• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Crucial MX100 SSD Specifications Appear Online

Joined
Dec 6, 2011
Messages
4,785 (1.65/day)
Location
Still on the East Side
We're still a few days away from the official unveiling of MX100 solid state drive but thanks to a distributor jumping the gun we already have the full scoop on Crucial's latest creation. As previously revealed, the MX100 is set to be the first SSD equipped with Micron's 16 nm MLC NAND flash memory but not all models will have the 16 nm NAND - the 128 GB drive will pack 20 nm chips, while the 256 GB and 512 GB versions will have 16 nm flash.

All three MX100 drives come in a 7 mm-thick 2.5-inch chassis (a 9.5 mm adapter is included), and have a SATA 6.0 Gbps interface, a Marvell 88SS9189 controller, and are backed by a three-year warranty.





Crucials' SSDs are capable of sequential read speeds of 550 MB/s while write speeds top 150 MB/s, 330 MB/s and 500 MB/s for the 128 GB, 256 GB and 512 GB models, respectively. The current pre-order prices are 70 Euro (128 GB), 95 Euro (256 GB) and 185 Euro (512 GB).



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
299 (0.14/day)
System Name gamingPZ
Processor i7-6700k
Motherboard Asrock Z170M Pro4S
Cooling scythe mugen4
Memory 32GB ddr4 2400mhz crucial ballistix sport lt
Video Card(s) gigabyte GTX 1070 ti
Storage ssd - crucial MX500 1TB
Case silverstone sugo sg10
Power Supply Evga G2 650w
Software win10
So, a 2TB SSD should cost around 500 EUR. That sounds reasonable and i'd buy one.
that is good price, but why the hell you need 2TB SSD?... i need ssd for progs and database (250+ is enough), and HDDs for movies, porns and gamediscs (and 2tb will never be enough)
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (2.50/day)
Because i have a 2TB HDD and it's enough. If i'd go SSD i'd go completelly or i'm not going to. Currently i have 2TB HDD paired with 32GB ReadyCache. Better than having stuff installed on some tiny SSD that i have to shuffle around to use it.
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2014
Messages
469 (0.23/day)
System Name Personal Rig
Processor Intel i5 3570K
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling Noctua NH-U12P Push/Pull
Memory 8GB 1600Mhz Vengeance
Video Card(s) Intel HD4000
Storage Seagate 1TB & 180GB Intel 330
Display(s) AOC I2360P
Case Enermax Vostok
Audio Device(s) Onboard realtek
Power Supply Corsair TX650
Mouse Microsoft OEM 2.0
Keyboard Logitech Internet Pro White
Software Legal ;)
Benchmark Scores Very big
I wonder what endurance 16nm flash has ?

Since 128GB model is still using 20nm flash, im guess it went down..
 
Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Messages
2,013 (0.71/day)
System Name msdos
Processor 8086
Motherboard mainboard
Cooling passive
Memory 640KB + 384KB extended
Video Card(s) EGA
Storage 5.25"
Display(s) 80x25
Case plastic
Audio Device(s) modchip
Power Supply 45 watts
Mouse serial
Keyboard yes
Software disk commander
Benchmark Scores still running
Yah I would love a 2TB SSD. Everything on one drive. I have 3 SSD presently 500+500+1000.
 
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
299 (0.14/day)
System Name gamingPZ
Processor i7-6700k
Motherboard Asrock Z170M Pro4S
Cooling scythe mugen4
Memory 32GB ddr4 2400mhz crucial ballistix sport lt
Video Card(s) gigabyte GTX 1070 ti
Storage ssd - crucial MX500 1TB
Case silverstone sugo sg10
Power Supply Evga G2 650w
Software win10
I guess there is some advantage to store in one huge SSD, without no backup... cuz you do not have to deal with that backup when that SSD passes away ;)
I know my self - and 80% of my terabytes are movies that I never will watch again - it is nonsence for me to spend extra hundreds of $ to save them on SSD (just so I can load them 10 seconds faster - after all - that is a crappy movie that will waste a 1,5hours of my life, so I do not mind those few second for coppying from HDD to SSD, same with a crappy game .iso - it will waste hours of my life till I will get to conclusion: "uninstall that crap.... and never again!!!!" - so also there those few second of coppying over does not count ). for TeraBytes of crap to store HDD still rocks
 
Joined
Mar 30, 2014
Messages
105 (0.05/day)
Location
India
System Name Sony Xperia L
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon MSM8930 @ 1.2 GHz
Memory 1 GB LPDDR2
Video Card(s) Qualcomm Adreno 305
Storage 8 GB inbuilt + 32 GB microSD
Display(s) 4.3" 480*854 TN Display
Power Supply 1750 mAh Li-Ion Battery
Software Android 4.2.2
Who in their right mind would buy the 128 GB model just to save 25 Euros??!!

Edit: The MX100 512 GB performs identically to the 512 GB M550 (except Max 4K Read IOPS, which are just 5,000 lower)... Good job Crucial... You just cannibalized your high end drives...
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Messages
2,013 (0.71/day)
System Name msdos
Processor 8086
Motherboard mainboard
Cooling passive
Memory 640KB + 384KB extended
Video Card(s) EGA
Storage 5.25"
Display(s) 80x25
Case plastic
Audio Device(s) modchip
Power Supply 45 watts
Mouse serial
Keyboard yes
Software disk commander
Benchmark Scores still running
Who in their right mind would buy the 128 GB model just to save 25 Euros??!!

Edit: The MX100 512 GB performs identically to the 512 GB M550 (except Max 4K Read IOPS, which are just 5,000 lower)... Good job Crucial... You just cannibalized your high end drives...
I'm sure AT will show the real story. A couple numbers doesn't really paint the picture.
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
4,681 (1.10/day)
System Name Obelisc
Processor i7 3770k @ 4.8 GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling H110
Memory 16GB(4x4) @ 2400 MHz 9-11-11-31
Video Card(s) GTX 780 Ti
Storage 850 EVO 1TB, 2x 5TB Toshiba
Case T81
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium HD
Power Supply EVGA 850 T2 80+ TITANIUM
Software Win10 64bit
Good job Crucial... You just cannibalized your high end drives...
They cannibalize everyone's high end drives with their prices. Will probably be even worse since no other big name has a 16 nm drive out yet.
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
1,493 (0.46/day)
Location
State College, PA, US
System Name My Surround PC
Processor Intel Core i7 8086K @ 5.1 GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
Cooling Swiftech MCP35X / XSPC Rasa CPU / Swiftech MCW82 / Koolance HX-1320 w/ 4 Corsair Fans
Memory 32GB (2 x 16 GB) Team DDR4-3200 CL16-18-18-38
Video Card(s) MSI Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti Armor 2X
Storage Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB, 2 x 4TB HGST NAS HDD in RAID 1
Display(s) 3 x Acer K272HUL 27" in Surround 7860x1440
Case NZXT Source 530
Audio Device(s) Integrated ALC1220 + Sony MDR-7506 + Logitech Z-5500 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic X-1250 1.25kW
Mouse Patriot Viper V560
Keyboard Logitech G15
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
I wonder what endurance 16nm flash has ?

Since 128GB model is still using 20nm flash, im guess it went down..
More likely the use of 20nm flash is because the 128GB drive is using 64Gb die, and the 64Gb die are only made at 20nm. Remember that the more die you have the faster the SSD since operations can be parallelized (think RAID 0).

I guess Crucial decided that you need a minimum of 16 die for acceptable performance. If you were to use 128Gbit die in a 128GB SSD, that would mean only 8 die and therefore a slow SSD. It's the same as what Crucial did with the M550 to make sure that the low capacity drives still had acceptable performance.

Who in their right mind would buy the 128 GB model just to save 25 Euros??!!
See the point above. They likely have to use 20nm 64Gbit die to maintain acceptable performance in the 128GB drive. In that case, 16 128Gbit chips at 16nm is likely not much more expensive than 16 64Gbit chips at 20nm thus reducing the cost difference between the 128GB and 256GB drives.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
5,294 (1.77/day)
Processor Intel Core i7 3770k @ 4.3GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V LK
Memory 16GB(2x8) DDR3@2133MHz 1.5v Patriot
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce GTX 1080 GAMING X 8G
Storage 59.63GB Samsung SSD 830 + 465.76 GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO + 2TB Hitachi + 300GB Velociraptor HDD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Anker
Software Win 10 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
Writes are crap for a 2014 drive...
 

Fx

Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
1,332 (0.33/day)
Location
Portland, OR
Processor Ryzen 2600x
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix X470-F Gaming
Cooling Noctua
Memory G.SKILL Flare X Series 16GB DDR4 3466
Video Card(s) EVGA 980ti FTW
Storage (OS)Samsung 950 Pro (512GB), (Data) WD Reds
Display(s) 24" Dell UltraSharp U2412M
Case Fractal Design Define R5
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser GAME ONE
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA 650 P2
Mouse Mionix Castor
Keyboard Deck Hassium Pro
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
This is the generation of SSDs that I have been waiting for. The price is extremely doable for SSDs with good performance, reliability, and capacity.
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2010
Messages
83 (0.02/day)
Drive went on sale more than a week ago where I live (at least you could order one...) and its prices are 10% lower than than the new Corsair LX series (size to size).

Waiting for reviews...
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2014
Messages
469 (0.23/day)
System Name Personal Rig
Processor Intel i5 3570K
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling Noctua NH-U12P Push/Pull
Memory 8GB 1600Mhz Vengeance
Video Card(s) Intel HD4000
Storage Seagate 1TB & 180GB Intel 330
Display(s) AOC I2360P
Case Enermax Vostok
Audio Device(s) Onboard realtek
Power Supply Corsair TX650
Mouse Microsoft OEM 2.0
Keyboard Logitech Internet Pro White
Software Legal ;)
Benchmark Scores Very big
More likely the use of 20nm flash is because the 128GB drive is using 64Gb die, and the 64Gb die are only made at 20nm. Remember that the more die you have the faster the SSD since operations can be parallelized (think RAID 0).

I guess Crucial decided that you need a minimum of 16 die for acceptable performance. If you were to use 128Gbit die in a 128GB SSD, that would mean only 8 die and therefore a slow SSD. It's the same as what Crucial did with the M550 to make sure that the low capacity drives still had acceptable performance.



See the point above. They likely have to use 20nm 64Gbit die to maintain acceptable performance in the 128GB drive. In that case, 16 128Gbit chips at 16nm is likely not much more expensive than 16 64Gbit chips at 20nm thus reducing the cost difference between the 128GB and 256GB drives.
Thats can't be true at all, becase m500 120GB is using 128Gbit dies already and already hits ~130MB/s with only 8 dies. So it's kinda pointless to think they would need 16 dies to hit 150MB/s, considering m550 128GB hits 350MB/s with that configration :)
 

rtwjunkie

PC Gaming Enthusiast
Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
12,514 (3.03/day)
Location
Louisiana -Laissez les bons temps rouler!
System Name Bayou Devil
Processor Core i7-4790k 4.4Ghz @ 1.18v
Motherboard ASUS Z97 Deluxe
Cooling All air: 2x140mm Fractal exhaust; 3x 140mm Cougar Intake; Enermax T40F CPU cooler
Memory 2x 8GB Mushkin Redline DDR-3 1866
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080Ti Gaming X
Storage 1x 500 MX500 SSD; 1x 2TB WD Black; 2x 4TB WD Black;1x 2TB WD Green (eSATA)
Display(s) HP 27q 27" IPS @ 2560 x 1440
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Black w/Titanium front -windowed
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic X-850
Mouse Coolermaster Sentinel III
Keyboard Logitech G610 Orion mechanical (Cherry Brown switches)
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (Start10 & Fences 3.0 installed)
Writes are crap for a 2014 drive...
None of Crucial's SSD's (e.g. M4, M500, M550), that I can remember have ever had fast write speeds. They aren't really going for the speed demon award, and so don't compete with the high-speed market. Even with their RAM, Crucial has always been that day in and day out dependable piece of equipment. They've kind of built their hallmark on long term reliability and durability with just above average performance.
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2014
Messages
469 (0.23/day)
System Name Personal Rig
Processor Intel i5 3570K
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling Noctua NH-U12P Push/Pull
Memory 8GB 1600Mhz Vengeance
Video Card(s) Intel HD4000
Storage Seagate 1TB & 180GB Intel 330
Display(s) AOC I2360P
Case Enermax Vostok
Audio Device(s) Onboard realtek
Power Supply Corsair TX650
Mouse Microsoft OEM 2.0
Keyboard Logitech Internet Pro White
Software Legal ;)
Benchmark Scores Very big
Other than 840PRO, m550 has the fastest write speeds on 120/128GB ssd.

You need to understand, that crucial isn't using any nasty tricks like compression or turbowrite (or nCache in case of sandisk). Write speeds on m500 is actually comparable to 840EVO, once you take away turbowrite.

Sandforce drives are league on its own. Their write speeds usually sux aswell, they just look good on paper (due to compression).

And not that write speed matters much anyway. Bulk of workload on client ssds is read anyway.
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2014
Messages
469 (0.23/day)
System Name Personal Rig
Processor Intel i5 3570K
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling Noctua NH-U12P Push/Pull
Memory 8GB 1600Mhz Vengeance
Video Card(s) Intel HD4000
Storage Seagate 1TB & 180GB Intel 330
Display(s) AOC I2360P
Case Enermax Vostok
Audio Device(s) Onboard realtek
Power Supply Corsair TX650
Mouse Microsoft OEM 2.0
Keyboard Logitech Internet Pro White
Software Legal ;)
Benchmark Scores Very big
Joined
Mar 30, 2014
Messages
105 (0.05/day)
Location
India
System Name Sony Xperia L
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon MSM8930 @ 1.2 GHz
Memory 1 GB LPDDR2
Video Card(s) Qualcomm Adreno 305
Storage 8 GB inbuilt + 32 GB microSD
Display(s) 4.3" 480*854 TN Display
Power Supply 1750 mAh Li-Ion Battery
Software Android 4.2.2
More likely the use of 20nm flash is because the 128GB drive is using 64Gb die, and the 64Gb die are only made at 20nm.

I guess Crucial decided that you need a minimum of 16 die for acceptable performance. If you were to use 128Gbit die in a 128GB SSD, that would mean only 8 die and therefore a slow SSD. It's the same as what Crucial did with the M550 to make sure that the low capacity drives still had acceptable performance.

M500 120 GB uses 8 128 Gb die and attains 140 MB/s write speeds.

M550 128 GB uses 16 64 Gb die and attains 300+ MB/s write speeds.

MX100 128 GB attains 150 MB/s write speeds.

Bingo?
 
Joined
Mar 30, 2014
Messages
105 (0.05/day)
Location
India
System Name Sony Xperia L
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon MSM8930 @ 1.2 GHz
Memory 1 GB LPDDR2
Video Card(s) Qualcomm Adreno 305
Storage 8 GB inbuilt + 32 GB microSD
Display(s) 4.3" 480*854 TN Display
Power Supply 1750 mAh Li-Ion Battery
Software Android 4.2.2
Other than 840PRO, m550 has the fastest write speeds on 120/128GB ssd.
Somebody forgot OCZ Vector, Vector 150, Vertex 450, Samsung XP941, Sandisk A110 and Plextor M6e.

And BTW, nCache is only used for storing the drive's firmware. It's not used for boosting write speeds.
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2014
Messages
469 (0.23/day)
System Name Personal Rig
Processor Intel i5 3570K
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling Noctua NH-U12P Push/Pull
Memory 8GB 1600Mhz Vengeance
Video Card(s) Intel HD4000
Storage Seagate 1TB & 180GB Intel 330
Display(s) AOC I2360P
Case Enermax Vostok
Audio Device(s) Onboard realtek
Power Supply Corsair TX650
Mouse Microsoft OEM 2.0
Keyboard Logitech Internet Pro White
Software Legal ;)
Benchmark Scores Very big
Somebody forgot OCZ Vector, Vector 150, Vertex 450, Samsung XP941, Sandisk A110 and Plextor M6e.

And BTW, nCache is only used for storing the drive's firmware. It's not used for boosting write speeds.
All of the OCZs drives used tricks (performance mode), samsung, plextro and sandisk are PCI-E based, so not really a fair comparisment.

And yes, nCache IS used for boosting write speeds. Educate yourself.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6553/sandisk-ultra-plus-ssd-review-256gb

Small file writes are sent to the nCache to keep performance high, and idle time garbage collection likely dumps the nCache out to the much larger MLC array. The nCache was typically used as a way around having to use DRAM for data structure storage, but in the case of the Ultra Plus you get both: nCache + DRAM. I’m not sure there’s enough of an nCache in the Ultra Plus to make a big enough difference to justify the decision in this case.
 
Joined
Mar 30, 2014
Messages
105 (0.05/day)
Location
India
System Name Sony Xperia L
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon MSM8930 @ 1.2 GHz
Memory 1 GB LPDDR2
Video Card(s) Qualcomm Adreno 305
Storage 8 GB inbuilt + 32 GB microSD
Display(s) 4.3" 480*854 TN Display
Power Supply 1750 mAh Li-Ion Battery
Software Android 4.2.2
I’m not sure there’s enough of an nCache in the Ultra Plus to make a big enough difference to justify the decision in this case.
Anand wasn't even sure if the presence of nCache makes a difference. That's just a guess. Gimme proof of nCache making a difference like TurboWrite does.

What proof do you have that OCZ's performance mode makes a difference?? Don't quote Tomshardware because they haven't got a clue what they are talking.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 1, 2014
Messages
469 (0.23/day)
System Name Personal Rig
Processor Intel i5 3570K
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling Noctua NH-U12P Push/Pull
Memory 8GB 1600Mhz Vengeance
Video Card(s) Intel HD4000
Storage Seagate 1TB & 180GB Intel 330
Display(s) AOC I2360P
Case Enermax Vostok
Audio Device(s) Onboard realtek
Power Supply Corsair TX650
Mouse Microsoft OEM 2.0
Keyboard Logitech Internet Pro White
Software Legal ;)
Benchmark Scores Very big
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6074/ocz-vertex-4-review-128gb performance mode.

nCache (as you could see from the anandtechs review) is intended for small writes, rather than big sequential writes, thats why its way smaller (~1GB). But sandisk is using pretty fast flash and 64Gbit dies, so write speeds don't suffer. It still makes it similar to turbowrite (pseudo SLC mode) just isn't used for all the writes.
 
Top