Discussion in 'Games' started by Assassin48, Jul 29, 2009.
Who cares about Crysis anyway?
The game play sucked, it lagged like crazy and the game its self was poorly optimized at best....I admit it looks nice but that doesn't make up for its huge shortcomings. :shadedshu
i think it will be interesting to compare the ps3 to the 360 using this game, and who knows, maybe they got it right for pc this time too
I dunno, I kinda enjoyed grabbing onto the retards, going into strength mode, and whacking them with my rifle up into a tree, which subsequently fell on top of a jeep and blew it up It did get old REALLY fast though. More fun for the screw-around factor.
Then again, Crysis 2 may actually have decent gameplay. Let's hope so.
Im wondering what hardware requirements would be quaddie and a 285 for 20 fps lol.
well if those guys with the two Asus MARS cards in quad SLi cant run it well, it looks like we're waiting for DX11
Couldn't agree more. I loved just messing around on it rather than actually playing the game
Hopefully 2 will have better game play to keep my from going ADD on it
And I think Crysis in general would make a 360 crawl and a PS3 walk. We'll have to see what happens though.
I think it'll be the other way around, coz the game is more GPU bound than CPU bound, so unless they can offload some stuff from the GPU to the Cell CPU of the PS3, the X360 will do a tad better
I`m tired of this garbage. When some one talks about PS3 like it is hardware from future. It has 512 DDR3 memory. And GPU similar to GeForce 7900. That is it. It has zilion NOT complete cores. Games are not that much dependent from CPUs. Even if you could simulate whole army they would not fit in to the 512MB and it could not be rendered with 7900. THE END.
I just played crysis just to see if my computer could run it. it seemed fun but with the game requiring so much it wasnt worth it. now that its coming out on the ps3 and 360 I think it would be pretty fun can't imagine how bad it will perform on the 360 however :/ ps3 I bet would run pretty good but also thats not saying much, but either way I may give it a try on my ps3
volatile int i;
omg i maxxed out the cpu
Am i the only one who feels dumb, for not getting this?
Lol i dont know either. =/
for any i, you add 1 to make a new i
Oh no I thought you were dumb WAY before i+i+1..........wait what?
endless loop consuming all cpu time doing nothing basically
How come great games play pretty well on consoles and then when you have a good computer it performs about the same?
You answer that question and you will have successfully divided by zero.
Anyway if the gaysouls can run "Crysis 2" then any of our CPU's will be fine. This thing will be so watered down compared to the first one it will be sad.
Only one core and only until i = 2,147,483,647. The moment it tries to hit 2,147,483,648, it will crash (out of bounds--can't increment).
If you put so much effort into trying to "max out" a platform, I can't see how you'd spend much time making the game fun. I suspect it will be the same story as Crysis (gorgeous but boring).
crysis was terrible optimised. end story.
You could do basic ini tweaks and get far better performance, with the same or better visual effects - the game needed 6 months of polish.
Hopefully with the second, they work on that.
FordGT90Concept what have I told you about over analyzing things? Hmmm?
The dude abides.
Over analyze? That's just grazing the surface! Want me to continue?
lol wizzard, and we all know how optimized crytek games are, remember crysis when it first came out
Separate names with a comma.