• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Global NAND Flash Revenue Fell by 24.3% QoQ for 3Q22 as Suppliers Made Large Price Concessions That in Turn Impacted Their Results

Nov 11, 2004
12,759 (1.93/day)
System Name Overlord Mk MXX
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE AM4
Memory 32GB Viper Steel 3600 DDR4 @ 3800MHz 16-19-16-19-36
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 2080 Gaming OC 8G
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 2TB Viper VPN100, 2TB Kingston KC3000
Display(s) Acer XV272K LVbmiipruzx 4K@160Hz
Case Fractal Design Focus 2 Solid
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply Seasonic Focus GX 750W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Svive Triton Pro
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/33u9si
Market intelligence firm TrendForce reports that the whole NAND Flash market was severely weakened by plummeting demand in 3Q22. Because shipments of end products including consumer electronics and servers had been below expectations, the overall NAND ASP fell by 18.3% QoQ. Furthermore, the general economic outlook remained pessimistic, so enterprises across many sectors started to scale back their capital expenditure plans and halted the momentum of their procurement activities. Due to this development, the problem of excess inventory eventually spread to NAND Flash suppliers. The pressure on suppliers to make sales was ratcheted up dramatically. According to TrendForce's investigation, NAND Flash bit shipments fell by 6.7% QoQ for 3Q22, and the overall NAND Flash ASP also kept sliding. On account of the unfavorable market situation, the NAND Flash industry recorded a total revenue of around US$13.71 billion for 3Q22. The QoQ revenue decline reached as much as 24.3%.

The ranking of NAND Flash suppliers by revenue saw two notable changes for 3Q22. First, SK Group moved down to third place as it suffered the largest revenue drop among suppliers. Its revenue slipped by 29.8% QoQ to US$2.54 billion mainly due to the significant deterioration of the demand for PCs and smartphones. Its subsidiary Solidigm was also affected by the slowdown in server procurements. Previously, servers had a fairly stable demand situation compared with other kinds of end products. However, server demand eventually buckled in 3Q22 as result of enterprises cutting capital expenditure and undergoing a period of inventory correction. Compared with 2Q22, SK Group (that encompasses SK hynix and Solidigm) posted a drop of 11.1% in bit shipments and an even steeper decline of more than 20% in ASP.

The other notable change in the 3Q22 ranking was Kioxia. The supplier returned to second place in terms of revenue and market share because it was able to make a gradual recovery from the material contamination incident that had happened earlier this year. Even though Kioxia did suffer a significant decline in its ASP due to the slumping demand for consumer electronics, its bit shipments were bolstered by the seasonal stock-up activities of its clients in the smartphone industry and rose by 23.5% QoQ. Taken altogether, Kioxia's revenue dipped by just 0.1% QoQ to US$2.83 billion.

Owing to Downturn in Both Quantity and Price, Micron Posted Largest Drop in NAND Flash Bit Shipments with QoQ Decline Reaching 21%
Other NAND Flash suppliers including Samsung, Western Digital and Micron all posted a considerable QoQ decline in revenue for 3Q22 because of a drop in both price and shipment quantity. Again, weakening demand for end products was one of the major reasons behind these suppliers' poor performances. Regarding Samsung, the supplier saw a drop in its enterprise SSD shipments during 3Q22 as server demand slowed down. This was a sharp negative turn compared with the situation in 2Q22, when orders related to data centers were propping up enterprise SSD procurements. Samsung's revenue fell by 28.1% QoQ to US$4.3 billion for 3Q22.

Western Digital's NAND Flash business were under enormous pressure in 3Q22 as it recorded a QoQ decline in bit shipments and a sharp drop in its ASP. All in all, Western Digital's revenue fell by 28.3% QoQ to US$1.72 billion. Turning to Micron, an analysis of its memory revenue performance, which encompasses both DRAM and NAND Flash, has revealed that the only the application segment that did well in 3Q22 was automotive memory solutions. Micron actually posted a new high for its revenue from automotive memory solutions in that quarter. Conversely, its revenue figures related to other memory-related applications, including NAND Flash solutions for data centers, industrial IoT, etc., all exhibited a QoQ drop. And because of the poor results for the rest of application segments, Micron's NAND Flash revenue as a whole registered a steep QoQ decline of 26.2% to US$1.69 billion.

NAND Revenue Will Show a QoQ Drop Again for 4Q22 as Inventory Pressure Continues to Mount and Production Cuts Bring No Immediate Relief
Moving into 4Q22, TrendForce believes that with the notable exception of Samsung, most suppliers will be more cautious in planning output following their respective earnings calls for the third quarter. To restore balance to supply-demand dynamics as quickly as possible, suppliers will be taking measures such as cutting wafer input and decelerating the pace of technology migration. However, the usual demand surge in connection with the year-end holiday sales has failed to materialize this year, and NAND Flash buyers' passiveness is causing inventory to further accumulate on the supply side. As for production cuts, their effect on the market will not be apparent for at least a quarter. Hence, prices of NAND Flash products will still be under significant downward pressure in 4Q22, and TrendForce has widened the projected QoQ decline in contract prices to 20~25% in its latest forecast. With high inventory and falling prices serving as constraining factors, the NAND Flash industry is also forecasted to post a QoQ decline of almost 20% in its total revenue for 4Q22.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
Jun 2, 2017
4,863 (2.41/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD 5950X
Motherboard MSI X570S ACE Max
Cooling In Win SR36
Memory ADATA D60 3600MHZ 32 GB
Video Card(s) MSI 6800XT Gaming Trio X
Storage Seagate 530 2Tb, Adata SX8200 2TBx2, Kingston 2 TBx2, Micron 8 TB
Display(s) GIGABYTE 32QC
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1200!
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 24955 Time Spy: 13500
Taking into account that 2021 was a unicorn year Electronics. I hope that they see now that we have reached a limit that cannot be maintained. It is past time to have 4, 6 8 or even 16 TB NVME for affordable prices for the consumer space. Manufacturers have been focusing on increasing layers without transferring those benefits to the consumer. I guess it is good for Companies though as Corsair has an 8TB NVME that is $400 more than if you bought 4 of the 2 TB versions. The other huge caveat to these limits is the size of modern Games where 100GB seems like a minimum for new Games. I for one do not like to waste electricity re-downloading a Game I want to play. It doesn't even have to be NVME as SATA SSDs suffer the same problem. Whoever will be first to offer a 8TB SSD/NVME for $499-$699 will rule the roost. I currently have 2 Kingston NV2 2TB in my Newegg cart for $330 that is 4 TB. They do not even offer 4 TB but why would I buy a 4TB drive if I know that with RAID 0 I can turn those into a Seagate 530 in terms of performance for half the cost of a 4TB NVME drive for 1/3 of the price of the 4TB 530?
May 13, 2015
400 (0.14/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 3800X / AMD 8350
Motherboard ASRock X570 Phantom Gaming X / Gigabyte 990FXA-UD5 Revision 3.0
Cooling Stock / Corsair H100
Memory 32GB / 24GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 6800 / AMD Radeon 290X (Toggling until 6950XT)
Storage C:\ 1TB SSD, D:\ RAID-1 1TB SSD, 2x4TB-RAID-1
Display(s) Samsung U32E850R
Case be quiet! Dark Base Pro 900 Black rev. 2 / Fractal Design
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi
Power Supply EVGA Supernova 1300G2 / EVGA Supernova 850G+
Mouse Logitech M-U0007
Keyboard Logitech G110 / Logitech G110
A Samsung 2TB NVMe drive is still $180 and I need to purchase five of them to replace my existing C:\ and D:\ drives. A little bit lower than six months ago though I'd really like to see them hit ~$150.
Mar 28, 2020
1,396 (1.42/day)
They really cannot expect red hot demand all the time. Most hardware companies made a lot of money due to unprecedented demand for electronics devices in 2020 and 2021 due to the pandemic lockdowns. In addition,
1. How many SSDs do they expect their users to own? One can only populate as many SSDs as their motherboard supports, assuming they even want to max it out.
2. Mobile devices have pretty much stagnated when it comes to storage size improvement. In 2022, it is shocking to still see high end phones with 128GB of storage.

With recession upon us/ looming, people have lost jobs, job security uncertainty, high inflation, etc. So I do expect demand to trend down a lot more, along with the revenue.
Jul 31, 2014
262 (0.09/day)
System Name Garbage / Trash
Processor Ryzen 5600X / 5600
Motherboard MSI B450M Mortar Ti / GB B550M Aorus Pro-P
Cooling Deepcool GTE / ID Cooling SE224XT
Memory Micron 32GB DDR4-3200 E-die @ 3600C16 / Ballistix Elite 16GB 3600C16
Video Card(s) MSI 2060 Super Armor OC / Zotac 3070 Twin Edge
Storage HP EX920 1TB Micron 1100 2TB, Crucial M550 1TB, Hynix P31 1TB
Display(s) Acer XB271HU @ 150Hz x2
Audio Device(s) JBL LSR305 + Topping D50S / iLoud MM + SMSL DO100
Power Supply Seasonic Focus Plus 850W / G-series 650W
Mouse Logitech G304 x2
Streaming and cloud has also cut a LOT of demand for consumer storage that would exist otherwise.