• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

EVGA GTX 650 Ti SSC 2 GB

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
26,956 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
Today we have on our testbench the EVGA GTX 650 Ti SSC with 2 GB of GDDR5 memory. The card runs at 1072 MHz GPU clock, which is higher than any other GTX 650 Ti available at this time. Using manual overclocking we could even increase memory clocks by 40%!

Show full review
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 21, 2008
Messages
4,113 (0.71/day)
Location
Iowa, USA
System Name THE CUBE 2.0
Processor Intel i5 13600k
Motherboard MSI MPG Z690 EDGE DDR4
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC14PE BK 2x T30-120 Fan mod mount
Memory G.Skill TridentZ 3200 MT/s C15 32GB 2x16GB
Video Card(s) Gigabyte Aorus 1080 Ti 11GB OC: Core 2GHz, Mem 5.7GHz
Storage WD SN770 250GB / 3x WD SN850X 2TB / Toshiba X300 4TB / 2x RAID1 Toshiba P300 3TB
Display(s) Samsung 49" Odyssey OLED G95SC 240Hz 5120 x 1440
Case "THE CUBE" Custom built, pure Red Alder wood
Audio Device(s) Beyerdynamic DT 880
Power Supply Corsair RM1000X
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Logitech G910
Software Windows 11 Pro
Great review W1zz I love all your game benchmarks! I think the 7850 is a better option for the price being that it's faster. I can't wait till you 'hopefully" get a Titan :)
 
Joined
Nov 25, 2008
Messages
926 (0.17/day)
Location
Akron, OH
System Name Main Rig
Processor Athlon 5350
Motherboard AsRock mITX
Memory 4gb
Storage 120gb Kingston HyperX SSD
Display(s) Samsung Syncmaster 740N
Power Supply Corsair 430 watt
Table on the 1st page of this review says this card has 1gb of RAM, not 2gb.
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2010
Messages
5,379 (1.08/day)
Overclocking results actually quite surprised me. It's good to see such good overclocking capability on a mid-class NVIDIA GPU
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
26,956 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit

alienstorexxx

New Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2012
Messages
27 (0.01/day)
wtf? 8.9? highly recommended? do i read the same review?

what's next "you can play games" on pros? c'mon..
also, didn't understand, to have 2gb is a pro or a con?

it looses against a 6870 wich is priced lower and it's an older generation. what's highly recommended? is the bussiness going so bad?

edit: and you forgot the 7850 1gb on those charts, because you could give 1 or 2 points less on final score if you compared to that gpu.
 
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
207 (0.04/day)
wtf? 8.9? highly recommended? do i read the same review?

what's next "you can play games" on pros? c'mon..
also, didn't understand, to have 2gb is a pro or a con?

it looses against a 6870 wich is priced lower and it's an older generation. what's highly recommended? is the bussiness going so bad?

edit: and you forgot the 7850 1gb on those charts, because you could give 1 or 2 points less on final score if you compared to that gpu.

Well the does 6870 and 7850 use 30w more on average, that's a plus I suppose.

I agree that this isn't exactly a good deal though, the $150 base model Ti is a far better deal and will most likely overclock to or within range of the SSC specs.
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
26,956 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
568 (0.13/day)
Processor Intel i9-9900KS @ 5.2 GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H150i Elite
Memory 32GB Viper Steel Series DDR4-4000
Video Card(s) RTX 3090 Founders Edition
Storage 2TB Sabrent Rocket NVMe + 2TB Intel 960p NVMe + 512GB Samsung 970 Evo NVMe + 4TB WD Black HDD
Display(s) 65" LG C9 OLED
Case Lian Li O11D-XL
Audio Device(s) Audeze Mobius headset, Logitech Z906 speakers
Power Supply Corsair AX1000 Titanium
This review is far more positive than I would be about a card that gets more or less pasted by other similarly priced competing cards (7850 in either 1GB or 2GB flavors). I'm also not sure I see a use for the 2GB memory here other than to drive the price up - I really don't like this tactic that GPU manufacturers use of slapping more vram on slow cards that can't use it. In my opinion, it's just to take advantage of gullible consumers.

Anyways, it's always good to see what these budget cards can do - a lot of sites don't bother reviewing anything below about the $200-250 mark, so thanks for the info!

Looking forward to seeing the Titan review soon (hopefully) :)
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2011
Messages
2,198 (0.46/day)
Location
So. Cal.
This review is far more positive than I would be

I thought 8.9, was for this particular card quite charitable, being it does have a astronomical price and especially straddling it with 2Gb which isn't adding any value.

W1zzard is right in the a GTX650Ti is more a ease at 1680x. When comparing a 7770 that cost $105-120 –AR, and then permit strong gains with OC'n they're still not out. The 650Ti doesn’t exactly offer increased settings that categorically enhance the experience visually, while not a huge difference actual seat of the pants gameplay either. For me a nice MSI Power Edition that might be had for $130 –AR, provides value and can see it's worth the little extra cost. The things I like about the GTX650Ti is lower power consumption and performance per watt, and then models like EVGA that have rear exhaust. They're nice cards for upgrading an OEM box with a decent 350W PSU.

But there's no better purchase for 1920x than 7850 1Gb; which are $155 –AR more often than not.
 

alienstorexxx

New Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2012
Messages
27 (0.01/day)
looking forward to your next troll comment. i checked your previous comments, thought to myself "just one more", but no luck. come again

if you have a problem with trolls, just don't feed them. if you think my posture is arguable you can just name where you think i'm wrong.
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
568 (0.13/day)
Processor Intel i9-9900KS @ 5.2 GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H150i Elite
Memory 32GB Viper Steel Series DDR4-4000
Video Card(s) RTX 3090 Founders Edition
Storage 2TB Sabrent Rocket NVMe + 2TB Intel 960p NVMe + 512GB Samsung 970 Evo NVMe + 4TB WD Black HDD
Display(s) 65" LG C9 OLED
Case Lian Li O11D-XL
Audio Device(s) Audeze Mobius headset, Logitech Z906 speakers
Power Supply Corsair AX1000 Titanium
I thought 8.9, was for this particular card quite charitable, being it does have a astronomical price and especially straddling it with 2Gb which isn't adding any value.

W1zzard is right in the a GTX650Ti is more a ease at 1680x. When comparing a 7770 that cost $105-120 –AR, and then permit strong gains with OC'n they're still not out. The 650Ti doesn’t exactly offer increased settings that categorically enhance the experience visually, while not a huge difference actual seat of the pants gameplay either. For me a nice MSI Power Edition that might be had for $130 –AR, provides value and can see it's worth the little extra cost. The things I like about the GTX650Ti is lower power consumption and performance per watt, and then models like EVGA that have rear exhaust. They're nice cards for upgrading an OEM box with a decent 350W PSU.

But there's no better purchase for 1920x than 7850 1Gb; which are $155 –AR more often than not.

I'm just not sure how an overpriced card with extremely niche value, as this one clearly is, scores so highly. And I REALLY don't get how it comes "highly recommended", but I guess TPU may mean something different than what I think when I read of "highly recommended".

I can't see this card being "highly recommendable" to most people.

(edit) I'm not trying to troll the review, I'm just confused - and I'll give an example - this site's own 7970 Lightning review. It's a card that got slammed in the conclusion for being niche (due to the output config) and overpriced, and the score reflected that.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 18, 2010
Messages
2,324 (0.46/day)
Processor Intel i7 970 // Intel i7 2600K
Motherboard Asus Rampage III Formula // Asus P8P67 Deluxe
Cooling Zalman CNPS9900MaxB // Zalman CNPS11X
Memory GSkill 2133 12GB // Corsair V 2400 32GB
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX1080 // MSI GTX1070
Storage Samsung 860EVO // Samsung840P
Display(s) HP w2207h
Case CoolerMaster Stacker 830se // Lian Li PC-9F
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Seasonic X 850w Gold // EVGA 850w G2
Mouse Logitech G502SE HERO, G9
Keyboard Dell
Software W10 Pro 22H2
@ W1zzard,

Would it be possible to include how these cards Fold or Crunch in the reviews?

Also, I am curious why you are running 3 x 2048 in your specs and not running dual channel pairs with 4 sticks of ram.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2011
Messages
1,259 (0.26/day)
Thank you for the review. One more GB ram gives 5% extra performance, not much, but it's still something enthusiasts would appreciate if the price of the card wouldn't be so ridiculously high.

Nice to see again how well the 560ti responds to the memory OC, 22.8% over standard cards is really great indeed. I wonder why there are no cards with factory OC-ed memory, perhaps Nvidia doesn't allow it?
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
26,956 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
One more GB ram gives 5% extra performance, not much, but it's still something enthusiasts would appreciate if the price of the card wouldn't be so ridiculously high.

actually the OC gives those 4-5%. If you look at BF3 2560 and Skyrim 2560 you can see a tiny increase beyond what you would expect, looking at the other resolutions
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2011
Messages
1,259 (0.26/day)
actually the OC gives those 4-5%. If you look at BF3 2560 and Skyrim 2560 you can see a tiny increase beyond what you would expect, looking at the other resolutions

Interesting, thank you for the correction. Do you know the technical details why is this happening? I remember I saw performance gains in tests with more memory on stronger cards (in games like bf3,maxpayne3,etc), so why there is non here?

Perhaps is it possible that there are so many cache misses because of the large texture LOD, that the bandwidth is simply not enough for the first GB let alone the second?
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
26,956 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
Also, I am curious why you are running 3 x 2048 in your specs and not running dual channel pairs with 4 sticks of ram.



?
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
5,398 (0.92/day)
Location
Australia
System Name Night Rider | Mini LAN PC | Workhorse
Processor AMD R7 5800X3D | Ryzen 1600X | i7 970
Motherboard MSi AM4 Pro Carbon | GA- | Gigabyte EX58-UD5
Cooling Noctua U9S Twin Fan| Stock Cooler, Copper Core)| Big shairkan B
Memory 2x8GB DDR4 G.Skill Ripjaws 3600MHz| 2x8GB Corsair 3000 | 6x2GB DDR3 1300 Corsair
Video Card(s) MSI AMD 6750XT | 6500XT | MSI RX 580 8GB
Storage 1TB WD Black NVME / 250GB SSD /2TB WD Black | 500GB SSD WD, 2x1TB, 1x750 | WD 500 SSD/Seagate 320
Display(s) LG 27" 1440P| Samsung 20" S20C300L/DELL 15" | 22" DELL/19"DELL
Case LIAN LI PC-18 | Mini ATX Case (custom) | Atrix C4 9001
Audio Device(s) Onboard | Onbaord | Onboard
Power Supply Silverstone 850 | Silverstone Mini 450W | Corsair CX-750
Mouse Coolermaster Pro | Rapoo V900 | Gigabyte 6850X
Keyboard MAX Keyboard Nighthawk X8 | Creative Fatal1ty eluminx | Some POS Logitech
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 | Windows 10 Pro 64 | Windows 7 Pro 64/Windows 10 Home
Great little card, good performance to, but to expensive.

That is one thing i wish my GTX 650 Ti had and thats 2GB of memory it realy makes a difference, where mine is only 1GB and cost $154, but for an extra $55 its not worth it. (AUS) http://www.pccasegear.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=193_1442&products_id=21790

Im also surprised at the max temps, thats as low or lower then mine and mine has a bigger heatsink.

Overall i think a 8.9 is completely fair because id like to see anyone find another card that has that much performance, has such a small form factor that it will fit into any tiny/mini case and uses that little power, its a total winner in my eyes for tiny PC builds.
 

alienstorexxx

New Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2012
Messages
27 (0.01/day)
Interesting, thank you for the correction. Do you know the technical details why is this happening? I remember I saw performance gains in tests with more memory on stronger cards (in games like bf3,maxpayne3,etc), so why there is non here?

Perhaps is it possible that there are so many cache misses because of the large texture LOD, that the bandwidth is simply not enough for the first GB let alone the second?

it hasn't enough gpu potential nor cuda cores. it's a middle-to-low end gpu, you can notice how it struggles on high resolutions, almost all kepler gpu's have that problem (against AMD)
nvidia make kepler the simplest they could, that way gpus have lower power consumption and don't loose potential on normal resolutions. it's an intelligent way to make a gpu, but in long terms, people who bought a 600 series may be dissapointed. time will tell. i don't see this gpus like a gt9500 or 9800gt that even today are running some the latest games (wich do not require dx11)
 
Joined
Jun 18, 2010
Messages
2,324 (0.46/day)
Processor Intel i7 970 // Intel i7 2600K
Motherboard Asus Rampage III Formula // Asus P8P67 Deluxe
Cooling Zalman CNPS9900MaxB // Zalman CNPS11X
Memory GSkill 2133 12GB // Corsair V 2400 32GB
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX1080 // MSI GTX1070
Storage Samsung 860EVO // Samsung840P
Display(s) HP w2207h
Case CoolerMaster Stacker 830se // Lian Li PC-9F
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Seasonic X 850w Gold // EVGA 850w G2
Mouse Logitech G502SE HERO, G9
Keyboard Dell
Software W10 Pro 22H2
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsfitz54
Also, I am curious why you are running 3 x 2048 in your specs and not running dual channel pairs with 4 sticks of ram.



?

SORRY, I meant under your own personal specs. Not the test bench.
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
26,956 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
SORRY, I meant under your own personal specs. Not the test bench.

oh .. i'm poor .. i'm using some leftover memory in my work rig .. back from when the vga test system was a triple channel i7-920
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2011
Messages
1,259 (0.26/day)
you can notice how it struggles on high resolutions, almost all kepler gpu's have that problem (against AMD)

It struggles because of the 128bit wide bus (see how much extra it can give with the rams above 1800Mh), the 768 Kelper shaders are not the bottlenecks in this story. I already stated in some other threads, that it's simply not fair to bench these low-mid 128bit cards with the 4XAA utlra detail @ high resolutions, but I also understand that Wizzard wants to stay consistent between different generations. Perhaps including one 2XAA+4XAF medium resolution (900p, 1050p or maybe a 1080p) bench could prove to be more useful with cards like this.

The main reason behind that Nvidia "struggles" on ultra-high res is also mostly due to the 256 bit wide bus on the 660-680, but they were able to stop pushing things more and only release the mid-high GK104 because it was enough to compete against AMD that time.

nvidia make kepler the simplest they could, that way gpus have lower power consumption and don't loose potential on normal resolutions. it's an intelligent way to make a gpu, but in long terms, people who bought a 600 series may be dissapointed. time will tell. i don't see this gpus like a gt9500 or 9800gt that even today are running some the latest games (wich do not require dx11)

I have to disagree, Kepler is built for gaming and it's performing beautifully in that regard, so let's see what the Titan will be capable of, then we will know for sure finally.

.................

I only asked my question because I did measure difference with earlier cards sporting extra memory (even if it was not that big), and I'm really curious what Nvida is doing which results in no benefit anymore with more Ram. Bf3 or Skyrim is clearly able to load up and use more than 1GB memory, yet we don't see any change in resolutions like 1200p or below. Is it some kind of a new memory management in the drivers or some new solution in the chip itself? I'm curious and I would like to know:toast:
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
568 (0.13/day)
Processor Intel i9-9900KS @ 5.2 GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H150i Elite
Memory 32GB Viper Steel Series DDR4-4000
Video Card(s) RTX 3090 Founders Edition
Storage 2TB Sabrent Rocket NVMe + 2TB Intel 960p NVMe + 512GB Samsung 970 Evo NVMe + 4TB WD Black HDD
Display(s) 65" LG C9 OLED
Case Lian Li O11D-XL
Audio Device(s) Audeze Mobius headset, Logitech Z906 speakers
Power Supply Corsair AX1000 Titanium
Cards like this don't benefit from more vram because they're not powerful enough to drive the settings and framerates where they would begin to see a performance hit due to a lack of vram. Doesn't have anything to do with how Nvidia is designing the card in particular.
 
Joined
May 13, 2010
Messages
5,632 (1.11/day)
System Name RemixedBeast-NX
Processor Intel Xeon E5-2690 @ 2.9Ghz (8C/16T)
Motherboard Dell Inc. 08HPGT (CPU 1)
Cooling Dell Standard
Memory 24GB ECC
Video Card(s) Gigabyte Nvidia RTX2060 6GB
Storage 2TB Samsung 860 EVO SSD//2TB WD Black HDD
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster P2350 23in @ 1920x1080 + Dell E2013H 20 in @1600x900
Case Dell Precision T3600 Chassis
Audio Device(s) Beyerdynamic DT770 Pro 80 // Fiio E7 Amp/DAC
Power Supply 630w Dell T3600 PSU
Mouse Logitech G700s/G502
Keyboard Logitech K740
Software Linux Mint 20
Benchmark Scores Network: APs: Cisco Meraki MR32, Ubiquiti Unifi AP-AC-LR and Lite Router/Sw:Meraki MX64 MS220-8P
I have this card and it's nice. Very good bang-for-the-buck card.
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
568 (0.13/day)
Processor Intel i9-9900KS @ 5.2 GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H150i Elite
Memory 32GB Viper Steel Series DDR4-4000
Video Card(s) RTX 3090 Founders Edition
Storage 2TB Sabrent Rocket NVMe + 2TB Intel 960p NVMe + 512GB Samsung 970 Evo NVMe + 4TB WD Black HDD
Display(s) 65" LG C9 OLED
Case Lian Li O11D-XL
Audio Device(s) Audeze Mobius headset, Logitech Z906 speakers
Power Supply Corsair AX1000 Titanium
I have this card and it's nice. Very good bang-for-the-buck card.

Your specs say you have the more sane 1GB version of the card rather than this overpriced 2GB one.
 
Top