- Feb 17, 2017
- 756 (0.86/day)
|Processor||i7 2600K @4.5GHz|
|Motherboard||Asus P8Z68-V PRO/Gen 3|
|Memory||G.Skill Ripjaws 4x4GB DDR3|
|Video Card(s)||MSI GTX 1060 6G Gaming X|
|Storage||Samsung 830 Pro 256GB + WD Caviar Blue 1TB|
|Display(s)||Samsung PX2370 + Acer AL1717|
|Case||Antec 1200 v1|
|Audio Device(s)||aune x1s|
|Power Supply||Enermax Modu87+ 800W|
Competition is useful and just when it offers advantages where the other part lacks, or when it offers something different, and Epic isn't doing any of it, there's no need to bring down anything, it'll fall itself with time.Yes. What Epic is doing is creating competition, which is beneficial for the consumer.
Of course, you may not like the way Epic is competing, but that doesn't change the fact that we are seeing a textbook example of competition being introduced to the market.
ADDED: Now that I think about it. I think this is the closest to an actual, true competitor to Steam that we have ever gotten.
You can huff and puff all you want, you aren't going to bring the house down.