• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Core i9-10900K vs. Ryzen 9 3950X Cinebench R15 Comparison Leaked

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
40,210 (8.37/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
Ahead of its launch a leaked ASUS ROG marketing slide reveals Cinebench R15 performance comparisons between the new Intel Core i9-10900K and AMD's current MSDT flagship part, the Ryzen 9 3950X. The graphs also include Intel's previous gen flagship, the i9-9900K, which should provide a reasonable indication of where the new Core i7-10700K performance could land.

In the single-threaded Cinebench R15 test, the Core i9-10900K scores 222 points, while the 3950X scores 213, which is a 4.22% lead for the new Intel flagship over AMD's. The i9-9900K is 2.81% faster than the 3950X in the same test. The landscape changes completely with multi-thread. Armed with 16 cores and 32 threads, the 3950X tests 48.61% faster than the i9-10900K, and a whopping 94.14% faster than the i9-9900K, which means the 3950X should land around 90% (±5%) faster than the i7-10700K. Core i9-10900K vs. Ryzen 9 3900X should make for a fascinating contest.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
13,870 (6.11/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor i7 8700k 4.7Ghz @ 1.26v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (34'' 3440x1440x)
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
4% in CS GO. That ain't much.
 
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
1,145 (0.32/day)
Intel still has that single core lead performance, but i'm sure that gap becomes smaller with the Ryzen 4 series. I mean a well tweaked AMD system with tight timings would proberly be very very close to it. There's so much untapped potential in AMD hardware really, just see the DDR4 timing guide here on Techpowerup.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
2,879 (0.67/day)
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD RX480
Storage Samsung 750 Evo 250gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television)
Case antec 600
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
Intel still has that single core lead performance, but i'm sure that gap becomes smaller with the Ryzen 4 series. I mean a well tweaked AMD system with tight timings would proberly be very very close to it. There's so much untapped potential in AMD hardware really, just see the DDR4 timing guide here on Techpowerup.
Well yeah but only because they do the one thing they can, keep pushing those clocks, no matter the power consumption and the heat (although for the end user especially heat can limit heavily what the processor can actually do)\

But like, who is even suprised by any of these results, cant we just produce these numbers before Intel even releases these?
We know its just the same cpu again but with a few more cores and higher clocks.
 
Joined
May 12, 2016
Messages
150 (0.09/day)
Intel still has that single core lead performance, but i'm sure that gap becomes smaller with the Ryzen 4 series. I mean a well tweaked AMD system with tight timings would proberly be very very close to it. There's so much untapped potential in AMD hardware really, just see the DDR4 timing guide here on Techpowerup.
That's what is currently still stopping me from comfortably jumping on the Ryzen platform. I don't want to spend too much time on tweaking memory or many other settings that apparently is very useful for getting the best performance and sometimes even basic stability from Ryzen cpus. Intel seems like a much lower maintenance with easy xmp enabling and very basic approach to OC (if you're going the OC route).
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
4,521 (0.87/day)
Location
Hong Kong
Processor Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Motherboard X399 Fatal1ty Professional Gaming
Cooling Custom loop water, 3x 420 Rad
Memory Team T-FORCE XCALIBUR RGB 4000 @3400 CL14
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 2080 Ti
Storage Samsung 960 Evo 512GB 3-way Raid 0
Display(s) Samsung C27HG70
Case Thermaltake Level 20 XT
Audio Device(s) EVGA Nu Audio
Power Supply FSP Aurum PT 1200W
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
That's what is currently still stopping me from comfortably jumping on the Ryzen platform. I don't want to spend too much time on tweaking memory or many other settings that apparently is very useful for getting the best performance and sometimes even basic stability from Ryzen cpus. Intel seems like a much lower maintenance with easy xmp enabling and very basic approach to OC (if you're going the OC route).
TBH, you are over-thinking things a bit too much. For Zen2 / 3rd gen Ryzen, the difference is really isn't that huge.
The reason why people often mentions about memory speed, is because Ryzen and Intel 14nm CPUs are within spitting distance of each other.
As a rough estimate, the 3950X's 213 points in single thread, at a 105% it is around 223 points. DDR4 3600 is generally achieveable XMP speed for Zen2.
As usual the bars on marketing graphs makes the difference looks bigger than it is.


https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-zen-2-memory-performance-scaling-benchmark/4.html
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 31, 2016
Messages
2,335 (1.42/day)
Location
Currently Norway
System Name Bro2
Processor Ryzen 2700X
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Carbon
Cooling Corsair h115i pro rgb
Memory G.Skill Flare X 3200 CL14 @ 3600Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) RX Vega 64 Red Devil / Sapphire 5600XT pulse
Storage M.2 Samsung Evo 970 250MB/ Samsung 860 Evo 1TB
Display(s) LG 27UD69 UHD
Case Fractal Design G
Audio Device(s) realtec 5.1
Power Supply Corsair AXi 760W / Seasonic 750W GOLD
Mouse Logitech G402
Keyboard Logitech slim
Software Windows 10 64 bit
Intel still has that single core lead performance, but i'm sure that gap becomes smaller with the Ryzen 4 series. I mean a well tweaked AMD system with tight timings would proberly be very very close to it. There's so much untapped potential in AMD hardware really, just see the DDR4 timing guide here on Techpowerup.
Considering the boost speed no shock there. the 3950x on the other hand can go faster if you tweak it a bit.

That's what is currently still stopping me from comfortably jumping on the Ryzen platform. I don't want to spend too much time on tweaking memory or many other settings that apparently is very useful for getting the best performance and sometimes even basic stability from Ryzen cpus. Intel seems like a much lower maintenance with easy xmp enabling and very basic approach to OC (if you're going the OC route).
I didn't have that impression jumping to TR's.
It sound weird because I can assure you, you would tweak your Intel counterpart if you get it. OC it and maybe tweak ram as well. undervolting not to fry the damn chip but still Ryzens require too much attention in your opinion. I didn't have that impression, actually it's been fun for me though and seeing the performance boost, made my day :)
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
1,719 (0.65/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Intel i5 4460 / Athlon 3000G / A6 7400K
Motherboard ASRock Z97 Extreme6 / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max / ASUS FM2+
Cooling Modified AM2 Asetek MicroChill / AMD stock / CoolerMaster TX2
Memory 16GB Kingston KHX1866C10D3 / 16GB G.Skill Aegis DDR4-3200MHz / 8GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) XFX RX 580 8GB + GT 620 (PhysX)/ Vega 3 / A6 7400K iGPU
Storage Intel NVMe 500GB, Samsung NVMe 250GB + more / Kingston 240GB + more / Samsung SSD 120GB
Display(s) Samsung LE32D550 32'' TV(2 systems connected) / 19'' monitor + projector
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / Sharkoon Rebel 9 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Sharkoon 650W / Seasonic 400W
Mouse CoolerMaster / Rapoo / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster / Microsoft / Logitech
Software Windows
If AMD starts winning on R15, I wonder what benchmark they will start pushing. Maybe some single core benchmark from before 2010 that only runs on Intel processors.
 
Joined
Jul 11, 2015
Messages
271 (0.14/day)
System Name Harm's Rig's
Processor 5800X /2700x / AMD 8370e 4500
Motherboard Asus Prime x470 Pro / Msi GD80 990fxa
Cooling Enermax LIQMAX III ARGB 360 AIO/ Zalman cooler fan 110mm
Memory TRIDENT Z F-43600V15D-16GTZ /G.SKILL DDR4 3333CL14 FASTEST PRESET 32GB /EVGA 16Gb 2400 DDR3
Video Card(s) 1080 Ti / 290x/290a cfx
Storage 1 Sabrent Rocket NVMe 512GB / 1 SSD 250GB / 1 HHD 3 TB
Display(s) 40"TV / 24" Asus
Case TT 37 VIEW 200MM'S/ NZXT Tempest custom
Audio Device(s) Sharp Aquos
Power Supply EVGA 1300G2/Corsair w750
Mouse G502
Keyboard G413
One run, neck and neck.
 

Attachments

Joined
May 12, 2017
Messages
1,108 (0.85/day)
3950x. ..Cinebench multi-thread score 3932. Err, the score almost matches the processor part number.
 

DonKnotts

New Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2018
Messages
12 (0.02/day)
That's what is currently still stopping me from comfortably jumping on the Ryzen platform. I don't want to spend too much time on tweaking memory or many other settings that apparently is very useful for getting the best performance and sometimes even basic stability from Ryzen cpus. Intel seems like a much lower maintenance with easy xmp enabling and very basic approach to OC (if you're going the OC route).
You're staying with Intel because of something you would not even have to do if you didn't want to, and if you did want to, you only had to do once in less than an hours time? I'm sorry, I just understand that logic at all.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
3,190 (0.55/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
Comparing a 10-core Intel CPU to a 16-core AMD one is somewhat unfair, methinks. Pity ASUS didn't bother to actually be useful and compare to the closer 3900X instead.

That's what is currently still stopping me from comfortably jumping on the Ryzen platform. I don't want to spend too much time on tweaking memory or many other settings that apparently is very useful for getting the best performance and sometimes even basic stability from Ryzen cpus. Intel seems like a much lower maintenance with easy xmp enabling and very basic approach to OC (if you're going the OC route).
I built a system in December 2019 using a Ryzen 3600X, 2x 16GB DDR4-3000, and an X370 motherboard. I didn't have to tweak anything. I have had zero blue screens or other stability issues with it. And I am extremely impressed with the performance. The only tweaking I did was to overclock the memory to DDR-3200 and that was utterly painless. You don't need to mess around with manual overclocking on Ryzen, just enable PBO and the chip does it for you.

You're missing out.
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
902 (0.17/day)
Those charts are wrong, both of them. Assuming the numbers are right.

Single core is obviously wrong, but so is the multi core. The 9900K bar should be closer to half the length of the 3950X bar.

I adjusted it ugly style, correct me if I'm wrong here.
1588241852741.png
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
1,750 (2.68/day)
System Name PowerEdge R730 DRS Cluster
Processor 4x Xeon E5-2698 v3
Cooling Many heckin screamy bois
Memory 480GB ECC DDR4-2133
Video Card(s) Matrox G200eR2
Storage SD Card. Yep, really no other local storage.
Display(s) It's probably a couple of boring Dell Ultrasharps and a sacrificial laptop.
Case 39U 6-rack server room with HEVC and 44KVA UPS
Mouse Maybe
Keyboard Yes!
Software ESXi 6.5 U3
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
GOSH WOW, If you take a 7 year old single-threaded test that was optimised with Intel compilers and doesn't stress the limited cache sizes of Skylake++++++++++, 5.3GHz is more than 4.7GHz. Whaddayaknow!

Those charts are wrong, both of them. Assuming the numbers are right.

Single core is obviously wrong, but so is the multi core. The 9900K bar should be closer to half the length of the 3950X bar.
"When you can't win a fair fight, fight dirty."
- Intel Corporation
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
3,120 (2.44/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD TR4 1920X
Motherboard MSI X399 SLI Plus
Cooling Alphacool Eisbaer 420 x2 Noctua XPX Pro TR4 block
Memory Gskill RIpjaws 4 3000MHZ 48GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Vega 64 Nitro, Gigabyte Vega 64 Gaming OC
Storage 6 x NVME 480 GB, 2 x SSD 2TB, 5TB HDD, 2 TB HDD, 2x 2TB SSHD
Display(s) Acer 49BQ0k 4K monitor
Case Thermaltake Core X9
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1200!
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 24955 Time Spy: 13500
That's what is currently still stopping me from comfortably jumping on the Ryzen platform. I don't want to spend too much time on tweaking memory or many other settings that apparently is very useful for getting the best performance and sometimes even basic stability from Ryzen cpus. Intel seems like a much lower maintenance with easy xmp enabling and very basic approach to OC (if you're going the OC route).

Interesting how people look at Ryzen performance as necessary to tweak to work nicely but I can tell you as an AMD system builder that the only issue with Ryzen was some 1st gen memory issues. Today even the the Athlon 3000G fully supports DDR4 3600. Even though the Intel CPUs (10th gen of the same node) OC better there really is no need to OC Ryzen either as the that AMD has built these to factory OC anyway. If you want to talk about stability Zen is pretty stable and has a ton of next gen features that you just cannot get from Intel.
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
10,203 (4.57/day)
Location
Sunshine Coast
System Name Black Box
Processor Intel i5-9600KF
Motherboard NZXT N7 Z370 Black
Cooling Cooler Master 240 RGB AIO / Stock
Memory Thermaltake Toughram 16GB 4400MHz DDR4 or Gigabyte 16GB 3600MHz DDR4 or Adata 8GB 2133Mhz DDR4
Video Card(s) Asus Dual 1060 6GB
Storage Kingston A2000 512Gb NVME
Display(s) AOC 24" Freesync 1m.s. 75Hz
Case Corsair 450D High Air Flow.
Audio Device(s) No need.
Power Supply FSP Aurum 650W
Mouse Yes
Keyboard Of course
Software W10 Pro 64 bit
"marketing slide "
Says it all really.
 
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
6,920 (2.21/day)
Location
Ovronnaz, Wallis, Switzerland
System Name Monster Panzer Max [MPM]/Nostalg33k/Huawei Mediapad M5/Xiaomi Mi Box S/TCL 10 Pro
Processor i5-6600K 3.9/E8500/Kirin960 4xA73/4xA53 /S905X 4X1.5 A53/Snapdragon 675
Motherboard Gigabyte Z170X Gaming 7/XFX 650i Ultra/uh?/uh?/uh?
Cooling Corsair H115i /Alphacool Eisberg /aluminum heatsink/Aluminum heatsink/Heatpipe
Memory 4x4gb HyperX Predator 2800 CL14/2gb DDR2 800/4gb LPDDR4/2gb LPDDR3/6gb LPDDR4X dual channel
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1070 ARMOR 8gb OC/Asus 8800 Ultra/Mali G71MP8/Mali 450MP5/Adreno 612
Storage 120gb VertexIII,1tb/8gb SSHD,2x1tb,NVMe 512gb,ext1tb P1+Arion/none/32gb+256gb/8gb/128gbUFS 2.1+256gb
Display(s) X58222 32"5ms OC 75hz 2880x1620/8.4" 2560x1600/273E3LHSB 27"1ms 1920x1080/~4" 480x800/6.4 inch FHD+
Case Cougar Panzer Max/none/Aluminum and tempered glass/None/alu frame +back/front glass GG5
Audio Device(s) Fiio Q1 Mark II+Logitec Z333/SB Audigy2 Platinum/AK4376+Harman Kardon speaker/HDMI/Fiio Fa1
Power Supply Seasonic M12II Evo 750 /Enermax Coolergiant 480/12v 1.5A/J5 Create QC3.0 9-12V 1.96A
Mouse Speedlink Sovos Vertical-Asus ROG Spatha-Logitech MX Ergo/touch/Xiaomi XMRM-006/touch
Keyboard GMMK TKL+Gateron Red+white keys/touch/none/touch
Software Win10 64/none/Android 5.1.1 custom/Android TV 8.1/Android 9.1.0
Benchmark Scores bench...mark? i do leave mark on bench sometime, to remember which one is the most comfortable. :o
wait for 4XXX .... 3XXX is not the concurrent of the 10XXX series ... :p (yeah i know ... that's a lot of X ... not a X rated i hope ... )
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2018
Messages
69 (0.07/day)
Processor i7 2600
Motherboard ASUS H67 rev. B3
Cooling EVO 212
Memory Kingston 8GB
Video Card(s) MSi 7870 GHz Edt.
Storage EVO 850 250GB + WD Black 1TB
Display(s) Dell U2412M
Case ASUS Essentio CG8250
Power Supply Delta 550W
Mouse Logitech
Keyboard Logitech
Software Windows 7
I would like to see R11.5 results with huge yellow and orange graphs spanning across A0 landscape mode.
 
Joined
Nov 6, 2016
Messages
615 (0.41/day)
Location
NJ, USA
System Name Lightbringer
Processor Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix X470-F Gaming
Cooling Enermax Liqmax Iii 360mm AIO
Memory G.Skill Trident Z RGB 32GB (8GBx4) 3200Mhz CL 14
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 5700XT Nitro+
Storage Hp EX950 2TB NVMe M.2, HP EX950 1TB NVMe M.2, Samsung 860 EVO 2TB
Display(s) LG 34BK95U-W 34" 5120 x 2160
Case Lian Li PC-O11 Dynamic (White)
Power Supply BeQuiet Straight Power 11 850w Gold Rated PSU
Mouse Glorious Model O (Matte White)
Keyboard Royal Kludge RK71
Software Windows 10
That's what is currently still stopping me from comfortably jumping on the Ryzen platform. I don't want to spend too much time on tweaking memory or many other settings that apparently is very useful for getting the best performance and sometimes even basic stability from Ryzen cpus. Intel seems like a much lower maintenance with easy xmp enabling and very basic approach to OC (if you're going the OC route).
That's ridiculous, and in all honesty, I'd be willing to be that isn't your real reason, just your pretext. On my 2700x/X470 system, when I first built it, I got into all that tweaking, I was able to push my 2700x to 4.4Ghz all core at only 1.3125v, did the RAM timings calculator, etc etc etc and you know what, I didn't notice a single difference in my daily use, in the way my games played or how quickly my videos rendered, so I said screw it, just left the PBO on, and again, didn't notice any degradation in performance.

While tweaking can be fun, I truly believe that it's a placebo effect that can only be seen in a benchmark,, in other words, I'm sure all that tweaking only gains 1%-2% performance which isn't even perceived by a human being... What I'm saying is, staying away from a better platform because you're worried about having to put in some time to accomplish a 1% performance increase that isn't even noticeable is ridiculous.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
13,870 (6.11/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor i7 8700k 4.7Ghz @ 1.26v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (34'' 3440x1440x)
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
Its a wink to the last bastion Intel has for MSDT... high refresh rate gaming. Most notably, high refresh rate games that rely heavily on ST.

4%. Not much left of that bastion :) Its nearly margin of error territory and definitely not anything noteworthy any more.
 
Joined
Jul 11, 2015
Messages
271 (0.14/day)
System Name Harm's Rig's
Processor 5800X /2700x / AMD 8370e 4500
Motherboard Asus Prime x470 Pro / Msi GD80 990fxa
Cooling Enermax LIQMAX III ARGB 360 AIO/ Zalman cooler fan 110mm
Memory TRIDENT Z F-43600V15D-16GTZ /G.SKILL DDR4 3333CL14 FASTEST PRESET 32GB /EVGA 16Gb 2400 DDR3
Video Card(s) 1080 Ti / 290x/290a cfx
Storage 1 Sabrent Rocket NVMe 512GB / 1 SSD 250GB / 1 HHD 3 TB
Display(s) 40"TV / 24" Asus
Case TT 37 VIEW 200MM'S/ NZXT Tempest custom
Audio Device(s) Sharp Aquos
Power Supply EVGA 1300G2/Corsair w750
Mouse G502
Keyboard G413
I have a 2700x and x470, as well , but 1.3125v at 4.4 all cores, have to see that please.
 
Top