• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

GK110 Specifications Approximated

Joined
Feb 7, 2006
Messages
713 (0.16/day)
Likes
157
Location
Austin, TX
System Name WAZAAM!
Processor Intel i5-2500k - 4.4GHz @ 1.3v
Motherboard ASUS Maximus IV Extreme-Z (z68)
Cooling HSF:: Noctua NH-D14 || CASE:: 2x Intake: Noctua NF-P12-1300 | 2x Exhaust: Noctua NF-S12B
Memory G.Skill RipJaws 16GB (4x4GB) @ 1866MHz | 10-10-10-28-2T @ 1.35v
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB SC
Storage Crucial 1.4TB P420m PCIe (boot & steam) | 4x Ultrastar 2TB in Storage Spaces Parity (Media)
Display(s) 3x1 nVidia Surround | Three Dell U2412m - 24" e-IPS 1920x1200
Case Antec P183 - Custom Interior Paint Job
Audio Device(s) Onboard - Bose Companion 2 Speakers
Power Supply CORSAIR Professional Series HX850
Keyboard Corsair K95 RGB
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Server -- Inte 4c Atom C2550D -- 2x4GB G.Skill 1866MHz DDR3 -- 100GB OS SSD -- 4x 2TB 5400 RAID5
#26
Sounds like they're following Intel's lead.

the top chip is no longer for enthusiasts but for professional use. (All of Intel's 8-core chips go to server procs) I'm sure they'll release this baby for consumers but most chips will go to workstation cards where $2k - $5k isn't out of the question. 512 bus makes more sense in that case.

I think AMD will still go mainstream-ish with their 8000 series. We'll get a performance increase but they'll be under 400 mm^2.

I also think that nVidia had the GK100 in the development cycle but didn't want another GF100. Work longer on the development cycle so that the initial release comes off without a hitch.

If they had done a release of GK100 it'd be worse than the GTX480 was at release. But I'm sure the GK110 (GTX780?) will be problem free.
 
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
1,066 (0.24/day)
Likes
193
Location
Look behind you!!
System Name NEW
Processor Intel 4770 non-K
Motherboard Gigabyte H81M-DS2V
Cooling CM Hyper 212 plus
Memory 16gb Muskin
Video Card(s) XFX 380X 4gb
Storage Sandisk 120gb plus WD blue 1tb
Display(s) AOC 23.5 LED bl
Case XIGMATEK
Audio Device(s) motherboard
Power Supply Cooler Master 500
#27
Want a GTX790.

Yeah SLI 2 of those MOFOs on one PCB :rockout: :nutkick:
 
Joined
Nov 29, 2010
Messages
5 (0.00/day)
Likes
0
Location
Japan
#29
Most faveriot GPU board which I would like to wait for

According to articles/news which I have ever read about "Keplar related" information , I believe the chip of GK100 (not GK104 ) maybe come as "GTX685" which is really/fully "28nm Keplar technology". Therefore I decided to skip (pass) "buying GK104(GTX680) and wait for "the availability date of GK110" ( around of "Aug 2012" time frame) in order to get "fully 1 Teraflops on one GPU in double _precision". Do you think so that this plan is reasonable ??:pimp:
 

MxPhenom 216

Corsair Fanboy
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
12,148 (4.50/day)
Likes
3,709
Location
Seattle, WA
System Name The Battlestation
Processor Intel Core i7 4770k @ 4.2GHZ 1.275v
Motherboard MSi Z97 Gaming 5
Cooling EK Supremacy w/ EK Coolstream PE360
Memory G. Skill Trident X 16Gb (4x4GB) 2400mhz @ 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSi GTX1070 Gaming X 8GB @ 2GHz
Storage Samsung 830 128GB SSD, Crucial MX200 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2x 1TB Partitions)
Display(s) Qnix QX2710 27" 2560 x 1440 PLS @ 100hz
Case Phantek Enthoo Evolv ATX TG
Audio Device(s) MSi Gaming AudioBoost ALC1150 w/ Sennheiser Game Ones
Power Supply Seasonic Flagship Prime Platinum 850
Mouse Steelseries Rival 310 w/ QCK Mass mat
Keyboard Corsair K70 w/ MX Browns and Red Backlit
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 15439
#30
yeah sorry amdftw, but your wrong in all respects. I have a GTX470 and its 526mm^2 die size and costed me $310 brand new from the egg. $310 != $1500
 
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
2,680 (0.88/day)
Likes
693
Location
Reaching your left retina.
#31
yeah sorry amdftw, but your wrong in all respects. I have a GTX470 and its 526mm^2 die size and costed me $310 brand new from the egg. $310 != $1500
By his numbers, he is pretending that only 5 working chips would come out of a wafer so yeah... right... lol.

Now seriously (not), didn't you get the memo? Your card really, trully was sold at a $1000 loss per card. It's true man, that's how you do bussiness nowadays. :eek:
 

Chappy

New Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2011
Messages
82 (0.04/day)
Likes
6
System Name Movie Maker
Processor Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 3.40Ghz
Motherboard GA-EP45-DQ6
Cooling OCZ
Memory Corsair Dominator DDR2 8GB (4X2GB) DDR2
Video Card(s) XFX GTX 280 XXX Edition (670Mhz)
Storage WD Caviar Black (2X) 2TB RAID-0 & WD Caviar Green 2TB
Display(s) Samsung T220
Case Gigabyte 3D Aurora
Audio Device(s) Realtek (Integrated)
Power Supply Corsair HX1000
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64-Bit
#32
Then the GK104 (GTX 680) as we know should be priced in a mid-range level. If not, then this GK110 will be priced like $880+ for a single GPU. :eek:
 
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
2,680 (0.88/day)
Likes
693
Location
Reaching your left retina.
#34
Then the GK104 (GTX 680) as we know should be priced in a mid-range level. If not, then this GK110 will be priced like $880+ for a single GPU. :eek:
No, I think Nvidia will engage in a price war in order to try to gain some market share and make room for GK110 when it launches in 5-6 months. Now that the $499 price tag is pretty much confirmed by some Newegg entries (now gone I think), I really think that's the case. They could have priced it at $550 without putting pressure on AMD, but they chose $500, which means that AMD will have to lower prices and more than likely AMD will try to put some pricing pressure on their own so that Nvidia has to adjust later on too.

Also the best price for a chip like GK104 is in the sub $400 region, maybe even below $300 where it would sell like hotcakes and where it would get much higher profits (not gross margin, profits). But 28nm supply being as it is now they will probably sell as many as they can make so it would be pointless for them to price it where demand would surpass their supply. Once supply is better prices will drop.
 
Joined
Dec 1, 2011
Messages
343 (0.15/day)
Likes
34
Location
Ft Stewart
System Name Queen Bee
Processor 3570k @ 4.0GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte UD3 Z77
Cooling Water Loop by EK
Memory 8GB Corsair 1600 DDR3
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 970 Gaming WaterCooled
Storage 1x Western Digital 500GB Black 1x Intel 20GB 311 SSD
Display(s) BenQ XL2420G
Case CoolTek W2
Power Supply Corsair 650Watt
Software Windows 7 Pro
#35
Just compare the GF104 to GF110 (GTX 560 ti vs GTX 580) there was a 25% increase in the shader count and a 50% increase to the L2 cache and the memory bus. The SM's were doubled as well and with it the ROP's jumped. GF110 has been speculated to carry a 512 bit bus, which would break this "mold" a little, but all totaled up its a true monster!
One thing I can speculate on is making the room for all this extra while not really gain'n to many more shaders (2048 theoretically) would bring back a hot clock of sorts, were the shaders can "boost" themselves far past the base clock or boost clock (think 1308-1509 for GTX 680).