• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Geil EVO Spear DDR4 for Ryzen

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
17,104 (3.46/day)
Geil's EVO Spear sticks are a standard-height, high-performance memory series specifically tuned for AMD Ryzen CPUs. With excellent CPU heatsink compatibility thanks to their low height, these EVO Spear sticks are ready for whatever type of Ryzen system you might build, entry-level or high-end. And yes, they work on Intel too.

Show full review
 
Last edited by a moderator:

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
6,628 (4.11/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x8GB DDR4 2400 G.Skill
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 128 and 256GB OCZ Vertex4, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Chieftec BX01
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Is 1.35V the JEDEC standard for DDR4-3000?
I'm asking because I know in the past there were some problems with sticks that didn't use the standard voltage by default and I tend to steer clear of those ever since.
 
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
11 (0.00/day)
Is 1.35V the JEDEC standard for DDR4-3000?
I'm asking because I know in the past there were some problems with sticks that didn't use the standard voltage by default and I tend to steer clear of those ever since.
JEDEC standard is 1.2v
 
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
763 (0.24/day)
  • 1R design lowers overall performance (but makes it highly compatible with Ryzen, so is this really a con?!?)
You hit the nail on the spot. I think for memory it's better to have max compatible rather then 'selective' systems or CPU's that can work with these chips.
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
4,299 (0.79/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MXVI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Motherboard X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro
Memory 32GB Viper Steel 3600 DDR4 @ 3800MHz 16-19-16-19-36
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 2080 Gaming OC 8G
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 2TB Viper VPN100, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 275Q
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Mouse Logitech G500s
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/ztiub6
So how much is the overclocking headroom? As it seems you didn't report what speeds you were able to overclock these modules to.
 
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
291 (0.10/day)
Location
South Africa
I have to be honest, I don't understand this review. It's pages and pages about the appearance, followed by a brief look at (extremely predictable) results and then a 9.6/10? Nothing in the review justifies/gives us reason for the score you awarded it - much less the award.

There's nothing about the ICs used or overclocking results. What speeds were obtainable? How did that influence performance?

Some boards not working at the rated speed is something you've listed as a con for the RAM, but how is that the RAM's fault? If it was rated at 2933 MHz would it have been awarded 10/10?

Overall, this review is really not much more useful than an unboxing.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
597 (0.32/day)
Isn't 14-14-14-34 latency better suited to Ryzen, as in the G.Skill Flare X ?
And why only 3000 MHz on a "for Ryzen" product?
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2014
Messages
257 (0.14/day)
Location
San Jose, California
System Name Soon to be retired rig
Processor Intel i3-4160
Motherboard Gigabyte G1 Sniper Z5S
Cooling 2x Cooler Master Sickle Flow Green LED case fan, 1x Cooler Master Hyper 212 Plus CPU cooler
Memory 8 GB (2x4) Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) Sapphire Tri-X R9 280X
Storage 1TB Western Digital Caviar Blue 7200 RPM
Display(s) 27" BenQ GW2760S 1920x1080 monitor
Case Cooler Master 431 Elite Plus (custom painted)
Audio Device(s) N/A
Power Supply Seasonic M12 II EVO Edition 850W
Mouse Logitech gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G105 C.O.D Edition
Software Windows 7 64 Bit OS
I have to be honest, I don't understand this review. It's pages and pages about the appearance, followed by a brief look at (extremely predictable) results and then a 9.6/10? Nothing in the review justifies/gives us reason for the score you awarded it - much less the award.

There's nothing about the ICs used or overclocking results. What speeds were obtainable? How did that influence performance?

Some boards not working at the rated speed is something you've listed as a con for the RAM, but how is that the RAM's fault? If it was rated at 2933 MHz would it have been awarded 10/10?

Overall, this review is really not much more useful than an unboxing.
Give Cadaveca a break, will ya? I'm sure he's quite the busy guy at the moment. He's doing the best he can. Do better if you think you can. ;)

Thanks for the review Cadaveca. It's good to see less prominent companies get some attention for a change. :toast:
 
Top