• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Galaxy GeForce GTX 970 Pictured, Specs Confirmed, Early Benchmarks Surface

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
38,241 (8.39/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
Here are some of the first pictures of an AIC partner branded NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 graphics card, the Galaxy GTX 970 GC. Spotted across Chinese PC enthusiast forums and social networks, the latest set of leaks cover not just pictures of what the GTX 970 looks like, but also what's under its hood. To begin with, Galaxy's card appears to be built for the high-end market segment. A meaty twin-fan aluminium fin-stack heatsink, coupled by a spacey backplate cover a signature Galaxy blue PCB, holding NVIDIA's new GTX 970 GPU, and 4 GB of GDDR5 memory. The card appears to feature a high-grade VRM that draws power from a combination of 8-pin and 6-pin PCIe power connectors.



There's also a selection of pictures of a purported reference-design GeForce GTX 970 graphics card. It may look drab, but that's because NVIDIA will not ship reference-design cards. The GTX 970 will likely be an AIC-exclusive, meaning that you'll only find custom-design cards based on the chip. We wonder if that's the same with the GTX 980. Straightaway, you'll notice that the GTX 970 reference PCB bears an uncanny resemblance to the one NVIDIA used for the GTX 670, GTX 660 Ti, and GTX 760. That's probably because the GK104 and new GM204 are pin-identical. Such a thing isn't new. The "Pitcairn" silicon (Radeon HD 7870, HD 7850) and its predecessor, "Barts" (HD 6870 and HD 6850) are similarly pin-identical, differing with the die. The similarity in PCB design, if nothing, shows that the GTX 970 will be as energy-efficient as the GTX 670.



Moving on to the actual-specs, and some users with access to GeForce GTX 970 managed to pull these specs off a TechPowerUp GPU-Z screenshot. Some parts of the screenshot look blurry, probably due to a failed attempt at blurring out the BIOS string. GPU-Z has preliminary support for GM204 since version 0.7.9. This is what it could make out:
  • GPU identified as "1C32"
  • 1,664 CUDA cores
  • 138 TMUs
  • 32 ROPs
  • 256-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface
  • 4 GB standard memory amount
  • 1051 MHz core, 1178 MHz GPU Boost, and 7012 MHz (GDDR5-effective) memory clocks
  • 224 GB/s memory bandwidth
The sample was put through a quick run of 3DMark 11 Extreme Preset. It scored X3963 points, which if you factor in the dual-core Core i3-4130 used in the bench, puts the GTX 970 somewhere between the GTX 780 and GTX 780 Ti, in terms of performance.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
2,377 (0.58/day)
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD RX480
Storage Samsung 750 Evo 250gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television)
Case antec 600
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
"puts the GTX 970 somewhere between the GTX 780 and GTX 780 Ti, in terms of performance."

Uuurggggg lame!
Come on now, you name as if its 2 jumps from the 700 series and THAT is the performance?
I hope some magic drivers can give it a good kick in the ass
 
Joined
Jul 2, 2008
Messages
7,462 (1.74/day)
Location
Hillsboro, OR
System Name Main/DC
Processor i7-3770K/i7-2600K
Motherboard MSI Z77A-GD55/GA-P67A-UD4-B3
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC14CS/H80
Memory Crucial Ballistix Sport 16GB (2 x 8GB) LP /4GB Kingston DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 660 Ti/MSI HD7770
Storage Crucial MX100 256GB/120GB Samsung 830 & Seagate 2TB(died)
Display(s) Asus 24' LED/Samsung SyncMaster B1940
Case P100/Antec P280 It's huge!
Audio Device(s) on board
Power Supply SeaSonic SS-660XP2/Seasonic SS-760XP2
Software Win 7 Home Premiun 64 Bit
draws power from a combination of 8-pin and 6-pin PCIe power connectors
Bummer. There goes the hope for a lower power middle weight. That's good for up to 300 watts. I was looking for something around the GTX 780's performance while using 125-150 watts. I do see that the other board shots show 2x6 pin.
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
4,683 (1.07/day)
System Name Obelisc
Processor i7 3770k @ 4.8 GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling H110
Memory 16GB(4x4) @ 2400 MHz 9-11-11-31
Video Card(s) GTX 780 Ti
Storage 850 EVO 1TB, 2x 5TB Toshiba
Case T81
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium HD
Power Supply EVGA 850 T2 80+ TITANIUM
Software Win10 64bit
Without a die shrink never expect much. Always hate it when this happens because you don't get as much performance jump and then when the die shrunk cards do comes its another small jump.

Bummer. There goes the hope for a lower power middle weight. That's good for up to 300 watts. I was looking for something around the GTX 780's performance while using 125-150 watts. I do see that the other board shots show 2x6 pin.
Galaxy likes to do that on lower power cards. They had my 660 Ti's on a 680 PCB and I was never able to come close to hitting the power limit on that thing even volt modded.
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2010
Messages
5,047 (1.38/day)
Location
Iberian Peninsula
1) LOVELY to see the TechpowerUp utility being used!!!!! Feeling proud of this community!
2) 970 is the lower spec twinbrother, so if it is in between 780 and 780Ti, I am in! :)
 

the54thvoid

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
7,604 (2.02/day)
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
System Name Newer Ho'Ryzen
Processor Ryzen 3700X
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VI Hero
Cooling TR Le Grand Macho
Memory 16Gb G.Skill 3200 RGB
Video Card(s) RTX 2080ti MSI Duke @2Ghz ish
Storage Samsumg 960 Pro m2. 512Gb
Display(s) LG 32" 165Hz 1440p GSYNC
Case Lian Li PC-V33WX
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TItanium 850
Software W10
Benchmark Scores Look, it's a Ryzen on air........ What's the point?
Reviews will be soon enough. No point even guessing now.

Let's all be patient, after all, we know we're getting the repeat scenario from a few years back.

Next year we'll have 980Ti. But for now, a 980 beating a 780Ti will be nice, if not for anything else, better perf/watt and more Vram.
 
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
3,844 (1.78/day)
Location
Texas
System Name SnowFire / The Reinforcer / Portable? / New Portable?
Processor i7 8086K 5.0ghz (24/7) / 2x Xeon E52650v2 / i7 7700HQ / AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Motherboard Asus Z370 Prime-A / Dell Dual Socket (R720) / HP Omen Stock / Asrock X570 ITX
Cooling RX 360mm + 140mm Custom Loop / Dell Stock / HP Stock / Noctua L9i (Yes L9i)
Memory Corsair RGB 16gb DDR4 3000 CL 16 / DDR3 128gb 16 x 8gb / 12gb DDR4 3 x 4gb / Corsair RGB 3200 16gb
Video Card(s) GTX Titan XP (2025mhz) / Asus GTX 950 (No Power Connector) / RX 580 / GTX 970 (Temp)
Storage Samsung 970 1tb NVME and 2tb HDD x4 RAID 5 / 300gb x8 RAID 5 / NVME 240gb SSD and 1tb HDD
Display(s) Acer XG270HU 1440p 144hz Freesync, Acer B286HK 4K UHD Monitor / 1080p 60hz Freesync display
Case Corsair Obsidian 800D / Dell Poweredge R720 Rack Mount Case / HP Omen 17 / Fractal Design Node 202
Audio Device(s) Realtec ALC1150 (On board)
Power Supply Rosewill Lightning 1300Watt / Dell Stock 750 / Brick / Fractal Design 450 Watt Bronze
Mouse Logitech G5
Keyboard Logitech G19S
Software Windows 10 Pro / Windows Server 2008 R2 / Windows 10 Home / Windows 10 Pro
That's more what I expected, its between the 780 and 780ti and its a X70 counterpart which is very good and could confirm that the 980 is going to be better than the 780ti even if it is not by an extreme amount.

Going to be a beast at that with 4gb GDDR5 with that 7012mhz clock for the memory! It will be a good high resolution gaming card from NVidia especially if the price falls nicely in line (Though I am expecting $600~).

Glad to see this card turns out well, now it just comes down to how good the power consumption is.
 
Joined
Jan 11, 2014
Messages
97 (0.04/day)
Processor Intel i5 4690k
Motherboard MSI Z97M Gaming
Cooling Custom Loop
Memory Kingston HyperX Savage
Video Card(s) GTX 970
Storage Samsung 840 EVO
Case Phanteks Enthoo Evolv
Power Supply EVGA Supernova 750G2
  • 1051 MHz core, 1178 MHz GPU Boost, and 7012 MHz (GDDR5-effective) memory clocks
  • 232 GB/s memory bandwidth
Bandwidth should be the same 224.4GB/s as a GTX 770 since its the same speed and bus size.
 
Joined
May 10, 2014
Messages
32 (0.01/day)
Bummer. There goes the hope for a lower power middle weight. That's good for up to 300 watts. I was looking for something around the GTX 780's performance while using 125-150 watts. I do see that the other board shots show 2x6 pin.
The amount of power connections say nothing about the actual consumption of the card.
 
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
4,481 (2.03/day)
Processor i7 7700k
Motherboard MSI Z270 SLI Plus
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 2 x 8 GB Corsair Vengeance
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2070 Super
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250 GB and WD Black 4TB
Display(s) Dell 27 inch 1440p 144 Hz
Case Corsair Obsidian 750D Airflow Edition
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply EVGA SuperNova 850 W Gold
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G105
Software Windows 10
Maxwell is more efficient so we know that the GTX 970/980 will outperform Keplers but being tied down to the 28nm process is what will limit it. My guess is the GTX 980 will perform somewhere around the GTX 780Ti maybe beating it.
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
38,241 (8.39/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
Bandwidth should be the same 224.4GB/s as a GTX 770 since its the same speed and bus size.
Fixed. Mixed up memory clocks between reference and that Galaxy GC (factory OC card).
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (0.89/day)
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
Bummer. There goes the hope for a lower power middle weight. That's good for up to 300 watts. I was looking for something around the GTX 780's performance while using 125-150 watts. I do see that the other board shots show 2x6 pin.
The original source does mention that the reference design is 150W TDP ( 2 x 6pin), so I guess it comes down to how aggressive the vendor boards push the OC's, and the marketing factor. A lot of people do associate a performance board with 1*8pin + 1*6pin (and 2*8 for uber SKUs) whether it warrants it or not.
 
Joined
Jul 2, 2008
Messages
7,462 (1.74/day)
Location
Hillsboro, OR
System Name Main/DC
Processor i7-3770K/i7-2600K
Motherboard MSI Z77A-GD55/GA-P67A-UD4-B3
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC14CS/H80
Memory Crucial Ballistix Sport 16GB (2 x 8GB) LP /4GB Kingston DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 660 Ti/MSI HD7770
Storage Crucial MX100 256GB/120GB Samsung 830 & Seagate 2TB(died)
Display(s) Asus 24' LED/Samsung SyncMaster B1940
Case P100/Antec P280 It's huge!
Audio Device(s) on board
Power Supply SeaSonic SS-660XP2/Seasonic SS-760XP2
Software Win 7 Home Premiun 64 Bit
The amount of power connections say nothing about the actual consumption of the card.
But it's obvious that Galaxy thinks that it can use more than the 225 watts that 2x6 pin (75 watts from the PCI-e bus) can provide.
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2008
Messages
237 (0.05/day)
System Name PC2.1
Processor Intel i7 3770k @4.6GHZ
Motherboard MSI Z68A-GD80
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 16GB Corsair XMS 1866MHz
Video Card(s) SLI EVGA 780 Classifieds
Storage Samsung 830 250gb /Samsung EVO 840 120GB
Display(s) 3x Dell 27" IPS screens
Case Thermaltake T81 Urban
Power Supply Cooler Master V1000
Software Windows 8.1 64bit
Sigh another mid rage GPU with a high end part number just like the 670/680 and 770. Will sit on my 780 Classifieds for a while longer.
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2008
Messages
2,513 (0.57/day)
Location
Switzerland
Processor i7 4790K ( O.C 4.7 Ghz ) 1.28 V
Motherboard Maximus VII Impact z97
Cooling CM Masterliquid 240mm AIO
Memory 16 GB Corsair Dominator Platinum DDR3 1866 Mhz
Video Card(s) ASUS Strix RTX 2080 Ti
Storage M.2 Samsung NVMe 960 Pro 512 GB
Display(s) Asus PG279 IPS 1440p 165Hz G-sync
Case CM Mastercase 3.1
Power Supply Corsair AX760
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard Rapoo
Software Win 10 64 Bit
I will skip this gen. because of the waterblock that i bought for my 780 Ti.
 
Joined
Jul 2, 2008
Messages
7,462 (1.74/day)
Location
Hillsboro, OR
System Name Main/DC
Processor i7-3770K/i7-2600K
Motherboard MSI Z77A-GD55/GA-P67A-UD4-B3
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC14CS/H80
Memory Crucial Ballistix Sport 16GB (2 x 8GB) LP /4GB Kingston DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 660 Ti/MSI HD7770
Storage Crucial MX100 256GB/120GB Samsung 830 & Seagate 2TB(died)
Display(s) Asus 24' LED/Samsung SyncMaster B1940
Case P100/Antec P280 It's huge!
Audio Device(s) on board
Power Supply SeaSonic SS-660XP2/Seasonic SS-760XP2
Software Win 7 Home Premiun 64 Bit
Can I swap out the GPU on my 660 Ti?;):laugh: I'm okay with 2 GB.
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
1,024 (0.35/day)
Location
New Jersey, USA
System Name Current Rig
Processor Intel i7 920 oc to 3.5ghz
Motherboard MSI x58 Platinum
Cooling Cooler Master Seidon 120M
Memory G.Skill 6gb ddr3 1333mhz 7-7-7-18
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 670 OC WindForce 3X GV-N670OC-2GD
Storage Samsung EVO SSD
Display(s) Viewsonic 1440x900 5ms
Case CoolMaster HAF 932
Power Supply Coolmax 950w
Software Win 7 64bit
Sigh another mid rage GPU with a high end part number just like the 670/680 and 770. Will sit on my 780 Classifieds for a while longer.
Exactly. The power efficiency will be better but still won't beat a 770sli setup.

High end will be GM210.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (0.89/day)
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
But it's obvious that Galaxy thinks that it can use more than the 225 watts that 2x6 pin (75 watts from the PCI-e bus) can provide.
Well, hopefully the decision reflects the overclocking headroom. If it mirrors the GM 107, then the DIY performance upgrade should make the card all the more interesting. If the reference card debuts at $399, then I doubt the vendor specials will be $20-30 more for the most part. Not bad for the performance, but I doubt it would cause AMD's exec's to get heart palpitations either. Seemingly the status quo remains....how surprising :rolleyes:
Just for the record, Galaxy used a 6-pin on their GTX 750 (non-Ti), and it did need it -barely- 80-85W with a max 1402MHz core boost frequency
 
Joined
Jul 2, 2008
Messages
7,462 (1.74/day)
Location
Hillsboro, OR
System Name Main/DC
Processor i7-3770K/i7-2600K
Motherboard MSI Z77A-GD55/GA-P67A-UD4-B3
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC14CS/H80
Memory Crucial Ballistix Sport 16GB (2 x 8GB) LP /4GB Kingston DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 660 Ti/MSI HD7770
Storage Crucial MX100 256GB/120GB Samsung 830 & Seagate 2TB(died)
Display(s) Asus 24' LED/Samsung SyncMaster B1940
Case P100/Antec P280 It's huge!
Audio Device(s) on board
Power Supply SeaSonic SS-660XP2/Seasonic SS-760XP2
Software Win 7 Home Premiun 64 Bit
The sad truth is that there are no games pushing the hardware anymore. Do remember how long it took for hardware to catch up to Crysis?
Exactly. The power efficiency will be better but still won't beat a 770sli setup.

High end will be GM210.
Remember the movie Trading Places? There's the scene where they're buying up all of the stock at rock bottom prices. This might turn out to be a good time to pick up some 670/680/770's as people blindly dump them for the new P/N.
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2010
Messages
4,602 (1.31/day)
I am not pleased by the fact that NVIDIA decided to use its micro-architecture supiriority over AMD and deliver us slower-than-expected product. Really hoped for a 1920 core product that will match or even surpass the 780 ti.

Oh well... time to wait for the bigger dogs.
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2011
Messages
2,164 (0.66/day)
Location
So. Cal.
Is there ample confirmation to the $400 MSRP for this GTX 970, I'd say given the small PCB of their reference BOM it might bare that out?
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (0.89/day)
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
I am not pleased by the fact that NVIDIA decided to use its micro-architecture supiriority over AMD and deliver us slower-than-expected product. Really hoped for a 1920 core product that will match or even surpass the 780 ti.
You hoped a 256-bit, 1920 core part would outperform a 384-bit 2880 core using the same basic architecture on the same process node ? I think you expect a little too much from a tweaking of shader module/core ratio's and increased cache. As it is, I'm guessing that GM 204 makes further sacrifices in compute to reduce power demand, and save die space (esp. if the 370-390mm² die size estimate is correct)
Oh well... time to wait for the bigger dogs.
Well, this is the GK 104 replacement after all, so I think there's only so much you can reasonably expect with any given transistor density.
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2010
Messages
4,602 (1.31/day)
You hoped a 256-bit, 1920 core part would outperform a 384-bit 2880 core using the same basic architecture on the same process node ? I think you expect a little too much from a tweaking of shader module/core ratio's and increased cache. As it is, I'm guessing that GM 204 makes further sacrifices in compute to reduce power demand, and save die space (esp. if the 370-390mm² die size estimate is correct)

Well, this is the GK 104 replacement after all, so I think there's only so much you can reasonably expect with any given transistor density.
Kepler and Maxwell are not the same, not nearly the same in performance\watt ratio.
If a 1664 part can beat a GTX 780, than yes, a 1920 part could match something that is 22% faster than a GTX 780.
 
Joined
May 8, 2013
Messages
84 (0.03/day)
But it's obvious that Galaxy thinks that it can use more than the 225 watts that 2x6 pin (75 watts from the PCI-e bus) can provide.
Or, alternatively, they just re-used the GTX 770 board design as-is. It is a mistake to estimate TDP from the power connectors on a non-reference card; even the power-sipping GTX 750 Ti has some aftermarket boards with PCI-E plugs.
 
Top