Discussion in 'NVIDIA' started by MrHydes, Jun 16, 2008.
bah! who cares about vista-only benchmarks. Throw some REAL stuff at it, I say!
It seems the graphics didnt do so well in the first test - did they forget the LN?
24k at vantage brutal
damn I cant believe it Vantage 24k
this can run crysis on maximum resolution with everything maxed at more than 100 fps I'm guessing.........
wish they posted some fps for some games test
That extreme score is insane. That's what I like about vantage. It shows a gpu score that isn't screwed up by the cpu.
Except for the part of the extreme OC, i was right on the money:
In the first test they tested with the extreme settings so therefore the resolution and such were much higher, and damn thats pretty nice, now I want to see 2x4870x2's under LN2 and see what those can really do.
hehe yeah, can u do the same with the lottery numbers please
I don't gamble ...
About 16 years ago, an uncle told me to go to bed saying it was over 1 AM and, out of the blue i said "no it's not: it's 00:43."
Looked @ my wrist watch and ... 00:43
That's the closest to a jackpot i've ever been, considering i don't gamble.
Back on topic:
For a single GPU, the results are impressive, but i still think it falls short of expectations, though not by much (i'm referring to the performance score).
On the other hand, the extreme score impresses me a LOT!!!
Take a look @ this:
See how much more it is? WOW
Please remember, we have ATi/Nvidia subforums. Thanks.
The scores are impressive to say the least now we wait for ATI's response, Also HTC i dont gamble much either , But i have to make an effort to stay away from the roulette tables virtual or not.
I don't gamble, period!
I was quite surprised about the xtreme preset scores in Vantage.
Separate names with a comma.