• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Corsair Neutron GTX 240 GB

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
20,641 (3.50/day)
Processor Core i7-4790K
Memory 16 GB
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 7
Corsair's Neutron GTX SSD uses a new Link A Media SSD controller, which is a great addition to a market that's full of SandForce and Marvell drives. The SSD performs very well in our real-life testing, we also added a new MySQL Enterprise benchmark to the test suite.

Show full review
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 21, 2008
Messages
4,092 (0.92/day)
Location
Iowa, USA
System Name FUTURE CUBE!
Processor intel Core i5 6600k
Motherboard Gigabyte Z170X-Gaming 7
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC14PE BK
Memory G.Skill TridentZ 3000 Mhz C15 32GB 2x16GB
Video Card(s) Gigabyte Aorus 1080 Ti
Storage 2x M.2 Samsung Evo 250GB/500GB / WD Blue 500GB / 2x RAID1 Toshiba P300 3TB
Display(s) Samsung C24FG70 1080p 144hz Quantum Dot/ASUS VH226H 1080p 21.5"
Case "THE CUBE" Custom built, pure Red Alder wood
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Core3D/ Logitech Z-2300 200 watts/ Beyerdynamic DT 880
Power Supply Seasonic X Gold 650W
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Logitech G910
Software Windows 10 Pro
Meh not very good drive. The all new Sammy 840 PRO rocks!

I can't believe that at Raid 0 it only gets 105%
 

Completely Bonkers

New Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
2,576 (0.53/day)
Processor Mysterious Engineering Prototype
Motherboard Intel 865
Cooling Custom block made in workshop
Memory Corsair XMS 2GB
Video Card(s) FireGL X3-256
Display(s) 1600x1200 SyncMaster x 2 = 3200x1200
Software Windows 2003
"GTX". Does the marketing genius that thought up this original name think they deserve a bonus or a severance cheque?
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
17,816 (4.63/day)
Did I miss the synthetic tests? Where is ATTO? CDM? AS SSD? Obviously that isnt the entire story, more like a small piece, but still...

I had to have missed it?
 
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
889 (0.30/day)
Location
US
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard AsRock X370 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H60 Liquid Cooling
Memory 16 GB CORSAIR Vengeance LPX 3000 Mhz (Running at 2933)
Video Card(s) EVGA FTW2 GTX 1070Ti
Storage 740GB of SSDs, 7 TB's of HDDs
Display(s) LG 27UD58P-B 27” IPS 4K
Case Phanteks Enthos Pro M
Audio Device(s) Integrated
Power Supply EVGA 750 P2
Mouse Mionix Naos 8200
Keyboard G Skill Ripjaws RGB Mechanical Keyboard
Software Windows 10 Pro
If the $/GB was like $0.74 then I would consider this. OCZ may have higher failure rates, but they have the price
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
20,641 (3.50/day)
Processor Core i7-4790K
Memory 16 GB
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 7
Did I miss the synthetic tests? Where is ATTO? CDM? AS SSD? Obviously that isnt the entire story, more like a small piece, but still...

I had to have missed it?
We don't do synthetics in our benchmarks. Check any other random review site for those. I think real life performance testing with real applications, not traces, will give you a more realistic idea what to expect. Infinitely fast storage will not give you zero application runtime. Do you buy a graphics card based on the fillrate testing? :)

I am debating adding some synthetic testing to our next SSD bench suite, but the results will not be part of the performance rating. Also always looking for feedback on what additional tests we could add. I find it kinda difficult to identify programs nowadays that really need tons of IO, other than what we already have
 
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
5,945 (1.80/day)
Processor Ryzen 3900x
Motherboard Asus Tuf Gaming x570-plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen 5 Rev B with push pull fans
Memory Corsair 4x8gb 3600mhz Cas 16
Video Card(s) EVGA 1060 3gb
Storage Adata SX8200 1tb
Display(s) Asus 144hz
Power Supply Cougar 850w
Software Windows 10 64 Bit
Check any other random review site for those. I think real life performance testing with real applications, not traces, will give you a more realistic idea what to expect. Infinitely fast storage will not give you zero application runtime. Do you buy a graphics card based on the fillrate testing? :)
Why tpu rocks :lovetpu:
 
Joined
Nov 18, 2011
Messages
243 (0.08/day)
Very odd the drive is performing so middle ground here, read about four other reviews showing these things absolutely destroying in latencies for sure, as well as read/writes were right up there with the Vertex, and the Raid 0 absolutely destroyed. I suppose for some reason it isn't translating as well on these benches.
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
20,641 (3.50/day)
Processor Core i7-4790K
Memory 16 GB
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 7
Very odd the drive is performing so middle ground here, read about four other reviews showing these things absolutely destroying in latencies for sure, as well as read/writes were right up there with the Vertex, and the Raid 0 absolutely destroyed. I suppose for some reason it isn't translating as well on these benches.
i assume those other reviews were using synthetic benchmarks or traces only?
 
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
274 (0.08/day)
Location
Unknown
System Name ASAS
Processor Intel Core i5 2500K @ 4.2 GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-Z68A-D3-B3
Cooling Scythe Ashura
Memory Patriot 2x4GB DDR3 1600MHz 9-9-9-24 T1 @ 1.5V
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce GTX 770 2GB Gaming
Storage Samsung 830 256GB + Samsung Spinpoint T133 HD400LJ 400GB
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster EX1920
Case Bitfenix Ghost
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC889
Power Supply Seasonic S12II-620 Bronze 620W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit SP1
We don't do synthetics in our benchmarks. Check any other random review site for those. I think real life performance testing with real applications, not traces, will give you a more realistic idea what to expect. Infinitely fast storage will not give you zero application runtime. Do you buy a graphics card based on the fillrate testing? :)

I am debating adding some synthetic testing to our next SSD bench suite, but the results will not be part of the performance rating. Also always looking for feedback on what additional tests we could add. I find it kinda difficult to identify programs nowadays that really need tons of IO, other than what we already have
That's what I wanted to suggest.

Having AS SSD and CDM (both compressible and incompressible) results wouldn't hurt. They can show what to expect when dealing with certain type of data. Also can be used to challenge manufacturer's specifications.

:toast:
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
17,816 (4.63/day)
We don't do synthetics in our benchmarks. Check any other random review site for those. I think real life performance testing with real applications, not traces, will give you a more realistic idea what to expect. Infinitely fast storage will not give you zero application runtime. Do you buy a graphics card based on the fillrate testing? :)

I am debating adding some synthetic testing to our next SSD bench suite, but the results will not be part of the performance rating. Also always looking for feedback on what additional tests we could add. I find it kinda difficult to identify programs nowadays that really need tons of IO, other than what we already have
No but a GPU's rated specs arent based off of fill rates, however like an SSD's specs are based off of ATTO results. You also run synthetic benchmarks on GPU's...last I checked I dont play 3DMark11... same concept here Wizz. Just adds another face to an already good testing suite.

Wouldnt it be nice to reach the specs they list if only for giggles? :toast:

As far as suggestions, ATTO, AS SSD, CDM, plus IOMeter (you can customize the load in IOMeter...).
 
Last edited:

washd123

New Member
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
50 (0.02/day)
why do you put "needs SATA III to perform the best" as a con? That's more of an issue with the interface itself not the drive. Also even if it does need it to perform the best, is the performance of SATA II that bad? I don't get how it's a con
 

N!ck

New Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2012
Messages
2 (0.00/day)
IMHO TPU SSD tests are the best :nutkick: because they don't include useless synthetic tests, real Aps FTW! Raid test are also nice - cause a lot of people raid small ssd's.
 

MxPhenom 216

ASIC Engineer
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
12,262 (3.40/day)
Location
Longmont, CO
System Name The Battlestation
Processor Intel Core i7 8700k @ 4.8GHz 1.28v
Motherboard MSi Z370 Gaming Pro Carbon AC
Cooling EK Supremacy w/ EK Coolstream PE360 & 6x Corsair LL120s
Memory Corsair Vengeance Pro RGB 32GB 3200 14-14-14-34
Video Card(s) MSi GTX1070 Gaming X 8GB @ 2GHz
Storage Samung 970 EVO 250GB (OS), Samsung 970 EVO 1TB (Games)
Display(s) Dell S3220DGF 32" 1440p Freesync 2 (G-Sync) HDR 165Hz | 2x Asus VP249QGR 144Hz IPS
Case Lian Li PC-011D
Audio Device(s) MSi Gaming AudioBoost ALC1220 w/ Sennheiser Game Ones
Power Supply Seasonic Flagship Prime Ultra Platinum 850
Mouse Razer Viper
Keyboard Razer Huntsman Elite
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit
IDK why people are hating on these drives. These and the non GTX drives are great. Reliable and fast. And don't use sand force, thank god.

why do you put "needs SATA III to perform the best" as a con? That's more of an issue with the interface itself not the drive. Also even if it does need it to perform the best, is the performance of SATA II that bad? I don't get how it's a con
He has put that for every drive he has reviewed. Its a stand procedure. And its true, it needs SATA III to perform the best.
 

Kreij

Senior Monkey Moderator
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
13,817 (2.82/day)
Location
Cheeseland (Wisconsin, USA)
I find it kinda difficult to identify programs nowadays that really need tons of IO, other than what we already have
Since most programs do not require tons of IO, adding non-mainstream programs that are IO heavy would be kind of superfluous and the same as synthetics, no?

Unless you want to try to simulate high use server load (ie. database, VM, RDS) I don't really see the need.

Just my 2 cents.
 
Top