenade AM4
Cooling Stock
Memory 2x4GB DDR4 2400 Kingston Hyper X
Video Card(s) Radeon R7 (IGP / APU)
Storage Samsung Spinpoint F1
Display(s) AOC 29" Ultra wide
Case Generic
Power Supply Antec Earthwatts 380w
Software Windows 10
#24
What confuses me is, why does AMD put the discrete video cards on the mainstream CPUs. Why don't they put GPUs on the enthusiast range too. Like surely they could put a 6850 on a Bulldozer or Phenom II die if they wanted?
Because llano A8 is a solution in the mainstream where you count every penny.
You don't count every penny on the enthusiast range, so a more powerful GPU integrated to a Phenom II or bulldozer won't necesarelly means the enthusiast crowd will buy it, first because you will be tied to that integrated GPU until you buy a discrete card, and second, no matter how powerful the integrated GPU is, it shares memory, and that makes performance drop, also DDR3 is not comparable to GDDR5 in any way.

Still quite mediocre IMO.
agree.
And I'm not counting graphics quality in 3D, microstutterings, and compatibility.
 
Joined
Apr 7, 2011
Messages
1,163 (0.47/day)
Likes
471
System Name Desktop
Processor Intel i7-3930k
Motherboard ASUS Sabertooth X79
Cooling Intel AIO
Memory 8x4GB 1866MHz
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 970 SC
Storage Adaptec 2405 SAS|Hitachi SAS 15k 450GB|2xSeagate 2TB|WD RE Enterprise 4 TB|HP Ultrium 1760 LTO4 Tape
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Fractal Define XL Black
Audio Device(s) Schiit Modi Uber>Schiit Asgard 2>Sennheiser HD600
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Mouse Logitech G603
Keyboard Logitech G613
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#25
What confuses me is, why does AMD put the discrete video cards on the mainstream CPUs. Why don't they put GPUs on the enthusiast range too. Like surely they could put a 6850 on a Bulldozer or Phenom II die if they wanted?
The TDP would be too high I imagine.