• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

Gigabyte Working on Radeon HD 5870 1 GHz Super Overclock Model

werez

New Member
Joined
May 28, 2009
Messages
298 (0.10/day)
Likes
46
Location
Romania
#26
HD 5870 1 GHz sounds pretty tempting . The card's price however will be a little to high for my taste , and it`s good to know that those clocks are achievable with some minor voltage bump . However if i had the money i would rather look at the HD 5870 Lightning Edition from MSI , looks a little bit better . But than again Gigabyte's version will end up cheaper . OH decisions decisions ... :)
Way to go Gigabyte !
 
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Messages
9,767 (2.99/day)
Likes
1,779
Location
Suffolk/Essex, England
System Name Joseph's Laptop Clevo P771ZM
Processor 4970k @4/4.4ghz
Motherboard *shrugs*
Cooling About 2 kilos of copper fins and pipes.
Memory 2x 8gb
Video Card(s) GTX 970m 6gb
Storage 500gb Msata SSD 2x 2TB storage drives
Display(s) Built in
Power Supply 300w power brick
Mouse Steam controller
Software Windows ten
#27
HD 5870 1 GHz sounds pretty tempting . The card's price however will be a little to high for my taste , and it`s good to know that those clocks are achievable with some minor voltage bump . However if i had the money i would rather look at the HD 5870 Lightning Edition from MSI , looks a little bit better . But than again Gigabyte's version will end up cheaper . OH decisions decisions ... :)
Way to go Gigabyte !

And it has a shorter custom PCB.

: ]
 
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
865 (0.29/day)
Likes
165
Location
Porto
Processor Phenom II X3 720BE @ 3.3GHz, 4th core unlocked
Motherboard Asus M4A78-E
Cooling Schythe Ninja + Dual 120mm
Memory GEiL 2*2GB Gold
Video Card(s) Gigabyte HD5870 1GB + PhysX/Computing 8800GTS 512MB
Storage Intel X25-M 80GB O.S. + WD 500GB Data
Display(s) HP 2408w 24" LCD
Case Antec Plusview 1000
Audio Device(s) X-Fi XtremeMusic + Gigaworks SB750 7.1 THX
Power Supply BeQuiet Dark Power Pro 650W
Software Windows 7 64bit
#28
The fact that there's 1 GHz HD 5870s shows that there won't be an HD 5890.


Most probably, there won't be a RV870-based HD5890.
But there will be an updated, higher-end, HD5000 GPU somewhere in 2010 (probably after Fermi's launch).
That's been pretty much confirmed by Richard Huddy in his last bittech interview.

Nonetheless, the RV870 doesn't need higher GPU clocks, it desperately needs higher memory bandwidth - be it with a redesigned memory bus or substantially faster GDDR5 memory.
 
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Messages
9,767 (2.99/day)
Likes
1,779
Location
Suffolk/Essex, England
System Name Joseph's Laptop Clevo P771ZM
Processor 4970k @4/4.4ghz
Motherboard *shrugs*
Cooling About 2 kilos of copper fins and pipes.
Memory 2x 8gb
Video Card(s) GTX 970m 6gb
Storage 500gb Msata SSD 2x 2TB storage drives
Display(s) Built in
Power Supply 300w power brick
Mouse Steam controller
Software Windows ten
#29
Most probably, there won't be a RV870-based HD5890.
But there will be an updated, higher-end, HD5000 GPU somewhere in 2010 (probably after Fermi's launch).
That's been pretty much confirmed by Richard Huddy in his last bittech interview.

Nonetheless, the RV870 doesn't need higher GPU clocks, it desperately needs higher memory bandwidth - be it with a redesigned memory bus or substantially faster GDDR5 memory.

Can you share some links about the memory affecting performance?

thus far I've not seen memory over clocks make much of a difference so I#ve not seen these bottles neck yet.
 
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
865 (0.29/day)
Likes
165
Location
Porto
Processor Phenom II X3 720BE @ 3.3GHz, 4th core unlocked
Motherboard Asus M4A78-E
Cooling Schythe Ninja + Dual 120mm
Memory GEiL 2*2GB Gold
Video Card(s) Gigabyte HD5870 1GB + PhysX/Computing 8800GTS 512MB
Storage Intel X25-M 80GB O.S. + WD 500GB Data
Display(s) HP 2408w 24" LCD
Case Antec Plusview 1000
Audio Device(s) X-Fi XtremeMusic + Gigaworks SB750 7.1 THX
Power Supply BeQuiet Dark Power Pro 650W
Software Windows 7 64bit
#30
Can you share some links about the memory affecting performance?

thus far I've not seen memory over clocks make much of a difference so I#ve not seen these bottles neck yet.

http://ixbtlabs.com/articles3/video/cypress-p12.html

Digit-Life said:
Moreover, the 48xx had very high memory bandwidth for the cores, and its insignificant increase in the 58xx only balances GPU and local video memory. As we can see, the core has grown by almost two times, while memory bandwidth has grown only by 25%. However, we don't see twofold performance gains versus the 4890. Perhaps, performance is limited by something in high resolutions. Probably by memory bandwidth.

Memory bandwidth is the only thing that didn't double from HD4890, where the performance difference is between 25 and 75% (average 40%).
 

TVman

New Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2009
Messages
308 (0.11/day)
Likes
41
Processor E8400 3.6 ghz
Memory 4 GB
Video Card(s) HD4850 512 MB
Storage 250 GB
Software win 7 64bit
#31
im the only one who noticed that the introduction card has some bad grammar:laugh:
 

InnocentCriminal

Resident Grammar Amender
Joined
Feb 21, 2005
Messages
6,477 (1.38/day)
Likes
844
System Name BeeR 6
Processor Intel Core i7 3770K*
Motherboard ASUS Maximus V Gene (1155/Z77)
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 16GB Samsung Green 1600MHz DDR3**
Video Card(s) 4GB MSI Gaming X RX480
Storage 256GB Samsung 840 Pro SSD
Display(s) 27" Samsung C27F591FDU
Case Fractal Design Arc Mini
Power Supply Corsair HX750W
Software 64bit Microsoft Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores *@ 4.6GHz **@ 2133MHz
#32
That's been pretty much confirmed by Richard Huddy in his last bittech interview.
Can you link that article, I don't recognise the name Richard Huddy and I've been reading Bit-Tech for years, d'you mean Richard Swinburne?


im the only one who noticed that the introduction card has some bad grammar:laugh:
I don't think Andrey Vorobiev's first language is English tbh. Or d'you mean the 5870 has bad grammar, I'm confused.
 

erocker

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
42,380 (10.17/day)
Likes
18,023
Processor Intel i7 8700k
Motherboard Gigabyte z370 AORUS Gaming 7
Cooling Water
Memory 16gb G.Skill 4000 MHz DDR4
Video Card(s) Evga GTX 1080
Storage 3 x Samsung Evo 850 500GB, 1 x 250GB, 2 x 2TB HDD
Display(s) Nixeus EDG27
Case Thermaltake X5
Power Supply Corsair HX1000i
Mouse Zowie EC1-B
Software Windows 10
#33
Nonetheless, the RV870 doesn't need higher GPU clocks, it desperately needs higher memory bandwidth - be it with a redesigned memory bus or substantially faster GDDR5 memory.
Why is it then, when you increase the memory bandwith on a 5870 there is minimal performance gain and when you overclock the GPU there is good performance gain? Surely if there was a memory bandwith bottleneck overclocking the GPU would result in no gain.
 

WarEagleAU

Bird of Prey
Joined
Jul 9, 2006
Messages
10,809 (2.59/day)
Likes
529
Location
Gurley, AL
System Name Boddha Getta Boddha Getta Bah!
Processor AMD FX 6100 @ 4.432Ghz @1.382
Motherboard ASUS M5A99X EVO AMD 990X AMD SB950
Cooling Custom Water. EK 240MM Kit, Supreme HSF - Runs 35C
Memory 2 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance White LP @ 1.35V
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon HD 6870 980/1100
Storage WD Caviar Black 1.0TB, WD Caviar Green 1.0TB, WD 160GB
Display(s) Asus VH222/S 22: (21.5" Viewable) 1920x1080p HDMI LCD Monitor
Case NZXT White Switch 810
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek 5.1
Power Supply NZXT Hale 90 Gold Cert 750W Modular PSU
Software Windows 8.1 Profession 64 Bit
#34
I want this card :)

I dont know if they have any sinks on the ram or the vrm area but it looks like maybe the cooling solution covers that.
 
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
865 (0.29/day)
Likes
165
Location
Porto
Processor Phenom II X3 720BE @ 3.3GHz, 4th core unlocked
Motherboard Asus M4A78-E
Cooling Schythe Ninja + Dual 120mm
Memory GEiL 2*2GB Gold
Video Card(s) Gigabyte HD5870 1GB + PhysX/Computing 8800GTS 512MB
Storage Intel X25-M 80GB O.S. + WD 500GB Data
Display(s) HP 2408w 24" LCD
Case Antec Plusview 1000
Audio Device(s) X-Fi XtremeMusic + Gigaworks SB750 7.1 THX
Power Supply BeQuiet Dark Power Pro 650W
Software Windows 7 64bit
#35
Can you link that article, I don't recognise the name Richard Huddy and I've been reading Bit-Tech for years, d'you mean Richard Swinburne?


Richard Huddy isn't the interviewer, he's AMD’s Worldwide Developer Relations manager.

http://www.bit-tech.net/bits/interviews/2010/01/06/interview-amd-on-game-development-and-dx11/1


It's a great read, the best hardware interview I've seen since this one. The guy is completely honest and he even takes all the blame about what happened with the Saboteur. It's not a "let me evade your questions and do PR crap" session (a la Jen Hsu Huang), it's an actual interview.


About the other part:
Why is it then, when you increase the memory bandwith on a 5870 there is minimal performance gain and when you overclock the GPU there is good performance gain? Surely if there was a memory bandwith bottleneck overclocking the GPU would result in no gain.
Maybe because those tests were made in low resolutions or detail?

Memory bottleneck is the only logical explanation for the HD5870 to be slower than a HD4870X2.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 13, 2009
Messages
5,614 (1.90/day)
Likes
1,678
Location
San Diego, CA
System Name White Boy
Processor Core i7 3770k @4.6 Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
Cooling CORSAIR H100
Memory CORSAIR Vengeance 16GB @ 2177
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 680 CLASSIEFIED @ 1250 Core
Storage 2 Samsung 830 256 GB (Raid 0) 1 Hitachi 4 TB
Display(s) 1 Dell 30U11 30"
Case BIT FENIX Prodigy
Audio Device(s) none
Power Supply SeaSonic X750 Gold 750W Modular
Software Windows Pro 7 64 bit || Ubuntu 64 Bit
Benchmark Scores 2017 Unigine Heaven :: P37239 3D Mark Vantage
#36
Meh.
 
Joined
Apr 14, 2008
Messages
1,777 (0.50/day)
Likes
163
Location
South Australia
System Name QUACK
Processor Intel i7 2600K (3.4 GHz, 8 threads)
Motherboard Asus P67P8-V3
Cooling Xigmatek Balder 120mm (4x120,1x140mm case)
Memory Patriot 2 Viper Sector 5, 8GB DDR3 1600 MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 G1 4GB
Storage 1x Samsung EVO 850 (500GB) SSD, 1x Fujitsu 256GB SSD
Display(s) Dell Ultrasharp U2311h 23" (so sexy)
Case CoolerMaster Gladiator RC-600
Audio Device(s) Onboard 5.1
Power Supply Antec 850w with yellow racing stripes
Software Windows 7 HP 64 bit
#37
Thanks for your brilliant contribution to this thread. :shadedshu

@ ToTTenTranz: I agree with you that memory bottleneck is one of the main reasons that the 5870 isn't a double in performance over the 4890. However, I think it also has to do with the fact that games might not fully utilize the number of SPUs on that single core. This could be because of the drivers, or just the fact that games developers need to play catchup with the tech market.

This 5870 OC Edition will be nice, but I still do expect a 5890, which will most likely solve the RAM bottleneck issue with a 384 bit bus (which, incidentally, will mean another 16 ROPs (total of 48 :D)), and higher clocked RAM. This would require a new GPU core, which might come with a die shrink, optimized power systems, or both, allowing for higher clocks. This is what I'm holding out for. ;)
 

HammerON

The Watchful Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
7,434 (2.32/day)
Likes
4,740
Location
Up North
System Name Cruncher / Cruncher 2
Processor i7 6900K / E5 2683 v3
Motherboard X99A Gaming Pro Carbon / ASRock X99 Extreme 4/3.1
Cooling EK Supremacy EVO Elite 2011-3 / EK Supremacy
Memory G.Skill Trident Z 32GB 3200 / G.SKILL Trident Z 16GB 3200
Video Card(s) EVGA 980 Ti Classified / ATI 3650
Storage Samsung 960 Pro 512 GB + Mushkin Reactor 1 TB / OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB
Display(s) Dell UltraSharp U3011 30"
Case Corsair Obsidian 800D / TT Core V51
Audio Device(s) On-board
Power Supply Corsair AX1200 / EVGA 500W
Software Win 10 Pro/ Win 10
Benchmark Scores Always changing~
#38
I would love to have two of these water cooled:)
 

InnocentCriminal

Resident Grammar Amender
Joined
Feb 21, 2005
Messages
6,477 (1.38/day)
Likes
844
System Name BeeR 6
Processor Intel Core i7 3770K*
Motherboard ASUS Maximus V Gene (1155/Z77)
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 16GB Samsung Green 1600MHz DDR3**
Video Card(s) 4GB MSI Gaming X RX480
Storage 256GB Samsung 840 Pro SSD
Display(s) 27" Samsung C27F591FDU
Case Fractal Design Arc Mini
Power Supply Corsair HX750W
Software 64bit Microsoft Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores *@ 4.6GHz **@ 2133MHz
#39
Richard Huddy isn't the interviewer, he's AMD’s Worldwide Developer Relations manager.

http://www.bit-tech.net/bits/interviews/2010/01/06/interview-amd-on-game-development-and-dx11/1


It's a great read, the best hardware interview I've seen since this one. The guy is completely honest and he even takes all the blame about what happened with the Saboteur. It's not a "let me evade your questions and do PR crap" session (a la Jen Hsu Huang), it's an actual interview..
That's right, I remember trying to read that but my girlfriend kept talking to me and nagging me to let her on to Facebook so I didn't read it all. I'll have to give it a proper read when I'm on my lunch today.
 
Joined
Sep 11, 2007
Messages
300 (0.08/day)
Likes
31
Location
Ambugaton
Processor Intel Skylake i5 6500 3.2 Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3p
Cooling Stock Intel
Memory HyperX Fury Black 32GB DDR4 2400Mhz CL15 1.2v
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1070 G1 8GB GDDR5 256bit
Storage ADATA Premier Pro 240GB & NAS - 4Tb Raid 1
Display(s) 22" Dell 2209WA A02 E-IPS
Case Cooler Master CM Silencio 452
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC /w Microlab Solo 6C Speakers
Power Supply Seasonic M12II-620 EVO Bronze 620W
Software Windows 10 x64
#40
Meanwhile ATi video cards price skyrocket :shadedshu , where I live the 5850's current price matches 5870's price at launch day and the 5870 itself is averaging around 525 USD.
 
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
1,940 (0.62/day)
Likes
409
Location
Singapore
System Name penguin
Processor i3-4160
Motherboard Asus H81 Mini-ITX
Cooling Stock
Memory 2x4GB Kingston 1600MHz
Video Card(s) Saphire Radeon 7850 2GB
Storage Plextor M5S 120GB+1TB Seagate
Display(s) 23' Dell
Case CM Elite 130
Audio Device(s) stock
Power Supply Corsair CX430m
Software W7/Lubuntu
#41
Thanks for your brilliant contribution to this thread. :shadedshu

@ ToTTenTranz:... However, I think it also has to do with the fact that games might not fully utilize the number of SPUs on that single core. This could be because of the drivers, or just the fact that games developers need to play catchup with the tech market...
A big +1. It's all about coding if you ask me on both sides. Obviously Ati has to invest more into drivers and probably educating game devs on how to utilize the full potential of their GPUs. Or maybe they can continue doing what they've been doing so far - leaning on Nvidia's back hoping they can utilize all the magic that is done in TWINTBP at a later point.
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
34,335 (9.23/day)
Likes
17,427
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name Long shelf-life potato
Processor Intel Core i7-4770K
Motherboard ASUS Z97-A
Cooling Xigmatek Aegir CPU Cooler
Memory 16GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3-1866
Video Card(s) 2x GeForce GTX 970 SLI
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590D 28-inch 4K
Case Cooler Master CM690 Window
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX850W
Mouse Razer Abyssus 2014
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro Creators Update
#42
Richard Huddy isn't the interviewer, he's AMD’s Worldwide Developer Relations manager.

http://www.bit-tech.net/bits/interviews/2010/01/06/interview-amd-on-game-development-and-dx11/1


It's a great read, the best hardware interview I've seen since this one. The guy is completely honest and he even takes all the blame about what happened with the Saboteur. It's not a "let me evade your questions and do PR crap" session (a la Jen Hsu Huang), it's an actual interview.


About the other part:


That's a confirmation that AMD has a Fermi counter in its roadmap, and it will launch at least before mid-2010 - which means it's most likely a 5000 series card.




Maybe because those tests were made in low resolutions or detail?

Memory bottleneck is the only logical explanation for the HD5870 to be slower than a HD4870X2.
No, that doesn't confirm anything. One can make such statements to be evasive too. AMD doesn't make two GPU architectures in an year, especially not with a mere 6 months' gap. RV7xx's were around for over an year, so were the RV6xx's, and so on. With the amount of investment it takes to make that "something better than Cypress", you can expect it only next year.
 
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
865 (0.29/day)
Likes
165
Location
Porto
Processor Phenom II X3 720BE @ 3.3GHz, 4th core unlocked
Motherboard Asus M4A78-E
Cooling Schythe Ninja + Dual 120mm
Memory GEiL 2*2GB Gold
Video Card(s) Gigabyte HD5870 1GB + PhysX/Computing 8800GTS 512MB
Storage Intel X25-M 80GB O.S. + WD 500GB Data
Display(s) HP 2408w 24" LCD
Case Antec Plusview 1000
Audio Device(s) X-Fi XtremeMusic + Gigaworks SB750 7.1 THX
Power Supply BeQuiet Dark Power Pro 650W
Software Windows 7 64bit
#43
AMD doesn't make two GPU architectures in an year, especially not with a mere 6 months' gap. RV7xx's were around for over an year, so were the RV6xx's, and so on. With the amount of investment it takes to make that "something better than Cypress", you can expect it only next year.

RV790 came out less than a year after RV770.

RV890 wouldn't need to be a dramatically new core, it could just be tweaker in order to support higher clocks and be bundled with (a lot) faster GDDR5.

Of course, a 384-bit bus would be welcome, but that would require a new PCB, so it's unlikely to happen.
 

kylzer

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
511 (0.16/day)
Likes
77
Location
192.168.1.1
System Name NDA BD
Processor NDA
Motherboard NDA
Cooling --------------
Memory Corsair GTX 1866Mhz 2x4GB
Video Card(s) --------------
Storage WDBlack 640GB and WDGreen 750GB
Display(s) BenQ G2200HD
Case ---------------
Audio Device(s) Built in
Power Supply Silverstone 500w
Software Win7 64
#44
Theres no memory bottleneck

Why?

overclock the mem you see basically no improvement

if you oc the core you get massive boosts.

In theory that means no memory bottleneck anyways....
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
34,335 (9.23/day)
Likes
17,427
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name Long shelf-life potato
Processor Intel Core i7-4770K
Motherboard ASUS Z97-A
Cooling Xigmatek Aegir CPU Cooler
Memory 16GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3-1866
Video Card(s) 2x GeForce GTX 970 SLI
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590D 28-inch 4K
Case Cooler Master CM690 Window
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX850W
Mouse Razer Abyssus 2014
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro Creators Update
#45
RV790 came out less than a year after RV770.

RV890 wouldn't need to be a dramatically new core, it could just be tweaker in order to support higher clocks and be bundled with (a lot) faster GDDR5.

Of course, a 384-bit bus would be welcome, but that would require a new PCB, so it's unlikely to happen.
And the only reason RV790 came out was because of RV770's clock speed and electrical limitations (with which AMD couldn't even make OC models to speak of), as I argued earlier. RV790 can't be used as an example, aside from the fact that it couldn't quite serve its purpose against GTX 285 and NVIDIA's response (GTX 275).

Don't equate RV790's creation to something similar with Cypress. It doesn't face the issues RV770 faced. To address the memory bandwidth "deficiency" issue, the GPU should be given a complete redesign due to the way the different components of the GPU are arranged. That's a substantially higher R&D than what went into making RV790. The bottomline is AMD can't afford to make performance GPUs every half year. It makes a performance GPU every >1 year. It took 15 months to get from RV770 to Cypress.

So AMD won't roll out two performance GPUs within a span of an year.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
9,950 (2.25/day)
Likes
2,309
System Name MoFo 2
Processor AMD PhenomII 1100T @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair IV
Cooling Swiftec 655 pump, Apogee GT,, MCR360mm Rad, 1/2 loop.
Memory 8GB DDR3-2133 @ 1900 8.9.9.24 1T
Video Card(s) HD7970 1250/1750
Storage Agility 3 SSD 6TB RAID 0 on RAID Card
Display(s) 46" 1080P Toshiba LCD
Case Rosewill R6A34-BK modded (thanks to MKmods)
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Power Supply 750W PC Power & Cooling modded (thanks to MKmods)
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
#46
For the last time, either get a 5870, and actually test memory bandwidth for yourself, read and comprehend reviews, or just die. The 5870 setup engine is starving the core, plus the redesign of the core for using the extra shaders to process the information generated by the tesselation unit doesn't require mega bandwidth.



After so many charts were made, tests by users who actualy owned a 5870, reviews by W1zz, and other sites if you think that it needs more bandwidth than you need to end yourself.
 
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
865 (0.29/day)
Likes
165
Location
Porto
Processor Phenom II X3 720BE @ 3.3GHz, 4th core unlocked
Motherboard Asus M4A78-E
Cooling Schythe Ninja + Dual 120mm
Memory GEiL 2*2GB Gold
Video Card(s) Gigabyte HD5870 1GB + PhysX/Computing 8800GTS 512MB
Storage Intel X25-M 80GB O.S. + WD 500GB Data
Display(s) HP 2408w 24" LCD
Case Antec Plusview 1000
Audio Device(s) X-Fi XtremeMusic + Gigaworks SB750 7.1 THX
Power Supply BeQuiet Dark Power Pro 650W
Software Windows 7 64bit
#47
Theres no memory bottleneck

Why?

overclock the mem you see basically no improvement

if you oc the core you get massive boosts.

In theory that means no memory bottleneck anyways....
For the last time, either get a 5870, and actually test memory bandwidth for yourself, read and comprehend reviews, or just die. The 5870 setup engine is starving the core, plus the redesign of the core for using the extra shaders to process the information generated by the tesselation unit doesn't require mega bandwidth.


After so many charts were made, tests by users who actualy owned a 5870, reviews by W1zz, and other sites if you think that it needs more bandwidth than you need to end yourself.
Memory overclocking in those tests isn't high enough to make those tests relevant, IMO.

And, @ Steevo, there's really no reason to tell others to "just die" and "you need to end yourself" when you disagree with them. That's childish.





And the only reason RV790 came out was because of RV770's clock speed and electrical limitations (with which AMD couldn't even make OC models to speak of), as I argued earlier. RV790 can't be used as an example, aside from the fact that it couldn't quite serve its purpose against GTX 285 and NVIDIA's response (GTX 275).
(...)
Don't equate RV790's creation to something similar with Cypress. It doesn't face the issues RV770 faced. The bottomline is AMD can't afford to make performance GPUs every half year. It makes a performance GPU every >1 year. It took 15 months to get from RV770 to Cypress.

So AMD won't roll out two performance GPUs within a span of an year.
The thing is, you (or me) don't know if there are enough improvements to be made to RV870 to justify a new chip. There's always something to improve, and these improvements wouldn't be the exact same thing as what happened in the RV770->RV790 transition (that would be stupid).

Notice that I'm not insisting that there will be a new chip, I'm just saying that nothing is certain at this point.
Richard Huddy did say they will have an unanounced product prepared to make sure that Fermi won't be the fastest graphics card throughout most of 2010 (like what happened with the GTX285 in 2009). Since Fermi is coming in late Q1, they're sure to launch this product before Q4.



To address the memory bandwidth "deficiency" issue, the GPU should be given a complete redesign due to the way the different components of the GPU are arranged. That's a substantially higher R&D than what went into making RV790.

They don't, not at all.
All AMD has to do is to pair a Cypress board with the new 7Gb/s memory chips being produced by Samsung and Hynix. It would bump the bandwidth to 224GB/s (45% up from the current 154GB/s that we see in the HD5870).


A Cypress card with 1GHz core and 224GB/s bandwidth could perfectly be the future HD5890 (and the card to compete with a Fermi flagship).
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
9,950 (2.25/day)
Likes
2,309
System Name MoFo 2
Processor AMD PhenomII 1100T @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair IV
Cooling Swiftec 655 pump, Apogee GT,, MCR360mm Rad, 1/2 loop.
Memory 8GB DDR3-2133 @ 1900 8.9.9.24 1T
Video Card(s) HD7970 1250/1750
Storage Agility 3 SSD 6TB RAID 0 on RAID Card
Display(s) 46" 1080P Toshiba LCD
Case Rosewill R6A34-BK modded (thanks to MKmods)
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Power Supply 750W PC Power & Cooling modded (thanks to MKmods)
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
#48
Tests were completed with UNDERCLOCKED memory, and at every point of memory clock the relationship it had as a percentage of gain or loos was significantly less related than the gain or loss created by the changing of core clock.

Is that better? Here is a benchmark run from a actual user, back to back changing only the memory speed.

I've tested in Unigine Heaven, SF4 benchmark and DMC4 benchmark, core always at 950mhz, and memory speed varying from 1000-1300.

Heaven 1680x1050 - 4xAA - 16xAF MAX settings

950/1000 = 31.7fps - score 799
950/1100 = 32.6fps - score 822
950/1200 = 33.6fps - score 845
950/1300 = 34.4fps - score 865

1920x1200 4xAA - 16xAF, MAX - Posterization

950/1000 - 134.64
950/1100 - 139.37
950/1200 - 142.01
950/1300 - 145.44

DMC4 I had to do average of 3 runs across the 4 scenes and experienced some issues, so i wont clog up my post with those results, suffice to say it followed these results quite linearly.

my testing shows;

30% difference in memory bandwidth across the 256 bit bus results in a performance difference of ~9%

I dare make the assumption that even if ATi paired this card with 6.4gbs memory instead of 4.8, we'd see performance of around 10%, given my testing between 4gbs to 5.2gbs

I'd love to speculate how the card would perform with a 512 bit bus, but I honestly don't think I could do it justice. But I really think the choice for 4.8gbs memory was based on how cheap and abundant the memory chips are compared to faster clocked stuff, and the fact that performance on this GPU seems to have little to gain from the speed alone.


http://forums.techpowerup.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=30510&d=1257887705

A simple chart to show the relatinoship of memory speed to gain.

Blue is the memory speed increase, red is the actual performance increase, yellow is the net loss of effect that people are proposing. So for evey 10% increase your 3% of win is overbalanced by 7% of fail, netting your over 200% more fail per clock.
 
Last edited:

kylzer

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
511 (0.16/day)
Likes
77
Location
192.168.1.1
System Name NDA BD
Processor NDA
Motherboard NDA
Cooling --------------
Memory Corsair GTX 1866Mhz 2x4GB
Video Card(s) --------------
Storage WDBlack 640GB and WDGreen 750GB
Display(s) BenQ G2200HD
Case ---------------
Audio Device(s) Built in
Power Supply Silverstone 500w
Software Win7 64
#49
Memory overclocking in those tests isn't high enough to make those tests relevant, IMO.
What tests?

I'm talking from my personal experiences with the HD58 and 57 series.
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
34,335 (9.23/day)
Likes
17,427
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name Long shelf-life potato
Processor Intel Core i7-4770K
Motherboard ASUS Z97-A
Cooling Xigmatek Aegir CPU Cooler
Memory 16GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3-1866
Video Card(s) 2x GeForce GTX 970 SLI
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590D 28-inch 4K
Case Cooler Master CM690 Window
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX850W
Mouse Razer Abyssus 2014
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro Creators Update
#50
The thing is, you (or me) don't know if there are enough improvements to be made to RV870 to justify a new chip. There's always something to improve, and these improvements wouldn't be the exact same thing as what happened in the RV770->RV790 transition (that would be stupid).
Right, and therefore neither of us can confirm anything based on vague statements someone made to the press.

My contention is that AMD won't release a new performance GPU this soon (within 12 months of Cypress' release), simply because it can't afford to. It can't do to Cypress what it did to RV770 (a change it could afford and desperately needed), because Cypress already has the resources to run at high clock speeds.

They don't, not at all.
All AMD has to do is to pair a Cypress board with the new 7Gb/s memory chips being produced by Samsung and Hynix. It would bump the bandwidth to 224GB/s (45% up from the current 154GB/s that we see in the HD5870).


A Cypress card with 1GHz core and 224GB/s bandwidth could perfectly be the future HD5890 (and the card to compete with a Fermi flagship).
So you've answered yourself. AMD won't have to come up with a new GPU.