1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

First Penryn Core 2 Chips Top At 3.33GHz

Discussion in 'News' started by HellasVagabond, Jul 19, 2007.

  1. HellasVagabond New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,376 (0.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Location:
    Athens , GREECE
    The Quad Core 2 Extreme processor will run at a frequency of 3.33 GHz have a 1333MHz FSB, 12MB L2 Cache and will retail for about 999$ when it gets released in Q4 2007. In addition to the Quad-Core 2 Extreme processor intel also plans to release two performance level 45nm quad-core processors which will also have a 1333 MHz FSB and 12MB L2 Cache. Another four 45nm dual-core processors (Wolfdale) will be launched in the first half of 2008. The first three processors will have a 1333MHz FSB and 6MB L2 Cache, while fourth will have a 1066MHz FSB and 3MB L2 Cache.

    Source: Digitimes
     
    Last edited: Jul 19, 2007
    10 Year Member at TPU
  2. LiNKiN

    LiNKiN

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,765 (0.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    311
    Location:
    Oklahoma, USA
    Man, poor AMD.....the performance is probably gonna be insane on these chips.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  3. a111087

    a111087

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Messages:
    2,796 (0.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    227
    Location:
    US
    Amd will probably delay to try and do something about it
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  4. kwchang007

    kwchang007 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,962 (1.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    185
    Location:
    Severn, MD, USA.
    3.33 ghz quad core? Are they still going to use the same stock cooling for that. Something tells me even at 45 nm their current stock cooling won't be able to keep it under 60C
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  5. 15th Warlock

    15th Warlock

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2004
    Messages:
    2,998 (0.65/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,583
    Location:
    Visalia, CA
    Geez, Intel sure is making everything in their hands to make them look like they're generations ahead of AMD!

    AMD is just about to release their answer to Conroe/Kentsfield, and Intel already is preparing Wolfdale and Penryn :eek:
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  6. LiNKiN

    LiNKiN

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,765 (0.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    311
    Location:
    Oklahoma, USA
    That's exactly what I was thinking. Hopefully they do have an ace up there sleeve. :ohwell:
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  7. a111087

    a111087

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Messages:
    2,796 (0.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    227
    Location:
    US
    Well, people do think so, but i say lets wait and see, some of the low end will be in August
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  8. HellasVagabond New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,376 (0.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Location:
    Athens , GREECE
    The stock cooler should suffice since the new 45nm process brings lower heat levels....And with a non stock cooler this baby should easily do 4 GHz in each core...Awesome...Not to mention the L2 cache and the FSB...
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  9. Kreij

    Kreij Senior Monkey Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    13,826 (3.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,631
    Location:
    Cheeseland (Wisconsin, USA)
    My quad runs fine at stock voltages when pushed to 3.1GHz, but it get HOT when under full load (like Folding on all four cores). The 45nm version should run cooler even clocked at 3.33 GHZ. I'm gooing to have to get me one of those. :rockout:
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  10. TXcharger

    TXcharger New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2006
    Messages:
    431 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Location:
    SAN ANTONE, TX
    this is what we were waiting for right? the penryn is supposed to be the bomb for like ever right? man i cant see anything being faster than this...

    a penryn + X38 = computergasm
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  11. mandelore

    mandelore New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2006
    Messages:
    3,250 (0.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    149
    Location:
    UK-small Village in a Valley Near Newcastle
    why wouldnt a quad phenom kick its ass?
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  12. HellasVagabond New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,376 (0.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Location:
    Athens , GREECE
    Well it would be nice to see that but i doubt AMD predicted the penryn when they started on phenom.......
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  13. kwchang007

    kwchang007 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,962 (1.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    185
    Location:
    Severn, MD, USA.
    Phenom is expected to be released at 2 ghz....Penryn is coming out with 3.33 ghz. If you can beat a 3.33 ghz quad core with a 2ghz quad core you'd have the best architecture ever. (Penryn being the 3.33, not something like netburst).
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  14. a111087

    a111087

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Messages:
    2,796 (0.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    227
    Location:
    US
    don't forget that 2 ghz phenom is prety much a low end of phenom, they will release higher clocks later on...
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  15. kwchang007

    kwchang007 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,962 (1.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    185
    Location:
    Severn, MD, USA.
    Yeah, but it depends on how much later. Also there are no solid benchies out yet :mad:. You can't trust the ones from amd...and you can't trust the ones from other sources...
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  16. quickie New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    Messages:
    238 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    26
    12mb L2 cache?:rockout: I thought 6mb was already a lot. Right now Intel has products that can deliver performance and are scalable. AMD will really have their hands full in the coming months, as if the situation now isn't bad enough.
     
  17. HellasVagabond New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,376 (0.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Location:
    Athens , GREECE
    I wonder why we havent seen any replies from AMD's investor........
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  18. Sent1nel New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2007
    Messages:
    38 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Dundee
    is the penryn or wolfdale native quad core or are these quads still dependant on the FSB for communication between the cores?
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  19. cdawall

    cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    25,026 (6.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,278
    Location:
    Houston
    45nm wont lower temps by itself. the chip will have to operate at a lower vcore for there to be any change in the cpu temps.

    oh and im just putting this out there intel cant have upgraded the way these chips work to well if a 6000+ can keep up with a ocnroe using 1/4 the l2 cache it makes me think that intel needs to improve its design and not half ass the chip if they want to stay ahead of AMD they will need a complete redesign not pentium 4m + a massive cache and a dual/quad core edition.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  20. mandelore

    mandelore New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2006
    Messages:
    3,250 (0.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    149
    Location:
    UK-small Village in a Valley Near Newcastle
    think only amd uses native quad and integrated memory controller :)
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  21. cdawall

    cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    25,026 (6.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,278
    Location:
    Houston
    both are supposed to be native
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  22. WarEagleAU

    WarEagleAU Bird of Prey

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,808 (2.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    547
    Location:
    Gurley, AL
    Well that is might nice stuff from Intel. But even at 45nm, the heat can still surge. I expect stock cooling to take a unique redesigned approach.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  23. HellasVagabond New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,376 (0.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Location:
    Athens , GREECE
    I hope skythe makes something nice for that baby :)
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  24. lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,370 (1.64/day)
    Thanks Received:
    991
    Is Core 2 about to top out (GHz)? Very few processors (whatever the architecture) can get a lot higher than 3-4GHz without fancy sub-zero liquid cooling.

    What is the next performance trick?
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  25. Chewy

    Chewy New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    3,287 (0.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    148
    Location:
    Halifax, Canada
    wont the die shrink cut down on temp? I would like to see avg 4ghz oc in Penryn :D

    I dont think were really going to need more performance for a couple years after this, that will give them enough time to draw up a better processor.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)