• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 Super KO


Staff member
May 14, 2004
20,451 (3.49/day)
Processor Core i7-4790K
Memory 16 GB
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 7
The EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 Super KO is a highly cost-efficient custom-design variant. This dual-slot, dual-fan card comes in at $499, so there is no price increase over NVIDIA MSRP. EVGA's cooler is solid, achieving good temperatures, and idle fan-stop is included, too.

Show full review
Mar 18, 2008
4,993 (1.12/day)
System Name Virtual Reality / Bioinformatics
Processor Undead CPU
Motherboard Undead TUF X99
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory GSkill 128GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) EVGA 2080Ti
Storage Samsung 960 Pro 1TB + 860 EVO 2TB + WD Black 5TB
Display(s) Acer K272HUL, HTC Vive
Case Fractal Design R5
Audio Device(s) BOSE 2.0
Power Supply Seasonic 850watt
Mouse Logitech Master MX
Keyboard Corsair K70 Cherry MX Blue
Software Windows 10 Professional/Linux Mint
Oh lord I LOVE THAT frame time analysis. Awesome charts!!!!
Feb 20, 2019
749 (1.59/day)
System Name PowerEdge R730 DRS Cluster
Processor 4x Xeon E5-2698 v3
Cooling Many heckin screamy bois
Memory 480GB ECC DDR4-2133
Video Card(s) Matrox G200eR2
Storage SD Card. Yep, really no other local storage.
Display(s) It's probably a couple of boring Dell Ultrasharps and a sacrificial laptop.
Case 39U 6-rack server room with HEVC and 44KVA UPS
Mouse Maybe
Keyboard Yes!
Software ESXi 6.5 U3
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
Man, I am torn over this. Clearly it is a decent, bone-stock card with no glaring faults and $0 surcharge for gimmicks. That is, essentially, great and everything I look for in a card, usually.

So what is the problem?

Well, it's $500. For 5% more money, you can get something that is considerably nicer - with a backplate, factory overclocks, maybe dual-BIOS, better power consumption. I mean, the KO models are the runt of the litter, the lowest-binned silicon that EVGA could buy. If you're gonna spend that much money, dont' get the worst possible version of it.

There is 100% a place for this type of card in the entry-level and lower-midrange GPU markets - where ever dollar counts and even $25 premium is enough to start buying basic SKUs from the next tier up. At $500 I just don't think there's much point; Nobody buying a $500 graphics card is desperate to get the most bang per buck - we're already well beyond the point of diminishing returns on the performance/$ chart here.

@Wizzard, as a side note - is there any chance you could change the colours for the frame time analysis? Statistically, 5-8% of your readers are going to be colourblind and that orange and green are exactly the same saturation/lightness Despite red/green colourblindness being very common, it's usually not a problem because even without the hue, colourblind people can still see saturation and lightness differences between say, a red and a green colour. If you make the lightness difference between them bigger, that will solve the problem.


May 22, 2015
7,552 (4.10/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k (AMD Ryzen5 3600 in a box, waiting for a mobo)
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V (@3200)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
What does the $10 account for? All that sets the KO apart from the Black is the lack of the USB type-C VirtualLink connector on the KO. That's it.
Well then, it's a good thing you never reviewed the Black version, otherwise i could have just skipped the rest ;)

If they lost the VirtuaLink port, they could have gone 6+6 PCIe power connectors. I mean, I'm sure the card doesn't draw more than it needs, but it just seems wasteful.

And kudos for the frame time analysis.
Jun 16, 2016
386 (0.27/day)
System Name Baxter
Processor Intel i7-5775C @ 4.2 GHz 1.35 V
Motherboard ASRock Z97-E ITX/AC
Cooling Scythe Big Shuriken 3 with Noctua NF-A12 fan
Memory 16 GB 2400 MHz CL11 HyperX Savage DDR3
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 2070 Super Black @ 1950 MHz
Storage 1 TB Sabrent Rocket 2242 NVMe SSD (boot), 500 GB Samsung 850 EVO, and 4TB Toshiba X300 7200 RPM HDD
Display(s) Vizio P65-F1 4KTV (4k60 with HDR or 1080p120)
Case Raijintek Ophion
Audio Device(s) HDMI PCM 5.1, Vizio 5.1 surround sound
Power Supply Corsair SF600 Platinum 600 W SFX PSU
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G613 and Microsoft Media Keyboard
The new frametime analysis is great. It really shows how AMD has improved from the Polaris/Vega days, as the frametimes track the Nvidia line closely, with no odd jumps or inconsistencies. It does look like the 2070 Super has a somewhat narrower distribution of framerates in some circumstances, and fewer outliers, especially in Red Dead Redemption 2. The 2070 Super is still a great card, and should be more relevant than the 5700 XT in a couple years if PC ports have DXR as expected from Xbox Series X. It's also interesting that the 2070 Super can OC to just about 2080 performance, even on the most budget card like this one. The 5700 XT has practically no OC headroom whatsoever, which helps to justify the $100 jump since you're essentially able to jump up a GPU rung with an easy memory OC, OC Scanner, and bumping the power limit to maximum.

I've said this before, but the removal of the USB C port is disappointing, especially when you can get the 2070 Super Black from EVGA for nearly the same price ($20 or less difference). I have an older computer with just USB 3.0, so having that 10 Gbps port is actually pretty awesome for me, and if I ever get a monitor with USB C as a cabling option, I'll be ready. I just tested an external NVMe SSD enclosure and I'm getting full speed from the port on my 2070 Super Black, actually even faster than my sole m.2 slot in my computer, which is limited to PCIe 2.0 x 2.

I don't have much hope for VirtuaLink as a standard nowadays since USB4 is right around the corner and has the same abilities, I believe. The difference between USB 3.2 and VirtuaLink was that VirtuaLink can send full video signal and have USB 3.0 speed over the "legacy" pins rather than just USB 2.0. With vanilla 3.2, you need to choose between the highest video profiles and USB 3.0 speed. But USB4 appears to be more flexible. Hopefully when VR headsets finally coalesce around USB4, they'll support these odd halfway ports as well.