Discussion in 'Graphics Cards' started by stupidbiznitch9, Dec 24, 2006.
Is this a decent card????
it has 256mb of mem and is in PCI-e
depends what you compare it to? and what games you want to play
if i were to buy a new one, should i go with a x1600pro or a 7600?
GS or GT? either way the 7600 pwns
the GS is in the same price range......
or would a x850pro be the best....
for the x850 it depends on the games you play....if you play games that require PS3 and VS3 then dont get it
i havent seen any games that requier ps3 yet, and HDR on the 6600/6800 cards sucks, kills performance.
but honestly if its pci-e and u need ps3 support x1300xt is a good choice its a renamed x1650pro(12 pipes and such) and runs like 80bucks
Splinter Cell requires PS3
The x1300 is not a good card...
And 1300's are getting renamed to 1550, not 1650
i think he's saying there like the 1650
cuz when are they going to start with DX10 games ?
Well, I don't think we'll be seeing dx10 games for a while.
And I still don't think the x1300 comes anywhere close to the 1650 in performance. Even as bad as the 1650 is, 1300 is still way worse.
check the tpu review of the 1300xt, its a renamed 1600pro u noob!!!!
and funny, i played splinter cell on my x800xt pe the other day.....very strange.
the x1300xt is just a renamed x1600pro, the x1300/pro are 4 pipe cards and very slow, but the XT is not
here you go http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Sapphire/X1300XT/
so if i get a 1950pro 512 well that last me how long ? or are there other one that well do good for less ?
that enought to prove to you that your wrong?
512 on a card in this class is pointless they cant take proper advantage of it, its like a 256mb 9600 card, the card just cant take advantage of the extra ram.
the x1300xt is basickly the same card, your better off gettin that for 80bukcs then the x1650pro!!
You could have posted just the link...
Anyways, it was a reading mistake. I thought you meant the crappy x1300 that has like 4 pixel pipes and slow clock speeds, not the 1300XT.
im not the one that was asking about thoses cards
cuz the card in my Dell x300 se it not working and i was thinking of getting a new card for my rig in my specs so i can leave this one in the comp for my girl but thats why i rather have a 512 cuz i dont want to have to get another one any time soon
like i said, 512 is pointless on a card thats in this class, the chip cant take full advantage of more then 256mb, 128bit dosnt give it the bandwith to do so.
my advice if you want something thats gonna last a long time, get an x1900gt for 150bucks!!!
and yes i could have used links BUT nobody ever bothers to click them then they do what you did, they assume, dispite the fact that i said "x1300xt".
this way they dont gotta go and do the very difficult tast of clicking a link they can just read the quotes from wiz here
Dude, i missed the "XT" part on your post. I said that in my last post. You act like I ignored the fact that you said "XT".
Either way, I am agreeing with the fact that you said the x1300xt IS the x1650 pro or whatever. It was a mistake on my end.
well people who cant read just get on my nerves specly when they correct me with FUD that came from their lack of proper reading of what i said.
and the cards are basickly the same exect thing, diffrance is clocks and hell throw on a vf700 cooler and u should beable to overclock the piss out of the dam thing no problem(the vf900 allows huge overclocks on my x1900xt)
i dont understand what this is all about...both of those cards are doorstops so quit fighting like little kids
I'm not fighting.
Athlonx2, in the 80$ price range the x1300xt isnt a bad deal, to somebody like me with a 1600x1200 res screen they would be a doorstop but for an avrage low res gamer they would be fine!!!
Separate names with a comma.