• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

crossfire 2x6970 or 1 7970?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
3,145 (0.69/day)
Processor 8700k Intel
Motherboard z370 MSI Godlike Gaming
Cooling Triple Aquacomputer AMS Copper 840 with D5
Memory TridentZ RGB G.Skill C16 3600MHz
Video Card(s) GTX 1080 Ti
Storage Crucial MX SSDs
Display(s) Dell U3011 2560x1600 + Dell 2408WFP 1200x1920 (Portrait)
Case Core P5 Thermaltake
Audio Device(s) Essence STX
Power Supply AX 1500i
Mouse Logitech
Keyboard Corsair
Software Win10
I have had quite a few headaches with Quad-fire, especially on Skyrim and now that profiles are out only 2 cards out of 4 are used.
I know that 4 GPUs are not 2 GPUs and support is not so covered because there aren't so many systems with such many GPUs but still, I'd rather pick a single GPU that could match 6990 CFX any day.
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2009
Messages
620 (0.11/day)
Location
Michigan, USA
System Name Black Box
Processor Intel i7 3770K
Motherboard AsRock z77 Extreme 6
Cooling Thermalright Venemous X
Memory 2 x 8GB Crucial Ballistix
Video Card(s) 2 x GTX 480
Storage A-Data 128GB SSD, Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB
Display(s) HANNspree 25" 1080p 2ms
Case Lian Li PC-9F
Audio Device(s) Creative XFI
Power Supply PC Power & Cooling Silencer MKII 750w
Software Win 7 pro x64
I have had quite a few headaches with Quad-fire, especially on Skyrim and now that profiles are out only 2 cards out of 4 are used.
I know that 4 GPUs are not 2 GPUs and support is not so covered because there aren't so many systems with such many GPUs but still, I'd rather pick a single GPU that could match 6990 CFX any day.

Well I can see what you mean. That's the main reason I've always stayed away from dual GPU cards. There always seems to be issues with them. And it didn't matter whether it was Nvidia or ATi, whether it's the 9800GX2, GTX 590, 4870x2, 5970 or the 6990. Typically it seems to be microstuttering issues. And occasionally lack of SLI or CF profile. Although it seems as though ATi is getting their act together more so than Nvidia in this regard. The 5970 and the 6990's didn't seem to have as many issues as cards past.

Regardless, CF 6970's will beat a 7970, and considering the cost, to me it's a no brainer especially if you already have one. I mean, why pay more for less performance? :confused:
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
43,585 (6.74/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard ASUS TUF x670e
Cooling EK AIO 360. Phantek T30 fans.
Memory 32GB G.Skill 6000Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus RTX 4090
Storage WD m.2
Display(s) LG C2 Evo OLED 42"
Case Lian Li PC 011 Dynamic Evo
Audio Device(s) Topping E70 DAC, SMSL SP200 Headphone Amp.
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti PRO 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk V3 Pro
Keyboard Tester84
Software Windows 11

Skyrim, Rage, BF3

I've been using CrossFire for every generation (excl. 2900) since the x1900 series. There are some games where CrossFire fails and you're using a wasted card. Many newer games don't utilize CrossFire very well. When it does work, it works beautifully but that just isn't always the case. AMD drivers aren't bad, they just don't work with everything when it comes to CrossFire. After using Crossfired 6950's, with the latest batch of games to come out, there's no way I would recommend doing it. A single, more powerful card in this case is definitely the better option.
 
Joined
Oct 19, 2008
Messages
3,159 (0.56/day)
System Name White Theme
Processor Intel 12700K CPU
Motherboard ASUS STRIX Z690-A D4
Cooling Lian Li Galahad Uni w/ AL120 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3200 Corsair Vengeance
Video Card(s) Gigabyte Aero 4080 Super 16GB
Storage 2TB Samsung 980 Pro PCIE 4.0
Display(s) Alienware 38" 3840x1600 (165Hz)
Case Lian Li O11 Dynamic EVO White
Audio Device(s) 2i2 Scarlett Solo + Schiit Magni 3 AMP
Power Supply Corsair HX 1000 Platinum
Skyrim, Rage, BF3

I've been using CrossFire for every generation (excl. 2900) since the x1900 series. There are some games where CrossFire fails and you're using a wasted card. Many newer games don't utilize CrossFire very well. When it does work, it works beautifully but that just isn't always the case. AMD drivers aren't bad, they just don't work with everything when it comes to CrossFire. After using Crossfired 6950's, with the latest batch of games to come out, there's no way I would recommend doing it. A single, more powerful card in this case is definitely the better option.

Agreed, Rage still seems to be broken for me on my 2x 6950's and it definitely was no fun waiting 2-4 weeks if I remember correctly waiting for a crossfire driver for a single player game meaning I'd have definitely almost finished the game once the profiles have come out. It is a big suck and hoping AMD can do better with launching these damn drivers at launch but for now a single 7970 looks like the way to go if you got money to spend.
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2009
Messages
620 (0.11/day)
Location
Michigan, USA
System Name Black Box
Processor Intel i7 3770K
Motherboard AsRock z77 Extreme 6
Cooling Thermalright Venemous X
Memory 2 x 8GB Crucial Ballistix
Video Card(s) 2 x GTX 480
Storage A-Data 128GB SSD, Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB
Display(s) HANNspree 25" 1080p 2ms
Case Lian Li PC-9F
Audio Device(s) Creative XFI
Power Supply PC Power & Cooling Silencer MKII 750w
Software Win 7 pro x64
Skyrim, Rage, BF3

I've been using CrossFire for every generation (excl. 2900) since the x1900 series. There are some games where CrossFire fails and you're using a wasted card. Many newer games don't utilize CrossFire very well. When it does work, it works beautifully but that just isn't always the case. AMD drivers aren't bad, they just don't work with everything when it comes to CrossFire. After using Crossfired 6950's, with the latest batch of games to come out, there's no way I would recommend doing it. A single, more powerful card in this case is definitely the better option.

And all three of those games just have issues in general, even with single card solutions let alone multi-GPU's.

Rage is a horribly broken game that no matter what GPU you have will look and play like crap.

Skyrim's horrible optimization and lack of proper compiling has caused major problems even with the most powerful gpus' out.

Same is the story with BF3. Everything was mostly ok right before release, they changed something and had Nvidia and ATi scrambling to "fix" drivers that were never really broken.

It's unfortunate that the only games that you'd actually recommend a 7970 over CF 69xx's are ones that were released horribly broken and, for the most part, still are.
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
43,585 (6.74/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard ASUS TUF x670e
Cooling EK AIO 360. Phantek T30 fans.
Memory 32GB G.Skill 6000Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus RTX 4090
Storage WD m.2
Display(s) LG C2 Evo OLED 42"
Case Lian Li PC 011 Dynamic Evo
Audio Device(s) Topping E70 DAC, SMSL SP200 Headphone Amp.
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti PRO 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk V3 Pro
Keyboard Tester84
Software Windows 11
It's unfortunate that the only games that you'd actually recommend a 7970 over CF 69xx's are ones that were released horribly broken and, for the most part, still are.

No, that's just some of the games. I'll still end up getting another 7970 eventually anyways. All I'm saying is that CrossFire does indeed have issues sometimes and if you're the sort that doesn't mind working through them, sure, go ahead and run CrossFire. Still, a single card experience is much smoother with less problems. That's a fact.
 
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
1,221 (0.25/day)
Location
Canada
System Name Brutus
Processor i5 4690k @4.7Ghz (Watercooled)
Motherboard z97 MSI Gaming 5
Cooling NZXT Kraken x61 AIO watercooler
Memory Gskill Ripjaws 8gb (2x4gb) 1600mhz 7-8-7-24
Video Card(s) MSI Gaming GTX 980ti x2 (sli)
Storage 1 SSD 64GB (OS) + 2x500GB WesternDigital RAID 0
Display(s) YAMAKASI Catleap q270 SE 27inch Glossy 2560x1440
Case NZXT Phantom
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar DX
Power Supply Antec TPQ 1200w
Software Windows 7 (64 bit)
yes but that's today's reality... with the on-going success of consoles, PC games often suffer from improper optimization and Because of that, Yes indeed, single card config means less hassle...

It also means less work for the CPU to deal with... and in my particular case, it also means x16 pci-e bandwith instead of x8...

So my question to you guys is this:

I'm gaming on a 60hz monitor @ 1920x1080, and I always want MAX settings and MAx quality which is why I bought 2x6950 2gb 1 year ago when my friends were saying it was overkill for my setup...

So, do you think trading my 2x6950 for 1 single 7970 is worth it (no matter the cost of the 7970) ??

Does the 7970 beat the 6950 2gb CF? or barely? Now I know, I could search on google about this and prob find some answers, but I'm feeling lazy @ the moment, I've been searching the web like crazy of late (for skyrim mods and fixes...)
 

Outback Bronze

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Aug 3, 2011
Messages
1,868 (0.40/day)
Location
Walkabout Creek
System Name Raptor Baked
Processor 14900k w.c.
Motherboard Z790 Hero
Cooling w.c.
Memory 32GB Hynix
Video Card(s) Zotac 4080 w.c.
Storage 2TB Kingston kc3k
Display(s) Gigabyte 34" Curved
Case Corsair 460X
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply PCIe5 850w
Mouse Asus
Keyboard Corsair
Software Win 11
Benchmark Scores Cool n Quiet.
Im going to say 7970. This is because generally one singe(powerfull) card has a higher minimum frame rate than any multi card setup.
 
Joined
Oct 7, 2006
Messages
1,338 (0.21/day)
Processor e8200 3.93mhz@1.264v
Motherboard P5E3 Pro
Cooling Scythe Infinity
Memory 4gb of G.Skill Ripjaw 6-7-7-18@1404 and 1.62v
Video Card(s) HIS 5770 v2 940/1275mhz stock volts
Storage 1TB Hitachi
Display(s) Acer 22" Widescreen LCD
Case Blue Cooler Master Centurion
Audio Device(s) Onboard audio :(, and Klipsch 5.1 Pro Media's
Power Supply 650 Watt BFG
Software Vista 64 Ultimate
To the OP, I would say 7970 because of power consumption as well as the fact it is fast. When you sell the 6970 and put that to the price of a 7970 vs. a second 6970 you are going to be out ~the same money. You are also going to take some strain off the power supply.
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
4,054 (0.58/day)
Location
Ancient Greece, Acropolis (Time Lord)
System Name RiseZEN Gaming PC
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X @ Auto
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix X570-E Gaming ATX Motherboard
Cooling Corsair H115i Elite Capellix AIO, 280mm Radiator, Dual RGB 140mm ML Series PWM Fans
Memory G.Skill TridentZ 64GB (4 x 16GB) DDR4 3200
Video Card(s) ASUS DUAL RX 6700 XT DUAL-RX6700XT-12G
Storage Corsair Force MP500 480GB M.2 & MP510 480GB M.2 - 2 x WD_BLACK 1TB SN850X NVMe 1TB
Display(s) ASUS ROG Strix 34” XG349C 180Hz 1440p + Asus ROG 27" MG278Q 144Hz WQHD 1440p
Case Corsair Obsidian Series 450D Gaming Case
Audio Device(s) SteelSeries 5Hv2 w/ Sound Blaster Z SE
Power Supply Corsair RM750x Power Supply
Mouse Razer Death-Adder + Viper 8K HZ Ambidextrous Gaming Mouse - Ergonomic Left Hand Edition
Keyboard Logitech G910 Orion Spectrum RGB Gaming Keyboard
Software Windows 11 Pro - 64-Bit Edition
Benchmark Scores I'm the Doctor, Doctor Who. The Definition of Gaming is PC Gaming...
Thoughts?
If you already have a HD 6970, then I would go with another for Crossfire, but if you don't have a HD 6970, then the HD 7970 is by far the better choice. :)
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
43,585 (6.74/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard ASUS TUF x670e
Cooling EK AIO 360. Phantek T30 fans.
Memory 32GB G.Skill 6000Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus RTX 4090
Storage WD m.2
Display(s) LG C2 Evo OLED 42"
Case Lian Li PC 011 Dynamic Evo
Audio Device(s) Topping E70 DAC, SMSL SP200 Headphone Amp.
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti PRO 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk V3 Pro
Keyboard Tester84
Software Windows 11
I could search on google about this and prob find some answers, but I'm feeling lazy @ the moment, I've been searching the web like crazy of late (for skyrim mods and fixes...)

Don't even need google. Check TPU's review section.
 
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Messages
470 (0.10/day)
Location
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
System Name Dell Studio XPS 8100 / Current PC
Processor Intel Core i5-750 @ 2.66 GHz / i5-3570K @ 3.4 GHz
Motherboard Dell Stock H55 / ASUS P8Z77-VLK
Cooling Stock
Memory Hynix 8GB DDR3-1333 / Kingston HyperX Blu Black 8 GB DDR3-1600
Video Card(s) MSI Radeon HD 7770 / EVGA GTX 560 Superclocked
Storage 1TB Western Digital Caviar Black / 128 GB Crucial m4 + 2TB Seagate Barracuda
Display(s) Samsung 19'' LCD / Dell 24'' LCD
Case Dell Studio XPS 8100 / Bitfenix Merc Alpha
Audio Device(s) Realtek Integrated
Power Supply Dell Stock 350W / OCZ ModXStream 700W
Benchmark Scores Dell Keyboard + Dell Mouse / Azio Levetron Clicker + Razer Lachesis
I'm thinking that you should get on 7970, and if for any reason, you feel like getting another (perhaps to lack of performance, haha), you have a chance.
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2009
Messages
620 (0.11/day)
Location
Michigan, USA
System Name Black Box
Processor Intel i7 3770K
Motherboard AsRock z77 Extreme 6
Cooling Thermalright Venemous X
Memory 2 x 8GB Crucial Ballistix
Video Card(s) 2 x GTX 480
Storage A-Data 128GB SSD, Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB
Display(s) HANNspree 25" 1080p 2ms
Case Lian Li PC-9F
Audio Device(s) Creative XFI
Power Supply PC Power & Cooling Silencer MKII 750w
Software Win 7 pro x64
No, that's just some of the games. I'll still end up getting another 7970 eventually anyways. All I'm saying is that CrossFire does indeed have issues sometimes and if you're the sort that doesn't mind working through them, sure, go ahead and run CrossFire. Still, a single card experience is much smoother with less problems. That's a fact.

Perhaps for some. I've literally run mutli-GPU setups for 7 years and other than with Nvidia and some 9600's, I've never had an issue with them. Seriously. I've never had to load any special profiles that weren't there or anything of the sort. Quite possibly because the games that didn't support it didn't need to. i.e. the FPS were already so high that it didn't matter.
Quite honestly, I'm rather puzzled that people have so many issues with multi-gpu setups.

That's just my experience and it seems to be different than, I guess, most peoples. Makes me wonder what am I doing differently than they?

yes but that's today's reality... with the on-going success of consoles, PC games often suffer from improper optimization and Because of that, Yes indeed, single card config means less hassle...

It also means less work for the CPU to deal with... and in my particular case, it also means x16 pci-e bandwith instead of x8...

So my question to you guys is this:

I'm gaming on a 60hz monitor @ 1920x1080, and I always want MAX settings and MAx quality which is why I bought 2x6950 2gb 1 year ago when my friends were saying it was overkill for my setup...

So, do you think trading my 2x6950 for 1 single 7970 is worth it (no matter the cost of the 7970) ??

Does the 7970 beat the 6950 2gb CF? or barely? Now I know, I could search on google about this and prob find some answers, but I'm feeling lazy @ the moment, I've been searching the web like crazy of late (for skyrim mods and fixes...)
The PCIe x8 lane bandwidth is not even a concern. There's still plenty of bandwidth there to keep your CPU fed to it's limit.

Your friend is right, 2 6950's is overkill really. Since your monitor is only 60Hz, there's really no point in running your GPUs' above that. Anytime you exceed the refresh rate, you're liable to get screen tearing (a lot of people mistake this for micro-stutter). Personally, I can't stand screen tearing so I enable Vsync in almost every game I play.
Some people will say that Vsync causes input lag, and indeed on some older games it does. Especially source based games such as CSS, DoD, TF2, etc. However, I personally haven't experienced input lag on most other games that I have, and I have quite a few (~140 on steam alone).
Input lag is typically only experienced on older game engines.

At any rate, if you already have 2 x 6950's, getting a 7970 would be a small improvement over your current configuration, not to mention, you'd be lucky to even get $440 for both cards, and that's only if they're reference and unlock. I don't think an additional $110 for a minimum increase is worth it.

To the OP, I would say 7970 because of power consumption as well as the fact it is fast. When you sell the 6970 and put that to the price of a 7970 vs. a second 6970 you are going to be out ~the same money. You are also going to take some strain off the power supply.

That's not true. Since the 7970 came out prices on the 69xx cards have been dropping. 7970's are anywhere from $550 - $600. I bet he could get another 6970 for <$250 and in the same right have better performance in most games.
As for the games mentioned previously, well, support for them will just get better and better so pretty soon that will be a non-issue altogether.
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
17,232 (2.63/day)
Makes me wonder what am I doing differently than they?

You probably haven't been using 2560x1600, or higher resolutions. I got into multi-GPU because I wanted to game at ultra-high resolutions. What a mistake that was. If you've been using the "common" resolutions, like 1680x1050 or 1920x1080(or 1200 back in the day), then sure, my experince using multiple GPUs has been the same as yours...But put those cards into a situation where they should have really been intended for, and it's a different story.


The 5-series cards finally made 2560x1600 a doable gaming resolution, when using two. But you couldn't use AA levels higher than 2x more often than not, without losing that ~60 FPS performance. 6950 improves upon that a bit, but still, isn't good enough, even with two GPUs. Not when you play new games.

From running 4870's, and knowing what the 5-series was generally going to offer, I bought itno Eyefinity, and again, that ~60FPS is not possible without multiple cards, and the 7970's might finally be enough for that. I'll be finding out at some point.


Single monitor @ 1920x1080 or less...you don't need a second card, or an HD7970. HD6970 is fine for any of that, some titles you won't get maximum details, but oh well.

2560x1600? Eyefinity? You'd still need multiple cards, even with HD7970's from what I can see.




So...to properly answer your question...what res are ya running?


;)
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
43,585 (6.74/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard ASUS TUF x670e
Cooling EK AIO 360. Phantek T30 fans.
Memory 32GB G.Skill 6000Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus RTX 4090
Storage WD m.2
Display(s) LG C2 Evo OLED 42"
Case Lian Li PC 011 Dynamic Evo
Audio Device(s) Topping E70 DAC, SMSL SP200 Headphone Amp.
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti PRO 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk V3 Pro
Keyboard Tester84
Software Windows 11
Perhaps for some. I've literally run mutli-GPU setups for 7 years and other than with Nvidia and some 9600's, I've never had an issue with them. Seriously. I've never had to load any special profiles that weren't there or anything of the sort. Quite possibly because the games that didn't support it didn't need to. i.e. the FPS were already so high that it didn't matter.
Quite honestly, I'm rather puzzled that people have so many issues with multi-gpu setups.

That's just my experience and it seems to be different than, I guess, most peoples. Makes me wonder what am I doing differently than they?

Thing is my experience is the same as yours. I really haven't had any issues either, other than games not being optimized (or the other way around) for CrossFire. You recognize this issue as well, yet you say you don't have any issues ever. So, having troubles with CrossFire on a hardware level, nope no issue. With games (the reason we use video cards in the first place) there can be issues with dual cards over a single card. Hence, why I and so many others have suggested a single card.
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2009
Messages
620 (0.11/day)
Location
Michigan, USA
System Name Black Box
Processor Intel i7 3770K
Motherboard AsRock z77 Extreme 6
Cooling Thermalright Venemous X
Memory 2 x 8GB Crucial Ballistix
Video Card(s) 2 x GTX 480
Storage A-Data 128GB SSD, Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB
Display(s) HANNspree 25" 1080p 2ms
Case Lian Li PC-9F
Audio Device(s) Creative XFI
Power Supply PC Power & Cooling Silencer MKII 750w
Software Win 7 pro x64
You probably haven't been using 2560x1600, or higher resolutions. I got into multi-GPU because I wanted to game at ultra-high resolutions. What a mistake that was. If you've been using the "common" resolutions, like 1680x1050 or 1920x1080(or 1200 back in the day), then sure, my experince using multiple GPUs has been the same as yours...But put those cards into a situation where they should have really been intended for, and it's a different story.


The 5-series cards finally made 2560x1600 a doable gaming resolution, when using two. But you couldn't use AA levels higher than 2x more often than not, without losing that ~60 FPS performance. 6950 improves upon that a bit, but still, isn't good enough, even with two GPUs. Not when you play new games.

From running 4870's, and knowing what the 5-series was generally going to offer, I bought itno Eyefinity, and again, that ~60FPS is not possible without multiple cards, and the 7970's might finally be enough for that. I'll be finding out at some point.


Single monitor @ 1920x1080 or less...you don't need a second card, or an HD7970. HD6970 is fine for any of that, some titles you won't get maximum details, but oh well.

2560x1600? Eyefinity? You'd still need multiple cards, even with HD7970's from what I can see.




So...to properly answer your question...what res are ya running?


;)


Running 1080p at the moment. :D

But you're right, I haven't gone to a higher resolution. My next monitor will be a 120Hz 27" Samsung with a much higher resolution and 16:10 aspect ratio. But I just couldn't pass up the HANNspree that I have now, got a SMOKIN deal on it. :pimp:

However, in the future I may try an eyefinity setup if I can find a monitor that has almost no bezels. Or maybe even try using a projector or something. :D


But all very good points. I read about how the 7-series will be able to use some really odd resolutions and even several monitors of different size. Now that'd be crazy.

Thing is my experience is the same as yours. I really haven't had any issues either, other than games not being optimized (or the other way around) for CrossFire. You recognize this issue as well, yet you say you don't have any issues ever. So, having troubles with CrossFire on a hardware level, nope no issue. With games (the reason we use video cards in the first place) there can be issues with dual cards over a single card. Hence, why I and so many others have suggested a single card.

Good point, but as I mentioned earlier, the games that weren't optimized, at least that I've come across at my resolution, it didn't really matter. My framerates were already well exceeding my monitors refresh rate and that's all that really matter to me.
I mainly use multi-card setups tomax out eyecandy. keep my minimum frame rates higher and spend less time at the minimum. This is something that most reviews don't even touch on --time spent at minimum FPS or time spent below a playable framerate.

Both great points guys. :toast:
 
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
757 (0.14/day)
System Name Lenovo 17IMH05H
Processor Core i7 10750H
Video Card(s) GTX 1660 Ti
Audio Device(s) SSL2
Software Windows 10 Pro 22H2
Benchmark Scores i've got a shitload of them in 15 years of TPU membership
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
757 (0.14/day)
System Name Lenovo 17IMH05H
Processor Core i7 10750H
Video Card(s) GTX 1660 Ti
Audio Device(s) SSL2
Software Windows 10 Pro 22H2
Benchmark Scores i've got a shitload of them in 15 years of TPU membership
Crysis Warhead minimal frames 2560X1600

HD6990: 33.8 FPS
HD7970: 23.5 FPS

Difference: playable VS unplayable. I guess HD7970 is better...........
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
3,145 (0.69/day)
Processor 8700k Intel
Motherboard z370 MSI Godlike Gaming
Cooling Triple Aquacomputer AMS Copper 840 with D5
Memory TridentZ RGB G.Skill C16 3600MHz
Video Card(s) GTX 1080 Ti
Storage Crucial MX SSDs
Display(s) Dell U3011 2560x1600 + Dell 2408WFP 1200x1920 (Portrait)
Case Core P5 Thermaltake
Audio Device(s) Essence STX
Power Supply AX 1500i
Mouse Logitech
Keyboard Corsair
Software Win10
My next monitor will be a 120Hz 27" Samsung with a much higher resolution and 16:10 aspect ratio

They do not exist. Choose either 120Hz or higher resolution like 1200p/1440p or 1600p.
I'd already be running a 120hz 30 incher if it existed

I also agree with Dave, I got this CFX to run multiple 30 inch monitors but with all the CFX issues the scaling after the third GPU is barely noticeable.
I used to get strange CFX usage on GPUs, the 1st and the 4th would end up being used while the other 2 had the clocks stuck in idle and such. Skyrim for example does not use all of my GPUs, only 2.

People should always pick the fastest single GPU and then if it's not enough you'd add another of it, but crossfiring two slower GPUs is vastly inferior to a single faster GPU.
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
17,232 (2.63/day)
Crysis Warhead minimal frames 2560X1600

HD6990: 33.8 FPS
HD7970: 23.5 FPS

Difference: playable VS unplayable. I guess HD7970 is better...........

Actually, you're looking at this the wrong way.

Neither solution is playable @ that FPS, in my opinion. I want 60 FPS MINIMUM @ 2560x1600. BTW, Those numbers may not be accurate 100% to everybody else's results.

7970 does 2/3 of 6990 performance for 1/2 the power. At high resolutions, you'll need multiple 7970's anyway, and there's where the 7970 shows the real benefit. You can run quad 7970 for say 94FPS total, or you can run dual 6990 or quad 6970 for 67.6 FPS, with both solutions using the same power.

Of course, Crossfire scaling isn't linear, but even if you get only 80 FPS with quad 7970, which is more likely(you won't get liner perforamnce with 6990, either), you still get higher performance for less power consumption.

Yes, it costs more. So? Nobody really NEEDS a 7970, so it's priced like the luxury it is.
 
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
773 (0.13/day)
System Name Daedalus | O'Neill | ZPM Hive |
Processor M3 Pro (11/14) | Epyc 7402p | i5 12400F |
Motherboard Apple M3 Pro | SM H11SSL-i | TUF B660M-E D4 |
Cooling Pure Silence | Noctua NH-U12S TR4 | Noctua NH-D14 |
Memory 18GB Unified | 128GB DDR4 | 16GB DDR4 |
Video Card(s) M3 Pro | RTX 4070FE (VM) | ARC A750 LE |
Storage 512GB NVME | ALOT of SSD's | 1TB NVME |
Display(s) 14" 3024x1964 | IPMI | 1440p UW |
Case Macbook Pro 14" | NZXT H510 Flow| BC1 Test Bench |
Audio Device(s) Onboard | None | Onboard |
Power Supply ~ 77w Magsafe | EVGA 750w G3 | HX1000i |
Mouse Razer Basilisk
Keyboard Logitech G915 TKL
Software MacOS Sonoma | Proxmox 8 | Win 11 x64 |
Crysis Warhead minimal frames 2560X1600

HD6990: 33.8 FPS
HD7970: 23.5 FPS

Difference: playable VS unplayable. I guess HD7970 is better...........

Absolute minimums tell us nothing about whether the game is playable or not. At the very least you need to be comparing framerate over time before drawing any conclusions.
 
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
757 (0.14/day)
System Name Lenovo 17IMH05H
Processor Core i7 10750H
Video Card(s) GTX 1660 Ti
Audio Device(s) SSL2
Software Windows 10 Pro 22H2
Benchmark Scores i've got a shitload of them in 15 years of TPU membership
Absolute minimums tell us nothing about whether the game is playable or not. At the very least you need to be comparing framerate over time before drawing any conclusions.

It tells you nothing about it, yes, to all other people, and the staff of many reviewers and benchmarkers it tells the most..
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2008
Messages
3,014 (0.54/day)
Location
Northampton,UK
System Name Jaffakeik
Processor I9 12900K
Motherboard MSI Pro B660M-A WIFI DDR4
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer II High Performance CPU Water cooler- 240mm
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX Black 32GB (2x16GB) 3600
Video Card(s) 7900XTX gigabyte OC edition
Storage WD Black SN770 1TB SSD M.2 2280 NVME x2
Display(s) TV LG C2
Case Phanteks Enthoo Pro 2 Full Tower Case Tempered
Audio Device(s) Mother board + Sennhiser HD650+ Elgato wave xlr + shure SM7B
Power Supply EVGA 1600w G+
Mouse Glorious Model 0
Keyboard Corsair RBG mini K65 + Steelseries Apex150
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores over 9000
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
757 (0.14/day)
System Name Lenovo 17IMH05H
Processor Core i7 10750H
Video Card(s) GTX 1660 Ti
Audio Device(s) SSL2
Software Windows 10 Pro 22H2
Benchmark Scores i've got a shitload of them in 15 years of TPU membership

This is how the thread should have started. Changing from CrossFire HD5850 to HD7970 might result in a small performance boost, but it is worth in every way and recommended.

Changing from CrossFire HD6970 to HD7970 is pure imbecility. The power savings and whatever BS new technologies incorporated in HD7970 do not justify the loss of performance by a huge 50 % amount.

It does not take a genius to figure out that 3000 shaders clocked at 880 MHz are better than 2000 shaders clocked at 925 MHz, as well as memory bandwidth of 352 GB/s is better than 264 GB/s. I am thinking that people voting for HD7970 are just ordinary fools, who have no life and post in forums for no reason, and they do damage to the forums with their insignificant votes without any reasonable arguments.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top