The_Gunslinger
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2007
- Messages
- 50 (0.01/day)
Processor | Athlon64 FX60 |
---|---|
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-K8NSNXP-939 |
Cooling | Arctic Freezer 64 Pro |
Memory | 3GB (2x1GB, 2x512MB) Patriot DDR400 CAS 2.5 |
Video Card(s) | HiS x1950 Pro Turbo (v2) - AGP |
Storage | 3x Seagate SATA150, 2x Seagate IDE, 1xUSB removable caddy, 1x1394 External, 1xUSB External |
Display(s) | DELL 2707WFP |
Case | Antec P180 |
Audio Device(s) | SB Audgy 2 ZS |
Power Supply | PC Power&Cooling Turbo-Cool 860 |
Software | WinXP Pro SP2 (32 bit) |
Benchmark Scores | No idea - but it doesnt crash ! :) |
not entirely sure if this should be in here or the motherboards section, hopefully someone will kick it over if i have it in the wrong place
so here's the question.
i have a gigabit LAN connection on-board my main board, however, this is hooked into the PCI bus with the resulting cap in speed that goes with such a design.
would using one of these remove that restriction, and allow it to operate at full speed ?
http://www.it247.com/Product/28-EA8...daptors&campaign=ciao&utm_medium=NetworkCards
also, does anyone know how this compares to an on-board, PCIe bound LAN chip in relation to speed and CPU usage ?
thanks
so here's the question.
i have a gigabit LAN connection on-board my main board, however, this is hooked into the PCI bus with the resulting cap in speed that goes with such a design.
would using one of these remove that restriction, and allow it to operate at full speed ?
http://www.it247.com/Product/28-EA8...daptors&campaign=ciao&utm_medium=NetworkCards
also, does anyone know how this compares to an on-board, PCIe bound LAN chip in relation to speed and CPU usage ?
thanks