• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

Dual socket setup.

Joined
Nov 27, 2012
Messages
357 (0.19/day)
Likes
28
System Name Broken Butterfly.
Processor Intel Core i5-3570.
Motherboard Asus P8H67-M LE.
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212 Plus.
Memory 2x4gB Corsair Value Series.
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 660 FTW Signature 2.
Storage 180gB Intel SSD 330 Series, WD Blue 500gB (AAKX).
Display(s) Samsung BX2031.
Case CM Elite 334.
Power Supply Corsair CX 430.
#1
Ok. I have been thinking of making a thread regarding this for a long time and today I am finally doing it.

So, I dont like single socket setup anymore. In my eyes, dual is the future (no offence meant to singe socket lovers).

This is just the start. I will be gaining as much knowledge about this new world and my next setup would be based on all that info.

See my current setup?. I am happy with that but not the processing power. Only dual processors will quench that.

Anyone know what is upcoming in next 6 to 8 months?.

What is the latest in dual socket world?.
 
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
178 (0.04/day)
Likes
85
Location
Nashville, Tennessee
System Name DeathAdder
Processor Intel Core i7 6700K @4.6 Ghz 1.31v
Motherboard Gigabyte Gaming 7 Z170X
Cooling NZXT Kraken x61 280mm
Memory 2x8GB G.Skill 3200Mhz
Video Card(s) MSI NVidia GeForce 980 Ti 6GB
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 500 GB + 10 TB in HDDs
Display(s) LG UC87C 34" Ultrawide 3440x1440
Case NZXT H440 White
Power Supply EVGA P2 Platinum 1000 W
Mouse Corsair M65
Keyboard Corsair K70 RGB
Software Windows 10 Pro
#2
What do you need all that processing power for?
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
10,401 (4.84/day)
Likes
5,481
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Zalman CPNS9900MAX 130mm
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSI AMD Radeon R9 390 GAMING 8GB @ PCI-E 3.0
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 Corsair Force GT Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 17.10
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
#3
What do you need all that processing power for?
This, that's very specific niche of people who really need that much compute power. It's going to cost a lot of money and if all you do is play games (I'm not saying you do, but most people on TPU do,) then this is a complete waste of money.

Is there any reason why you're not looking at investing in an IVB i7 like a 3770? If more cores help you, so will hyper-threading.
 
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
178 (0.04/day)
Likes
85
Location
Nashville, Tennessee
System Name DeathAdder
Processor Intel Core i7 6700K @4.6 Ghz 1.31v
Motherboard Gigabyte Gaming 7 Z170X
Cooling NZXT Kraken x61 280mm
Memory 2x8GB G.Skill 3200Mhz
Video Card(s) MSI NVidia GeForce 980 Ti 6GB
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 500 GB + 10 TB in HDDs
Display(s) LG UC87C 34" Ultrawide 3440x1440
Case NZXT H440 White
Power Supply EVGA P2 Platinum 1000 W
Mouse Corsair M65
Keyboard Corsair K70 RGB
Software Windows 10 Pro
#4
Yes, actually most applications today won't be able to take advantage of such parallelism that would exist in a 16 or 32 core system, unless you are talking about enterprise applications and databases holding terabytes of data.

For everybody else, storage is the slowest component, and faster SSDs will benefit most. RAID them if you're still not happy.

I am curious what you wanna do with all that power...
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
10,401 (4.84/day)
Likes
5,481
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Zalman CPNS9900MAX 130mm
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSI AMD Radeon R9 390 GAMING 8GB @ PCI-E 3.0
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 Corsair Force GT Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 17.10
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
#5
Yes, actually most applications today won't be able to take advantage of such parallelism that would exist in a 16 or 32 core system, unless you are talking about enterprise applications and databases holding terabytes of data.
Not relational data, that's for sure. Unless you're using a MapReduce-like technique for getting and relating data, you're not even going to be running that in multiple threads. Keep in mind that most servers have a lot of cores not because the software is multi-threaded but because you have a ton of people logged into a system and each person is essentially another process or set of processes, so server workloads (regardless of how they're programmed,) more often than not, are inherently multi-process. Web servers certainly are.

For everybody else, storage is the slowest component, and faster SSDs will benefit most. RAID them if you're still not happy.
I don't recommend RAIDing SSDs unless you have money to spare and you're really hell-bent on doing it. You won't feel a difference despite having 1GB/s of bandwidth. Your IOPS doesn't improve by running RAID (in fact it gets worse,) so your random reads/writes might actually suffer a bit. For most cases, one bigger SSD would be ideal.

I am curious what you wanna do with all that power...
Me too.