cdawall
where the hell are my stars
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2006
- Messages
- 27,680 (4.29/day)
- Location
- Houston
System Name | All the cores |
---|---|
Processor | 2990WX |
Motherboard | Asrock X399M |
Cooling | CPU-XSPC RayStorm Neo, 2x240mm+360mm, D5PWM+140mL, GPU-2x360mm, 2xbyski, D4+D5+100mL |
Memory | 4x16GB G.Skill 3600 |
Video Card(s) | (2) EVGA SC BLACK 1080Ti's |
Storage | 2x Samsung SM951 512GB, Samsung PM961 512GB |
Display(s) | Dell UP2414Q 3840X2160@60hz |
Case | Caselabs Mercury S5+pedestal |
Audio Device(s) | Fischer HA-02->Fischer FA-002W High edition/FA-003/Jubilate/FA-011 depending on my mood |
Power Supply | Seasonic Prime 1200w |
Mouse | Thermaltake Theron, Steam controller |
Keyboard | Keychron K8 |
Software | W10P |
So there is always gobs of questions about how to tweak cards. I am going to show some configurations for the cards I personally have, these will be split between memory intensive algorithms and core intensive algorithms
If this helped you out feel free to toss a donation my way, guaranteed it will just go towards buying more GPU's and testing more out.
ETH: 0xFA753B35457A06044992A375FD084Ce9F04Ab3BF
LTC: LVbmEU3kA8YA7RtDbvpJrR6oPQiMacoQ77
Hawaii AKA R9 290(X)/390(X)
CORE INTENSIVE
We will be using GatelessGate miner and Neoscrypt for an example. This is towards the top of power hungry algorithms. AMD cards seem to not particularly like this. These older cards do not seem to do as well with Neoscrypt as the newer Polaris based cards do. For these we need to adjust the running config a smidgen. This gained me a total of 100KH/s at stock clocks.
Look closely and you will see the intensity is "14", default is 13, worksize is also lowered to "128" instead of the default 256.
You can overclock to whatever you can cool from here. I personally have the card barely bumped and undervolted -130mV.
MEMORY INTENSIVE
We will be using Claymore miner version 10.4, version 11 is out hashrate is not improved, but some more dual mining algorithms have been added WATCH GPU0, the others are 1080Ti's. Also this is going to be on DAG 90 to make it the same for all cards. 2GB cards max out on DAG 95 using claymore's miner quite a few coins are before this and you can still mine on those. This card is not maxed out. This is what it does comfortably and without using a million watts of power. Hawaii needs more core clock to match increased memory clocks. These cards can do 34MH/s if you don't care about power usage. I found them sitting around 30-32MH/s is their best spot.
Polaris 11 AKA the RX460/560
Step zero with these for any algorithm is to unlock the extra shaders. Everything does better with more shaders. Stop by the BIOS mod thread and see if your card is already done, or make a request for an updated one.
CORE INTENSIVE
We will be using GatelessGate miner and Neoscrypt for an example. This is towards the top of power hungry algorithms. AMD cards seem to not particularly like this. The core boost clocks seem to die for lack of a better word, also out of the box they want all of the volts. Tweaking these settings is good for tons of performance on AMD. Out of the box these cards only did 280KH/s for the 1024SP models and 230KH/s for the 896SP models.
These cards are all 1200+ mhz cores from the factory. I have adjusted the BIOS to lock max clock at 1106 this seems like a great balance between power and performance. Sub 50w in GPUz translates to 60-70w at the wall from my experience with these cards.
So on the cards I have here there are 2 Asus RX560 2GB cards and 1 MSI RX460 2GB. I have modified the memory straps for ethash/cryptonight nothing special BIOS is available in my BIOS mod thread.
Settings are as follows
1106mhz max GPU clock with default power tables
2000mhz mclock with 950mV set in the BIOS
fan speed "high power" changed from 60% to 100% to allow full access to fan speed by GPU BIOS without software intervention
42W TDP normal
54A TDA
48W TDP max
This is all BIOS settings, I only changed additional settings in the OS with my MSI RX 460, unfortunately the cards ASIC quality could not maintain the full clocks.
Polaris 10 AKA the 470/570/480/580
These cards are very well known for their Ethash performance, they seem to match a 1070(Ti) in that algorithm. When you get them working the core however they can only just edge out a 1060 and that requires some work.
CORE INTENSIVE
We will be using GatelessGate miner and Neoscrypt for an example. This is towards the top of power hungry algorithms. AMD cards seem to not particularly like this. The core boost clocks seem to die for lack of a better word, also out of the box they want all of the volts. Tweaking these settings is good for tons of performance on AMD. Out of the box these cards only did 550KH/s depending on model.
The cards I am running in this particular rig are an Asus Strix 570 4GB and MSI Aero 580 4GB, as you will notice unlike the Polaris 11 cards, extra shaders don't seem to matter it is purely clockspeed.
1266mhz max GPU clock with default power tables
UNDERVOLTED TO MINIMUM STABLE AMOUNT. This is the most important part. Cards are all different I have cards stable from 890mV up to 950mV.
mclock with 950mV set in the BIOS, this doesn't matter much for this algorithm. Cards are still setup from Ethash and Cryptonight mining with modded timing tables.
fan speed "high power" changed from 60% to 100% to allow full access to fan speed by GPU BIOS without software intervention
TDP limited to around 120-130w showing in GPUz higher seems to hurt performance across the board.
GTX 1050Ti 4GB
These behave like exactly one half of a GTX 1070. Ethash, Neoscrypt, Equihash it doens't matter they seem to be exactly one half. With current GTX 1070 prices if you can handle the larger number of cards these could be a good swap for you.
CORE INTENSIVE
I will be using CCminer KlausT fork and Neoscypt for an example. You can try HSRminer as well it has a 1% dev fee included and I have seen some stability problems. With GDDR5x cards it showed a solid improvement in performance, however I make zero money when the miner is mining because it crashed so I will take the stability of CCminer personally.
Core heavy algorithms seem to be Nvidia's bread and butter. Pascal is supremely more efficient than Polaris
This is an Asus STRIX version of the card so default wattage was actually higher than the card could maintain clocks at. There was no difference in performance between 75% and 100% TDP, GPUz flags VREL as limiting reason which is code for we need MOAR VOLTS. +50 in MSI afterburner was able to free up another 10KH/s, but wattage bump worth the extra performance.
The settings you see are for my specific card with Micron memory.
+140mhz core seemed to be the max the card went before the clock speed change did nothing for boost clock. Again we are voltage limited here.
+400mhz memory clock, doesn't seem to matter nearly as much as core clock this gained a few KH/s not many.
75% TDP this limit is where the card would start to flip between VREL and TDP on GPUz anything lower and performance was lost.
83C temp limit, this is the default setting for this card. Lots of words of thought on this if Nvidia set it, that is good enough for me.
GTX 1060 3GB/6GB
There is a lot of talk about needed a 6GB card for mining. For Ethash you still have at least a year before the DAG is too large. Other algorithms are not affected by this. Don't believe the FUD.
CORE INTENSIVE
I will be using CCminer KlausT fork and Neoscypt for an example. You can try HSRminer as well it has a 1% dev fee included and I have seen some stability problems. With GDDR5x cards it showed a solid improvement in performance, however I make zero money when the miner is mining because it crashed so I will take the stability of CCminer personally.
Core heavy algorithms seem to be Nvidia's bread and butter. Pascal is supremely more efficient than Polaris
The card used for screenshots is a Zotac GTX 1060 3GB Samsung I have Asus Dual's, Gigabyte dual fans and Zotac 6GB cards as well all of the settings are very similar minus I run the Asus dual card with it's superior cooler at a higher TDP. This particular Zotac card is spoiled and sits in slot 4 of my gaming PC I have pushed it further than the cards in my mining cases.
+10 Core voltage
+120mhz core clock
+400mhz memory clock, additional clockspeed didn't matter in this algorithm. All of my 1060's are Samsung based and can handle +800mhz
92% TDP this is much higher than I run in my mining rigs those normally sit at 80-85% for Zotac/GB cards and 95% for the Asus dual cards
83C temp limit, this is the default setting for this card. Lots of words of thought on this if Nvidia set it, that is good enough for me.
GTX 1070(Ti) 8GB
These are the go to cards for mining in my opinion. Tons of ram for any algorithm, this is getting towards the top of mid range gaming cards so everything seems to be better done on these over the lower end cards. The Ti version will follow the exact same methods as it is virtually the same thing.
CORE INTENSIVE
I will be using CCminer KlausT fork and Neoscypt for an example. You can try HSRminer as well it has a 1% dev fee included and I have seen some stability problems. With GDDR5x cards it showed a solid improvement in performance, however I make zero money when the miner is mining because it crashed so I will take the stability of CCminer personally.
Core heavy algorithms seem to be Nvidia's bread and butter. Pascal is supremely more efficient than Polaris
The card used for screenshots is an EVGA GTX 1070 FTW, I also have reference PCB blower cards from PNY/MSI, Asus Turbo's and have played with just about any of the other cards you can think of.
+100mhz core clock
+500mhz memory clock, additional clockspeed didn't matter in this algorithm.
80% TDP this rig is being limited. 12 cards and running a bit close to max power for the PSU setup.
83C temp limit, this is the default setting for this card. Lots of words of thought on this if Nvidia set it, that is good enough for me.
GTX 1080 8GB
This card is only good for core intensive mining. This card is NOT good for ethash or cryptonight algorithms. There isn't a way to tweak that better they just aren't good.
CORE INTENSIVE
I will be using CCminer KlausT fork and Neoscypt for an example. You can try HSRminer as well it has a 1% dev fee included and I have seen some stability problems. With GDDR5x cards it showed a solid improvement in performance, however I make zero money when the miner is mining because it crashed so I will take the stability of CCminer personally.
Core heavy algorithms seem to be Nvidia's bread and butter. Pascal is supremely more efficient than Polaris
The card used for screenshots is an EVGA GTX 1080 SC, reference card with a fancy cooler I have had three of these not bad cards at all if used correctly.
+100mhz core clock
+400mhz memory clock, additional clockspeed didn't matter in this algorithm.
80% TDP this rig is being limited. 12 cards and running a bit close to max power for the PSU setup.
83C temp limit, this is the default setting for this card. Lots of words of thought on this if Nvidia set it, that is good enough for me.
GTX 1080Ti 11GB
If your goal is to get as hashrate dense within a reasonable price point this is the card.
CORE INTENSIVE
I will be using CCminer KlausT fork and Neoscypt for an example. You can try HSRminer as well it has a 1% dev fee included and I have seen some stability problems. With GDDR5x cards it showed a solid improvement in performance, however I make zero money when the miner is mining because it crashed so I will take the stability of CCminer personally.
Core heavy algorithms seem to be Nvidia's bread and butter. Pascal is supremely more efficient than Polaris
The card used for screenshots is an EVGA GTX 1080Ti SC Black, I have been using Founder Editions, STRIX and my least favorite the MSI Gaming X (two RMA's then sold).
+100mhz core clock, I had stability issues pushing past this point depending on card.
+400mhz memory clock, additional clockspeed didn't matter in this algorithm.
90% TDP this is pushing what I would call the max of longevity. I am not a fan of 100-120% TDP on these cards, it is just too much for 24/7
84C temp limit, this is the default setting for this card. Lots of words of thought on this if Nvidia set it, that is good enough for me.
MEMORY INTENSIVE
We will be using Claymore miner version 10.4, version 11 is out hashrate is not improved, but some more dual mining algorithms have been added WATCH GPU1/2/3, the other is a 390. Also this is going to be on DAG 90 to make it the same for all cards. 2GB cards max out on DAG 95 using claymore's miner quite a few coins are before this and you can still mine on those. These cards are easy to push. The display card is GPU1 as you can see it is lagging behind, try to use onboard whenever possible. All the cards are set to the same clocks, this is about as high as I am willing to set mine, but people push well higher than this and hit 40MH/s on these with great memory.
GTX 980Ti 6GB
This card is only good for core intensive mining. This card is NOT good for ethash or cryptonight algorithms. There isn't a way to tweak that better they just aren't good. Being Maxwell they also pull ALL of the power. Be careful using these to mine.
CORE INTENSIVE
I will be using CCminer KlausT fork and Neoscypt for an example. You can try HSRminer as well it has a 1% dev fee included and I have seen some stability problems. With GDDR5x cards it showed a solid improvement in performance, however I make zero money when the miner is mining because it crashed so I will take the stability of CCminer personally.
Core heavy algorithms seem to be Nvidia's bread and butter. Maxwell has improved over Kepler in mining quite substantially, but still is not good for memory intensive algos.
The card used for screenshots is an EVGA GTX 980Ti FTW, I am more of a fan of the GB 980Ti three fan models, I have sold all of the ones I had however. The reference cards were not bad just hotter.
+150mhz core clock, I had stability issues pushing past this point depending on card.
+400mhz memory clock, additional clockspeed didn't matter in this algorithm.
80% TDP this card can do so much more if you let it burn power.
84C temp limit, this is the default setting for this card. Lots of words of thought on this if Nvidia set it, that is good enough for me.
If this helped you out feel free to toss a donation my way, guaranteed it will just go towards buying more GPU's and testing more out.
ETH: 0xFA753B35457A06044992A375FD084Ce9F04Ab3BF
LTC: LVbmEU3kA8YA7RtDbvpJrR6oPQiMacoQ77
Hawaii AKA R9 290(X)/390(X)
CORE INTENSIVE
We will be using GatelessGate miner and Neoscrypt for an example. This is towards the top of power hungry algorithms. AMD cards seem to not particularly like this. These older cards do not seem to do as well with Neoscrypt as the newer Polaris based cards do. For these we need to adjust the running config a smidgen. This gained me a total of 100KH/s at stock clocks.
Look closely and you will see the intensity is "14", default is 13, worksize is also lowered to "128" instead of the default 256.
Code:
"algorithm": "neoscrypt",
"intensity": "14",
"worksize": "128",
"gpu-threads": "1",
"load-balance": true,
"auto-fan": true,
"temp-cutoff": "90",
"temp-overheat": "85",
"temp-target": "70",
You can overclock to whatever you can cool from here. I personally have the card barely bumped and undervolted -130mV.
MEMORY INTENSIVE
We will be using Claymore miner version 10.4, version 11 is out hashrate is not improved, but some more dual mining algorithms have been added WATCH GPU0, the others are 1080Ti's. Also this is going to be on DAG 90 to make it the same for all cards. 2GB cards max out on DAG 95 using claymore's miner quite a few coins are before this and you can still mine on those. This card is not maxed out. This is what it does comfortably and without using a million watts of power. Hawaii needs more core clock to match increased memory clocks. These cards can do 34MH/s if you don't care about power usage. I found them sitting around 30-32MH/s is their best spot.
Polaris 11 AKA the RX460/560
Step zero with these for any algorithm is to unlock the extra shaders. Everything does better with more shaders. Stop by the BIOS mod thread and see if your card is already done, or make a request for an updated one.
CORE INTENSIVE
We will be using GatelessGate miner and Neoscrypt for an example. This is towards the top of power hungry algorithms. AMD cards seem to not particularly like this. The core boost clocks seem to die for lack of a better word, also out of the box they want all of the volts. Tweaking these settings is good for tons of performance on AMD. Out of the box these cards only did 280KH/s for the 1024SP models and 230KH/s for the 896SP models.
These cards are all 1200+ mhz cores from the factory. I have adjusted the BIOS to lock max clock at 1106 this seems like a great balance between power and performance. Sub 50w in GPUz translates to 60-70w at the wall from my experience with these cards.
So on the cards I have here there are 2 Asus RX560 2GB cards and 1 MSI RX460 2GB. I have modified the memory straps for ethash/cryptonight nothing special BIOS is available in my BIOS mod thread.
Settings are as follows
1106mhz max GPU clock with default power tables
2000mhz mclock with 950mV set in the BIOS
fan speed "high power" changed from 60% to 100% to allow full access to fan speed by GPU BIOS without software intervention
42W TDP normal
54A TDA
48W TDP max
This is all BIOS settings, I only changed additional settings in the OS with my MSI RX 460, unfortunately the cards ASIC quality could not maintain the full clocks.
Polaris 10 AKA the 470/570/480/580
These cards are very well known for their Ethash performance, they seem to match a 1070(Ti) in that algorithm. When you get them working the core however they can only just edge out a 1060 and that requires some work.
CORE INTENSIVE
We will be using GatelessGate miner and Neoscrypt for an example. This is towards the top of power hungry algorithms. AMD cards seem to not particularly like this. The core boost clocks seem to die for lack of a better word, also out of the box they want all of the volts. Tweaking these settings is good for tons of performance on AMD. Out of the box these cards only did 550KH/s depending on model.
The cards I am running in this particular rig are an Asus Strix 570 4GB and MSI Aero 580 4GB, as you will notice unlike the Polaris 11 cards, extra shaders don't seem to matter it is purely clockspeed.
1266mhz max GPU clock with default power tables
UNDERVOLTED TO MINIMUM STABLE AMOUNT. This is the most important part. Cards are all different I have cards stable from 890mV up to 950mV.
mclock with 950mV set in the BIOS, this doesn't matter much for this algorithm. Cards are still setup from Ethash and Cryptonight mining with modded timing tables.
fan speed "high power" changed from 60% to 100% to allow full access to fan speed by GPU BIOS without software intervention
TDP limited to around 120-130w showing in GPUz higher seems to hurt performance across the board.
GTX 1050Ti 4GB
These behave like exactly one half of a GTX 1070. Ethash, Neoscrypt, Equihash it doens't matter they seem to be exactly one half. With current GTX 1070 prices if you can handle the larger number of cards these could be a good swap for you.
CORE INTENSIVE
I will be using CCminer KlausT fork and Neoscypt for an example. You can try HSRminer as well it has a 1% dev fee included and I have seen some stability problems. With GDDR5x cards it showed a solid improvement in performance, however I make zero money when the miner is mining because it crashed so I will take the stability of CCminer personally.
Core heavy algorithms seem to be Nvidia's bread and butter. Pascal is supremely more efficient than Polaris
This is an Asus STRIX version of the card so default wattage was actually higher than the card could maintain clocks at. There was no difference in performance between 75% and 100% TDP, GPUz flags VREL as limiting reason which is code for we need MOAR VOLTS. +50 in MSI afterburner was able to free up another 10KH/s, but wattage bump worth the extra performance.
The settings you see are for my specific card with Micron memory.
+140mhz core seemed to be the max the card went before the clock speed change did nothing for boost clock. Again we are voltage limited here.
+400mhz memory clock, doesn't seem to matter nearly as much as core clock this gained a few KH/s not many.
75% TDP this limit is where the card would start to flip between VREL and TDP on GPUz anything lower and performance was lost.
83C temp limit, this is the default setting for this card. Lots of words of thought on this if Nvidia set it, that is good enough for me.
GTX 1060 3GB/6GB
There is a lot of talk about needed a 6GB card for mining. For Ethash you still have at least a year before the DAG is too large. Other algorithms are not affected by this. Don't believe the FUD.
CORE INTENSIVE
I will be using CCminer KlausT fork and Neoscypt for an example. You can try HSRminer as well it has a 1% dev fee included and I have seen some stability problems. With GDDR5x cards it showed a solid improvement in performance, however I make zero money when the miner is mining because it crashed so I will take the stability of CCminer personally.
Core heavy algorithms seem to be Nvidia's bread and butter. Pascal is supremely more efficient than Polaris
The card used for screenshots is a Zotac GTX 1060 3GB Samsung I have Asus Dual's, Gigabyte dual fans and Zotac 6GB cards as well all of the settings are very similar minus I run the Asus dual card with it's superior cooler at a higher TDP. This particular Zotac card is spoiled and sits in slot 4 of my gaming PC I have pushed it further than the cards in my mining cases.
+10 Core voltage
+120mhz core clock
+400mhz memory clock, additional clockspeed didn't matter in this algorithm. All of my 1060's are Samsung based and can handle +800mhz
92% TDP this is much higher than I run in my mining rigs those normally sit at 80-85% for Zotac/GB cards and 95% for the Asus dual cards
83C temp limit, this is the default setting for this card. Lots of words of thought on this if Nvidia set it, that is good enough for me.
GTX 1070(Ti) 8GB
These are the go to cards for mining in my opinion. Tons of ram for any algorithm, this is getting towards the top of mid range gaming cards so everything seems to be better done on these over the lower end cards. The Ti version will follow the exact same methods as it is virtually the same thing.
CORE INTENSIVE
I will be using CCminer KlausT fork and Neoscypt for an example. You can try HSRminer as well it has a 1% dev fee included and I have seen some stability problems. With GDDR5x cards it showed a solid improvement in performance, however I make zero money when the miner is mining because it crashed so I will take the stability of CCminer personally.
Core heavy algorithms seem to be Nvidia's bread and butter. Pascal is supremely more efficient than Polaris
The card used for screenshots is an EVGA GTX 1070 FTW, I also have reference PCB blower cards from PNY/MSI, Asus Turbo's and have played with just about any of the other cards you can think of.
+100mhz core clock
+500mhz memory clock, additional clockspeed didn't matter in this algorithm.
80% TDP this rig is being limited. 12 cards and running a bit close to max power for the PSU setup.
83C temp limit, this is the default setting for this card. Lots of words of thought on this if Nvidia set it, that is good enough for me.
GTX 1080 8GB
This card is only good for core intensive mining. This card is NOT good for ethash or cryptonight algorithms. There isn't a way to tweak that better they just aren't good.
CORE INTENSIVE
I will be using CCminer KlausT fork and Neoscypt for an example. You can try HSRminer as well it has a 1% dev fee included and I have seen some stability problems. With GDDR5x cards it showed a solid improvement in performance, however I make zero money when the miner is mining because it crashed so I will take the stability of CCminer personally.
Core heavy algorithms seem to be Nvidia's bread and butter. Pascal is supremely more efficient than Polaris
The card used for screenshots is an EVGA GTX 1080 SC, reference card with a fancy cooler I have had three of these not bad cards at all if used correctly.
+100mhz core clock
+400mhz memory clock, additional clockspeed didn't matter in this algorithm.
80% TDP this rig is being limited. 12 cards and running a bit close to max power for the PSU setup.
83C temp limit, this is the default setting for this card. Lots of words of thought on this if Nvidia set it, that is good enough for me.
GTX 1080Ti 11GB
If your goal is to get as hashrate dense within a reasonable price point this is the card.
CORE INTENSIVE
I will be using CCminer KlausT fork and Neoscypt for an example. You can try HSRminer as well it has a 1% dev fee included and I have seen some stability problems. With GDDR5x cards it showed a solid improvement in performance, however I make zero money when the miner is mining because it crashed so I will take the stability of CCminer personally.
Core heavy algorithms seem to be Nvidia's bread and butter. Pascal is supremely more efficient than Polaris
The card used for screenshots is an EVGA GTX 1080Ti SC Black, I have been using Founder Editions, STRIX and my least favorite the MSI Gaming X (two RMA's then sold).
+100mhz core clock, I had stability issues pushing past this point depending on card.
+400mhz memory clock, additional clockspeed didn't matter in this algorithm.
90% TDP this is pushing what I would call the max of longevity. I am not a fan of 100-120% TDP on these cards, it is just too much for 24/7
84C temp limit, this is the default setting for this card. Lots of words of thought on this if Nvidia set it, that is good enough for me.
MEMORY INTENSIVE
We will be using Claymore miner version 10.4, version 11 is out hashrate is not improved, but some more dual mining algorithms have been added WATCH GPU1/2/3, the other is a 390. Also this is going to be on DAG 90 to make it the same for all cards. 2GB cards max out on DAG 95 using claymore's miner quite a few coins are before this and you can still mine on those. These cards are easy to push. The display card is GPU1 as you can see it is lagging behind, try to use onboard whenever possible. All the cards are set to the same clocks, this is about as high as I am willing to set mine, but people push well higher than this and hit 40MH/s on these with great memory.
GTX 980Ti 6GB
This card is only good for core intensive mining. This card is NOT good for ethash or cryptonight algorithms. There isn't a way to tweak that better they just aren't good. Being Maxwell they also pull ALL of the power. Be careful using these to mine.
CORE INTENSIVE
I will be using CCminer KlausT fork and Neoscypt for an example. You can try HSRminer as well it has a 1% dev fee included and I have seen some stability problems. With GDDR5x cards it showed a solid improvement in performance, however I make zero money when the miner is mining because it crashed so I will take the stability of CCminer personally.
Core heavy algorithms seem to be Nvidia's bread and butter. Maxwell has improved over Kepler in mining quite substantially, but still is not good for memory intensive algos.
The card used for screenshots is an EVGA GTX 980Ti FTW, I am more of a fan of the GB 980Ti three fan models, I have sold all of the ones I had however. The reference cards were not bad just hotter.
+150mhz core clock, I had stability issues pushing past this point depending on card.
+400mhz memory clock, additional clockspeed didn't matter in this algorithm.
80% TDP this card can do so much more if you let it burn power.
84C temp limit, this is the default setting for this card. Lots of words of thought on this if Nvidia set it, that is good enough for me.
Last edited: