• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

Do you agree with AMD's new GPU naming scheme?

Do you agree with AMD's new GPU naming scheme?

  • Products & pricing justify it

    Votes: 1,423 21.4%
  • It's confusing

    Votes: 2,842 42.7%
  • It actually makes more sense now

    Votes: 530 8.0%
  • NVIDIA does it all the time

    Votes: 1,212 18.2%
  • What new naming?

    Votes: 642 9.7%

  • Total voters
    6,649
  • Poll closed .

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
17,021
Likes
17,872
Processor Core i7-4790K
Memory 16 GB
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 7
#1
The Radeon HD 6800 Series marks a fundamental shift in AMD's approach to the market. Until now, the HD x800 series (such as HD 3800 series, HD 4800 series, and HD 5800 series) is regarded as that class of SKUs that give you the highest single-GPU performance possible for the prevalent architecture. But now, AMD has restructured its nomenclature in a big way.

When it came to light that Barts, oversimplistically a successor to the Juniper GPU (which makes up the Radeon HD 5700 series), is going to be branded under the HD 6800 series, it created quite some drama; with some users claiming it to be very gimmicky of AMD to release a series that isn't much of an upgrade option for existing users of HD 5800 series GPUs. That's not the case, because AMD made it adequately public through the press, its reasoning behind using the HD 6800 series as the "gamer's sweet spot" series, and consolidating all higher-end SKUs into the Radeon HD 6900 series, slated for next month. Besides, it's not like AMD is asking Radeon HD 5800 series kind of prices for today's GPUs. The main design ideology behind the HD 6800 series, as AMD put it, is to give you Radeon HD 5800 series performance at sweet-spot price.

What do you think?
 
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Messages
9,767
Likes
1,779
Location
Suffolk/Essex, England
System Name Joseph's Laptop Clevo P771ZM
Processor 4970k @4/4.4ghz
Motherboard *shrugs*
Cooling About 2 kilos of copper fins and pipes.
Memory 2x 8gb
Video Card(s) GTX 970m 6gb
Storage 500gb Msata SSD 2x 2TB storage drives
Display(s) Built in
Power Supply 300w power brick
Mouse Steam controller
Software Windows ten
#2
I'm not fussed at all, was extremely easy to get used to.


x900 will now be enthusiast and dual gpu.

x800 will be "sweet spot" ( much like 4870 etc although they were atis top end they were comparatively not top end gpus )
 
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
283
Likes
81
Location
Zagreb, Croatia
Processor Phenom II X3 720 BE @ 3.15 GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte MA790X-UD4
Cooling Zalman CNPS10X Optima
Memory Corsair XMS2, 2x2 GB DDR2, 800 MHz, CL5
Video Card(s) Asus R9 270X DirectCu II
Storage Caviar Black 500 GB & Caviar Green 1 TB
Display(s) Dell U2311H (23'' IPS)
Case Gigabyte GZ-X5
Power Supply Corsair VX550
Software Win 7 Pro 64-bit
#3
Even though I voted "Products & pricing justify it" I don't really like the change; it is too similar to the old naming scheme so it's bound to confuse people, as we've all came to expect quite a jump from (X)800 to (X+1)800...

As an informed geek, I don't mind the name... they could call the models xzy, xzz, xxz, etc and I still wouldn't care, as long as they perform well and don't cost a lot ;)
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2010
Messages
3,443
Likes
1,685
Location
NL, Europe
Processor Intel Core i5-4460
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-Z97-D3H
Cooling Arctic Freezer i11
Memory Crucial Ballistix Sport, DDR3-1600, 2x4 GB kit
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon R9 270X Vapor-X
Storage Kingston SSDNow V300 (120GB) + Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 (1TB)
Display(s) AOC G2260VWQ6 | Acer AL1916 (in reserve)
Case Cooler Maste Centurion 5
Audio Device(s) integrated
Power Supply Seasonic G450
Mouse Logitech G500
Keyboard Qpad MK-50
Software Windows 10
#4
I'm not fussed at all, was extremely easy to get used to.

x900 will now be enthusiast and dual gpu.

x800 will be "sweet spot" ( much like 4870 etc although they were atis top end they were comparatively not top end gpus )
That is what I think as well. x900 --> high-end, x800 --> "sweet spot".
nVidia's naming schemes are more "difficult", though Intel is the worst with their socket and processor naming imho.
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2005
Messages
1,625
Likes
552
Location
The Pico Mundo Grill
System Name Commercial towing vehicle Nostromo
Processor R7 1700X Base Clock @4.000.000.000 Hz
Motherboard Crosshair Hero VI (BIOS 1701)
Cooling Hydro H110i V2 High Performance
Memory 2x8 GB Dominator CMD16GX4M2B3200C16 v4.31
Video Card(s) 970 STRIX
Storage 960 EVO M2 500 GB w. EKWB EK-M.2 NVMe nickel heatsink / UV400 480 GB / Red PRO 4 TB
Display(s) VG248QE
Case HAF XB
Audio Device(s) Onboard / JDS Labs O2 AMP / K550 headphones
Power Supply AX 860
Mouse KANA
Keyboard K60
Software Win 10 Pro x64 / KIS 2018
Benchmark Scores 2141 lightyears per hour.......
#5
Well - like someone said before - names does nothing.
All enthusiasts knows what they are buying ... I would´nt blindly go out and buy a
graphics card only be the name...so IMO it´s okay with there naming scheme
 

Black Panther

Senior Moderator™
Staff member
Joined
May 30, 2007
Messages
8,957
Likes
2,166
System Name Great White Bengal
Processor i7 930 @ 4Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R
Cooling Scythe Yasya
Memory 12GB (3 x 4GB DDR3 Geil Black Dragon)
Video Card(s) Zotac 670 4GB
Storage eSata Seagate 2TB -- 240GB SSD Sandisk Extreme
Display(s) 27" 2560x1440 Dell U2711
Case NZXT Switch 810 White
Audio Device(s) Onboard sound & Z5500 Speakers
Power Supply Corsair 850W Gold
Mouse Asus ROG Sica
Keyboard Motospeed
Software Windows 10
#6
It's confusing. I was expecting the 6870 to be a bit better than the 5870, not a bit worse...

The fact that the price justifies it, and that nvidia does it all the time is irrelevant...
 

Frick

Fishfaced Nincompoop
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
14,876
Likes
5,411
System Name A dancer in your disco of fire
Processor i3 4130 3.4Ghz
Motherboard MSI B85M-E45
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo
Memory 4 x 4GB Crucial Ballistix Sport 1400Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 760 DCU2OC 2GB
Storage Crucial BX100 120GB | WD Blue 1TB x 2
Display(s) BenQ GL2450HT
Case AeroCool DS Cube White
Power Supply Cooler Master G550M
Mouse Intellimouse Explorer 3.0
Keyboard Dell SK-3205
Software Windows 10 Pro
#7
I think it would not be smart to name a new generation of GPU's after the old generation, so I'm very OK with it.
 
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
742
Likes
134
Location
Auckland
System Name PBD
Processor Core i5 760 @ 4.0GHz
Motherboard Asus Maximus III Gene
Cooling Corsair H-50-1
Memory 4 x 4096mb G.Skill Ripjaws 1600 Cas7
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 670 DirectCU TOP
Storage Crucial 256GB SSD (system) + 2x Samsung F3 1TB (storage) + 2x 2TB Raid-1 NAS (backup)
Display(s) Dell SP2309w 23" 2048x1152
Case Antec Max Fusion Remote
Power Supply Corsair AX750W
Software Win 7 Pro x64
#8
I don't have a problem with it, and can see the logic behind it.

Best GPU = highest identifier = #9##
Second-best GPU = second highest identifier = #8##

This is reflected in the price and performance of the products too.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2010
Messages
1,261
Likes
328
Processor Core i7 920
Motherboard Asus P6T v2
Cooling Noctua D-14
Memory OCZ Gold 1600
Video Card(s) Powercolor PCS+ 5870
Storage Samsung SpinPoint F3 1 TB
Display(s) Samsung LE-B530 37" TV
Case Lian Li PC-B25F
Audio Device(s) N/A
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower 700w
Software Windows 7 64-bit
#9
No, I do not agree with the rebranding, these cards could just as easily have been called 6750/6770.
 

Fourstaff

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 29, 2009
Messages
9,376
Likes
2,100
Location
Home
System Name Asus K50-X5DAB \\ Orange!
Processor Athlon QL-65 2.2Ghz \\ 3570K
Motherboard Laptop \\ ASRock z77 Extreme4
Cooling Laptop \\ H100i
Memory 1x1GB + 1X2GB \\ 2x4Gb 1600Mhz CL9 Corsair XMS3
Video Card(s) Mobility Radeon HD4570 512mb \\ Zotac 660Ti OC 2Gb
Storage 250Gb \\ Samsung 840 250Gb + Toshiba DT01ACA300 3Tb
Display(s) 15.6" 1366x768 \\ LG 22EA53VQ
Case Laptop Chassis \\ NZXT Phantom 410 Black/Orange
Power Supply Power Brick \\ Corsair CXM500w
#10
I think its allright, but its a bit tricky for your average user that the 58xx are better than their 68xx counterparts. That might be a loophole waiting to be exploited, but it makes more sense calling the top end products x9xx and the dual GPU 6xxx X2 alá the 4000 series rather than the current 5970.
 

mdsx1950

New Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2009
Messages
2,064
Likes
408
Location
In a gaming world :D
System Name Knight-X
Processor Intel Core i7-980X [4.2Ghz]
Motherboard ASUS P6T7 WS
Cooling CORSAIR Hydro H70 + 2x CM 2000RPM 120mm LED Fans
Memory Corsair DOMINATOR-GT 12GB (6 x 2GB) DDR3 2000MHz
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon HD6970 2GB CrossFire [PhysX - EVGA GTX260(216SP) 896MB]
Storage 2x Corsair Perf. 512GB | OCZ Colossus 1TB | 2xOCZ Agilities 120GB SSDs
Display(s) Dell UltraSharp™ 3008WFP [2560x1600]
Case Cooler Master HAF-X + NZXT Temp LCD
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar D2X | ONKYO HTS9100THX 7.1
Power Supply Silverstone ST1500 1500W [80 PLUS Silver]
Software Windows 7 Ultimate X64 (Build 7600)
Benchmark Scores Heaven 2.0 with Extreme Tessellation at 1080p - 96FPS
#11
No, I do not agree with the rebranding, these cards could just as easily have been called 6750/6770.
+1

People who don't keep up with tech news will easily get confused.
 

Paintface

New Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
389
Likes
72
Processor E5200 @ 3.7ghz
Motherboard DFI LanParty DK P35 DARK
Cooling Zalman CPU + case cooling
Memory OCZ Reaper HPC DDR2 4GB 1066
Video Card(s) Saphire 4890 Vapor-X OCed
Storage Raptor 74GB + 640GB sata + 1TB sata ( all WD)
Display(s) BENQ 24inch LCD 1080p
Case my desk
Audio Device(s) Creative Audigy 2 ZS
Power Supply OCZ gameXstream 700w
Software Windows 7 x64 ultimate
#12
If you bought a 5870 without reading any reviews or benchmarks for $400 a year ago

and buy a 6870 for $230 now without reading any reviews or benchmarks what so ever expecting a huge increase in performance

Then you are only yourself to blame, and where i come from stupidity is not rewarded.

AMD has explained it over and over how and why it was done, and it makes perfect sense with the 5770 already being down to $140 while having 4870 performance ( which still kicks butt ) to be rebranded cause there simply was no room to remake the series or to sell it as a 6670.

It takes 60 seconds to google a review, check the benchmarks, check the conclusion.

If you spend $400 and now $230 that easely without even knowing what you bought you are yourself to blame. And if you really think AMD did this to screw people over ..... then go buy nvidia, but that isnt an option now is it :)
 

AsRock

TPU addict
Joined
Jun 23, 2007
Messages
15,309
Likes
4,717
Location
US
Processor 2500k \ 3770k
Motherboard ASRock Z68 \ Z77
Memory Samsung low profile 1600
Video Card(s) XFX 6770 \ XFX R9 290X
Storage Intel 80Gb (SATA2) WD 250Gb \ Team SSD+Samsung Evo 250Gb+500Gb+ 2xCorsair Force+WD250GbHDD
Display(s) Samsung 1080P \ Toshiba HDTV 1080P
Case HTPC400 \ Thermaltake Armor case ( original ), With Zalman fan controller ( wattage usage ).
Audio Device(s) Yamaha RX-V475 \ Marantz SR5008 Tannoy Mercury MKII Paradigm 5SE + Tannoy Mercury F4
Power Supply PC&Power 750w \ Seasonic 750w MKII
Mouse MS intelimouse \ Logitech G700s + Steelseries Sensei wireless
Keyboard Logitech K120 \ ROCCAT MK Pro ( modded amber leds )
Benchmark Scores Meh benchmarks.
#13
It's confusing. I was expecting the 6870 to be a bit better than the 5870, not a bit worse...

confusing no, but it does mess things up for new comers with questions and i guess that would lead to the confusion. But most on this site and other tech sites understand. I think it's more of a annoyance my self.

The fact that the price justifies it, and that nvidia does it all the time is irrelevant...
As i understand it the 5870 has 1600 ( 320 ) shader units and the 6870 has 1120 (280 )shader units. But the 68xx has 4D and not 5D like the 5870.

That allowed said to me it would not be as good but the release price makes it a better buy.

EDIT: maybe with the performance being a little lower than the 5870 the numbers should of been lower but i guess it could of been seen as silly calling them 6865 and 6855 huh..
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 6, 2009
Messages
469
Likes
68
Location
Victoria, Australia
System Name Haswell Ranger
Processor Intel i5 4690K 4.2GHz
Motherboard ASUS Maximus VII Ranger
Cooling Corsair H80 Hydro Series Cooler
Memory 16GB DDR3 @ 1333MHz
Video Card(s) ASUS RX480 Strix 8GB @1350MHz
Storage OCZ Trion 100 240GB(OS) + 4TB HDD(s)
Display(s) Samsung SE790C 34" Ultra-wide/Curved 3440x1440p 60hz
Case Corsair 750D Obsidian
Audio Device(s) Onboard - Logitech Z-5500 Digital 5.1 Speaker System/Roccat Kave XTD 5.1 Headphones
Power Supply Corsair HX850i Modular
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Logitech G510s
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
#14
Joined
May 7, 2008
Messages
921
Likes
128
System Name Demented
Processor AMD FX-8320 Vishera @ 4.5
Motherboard ASRock 970 EXTREME3
Cooling Thermaltake Frio
Memory G.SKILL Ripjaws Sniper Gaming Series 8GB (2 x 4GB)
Video Card(s) PowerColor AXR9 280X 3GBD5-2DHE/OC Radeon R9 280X
Storage (1)Crucial M500 240GB ssd (1)WD 500GB Black Edition
Display(s) Samsung 27" w/ Acer X163W 16" secondary
Case Antec P183
Audio Device(s) Realtek High Definition Audio (On Board 7.1)
Power Supply Corsair CMPSU-650TX 650W
Mouse SteelSeries Rival
Keyboard Tt eSPORTS MEKA G-Unit
Software Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium
#15
To me personally it makes no difference. As already stated almost everyone that is a member here is into the hardware at a higher level than the normal. But we are a fraction of the population. I have seen many just gamers (not tec gurus) who with past naming of cards were confused. No matter how it is explained or justified (AMD made it adequately public) it will still catch some of those walking into the store with cash in hand as a surprise as they buy on site not on knowledge.

By far I believe each generation should follow a standard sequence of some sort and stay with it for each generation.

This obviously is a naming issue. For good or bad, right or wrong, gimmicky or not, tec guys will generally be OK. The other 98% who the hell knows yet. Time will tell. :D
 

Mussels

Moderprator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
46,094
Likes
13,521
Location
Australalalalalaia.
System Name Daddy Long Legs
Processor Ryzen R7 1700, 3.9GHz 1.375v
Motherboard MSI X370 Gaming PRO carbon
Cooling Fractal Celsius S24 (Silent fans, meh pump)
Memory 16GB 2133 generic @ 2800
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X (BIOS modded to Gaming Z - faster and solved black screen bugs!)
Storage 1TB Intel SSD Pro 6000p (60TB USB3 storage)
Display(s) Samsung 4K 40" HDTV (UA40KU6000WXXY) / 27" Qnix 2K 110Hz
Case Fractal Design R5. So much room, so quiet...
Audio Device(s) Pioneer VSX-519V + Yamaha YHT-270 / sennheiser HD595/518 + bob marley zion's
Power Supply Corsair HX 750i (Platinum, fan off til 300W)
Mouse Logitech G403 + KKmoon desk-sized mousepad
Keyboard Corsair K65 Rapidfire
Software Windows 10 pro x64 (all systems)
Benchmark Scores Laptops: i7-4510U + 840M 2GB (touchscreen) 275GB SSD + 16GB i7-2630QM + GT 540M + 8GB
#16
No, I do not agree with the rebranding, these cards could just as easily have been called 6750/6770.
agreed.


do i care that they were rebranded? NOT AT ALL.


but having new cards with higher numbers implies newer/faster, not cheaper/slower
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
20,902
Likes
9,994
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) PowerColor PCS+ 390 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate 6 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
#17
Great, AMD is pulling an NVIDIA. Now who am I going to switch to? :(
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2008
Messages
3,471
Likes
655
System Name Acer Aspire V3-771G-53218G75Maii
Processor Core i5 3210M (2,5-3,1Ghz)
Memory 8GB DDR3 SODIMM
Video Card(s) Geforce GT650M
Storage Samsung 830 256GB - 750GB Toshiba drive
Software Windows 7 x64 Home Premium (non-acer-bloatware)
#18
No, I do not agree with the rebranding, these cards could just as easily have been called 6750/6770.
Agreed in full. Pulling the ATI name and confusing numbers, AMD is failing here.
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
2,576
Likes
510
Processor Mysterious Engineering Prototype
Motherboard Intel 865
Cooling Custom block made in workshop
Memory Corsair XMS 2GB
Video Card(s) FireGL X3-256
Display(s) 1600x1200 SyncMaster x 2 = 3200x1200
Software Windows 2003
#19
NVIDIA does it all the time
If you have to use these fool the customer and baiting tricks to sell your products, then, IMO, you either have a second class product or a second class marketing department.
 

[Ion]

WCG Team Assistant
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Messages
13,391
Likes
14,251
Location
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
System Name Niedersachsen / Ribe / Minsk
Processor i3 3240 / i7-3520M / 4x Opteron 6376 @ 2.86GHz
Motherboard BIOSTAR H61M / HP Q77 / Supermicro H8QG7
Cooling Stock / Stock / 4x 1U G34
Memory 1x8GB / 2x4GB / 4x4GB
Video Card(s) GTX260 / Intel HD 4000 / nVidia GT310
Storage 80GB Intel SSD / 256GB Intel SSD / 2x 60GB SSD (RAID1)
Display(s) Dell 3007 + HP 2245w / 12.1" 1366x768 / None
Case Antec NSK3480 / HP / Supermicro 1U
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Enermax 500W / HP 130W / Supermicro Gold 1400W
Keyboard IBM Model M
Software Windows 7 (Niedersachsen/Ribe) / Linux Mint 17.2 (Minsk)
#20
I think it's terrible. I did not like what they did with the HD5970 being a HD5870X2, but I got over it. I think they would have been far better off calling it HD5870x2, but that was their decision.

Now, they're going to make their X900 cards be single GPU :wtf: :confused:

That just doesn't make sense. If you're going to make your dual-GPU cards X900, stick with it. Because what this means is that now they've elevated the midrange HD57X0 to the HD6850. While I know that the HD6850 is slower than a HD5850, as I'm sure the rest of you do, the average consumer won't. I know that there are going to be people who buy a HD6850 thinking it's an upgrade for their HD5850 :banghead:

That being said, I think that the HD6850 is an absolutely amazing card, and I wouldn't hesitate for one moment before buying one.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2004
Messages
1,561
Likes
207
Location
Poland,Slask
System Name HAL
Processor Core i5 2500K
Motherboard Asus P8P67 Pro Rev3.1
Cooling stock
Memory 2x4GB Kingston 1600Mhz Blu
Video Card(s) Asus 560Ti DirectCuII TOP
Storage Kingston 120 3K SSD,WD Black WD1502FAEX
Display(s) LG 1440x900
Case Chieftec Mesh Midi
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX750V2
Software w8
#21
Pure bs if its a "sweet spot" it should be named 6800 and nobody would whine.
 
Joined
Sep 26, 2010
Messages
231
Likes
24
System Name Vika
Processor Intel Core i3 2100
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V Gen 3
Cooling Stock Intel
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws X 8GB DDR3
Video Card(s) HIS IceQ X Radeon HD 7970 @ 1100/1550
Storage Crucial M4 SSD 64GB, Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB
Display(s) Viewsonic VX2453MH-LED 23.6in LED
Case Fractal Design Arc Midi
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar DG
Power Supply Antec HCG 620W
Software Windows 7 Premium 64bit
#22
Great, AMD is pulling an NVIDIA. Now who am I going to switch to? :(
Swap to intel intergrated :laugh:

besides i don't really mind the naming scheme. however, i do believe that they shouldn't have implemented the new naming scheme
 

Arska

New Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2008
Messages
13
Likes
0
#23
If ATI (=AMD but I prefer the brand ATI so I'll keep using it) thought using 67xx numbers was not possible, at least they should have named them 6840/6860 or 6830/6850. The latter ones would probably have been honest enough for almost everyone.
 
Joined
Sep 1, 2009
Messages
860
Likes
117
Location
Manteca, Ca
System Name Rebirth
Processor Intel i5 2500k @4.5Ghz
Motherboard Asus P8P67 Pro
Cooling Megahalem 120x25 x2 GT AP-15 Push/Pull
Memory 2x4Gb Corsair Vengeance
Video Card(s) Sapphire HD7950 Vapor-X + MSI HD7950 TF3
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 120 SSD + Seagate 7200.12 1TB + 500gig WD + 3TB Hitachi
Display(s) X-Star Glossy DP2710
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar STX
Power Supply Antec CP-850
Software Microsoft Windows 8 Pro x64
#24
I think it was a good name change. To me i feel that the 68xx series was just a refresh of cypress that made it affordable for all. Now the 69xx series will up the ante and will give the enthusiasts pure power cards.
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
16,543
Likes
10,907
Location
Parkland County, Alberta
System Name Gamer
Processor Intel i7-6700K (ES)
Motherboard MSI Aegis TI
Cooling Custom Dragon Cooler
Memory 16 GB Kingston HyperX 2133 MHz C13
Video Card(s) 2x MSI GAMING GTX 980
Storage 2x Intel 600P
Display(s) Dell 3008WFP
Case MSI Aegis Ti
Mouse MSI Interceptor DS B1
Keyboard MSI DS4200 GAMING Keyboard
Software Windows 10 Home
#25
As i understand it the 5870 has 1600 ( 320 ) shader units and the 6870 has 1120 (280 )shader units. But the 68xx has 4D and not 5D like the 5870.

That allowed said to me it would not be as good but the release price makes it a better buy.

EDIT: maybe with the performance being a little lower than the 5870 the numbers should of been lower but i guess it could of been seen as silly calling them 6865 and 6855 huh..
:shadedshu

It's NOT 4-D. Go check out any review. If they don't make that point plain, best bitch at them for not being clear...it's still most definately 5D.