• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

FX 8350 or i7 4770k

Which will u buy for a gaming PC


  • Total voters
    87
Status
Not open for further replies.

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
34,491 (9.18/day)
Likes
17,518
Location
Hyderabad, India
#76
I want to say something here, i know that the second combination is a better option for the cost but i will have to keep my new CPU and new GPU (gtx 770 or hd 8950) for 5 years, i bought a Core 2 Duo e7400 2.8ghz 4 years ago and i regret my decision to save on my CPU and go for a better GPU since i am only able to utilise 40% of my current card. I have the money to get a 4770k and a gr8 GPU, actually for reference 3770k costs $430 in my country, and a 670 cost $560 so its really expensive. These types of setups " $200 FX-8350 + $330 GeForce GTX 670 (total $530)" are for those who want to keep their systems for 2 years and my question is it capable to survive for 5 years.

And when is steam roller coming and what are the new features? Because some on this forum are suggesting wait for steamroller to come out and then compare the highest version with the 4770k.
Then it's i7-4770K for you. I wouldn't wait for Steamroller, I have no reason to think it will be >5% performance over FX-8350.
 
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
3,416 (1.22/day)
Likes
1,049
System Name My baby
Processor Athlon II X4 620 @ 3.5GHz, 1.45v, NB @ 2700Mhz, HT @ 2700Mhz - 24hr prime95 stable
Motherboard Asus M4A785TD-V EVO
Cooling Sonic Tower Rev 2 with 120mm Akasa attached, Akasa @ Front, Xilence Red Wing 120mm @ Rear
Memory 16 GB G.Skills 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) ATI ASUS Crossfire 5850
Storage Samsung 1Tb EcoGreen hard drive
Display(s) Hanngs-G 19"
Case Antec VSK 2000 Black Tower Case
Audio Device(s) Onkyo TX-SR309 Receiver, 2x Kef Cresta 1, 1x Kef Center 20c
Power Supply OCZ StealthXstream II 600w, 4x12v/18A, 80% efficiency.
Software Windows Vista X64
#77
i bought a Core 2 Duo e7400 2.8ghz 4 years ago and i regret my decision to save on my CPU and go for a better GPU since i am only able to utilise 40% of my current card.
No CPU 4 years ago would be powerful enough to ultilise a modern video card to it's full potential. The best you couldn't have got was a Core 2 Quad which would be playing today's games fine but even so a modern GPU wouldn't be utilised fully.


These types of setups " $200 FX-8350 + $330 GeForce GTX 670 (total $530)" are for those who want to keep their systems for 2 years

Says who? I've been running a crappy Athlon II X4 since 2009, and there isn't a single game it cannot play maxed out today. I could probably hang onto it for another 2 years if I wanted to making 6 years total.


my question is it capable to survive for 5 years.
There is no correct answer. Technology moves so fast so what we recommend today might be a lemon for longevity. IMO the FX would last longer for gaming, in the short distant future you'll get better performance as it'll be paired with a faster GPU and in the long distant future you'll get better performance due to it being a genuine 8 core CPU.
 
Joined
Apr 3, 2013
Messages
62 (0.04/day)
Likes
8
#78
ATI crossfire set ups favor intel cpu's.
Where as Nvidia sli set ups perform better than ATI crossfire on AMD cpu's.

the 8350 is at least 140 bucks cheaper then that i7.. is it even available yet?
keep in mind that if you plan to do SLI or crossfire, i'd use an intel system since AMD platform offers diminishing returns... weird huh?

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/crossfire-sli-scaling-bottleneck,3471.html

Read it and weep.

No CPU 4 years ago would be powerful enough to ultilise a modern video card to it's full potential. The best you couldn't have got was a Core 2 Quad which would be playing today's games fine but even so a modern GPU wouldn't be utilised fully.
Dude, seriously?
If you're playing a game that is CPUdependent, then what you say is true to a point. A core 2 due E8400 will Over clock to 4 ghzand is more than enough CPUfor you to play the games of today.

That cpu is 7 years old.

If you plan to run dual GPU's, a system that uses PCIe 1.0 only has enough bandwidth for a single modern GPU. cutting it down to x8x8 will bottleneck your graphics cards.

any non CPU dependent game will utilized your modern GPU to it's full potential on a CPU from up to 7 years ago.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

RCoon

Gaming Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 19, 2012
Messages
11,401 (5.43/day)
Likes
9,572
Location
Gypsyland, UK
System Name HP Omen 17
Processor i7 7700HQ
Memory 16GB 2400Mhz DDR4
Video Card(s) GTX 1060
Storage Samsung SM961 256GB + HGST 1TB
Display(s) 1080p IPS G-SYNC 75Hz
Audio Device(s) Bang & Olufsen
Power Supply 230W
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD+
Software Win 10 Pro
#79
Dude, seriously?
If you're playing a game that is CPUdependent, then what you say is true to a point. A core 2 due E8400 will Over clock to 4 ghzand is more than enough CPUfor you to play the games of today.

That cpu is 7 years old.

If you plan to run dual GPU's, a system that uses PCIe 1.0 only has enough bandwidth for a single modern GPU. cutting it down to x8x8 will bottleneck your graphics cards.

any non CPU dependent game will utilized your modern GPU to it's full potential on a CPU from up to 7 years ago.
Please use the Edit function instead of double posting :)
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
398 (0.20/day)
Likes
83
Location
Brooklyn, New York
Processor AMD FX-9790 at 4.65 GHZ
Motherboard Asus Crosshairs V rev 1.0
Cooling Swiftech H320 cpu liquid cooling
Memory G. Skill Trident X 8GBx2 (16 GB) 2400 mhz dimms
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon R9 290
Storage 1 TB Samsung 840 EVO SSD, 500 GB Samsung 840 Sata III SSD, Samsung 840 PRO 240 GB Sata III SSD,
Display(s) Samsung 23 inch LDEC monitor
Case Rosewill BlackHawk Ultra Full Tower Gaming Case
Power Supply Seasonic 860 watt Platinum Plus 80 psu
Software Windows 8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores Cinebench 11.5 64 bit Open GL 81.46 FPS Cinebench 11.5 CPU 7.93
#80
If you have nothing better to say can you kindly please not post anything? :slap:
There was NOTHING wrong with his comment. You went out of bounds in your moderation. He was on topic and polite. Your role is not to censor but to keep things civil. He was civil. You owe him an apology.
 
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
3,416 (1.22/day)
Likes
1,049
System Name My baby
Processor Athlon II X4 620 @ 3.5GHz, 1.45v, NB @ 2700Mhz, HT @ 2700Mhz - 24hr prime95 stable
Motherboard Asus M4A785TD-V EVO
Cooling Sonic Tower Rev 2 with 120mm Akasa attached, Akasa @ Front, Xilence Red Wing 120mm @ Rear
Memory 16 GB G.Skills 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) ATI ASUS Crossfire 5850
Storage Samsung 1Tb EcoGreen hard drive
Display(s) Hanngs-G 19"
Case Antec VSK 2000 Black Tower Case
Audio Device(s) Onkyo TX-SR309 Receiver, 2x Kef Cresta 1, 1x Kef Center 20c
Power Supply OCZ StealthXstream II 600w, 4x12v/18A, 80% efficiency.
Software Windows Vista X64
#81
Dude, seriously?
If you're playing a game that is CPUdependent, then what you say is true to a point. A core 2 due E8400 will Over clock to 4 ghzand is more than enough CPUfor you to play the games of today.

That cpu is 7 years old.

If you plan to run dual GPU's, a system that uses PCIe 1.0 only has enough bandwidth for a single modern GPU. cutting it down to x8x8 will bottleneck your graphics cards.

any non CPU dependent game will utilized your modern GPU to it's full potential on a CPU from up to 7 years ago.
The E8400 is 5 years old. Released January 2008.

http://ark.intel.com/products/33910

I was careful with my wording, I wasn't implying that E7400 coupled with a modern GPU couldn't play games well. But just because it can play games well doesn't mean it pushing the GPU to its full potential.

If an Core 2 Duo could push a modern GPU to it's full potential then a Core 2 Duo E7400 + ATI 7970 would perform identical to an i7 4770k + ATI 7970 in single threaded games. The latter would have double the frame rate whether the game is single thread or not. (That is not to say the former couldn't max out most games, it would) What you're forgeting is an older CPU has slower instructions per clock and access to slower memory bandwidth so even in a single threaded environment it would be signficantly slower.
 
Last edited:

Fourstaff

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 29, 2009
Messages
9,379 (3.15/day)
Likes
2,101
Location
Home
System Name Asus K50-X5DAB \\ Orange!
Processor Athlon QL-65 2.2Ghz \\ 3570K
Motherboard Laptop \\ ASRock z77 Extreme4
Cooling Laptop \\ H100i
Memory 1x1GB + 1X2GB \\ 2x4Gb 1600Mhz CL9 Corsair XMS3
Video Card(s) Mobility Radeon HD4570 512mb \\ Zotac 660Ti OC 2Gb
Storage 250Gb \\ Samsung 840 250Gb + Toshiba DT01ACA300 3Tb
Display(s) 15.6" 1366x768 \\ LG 22EA53VQ
Case Laptop Chassis \\ NZXT Phantom 410 Black/Orange
Power Supply Power Brick \\ Corsair CXM500w
#82
He was stating the obvious:wtf: I see nothing wrong with that :wtf:
There was NOTHING wrong with his comment. You went out of bounds in your moderation. He was on topic and polite. Your role is not to censor but to keep things civil. He was civil. You owe him an apology.
Should we let the forums fill up with comments like "lolwut", "Cheezburgers!" and other useless post like that then? I don't see anything wrong with posting banter either, but I have been in the forum long enough to know what once comments like this creep in, the thread derails within a page and becomes completely useless for OP. Did I censor him? I didn't delete the post (quite a few of us will do that without batting an eyelid). Enough of this sidetracking, if you are not too happy with the way I moderate please feel free to make a complaint, and I shall be judged by the superiors.
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
2,286 (0.92/day)
Likes
528
Location
Burlington, VT
Processor Intel i5-2500k
Motherboard MSI P67A-GD65
Cooling Deep Cool Gammax 400
Memory 8GB (4x2GB) G.Skill Ripjaws X DDR3-1600
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1060 Windforce OC 6GB
Storage Samsung EVO 850 256GB / WD Caviar Black 1TB
Display(s) Acer GD235HZbid 120hz LCD
Case Rosewill Challenger Mid-Tower
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair 650W 650-TX
Software Windows 10
#83
My Vote:

Intel i7-4770K

Reasoning:

I would take the i7 for a number of reasons. For starters, it will consume less power and generate less heat than the AMD alternative. Nect, you said your primary focus was gaming, there are both quite a few games that favor Intel CPU's due to using abstract instruction sets, and a lot of games that use 4 or less threads--which also favors Intel. The only games I can think of where AMD CPU's are on equal footing and there are up to or more than 8 threads supported, are Battlefield 3 and Metro 2033. Now even with those two titles, BF3 somewhat favors Intel CPU's as well as supporting a maximum of 8 threads--which would lead to the i7 outperforming the FX-8350.

There's also the fact that even though next-gen consoles will have up to 8 threads available, it doesn't immediately mean every game that comes out will support 8 threads. It will probably take 2-3 more years to see games optimized for that, which means the hardware in question will already be up to 3 years old, and still kicking, at that point, there will be substantially faster hardware available from Intel and AMD, and what you picked at this point will almost seem irrelevant. The fact is almost all games being released this year will probably use 1-4 threads, and most of the games for the next ~3 years will probably use ~4 threads.

Now there's always the argument about going AMD to save money, because you can always upgrade in the future since they stay on the same socket. Here's what nobody here has mentioned; there is only 1 AM3+ motherboard on Newegg that lists having PCI-Express 3.0 sockets, and it's $200. By comparison, there are dozens of Intel Motherboards that feature them--every 7x series motherboard to be precise starting as low as $75. This means if you upgraded your GPU, you risk a chance at a noticeable bottleneck not too far down the road--sure, current PCI-ex 3.0 GPU's don't take a huge performance hit from dropping down to 2.0, but what about the next generation of GPU's? And what about multi-gpu setups for that matter?

The obvious retort would be "well he can just buy a new mobo when PCI-express 3.0 is natively supported", but then you're adding additional cost in the foreseeable future--something this guy is explicitly trying to avoid. You'd be looking at buying 2 motherboards, a cpu, and any gpu expenses, and that $100-150 you saved has been completely voided.
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
398 (0.20/day)
Likes
83
Location
Brooklyn, New York
Processor AMD FX-9790 at 4.65 GHZ
Motherboard Asus Crosshairs V rev 1.0
Cooling Swiftech H320 cpu liquid cooling
Memory G. Skill Trident X 8GBx2 (16 GB) 2400 mhz dimms
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon R9 290
Storage 1 TB Samsung 840 EVO SSD, 500 GB Samsung 840 Sata III SSD, Samsung 840 PRO 240 GB Sata III SSD,
Display(s) Samsung 23 inch LDEC monitor
Case Rosewill BlackHawk Ultra Full Tower Gaming Case
Power Supply Seasonic 860 watt Platinum Plus 80 psu
Software Windows 8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores Cinebench 11.5 64 bit Open GL 81.46 FPS Cinebench 11.5 CPU 7.93
#84
Then it's i7-4770K for you. I wouldn't wait for Steamroller, I have no reason to think it will be >5% performance over FX-8350.
You have every reason to believe it will give a 15% performance boost overall. With the doubling of decoders and the shortening of the memory channel that is what AMD executives and engineers are predicting. Now single thread performance will be in the area of 6-7 % which is 2 to 3% more than you stated in your erroneous post.
 

Fourstaff

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 29, 2009
Messages
9,379 (3.15/day)
Likes
2,101
Location
Home
System Name Asus K50-X5DAB \\ Orange!
Processor Athlon QL-65 2.2Ghz \\ 3570K
Motherboard Laptop \\ ASRock z77 Extreme4
Cooling Laptop \\ H100i
Memory 1x1GB + 1X2GB \\ 2x4Gb 1600Mhz CL9 Corsair XMS3
Video Card(s) Mobility Radeon HD4570 512mb \\ Zotac 660Ti OC 2Gb
Storage 250Gb \\ Samsung 840 250Gb + Toshiba DT01ACA300 3Tb
Display(s) 15.6" 1366x768 \\ LG 22EA53VQ
Case Laptop Chassis \\ NZXT Phantom 410 Black/Orange
Power Supply Power Brick \\ Corsair CXM500w
#85
You have every reason to believe it will give a 15% performance boost overall. With the doubling of decoders and the shortening of the memory channel that is what AMD executives and engineers are predicting. Now single thread performance will be in the area of 6-7 % which is 2 to 3% more than you stated in your erroneous post.
No concrete launch window for the consumer versions, and no tests done. Even if its 15% better I believe you are better off getting a 4770K half a year early, at worst case 4770K will be equal to 3770K (which is on average quite a bit better than 8350 in games, and can overclock better). The only advantage Steamroller have (at 15% improvement over Bulldozer) will be price, but I have no reason to believe that the price will be significantly different.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2011
Messages
840 (0.34/day)
Likes
813
Location
Greece
Processor AMD FX-8350 4GHz@1.3V
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-970A UD3 Rev3.0
Cooling Zalman CNPS5X Performa
Memory 2*4GB Patriot Venom RED DDR3 1600MHz CL9
Video Card(s) XFX RX580 GTS 4GB
Storage Sandisk SSD 120GB, 2 Samsung F1 & F3 (1TB)
Display(s) LG IPS235
Case Zalman Neo Z9 Black
Audio Device(s) Via 7.1 onboard
Power Supply OCZ Z550
Mouse Zalman ZM-M401R
Keyboard Trust GXT280
Software Win 7 sp1 64bit
Benchmark Scores CB R15 64bit: single core 95p, multicore 626p WPrime 1.55 (8 cores): 9.0 secs
#86
SR will be 20-30% better in fully supporting sw and 10-15% in IPC. So, Intel will have heavy competition and everyone with an AM3 mobo the best CPU upgrade EVER... So, everyone should hope that this happens and this scenario has very nice possibility to be seen close to the end of 2013.
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
398 (0.20/day)
Likes
83
Location
Brooklyn, New York
Processor AMD FX-9790 at 4.65 GHZ
Motherboard Asus Crosshairs V rev 1.0
Cooling Swiftech H320 cpu liquid cooling
Memory G. Skill Trident X 8GBx2 (16 GB) 2400 mhz dimms
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon R9 290
Storage 1 TB Samsung 840 EVO SSD, 500 GB Samsung 840 Sata III SSD, Samsung 840 PRO 240 GB Sata III SSD,
Display(s) Samsung 23 inch LDEC monitor
Case Rosewill BlackHawk Ultra Full Tower Gaming Case
Power Supply Seasonic 860 watt Platinum Plus 80 psu
Software Windows 8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores Cinebench 11.5 64 bit Open GL 81.46 FPS Cinebench 11.5 CPU 7.93
#87
No concrete launch window for the consumer versions, and no tests done. Even if its 15% better I believe you are better off getting a 4770K half a year early, at worst case 4770K will be equal to 3770K (which is on average quite a bit better than 8350 in games, and can overclock better). The only advantage Steamroller have (at 15% improvement over Bulldozer) will be price, but I have no reason to believe that the price will be significantly different.
4770K is not available. You are making assumptions about availability and performance. Fourth quarter begins 10/1/13 That is as little as 5 months away. It certainly won't be coming in December too late for Christmas rush. So it will be October or November. 5-6 months. Hasbeen has been delayed you can't be sure when it will arrive. You can't recommend products until they are tested on real applications. So you are definitely jumping the gun. I still FIRMLY state wait until the dust clears The fellow said he can wait into the 4th quarter why are you showing your Intel fangs so soon??? I hate having to waste time combating FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt) the famous PR tactics of the WINTEL crowd. Lets cut the hype down a couple of notches and wait until the 4th quarter. If somebody else needs a computer tomorrow then a recommendation now is necessary and we can see for what purpose the computer is needed and what budget is available and then make an appropriate recommendation
 
Last edited:

erocker

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
42,459 (10.10/day)
Likes
18,126
Processor i7 8700K
Motherboard Asus Maximus Hero X WiFi
Cooling Water
Memory 16GB G.Skill 3200Mhz CL14
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Storage SSD's
Display(s) Nixeus EDG27
Case Thermaltake Core X5
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Zx
Power Supply Corsair H1000i
Mouse Zowie EC1-B
#88
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
11,706 (3.98/day)
Likes
6,415
Location
Ohio
System Name Daily Driver
Processor 7900X 4.5GHz 10c/10t 1.15V.
Motherboard ASUS Prime X299 Deluxe
Cooling MCR320 + Kuplos Kryos NEXT CPU block
Memory GSkill Trident Z 4x8 GB DDR4 3600 MHz CL16
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1080 FTW3
Storage 512GB Patriot Hellfire, 512GB OCZ RD400, 640GB Caviar Black, 2TB Caviar Green
Display(s) Yamakasi 27" 2560x1440 IPS
Case Thermaltake P5
Power Supply EVGA 750W Supernova G2
Benchmark Scores Faster than most of you! Bet on it! :)
#89
Haswell is a month away and there have been plenty of performance leaks. Versus SR which hasnt leaked a thing outside of electrons :)p). WHile both are speculative, one at least has rumors of performance circlating while the other, SR, is a mythical beast at this time regarding performance...One cant hang their hat on anything at this point, but at least Haswell has a nub to make you want to think about it. :D

small_banksy steam roller.jpg

EDIT: It sure seems people are looking really REALLY hard to find BIAS in posts... Amazing...
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
398 (0.20/day)
Likes
83
Location
Brooklyn, New York
Processor AMD FX-9790 at 4.65 GHZ
Motherboard Asus Crosshairs V rev 1.0
Cooling Swiftech H320 cpu liquid cooling
Memory G. Skill Trident X 8GBx2 (16 GB) 2400 mhz dimms
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon R9 290
Storage 1 TB Samsung 840 EVO SSD, 500 GB Samsung 840 Sata III SSD, Samsung 840 PRO 240 GB Sata III SSD,
Display(s) Samsung 23 inch LDEC monitor
Case Rosewill BlackHawk Ultra Full Tower Gaming Case
Power Supply Seasonic 860 watt Platinum Plus 80 psu
Software Windows 8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores Cinebench 11.5 64 bit Open GL 81.46 FPS Cinebench 11.5 CPU 7.93
#90

Fourstaff

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 29, 2009
Messages
9,379 (3.15/day)
Likes
2,101
Location
Home
System Name Asus K50-X5DAB \\ Orange!
Processor Athlon QL-65 2.2Ghz \\ 3570K
Motherboard Laptop \\ ASRock z77 Extreme4
Cooling Laptop \\ H100i
Memory 1x1GB + 1X2GB \\ 2x4Gb 1600Mhz CL9 Corsair XMS3
Video Card(s) Mobility Radeon HD4570 512mb \\ Zotac 660Ti OC 2Gb
Storage 250Gb \\ Samsung 840 250Gb + Toshiba DT01ACA300 3Tb
Display(s) 15.6" 1366x768 \\ LG 22EA53VQ
Case Laptop Chassis \\ NZXT Phantom 410 Black/Orange
Power Supply Power Brick \\ Corsair CXM500w
#91
4770K is not available. You arer making assumptions about availability and performance. Fourth quarter begins 10/1/13 That is as little as 5 months away. It cewrtainly won't be coming in December too9 late for Christmas rush. Sot it will be October or November. 5-6 months. Hasbeen has been delayed you can't be sure when it will arrive.
If I don't make assumptions on the availability and performance of Steamroller there is absolutely no point in talking about it at all. :rolleyes:

Given what little we know about Steamroller the expected time gap between it and Haswell is still going to be about half a year, thank you for doing the math for me. No I am not making any assumptions on the expected performance of 4770K, the worst case is that 4770K is a total turd and OP gets a 3770K instead (which is proven to be quite powerful). Or we can expect a slight improvement (on par with 2770K to 3770K), in which case Steamroller needs to work pretty hard in order to catch up with it in gaming.
 
Joined
May 14, 2009
Messages
2,132 (0.67/day)
Likes
477
Location
Chicago burbs
System Name Halloween Boo!
Processor Intel Core i7 3770K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77-Up7
Cooling Custom Water/ Thermalchill TA 120.3/ Swiftech Apogeee XT/ MCP655/ Swiftech M icrores/ XSPC RX 240
Memory 16G G.Skill trident 2400MHz
Video Card(s) 3 x Radeon 7970
Storage OCZ Revo Drive 240G
Display(s) 24 inch Viewsonic
Case Phobia WayCoolIt Test Bench
Power Supply Nexus 1100 watt
#92
long term 4770K will be better
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
398 (0.20/day)
Likes
83
Location
Brooklyn, New York
Processor AMD FX-9790 at 4.65 GHZ
Motherboard Asus Crosshairs V rev 1.0
Cooling Swiftech H320 cpu liquid cooling
Memory G. Skill Trident X 8GBx2 (16 GB) 2400 mhz dimms
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon R9 290
Storage 1 TB Samsung 840 EVO SSD, 500 GB Samsung 840 Sata III SSD, Samsung 840 PRO 240 GB Sata III SSD,
Display(s) Samsung 23 inch LDEC monitor
Case Rosewill BlackHawk Ultra Full Tower Gaming Case
Power Supply Seasonic 860 watt Platinum Plus 80 psu
Software Windows 8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores Cinebench 11.5 64 bit Open GL 81.46 FPS Cinebench 11.5 CPU 7.93
#93
long term 4770K will be better
Most likely. It will however be far more expensive. Intel will likely price at the same level of the 3770 or a bit higher. That will enable them to maintain their return on investment. Remember the cpu market is shrinking. So Intel is not likely desirous of lowering the unit pricing
of the Hasbeen chips.
So if Steamroller delivers a 15% overall performance improvement over FX Vishera as AMD insists, and 6-7% gain in single threaded performance. it is likely to be much closer to I7 4770k
performance than Vishera is to I7 3770k. For most productivity apps Vishera is only a hairsbreath behind I7. Apps like winzip,Photoshop, databases etc. In multimedia decoding it is quite a respectable competitor to I7 3770k.

I have every reason to wait and see. If I am disappointed, I have never had an issue with expressing it here or elsewhere.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
11,706 (3.98/day)
Likes
6,415
Location
Ohio
System Name Daily Driver
Processor 7900X 4.5GHz 10c/10t 1.15V.
Motherboard ASUS Prime X299 Deluxe
Cooling MCR320 + Kuplos Kryos NEXT CPU block
Memory GSkill Trident Z 4x8 GB DDR4 3600 MHz CL16
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1080 FTW3
Storage 512GB Patriot Hellfire, 512GB OCZ RD400, 640GB Caviar Black, 2TB Caviar Green
Display(s) Yamakasi 27" 2560x1440 IPS
Case Thermaltake P5
Power Supply EVGA 750W Supernova G2
Benchmark Scores Faster than most of you! Bet on it! :)
#94
Remember however, the cost to support Steamroller (mobo with proper VRMs, proper Heatsink to support similar overclocks to IB), assuming its like BD, could drive the cost difference down a bit.

Thing is, one can wait until XXXXX, but then when they get there, Broadwell is around the corner or AMD's 'tock'...Really, I mirror what a few people said here already and if you are ready now, buy in a month... waiting a month as opposed to AT LEAST 5 is a different ballgame. I'm not sure SR will be worth waiting that long for IMO... and I say SR but that is quite interchangeable really. If SR was coming out in a month I would say wait for that and dont wait for Haswell. ;)
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
398 (0.20/day)
Likes
83
Location
Brooklyn, New York
Processor AMD FX-9790 at 4.65 GHZ
Motherboard Asus Crosshairs V rev 1.0
Cooling Swiftech H320 cpu liquid cooling
Memory G. Skill Trident X 8GBx2 (16 GB) 2400 mhz dimms
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon R9 290
Storage 1 TB Samsung 840 EVO SSD, 500 GB Samsung 840 Sata III SSD, Samsung 840 PRO 240 GB Sata III SSD,
Display(s) Samsung 23 inch LDEC monitor
Case Rosewill BlackHawk Ultra Full Tower Gaming Case
Power Supply Seasonic 860 watt Platinum Plus 80 psu
Software Windows 8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores Cinebench 11.5 64 bit Open GL 81.46 FPS Cinebench 11.5 CPU 7.93
#95
Remember however, the cost to support Steamroller (mobo with proper VRMs, proper Heatsink to support similar overclocks to IB), assuming its like BD, could drive the cost difference down a bit.

Thing is, one can wait until XXXXX, but then when they get there, Broadwell is around the corner or AMD's 'tock'...Really, I mirror what a few people said here already and if you are ready now, buy in a month... waiting a month as opposed to AT LEAST 5 is a different ballgame. I'm not sure SR will be worth waiting that long for IMO... and I say SR but that is quite interchangeable really. If SR was coming out in a month I would say wait for that and dont wait for Haswell. ;)
No Broadbust is likely at least 2 years off. Pay no mind to the projected release it will be a good deal later than that. It will take 2 years for Intel to make its return on investment in Hasbeen wothwhile. Also Broadbust is a further die shrink. It will be harder each time they shrink the process closer to atomic size.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
11,706 (3.98/day)
Likes
6,415
Location
Ohio
System Name Daily Driver
Processor 7900X 4.5GHz 10c/10t 1.15V.
Motherboard ASUS Prime X299 Deluxe
Cooling MCR320 + Kuplos Kryos NEXT CPU block
Memory GSkill Trident Z 4x8 GB DDR4 3600 MHz CL16
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1080 FTW3
Storage 512GB Patriot Hellfire, 512GB OCZ RD400, 640GB Caviar Black, 2TB Caviar Green
Display(s) Yamakasi 27" 2560x1440 IPS
Case Thermaltake P5
Power Supply EVGA 750W Supernova G2
Benchmark Scores Faster than most of you! Bet on it! :)
#96
No Broadbust is likely at least 2 years off. Pay no mind to the projected release it will be a good deal later than that. It will take 2 years for Intel to make its return on investment in Hasbeen wothwhile. Also Broadbust is a further die shrink. It will be harder each time they shrink the process closer to atomic size.
Release dates were not the underlying point in that... the concepts were, note.



Ya know, for someone who seems to resent bias, you sure do take your jabs at Intel quite a bit without provocation I may add...

"Broadbust"

"Hasbeen"

If you would like to stop bias and argumentative posts, perhaps looking in the mirror is a good place to start. :)
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
398 (0.20/day)
Likes
83
Location
Brooklyn, New York
Processor AMD FX-9790 at 4.65 GHZ
Motherboard Asus Crosshairs V rev 1.0
Cooling Swiftech H320 cpu liquid cooling
Memory G. Skill Trident X 8GBx2 (16 GB) 2400 mhz dimms
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon R9 290
Storage 1 TB Samsung 840 EVO SSD, 500 GB Samsung 840 Sata III SSD, Samsung 840 PRO 240 GB Sata III SSD,
Display(s) Samsung 23 inch LDEC monitor
Case Rosewill BlackHawk Ultra Full Tower Gaming Case
Power Supply Seasonic 860 watt Platinum Plus 80 psu
Software Windows 8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores Cinebench 11.5 64 bit Open GL 81.46 FPS Cinebench 11.5 CPU 7.93
#97
Release dates were not the underlying point in that... the concepts were, note.



Ya know, for someone who seems to resent bias, you sure do take your jabs at Intel quite a bit without provocation I may add...

"Broadbust"

"Hasbeen"

If you would like to stop bias and augmentative posts, perhaps looking in the mirror is a good place to start. :)
I understand where you are coming from on that, but my derision of Intel monikers is not based on lack of performance it is about their monopolistic practices which cause higher cpu prices and slow down technical advances. I have intense hatred of monopoly capitalists and their undue influence on goverment processes. There are many anti-monopoly laws on the books that are not being enforced because of the big money they use to corrupt an already corrupt government. So I have a bias against Intel for that reason alone. If AMD ever fails cpu prices will shoot up further and innovation will slow even further. It is not that I view AMD as a good capitalist. To me they all stink, but I am concerned about technical progress and the cost of commodities that I purchase.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
11,706 (3.98/day)
Likes
6,415
Location
Ohio
System Name Daily Driver
Processor 7900X 4.5GHz 10c/10t 1.15V.
Motherboard ASUS Prime X299 Deluxe
Cooling MCR320 + Kuplos Kryos NEXT CPU block
Memory GSkill Trident Z 4x8 GB DDR4 3600 MHz CL16
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1080 FTW3
Storage 512GB Patriot Hellfire, 512GB OCZ RD400, 640GB Caviar Black, 2TB Caviar Green
Display(s) Yamakasi 27" 2560x1440 IPS
Case Thermaltake P5
Power Supply EVGA 750W Supernova G2
Benchmark Scores Faster than most of you! Bet on it! :)
#98
I agree with your reasoning, but that isn't an excuse. Just stop it and perhaps people will respond more in kind to your views as, without that, they are mostly rooted in fact.

Catch you around... its GO TIME! :)
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
398 (0.20/day)
Likes
83
Location
Brooklyn, New York
Processor AMD FX-9790 at 4.65 GHZ
Motherboard Asus Crosshairs V rev 1.0
Cooling Swiftech H320 cpu liquid cooling
Memory G. Skill Trident X 8GBx2 (16 GB) 2400 mhz dimms
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon R9 290
Storage 1 TB Samsung 840 EVO SSD, 500 GB Samsung 840 Sata III SSD, Samsung 840 PRO 240 GB Sata III SSD,
Display(s) Samsung 23 inch LDEC monitor
Case Rosewill BlackHawk Ultra Full Tower Gaming Case
Power Supply Seasonic 860 watt Platinum Plus 80 psu
Software Windows 8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores Cinebench 11.5 64 bit Open GL 81.46 FPS Cinebench 11.5 CPU 7.93
#99
I agree with your reasoning, but that isn't an excuse. Just stop it and perhaps people will respond more in kind to your views as, without that, they are mostly rooted in fact.

Catch you around... its GO TIME! :)
I appreciate your response ,I will heed your advice . It's good we found some common ground.
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
3,800 (2.08/day)
Likes
1,320
System Name Out of the game..
Benchmark Scores d1nky@hwbot.org
can we draw up a conclusion for OP then?! theres been several pages, giving fact and opinion on every stance, amd, intel and amd steamroller.

would it be best to say to wait, if thats what he wants and to last 5/6 years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.