1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Crucial Ballistix Tactical 3000 MHz DDR4 (4x 8 GB)

Discussion in 'Reviews' started by cadaveca, Nov 28, 2016.

  1. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    16,082 (3.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10,182
    Location:
    Beaumont, Alberta
    Crucial released a speed bump to their DDR4 products! Today, we get get to look at their update to the Ballistix Tracer line-up with a maximum speed of 3000 MHz and amazingly decent timings of 15-16-16-35 operating at a voltage of 1.35 V. You may have thought of Crucial as a company that only offers entry-level to mid-grade DDR4 products, but cannot do so any longer!

    To read this review go to: https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Crucial/Ballistix_Tactical_3000/
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 28, 2016
    avatar_raq, HD64G and Folterknecht say thanks.
    10 Year Member at TPU
  2. Folterknecht

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2007
    Messages:
    277 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    185
    Location:
    Where the beer is good
    So what was your OC result @1.35V with them? Stop teasing!!! ;)
     
    cadaveca says thanks.
    10 Year Member at TPU
  3. xkm1948

    xkm1948

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Messages:
    1,701 (0.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    921
    Pretty nice to have DDR4-3000 run on 100BCLK now. BWE has definitely improved IMC both performance and stability. I wish my 5820K can tackle DDR4-3000 with 100BCLK.
     
    cadaveca says thanks.
  4. buildzoid

    buildzoid

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2012
    Messages:
    1,844 (1.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    691
    Location:
    CZ
    How do they OC? I have a 2400 16-16-16-39 kit that does 2800 10-14-13-26-1T on 1.5V but I'd prefer to have something that clocks a little higher for X99
     
    cadaveca says thanks.
  5. TheLostSwede

    TheLostSwede

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,522 (0.33/day)
    Thanks Received:
    589
    Location:
    Formosa
    Got a 2x8GB kit of these a few months ago, been rock solid apart from the fact that my motherboard doesn't like the XMP settings...
    Hopefully the UEFI update I just downloaded will solve that...
     
    cadaveca says thanks.
    10 Year Member at TPU
  6. Farmer Boe

    Farmer Boe

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2011
    Messages:
    81 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    31
    Location:
    Deadmonton
    Dave, you should still post your overclock results as I'm sure lots of people are interested in seeing what you could hit for MHz and timings. Maybe have something like a spoiler tag with a drop down tab so you don't see them by default.

    Regardless, good review and long live Crucial! (Or is it Ballistix now....).
     
    cadaveca says thanks.
  7. xkm1948

    xkm1948

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Messages:
    1,701 (0.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    921
    From my personal experience DDR4 doesn't overclock too well. A lot of the samsung IC chips are very specific binned into different tier of speed and timing. That applies to DDR4-3000 and upwards at least.
     
    cadaveca says thanks.
  8. Breit

    Breit

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2004
    Messages:
    399 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    73
    Doesn't Cinebench R15 always measure the CPU performance and then in single thread and multi thread mode?
    The performance numbers in the review state a GPU score (in points) and a CPU score in FPS. I bet the CPU score should read as multi threaded CPU performance (in points) and the GPU score is actually the CPU single threaded score.
     
    cadaveca says thanks.
    10 Year Member at TPU
  9. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    16,082 (3.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10,182
    Location:
    Beaumont, Alberta
    Uh, no. Cinebench offers a couple of different testing "modes".

    [​IMG]

    I do keep screenshots of all results of all reviews.
     
    phanbuey says thanks.
    10 Year Member at TPU
  10. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    10,660 (2.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4,597
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    So, it still stands true that RAM capacity is more important than RAM speed. The difference between 2400 and 3000 is next to non existent for 90% of scenarios.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  11. Breit

    Breit

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2004
    Messages:
    399 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    73
    OK, thanks for clearing that up. But then again it should not read 'fps' for the CPU tests when it actually is points (or 'cb'), and it should read FPS for the GPU tests, where now it says 'pts'. Or am I missing something here?!

     
    cadaveca says thanks.
    10 Year Member at TPU
  12. EarthDog

    EarthDog

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Messages:
    8,729 (3.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4,335
    Certainly... that is OFN...the last part. The capacity thing depends. I would guess that its memory ranks/banks on the higher capacity chips is the reason you are seeing (negligible) performance gains.

    Open GL tests the GPU, not the CPU. Hence why its in FPS. Ive never looked at it with the same GPU and different CPUs, however, so CPU may come into play. That said, out of 20 threads, one was maxed out during open GL while the others were essentially idle. The GPU was getting loaded (not a lot) in that test. In the CPU test, all 20 threads were used fully while the GPU was idle.
     
    Last edited: Dec 1, 2016
  13. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    10,660 (2.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4,597
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    I mean, deciding between 8GB of ultra fast DDR4 RAM and 16GB of just the most average RAM you can find cheap, going 16GB makes far more sense and it'll benefit you for far longer. Or even if you have to decide between 16GB and 32GB, 32GB would still make more sense, regardless of RAM sticks speed. You only really look at maximum speed when you're benchmarking for bragging and you need to extract every score point you can get.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  14. biffzinker

    biffzinker

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2016
    Messages:
    782 (1.95/day)
    Thanks Received:
    921
    Location:
    Anchorage, Alaska
    Speaking of the increase in RAM capacity (16/32 GB) shouldn't we be making use of ECC by now irregardless of Intel's attempts at artificial product segmentation?
     
  15. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    10,660 (2.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4,597
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    Sure ECC is nice, but is it really necessary for consumers? Or does need for ECC increase with the RAM capacity? I never really paid much attention for it on systems outside "serious business".
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  16. biffzinker

    biffzinker

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2016
    Messages:
    782 (1.95/day)
    Thanks Received:
    921
    Location:
    Anchorage, Alaska
    With today's CPUs for example the i7 6700K to the i3 6100 allowing for up to 64 GB the need for ECC is more important than it was in the past. Of course the i3-6100 does have ECC turned on but the i5 up to the i7 doesn't have ECC, there's a more probable chance the i5/i7 are likely to be populated with above 16 GB.
     
  17. Breit

    Breit

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2004
    Messages:
    399 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    73
    Yeah I get that, but thats my point: The graph says 'fps' for the CPU tests and 'cp' or points for the GPU tests and NOT the other way around.
    I just wanted to make the author aware of a simple typo, nothing more. But that seems far more complicated than I'd expected, obviously.
    Maybe my English isn't good enough to express that in any comprehensible way?!

    o_O
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  18. pokazene_maslo

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2006
    Messages:
    48 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9
    Location:
    Slovakia
    Is this single rank or dual rank memory?
     
    basco says thanks.
    10 Year Member at TPU
  19. basco

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2009
    Messages:
    715 (0.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    376
    Location:
    austria
    would be nice if this would be answered in all reviews of Memory
    TIA
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)