• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Hard Drive Failure Rates

Joined
Apr 19, 2012
Messages
12,062 (2.77/day)
Location
Gypsyland, UK
System Name HP Omen 17
Processor i7 7700HQ
Memory 16GB 2400Mhz DDR4
Video Card(s) GTX 1060
Storage Samsung SM961 256GB + HGST 1TB
Display(s) 1080p IPS G-SYNC 75Hz
Audio Device(s) Bang & Olufsen
Power Supply 230W
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD+
Software Win 10 Pro
Something for people to refer to when moaning about HDD failure rates.

http://techreport.com/news/25940/hard-drive-reliability-study-names-names

 

Ahhzz

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 27, 2008
Messages
8,708 (1.48/day)
System Name OrangeHaze / Silence
Processor i7-13700KF / i5-10400 /
Motherboard ROG STRIX Z690-E / MSI Z490 A-Pro Motherboard
Cooling Corsair H75 / TT ToughAir 510
Memory 64Gb GSkill Trident Z5 / 32GB Team Dark Za 3600
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2070 / Sapphire R9 290 Vapor-X 4Gb
Storage Hynix Plat P41 2Tb\Samsung MZVL21 1Tb / Samsung 980 Pro 1Tb
Display(s) 22" Dell Wide/24" Asus
Case Lian Li PC-101 ATX custom mod / Antec Lanboy Air Black & Blue
Audio Device(s) SB Audigy 7.1
Power Supply Corsair Enthusiast TX750
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed Wireless / Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum
Keyboard K68 RGB — CHERRY® MX Red
Software Win10 Pro \ RIP:Win 7 Ult 64 bit
I knew to stay away from Seagate, and prefer the WD Blacks, but I'll have to look a little more at the Hitachis. Thanks :)
 

rtwjunkie

PC Gaming Enthusiast
Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
13,909 (2.43/day)
Location
Louisiana -Laissez les bons temps rouler!
System Name Bayou Phantom
Processor Core i7-8700k 4.4Ghz @ 1.18v
Motherboard ASRock Z390 Phantom Gaming 6
Cooling All air: 2x140mm Fractal exhaust; 3x 140mm Cougar Intake; Enermax T40F Black CPU cooler
Memory 2x 16GB Mushkin Redline DDR-4 3200
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 2080 Ti Xc
Storage 1x 500 MX500 SSD; 2x 6TB WD Black; 1x 4TB WD Black; 1x400GB VelRptr; 1x 4TB WD Blue storage (eSATA)
Display(s) HP 27q 27" IPS @ 2560 x 1440
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Black w/Titanium front -windowed
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic X-850
Mouse Coolermaster Sentinel III (large palm grip!)
Keyboard Logitech G610 Orion mechanical (Cherry Brown switches)
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (Start10 & Fences 3.0 installed)
I've still got a couple WD 74Gb Raptors (one in my son's PC, and one in HTPC) that are still in use since Sept 2006. Both still have no SMART warnings, and still have no bad sectors. Simply amazing the longevity of those things!
 
Last edited:

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.65/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
I have two of the 3 TB Seagates and neither has failed yet. I've kind of written Hitachi off lately but that was clearly a mistake. Bare in mind that Hitachi is the smallest HDD manufacturer out of the three so that may be skewing results.
 
Joined
Apr 3, 2012
Messages
4,355 (0.99/day)
Location
St. Paul, MN
System Name Bay2- Lowerbay/ HP 3770/T3500-2+T3500-3+T3500-4/ Opti-Con/Orange/White/Grey
Processor i3 2120's/ i7 3770/ x5670's/ i5 2400/Ryzen 2700/Ryzen 2700/R7 3700x
Motherboard HP UltraSlim's/ HP mid size/ Dell T3500 workstation's/ Dell 390/B450 AorusM/B450 AorusM/B550 AorusM
Cooling All stock coolers/Grey has an H-60
Memory 2GB/ 4GB/ 12 GB 3 chan/ 4GB sammy/T-Force 16GB 3200/XPG 16GB 3000/Ballistic 3600 16GB
Video Card(s) HD2000's/ HD 2000/ 1 MSI GT710,2x MSI R7 240's/ HD4000/ Red Dragon 580/Sapphire 580/Sapphire 580
Storage ?HDD's/ 500 GB-er's/ 500 GB/2.5 Samsung 500GB HDD+WD Black 1TB/ WD Black 500GB M.2/Corsair MP600 M.2
Display(s) 1920x1080/ ViewSonic VX24568 between the rest/1080p TV-Grey
Case HP 8200 UltraSlim's/ HP 8200 mid tower/Dell T3500's/ Dell 390/SilverStone Kublai KL06/NZXT H510 W x2
Audio Device(s) Sonic Master/ onboard's/ Beeper's!
Power Supply 19.5 volt bricks/ Dell PSU/ 525W sumptin/ same/Seasonic 750 80+Gold/EVGA 500 80+/Antec 650 80+Gold
Mouse cheap GigaWire930, CMStorm Havoc + Logitech M510 wireless/iGear usb x2/MX 900 wireless kit 4 Grey
Keyboard Dynex, 2 no name, SYX and a Logitech. All full sized and USB. MX900 kit for Grey
Software Mint 18 Sylvia/ Opti-Con Mint KDE/ T3500's on Kubuntu/HP 3770 is Win 10/Win 10 Pro/Win 10 Pro/Win10
Benchmark Scores World Community Grid is my benchmark!!
I have two Hitachi's, a 250GB in, This Old Comp, and a 750GB in my ASUS Laptop.

I the 250 has been stellar! The 750, in my laptop, so far, so good, It is the newer of the two and has been used for a shorter time.

When I, eventually, get my life back to squared away, I plan to get a Kingston SSD kit and use this 750 for a backup and data drive. Blah, Blah. :lovetpu:

Thanks @RCoon for the post.
 

Ahhzz

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 27, 2008
Messages
8,708 (1.48/day)
System Name OrangeHaze / Silence
Processor i7-13700KF / i5-10400 /
Motherboard ROG STRIX Z690-E / MSI Z490 A-Pro Motherboard
Cooling Corsair H75 / TT ToughAir 510
Memory 64Gb GSkill Trident Z5 / 32GB Team Dark Za 3600
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2070 / Sapphire R9 290 Vapor-X 4Gb
Storage Hynix Plat P41 2Tb\Samsung MZVL21 1Tb / Samsung 980 Pro 1Tb
Display(s) 22" Dell Wide/24" Asus
Case Lian Li PC-101 ATX custom mod / Antec Lanboy Air Black & Blue
Audio Device(s) SB Audigy 7.1
Power Supply Corsair Enthusiast TX750
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed Wireless / Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum
Keyboard K68 RGB — CHERRY® MX Red
Software Win10 Pro \ RIP:Win 7 Ult 64 bit
I have two of the 3 TB Seagates and neither has failed yet. I've kind of written Hitachi off lately but that was clearly a mistake. Bare in mind that Hitachi is the smallest HDD manufacturer out of the three so that may be skewing results.
Actually, click thru to the orig report, you'll see that they had 13000 Seagate and hitachis in the mix, and around 3500 wd drives.
 

AsRock

TPU addict
Joined
Jun 23, 2007
Messages
18,851 (3.08/day)
Location
UK\USA
Processor AMD 3900X \ AMD 7700X
Motherboard ASRock AM4 X570 Pro 4 \ ASUS X670Xe TUF
Cooling D15
Memory Patriot 2x16GB PVS432G320C6K \ G.Skill Flare X5 F5-6000J3238F 2x16GB
Video Card(s) eVga GTX1060 SSC \ XFX RX 6950XT RX-695XATBD9
Storage Sammy 860, MX500, Sabrent Rocket 4 Sammy Evo 980 \ 1xSabrent Rocket 4+, Sammy 2x990 Pro
Display(s) Samsung 1080P \ LG 43UN700
Case Fractal Design Pop Air 2x140mm fans from Torrent \ Fractal Design Torrent 2 SilverStone FHP141x2
Audio Device(s) Yamaha RX-V677 \ Yamaha CX-830+Yamaha MX-630 Infinity RS4000\Paradigm P Studio 20, Blue Yeti
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TX-750 \ Corsair RM1000X Shift
Mouse Steelseries Sensei wireless \ Steelseries Sensei wireless
Keyboard Logitech K120 \ Wooting Two HE
Benchmark Scores Meh benchmarks.
Info not worthy, lack of details.

How ever i am a WD fan regardless what these kind of reports say.
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.65/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
Actually, click thru to the orig report, you'll see that they had 13000 Seagate and hitachis in the mix, and around 3500 wd drives.
That's not representative of the market at all. :eek:
 
Joined
Mar 26, 2010
Messages
9,762 (1.91/day)
Location
Jakarta, Indonesia
System Name micropage7
Processor Intel Xeon X3470
Motherboard Gigabyte Technology Co. Ltd. P55A-UD3R (Socket 1156)
Cooling Enermax ETS-T40F
Memory Samsung 8.00GB Dual-Channel DDR3
Video Card(s) NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
Storage V-GEN03AS18EU120GB, Seagate 2 x 1TB and Seagate 4TB
Display(s) Samsung 21 inch LCD Wide Screen
Case Icute Super 18
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Fi Forte
Power Supply Silverstone 600 Watt
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Sades Excalibur + Taihao keycaps
Software Win 7 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Classified
just saw it from facebook.
so size matter?
and i dunno, bigger space can save many data but when suddenly it die, you lose it all
 

freaksavior

To infinity ... and beyond!
Joined
Dec 11, 2006
Messages
8,095 (1.28/day)
System Name ZeroUptime | M.A.S.S / MM1
Processor Xeon 2659 v3 / Xeon 2683 v4 / ARM A14
Motherboard Asus X99-E-10G WS / ASRock x99 usb 3.1 / Apple
Cooling NZXT Kraken / Noctua NH-L12 / Apple
Memory 16Gb DDR4 / 32Gb DDR4 / 16GB HBLM
Video Card(s) Powercooler ATI vega 64 / GT 7300 / ARM
Storage Samsung 970 512 Evo NVMe / A lot. / 256 + 512 External TB3
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 / Headless / Acer X34 Non predator
Case NZXT H630 |Rosewill 8bay 4u server chasiss / MMM1
Audio Device(s) Onboard / Onboard / Onboard
Power Supply Corais HX850 | Corsair TX750 / Internal 250w
Mouse g502 proteus core / Headless / g502 proteus core
Keyboard Corsair K95 Cherry Blue / Headless / K65 Cherry Red
Software Windows 10 / ESXI / Big Sur 11.2.2
The 1.5Tb had bad firmware causing them to fail, after about a dozen RMA's I finally got some that worked.

just saw it from facebook.
so size matter?
and i dunno, bigger space can save many data but when suddenly it die, you lose it all

That's why when you use large file systems you need something to check the data often enough to prevent loss like ZFS. Standard raid levels were not designed for this type of capacity. Now if you're just running one then you can use a backup service or buy a second for backups.
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
4,686 (0.80/day)
System Name Obelisc
Processor i7 3770k @ 4.8 GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling H110
Memory 16GB(4x4) @ 2400 MHz 9-11-11-31
Video Card(s) GTX 780 Ti
Storage 850 EVO 1TB, 2x 5TB Toshiba
Case T81
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium HD
Power Supply EVGA 850 T2 80+ TITANIUM
Software Win10 64bit
I've never had a HDD outright fail. Had them spit out errors but they all seemed to shape up after a reformat. I switched to Seagate because I got tired of the racket WDs make when seeking. Now I would never go back. Same speed, less noise, lower price.
 
Joined
May 13, 2009
Messages
176 (0.03/day)
Processor Core i7 @ 3.5GHz stock voltage
Motherboard MSI Eclipse
Cooling Noctua NH-12P SE
Memory 6 GB 1066MHz
Video Card(s) 2x GTX260 @ 701/1506
Storage Raptor 74 GB
Display(s) NEC MultiSync 2080UX+
Power Supply Corsair HX620
Software Win7
I was big Seagate fanboi until I had to replace 7(seven) in 1 year- all different ages and sizes. One of the replacements came dead. 1 died a year later. Long turn around and poor refurbishing from Seagate's Tennessee plant. Costly returns- whether 1 or 4 HDDs. Not even factoring their poor manufacturing and quality issues.
Western Digital is the exact opposite- fast turnaround from California, very cheap shipping - $5 for something UPS charges $11, replacement drives come with nearly full warranty as opposed to refurbs from Seagate, which sometimes have no remaining warranty but 90 days. I made the decision 2 years ago to never buy Seagate ( Samsung too since they are owned by Seagate and warranty is handled exactly the same).
Another lesson learned - don't use WHS drive duplication. Ever.
Since all hard drives will fail sooner or later, it gets really hard to make sure your data is not corrupted before that. SMART is not doing much at all for data integrity, let alone warning. After that abomination Windows Home Server drive duplicaton slowly corrupted over 2TB of data, ZFS made me see the light. For me ZFS and WD Black is the winning solution. I laugh at Seagte's peeling magnetic layer now.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,472 (4.25/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
If you adjust the numbers by only including the numbers you choose to include and purposely leaving others off, you can make it look as bad as you want for any manufacturer you want.

WD's Green 3TB "start accumulating errors as soon as they are put into production... they were left out of the totals completely...

Every company has a bad run from time to time. I don't prefer any company when it comes to hard drives, I buy what provides the best GB/$, and never rely on a single drive to house any important data. Make backups!
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Messages
10,881 (1.63/day)
Location
Manchester, NH
System Name Senile
Processor I7-4790K@4.8 GHz 24/7
Motherboard MSI Z97-G45 Gaming
Cooling Be Quiet Pure Rock Air
Memory 16GB 4x4 G.Skill CAS9 2133 Sniper
Video Card(s) GIGABYTE Vega 64
Storage Samsung EVO 500GB / 8 Different WDs / QNAP TS-253 8GB NAS with 2x10Tb WD Blue
Display(s) 34" LG 34CB88-P 21:9 Curved UltraWide QHD (3440*1440) *FREE_SYNC*
Case Rosewill
Audio Device(s) Onboard + HD HDMI
Power Supply Corsair HX750
Mouse Logitech G5
Keyboard Corsair Strafe RGB & G610 Orion Red
Software Win 10

Ahhzz

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 27, 2008
Messages
8,708 (1.48/day)
System Name OrangeHaze / Silence
Processor i7-13700KF / i5-10400 /
Motherboard ROG STRIX Z690-E / MSI Z490 A-Pro Motherboard
Cooling Corsair H75 / TT ToughAir 510
Memory 64Gb GSkill Trident Z5 / 32GB Team Dark Za 3600
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2070 / Sapphire R9 290 Vapor-X 4Gb
Storage Hynix Plat P41 2Tb\Samsung MZVL21 1Tb / Samsung 980 Pro 1Tb
Display(s) 22" Dell Wide/24" Asus
Case Lian Li PC-101 ATX custom mod / Antec Lanboy Air Black & Blue
Audio Device(s) SB Audigy 7.1
Power Supply Corsair Enthusiast TX750
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed Wireless / Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum
Keyboard K68 RGB — CHERRY® MX Red
Software Win10 Pro \ RIP:Win 7 Ult 64 bit
If you adjust the numbers by only including the numbers you choose to include and purposely leaving others off, you can make it look as bad as you want for any manufacturer you want.



Every company has a bad run from time to time. I don't prefer any company when it comes to hard drives, I buy what provides the best GB/$, and never rely on a single drive to house any important data. Make backups!

Not to disagree with your conclusion by any stretch, but it appears that the only ones they left off, they COMPLETELY left off, due to being completely skewed. they also commented directly to that, saying that the greens were just not dealing well in that environment. Didn't say they were crappy drives or anything. As for a "bad run", if you go back thru their blog, they've obtained these drives from multiple sources, not one set. It's a pretty good read. The data I liked best was the quantity of drives overall. this was not a limited run of even a few hundred drives
Quote:
Brand Number of Drives Terabytes Average Age in Years
Seagate 12,765 39,576 1.4
Hitachi 12,956 36,078 2.0
Western Digital 2,838 2,581 2.5


Toshiba 58 174 0.7
Samsung 18 18 3.7
end quote

sorry, my table-fu is not strong :)

Looks to me like that's a really wide spread of drives, large collection, and the best Actual Use report I've ever seen on drives. Who else has put that many different brand drives thru that long of a run, and published the details? I have long preferred WD Blacks, have several 2Tb in the house right now, with 2 3Tb reds in my NAS. But this will make me consider the hitachi brand next time out...
 
Last edited:

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,472 (4.25/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Not to disagree with your conclusion by any stretch, but it appears that the only ones they left off, they COMPLETELY left off, due to being completely skewed. they also commented directly to that, saying that the greens were just not dealing well in that environment. Didn't say they were crappy drives or anything. As for a "bad run", if you go back thru their blog, they've obtained these drives from multiple sources, not one set. It's a pretty good read. The data I liked best was the quantity of drives overall. this was not a limited run of even a few hundred drives

Yes, but if you are releasing studies on hard drive reliability, if you want to seem reputable don't leave off an entire group of drives just because they all failed and you don't want to show that information.

Also, I'm not talking about a bad production run, I'm talking about a bad run in terms of a bad stretch of time where they are having issues. Every year we see reports like this, and every year the company with the problems seems to change. A month from now WD could run into issues and their reliability could start to go down.

Also, one of the 1.5TB Seagate models had an annual failure rate of 120%...yeah their numbers are reliable...:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

Ahhzz

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 27, 2008
Messages
8,708 (1.48/day)
System Name OrangeHaze / Silence
Processor i7-13700KF / i5-10400 /
Motherboard ROG STRIX Z690-E / MSI Z490 A-Pro Motherboard
Cooling Corsair H75 / TT ToughAir 510
Memory 64Gb GSkill Trident Z5 / 32GB Team Dark Za 3600
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2070 / Sapphire R9 290 Vapor-X 4Gb
Storage Hynix Plat P41 2Tb\Samsung MZVL21 1Tb / Samsung 980 Pro 1Tb
Display(s) 22" Dell Wide/24" Asus
Case Lian Li PC-101 ATX custom mod / Antec Lanboy Air Black & Blue
Audio Device(s) SB Audigy 7.1
Power Supply Corsair Enthusiast TX750
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed Wireless / Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum
Keyboard K68 RGB — CHERRY® MX Red
Software Win10 Pro \ RIP:Win 7 Ult 64 bit
Also, one of the 1.5TB Seagate models had an annual failure rate of 120%...yeah their numbers are reliable...:rolleyes:

You really should read the whole article. The 120% failure means they replaced them more than once in a year, due to what they assume is a bad batch from refurbs. Again, it doesn't look like they're sugar coating anything except dropping off what appear to be some obvious anomalies, which is what any statistician worth .500000000001 a grain of salt is going to do :)


Quote:
We got them from Seagate as warranty replacements for the older drives, and these new drives are dropping like flies. Their average age shows 0.8 years, but since these are warranty replacements, we believe that they are refurbished drives that were returned by other customers and erased, so they already had some usage when we got them.
End Quote

And after nagging you to read the article, I missed this gem at the bottom
"A year and a half ago, Western Digital acquired the Hitachi disk drive business. Will Hitachi drives continue their excellent performance? Will Western Digital bring some of the Hitachi reliability into their consumer-grade drives?" ;)
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,472 (4.25/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
You really should read the whole article. The 120% failure means they replaced them more than once in a year, due to what they assume is a bad batch from refurbs. Again, it doesn't look like they're sugar coating anything except dropping off what appear to be some obvious anomalies, which is what any statistician worth .500000000001 a grain of salt is going to do

I read the whole article, I just don't agree with their methods. I believe it makes their numbers in-accurate. Something can't fail more than once, if the replacement fails then that is still only a 100% failure rate. The replacement drive counts as a new drive in the study.

Furthermore, they talk more than once about the fact that they believe a lot of the drives they use are failing because they are using them in environments the drives weren't meant to be used in. These are high-vibration, high temperature, RAID environments. And not surprisingly, the desktop drives that aren't supposed to be used in these environments fail a lot. They are using Seagate desktop drives, which aren't supposed to be used in a RAID environment of more than 2 drives and they are failing. But the WD RED drives that are meant for this type of environment are showing to be more reliable. This isn't a surprise. However, they are presenting this data in a way to get people to believe these are how the drives perform in a desktop environment, or at least they knew that is how people would view the results.

In fact, if you look at similar studies, such as the one from Google, you see they specifically don't name brand names because they admit that they are using the drives outside of their intended purpose and it would be unfair to use the numbers to influence brand buying decisions of the standard consumer. This is because a drive might behave very poorly in a data center, but will run flawlessly in a desktop.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 26, 2013
Messages
954 (0.25/day)
Location
Cumberland Plateau
System Name EVGA-FX | Lenny (Lenovo Y480)
Processor AMD FX-8320 @ 4.5GHz 1.416v | i7 3610qm
Motherboard Asus M5A99FX Pro R2.0
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC14PE
Memory 2x4GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1600 | 8gb DDR3 @ 1600
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX780 Classified @ 1228MHz 1.615v | GT640m LE
Storage Crucial M500 480GB, WD Caviar Blue 500GB, WD Scorpio Blue 750GB | Samsung 250GB 840
Display(s) Qnix QX2710 1440p | 42" Vizio 3D LCD TV 1080p
Case CoolerMaster HAF XB Evo
Power Supply Seasonic G-650
Software Windows 6.3.9600
I read the whole article, I just don't agree with their methods. I believe it makes their numbers in-accurate. Something can't fail more than once, if the replacement fails then that is still only a 100% failure rate. The replacement drive counts as a new drive in the study.

I agree.

Now if they wanted to go into Failures per purchased drive.....
 

Ahhzz

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 27, 2008
Messages
8,708 (1.48/day)
System Name OrangeHaze / Silence
Processor i7-13700KF / i5-10400 /
Motherboard ROG STRIX Z690-E / MSI Z490 A-Pro Motherboard
Cooling Corsair H75 / TT ToughAir 510
Memory 64Gb GSkill Trident Z5 / 32GB Team Dark Za 3600
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2070 / Sapphire R9 290 Vapor-X 4Gb
Storage Hynix Plat P41 2Tb\Samsung MZVL21 1Tb / Samsung 980 Pro 1Tb
Display(s) 22" Dell Wide/24" Asus
Case Lian Li PC-101 ATX custom mod / Antec Lanboy Air Black & Blue
Audio Device(s) SB Audigy 7.1
Power Supply Corsair Enthusiast TX750
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed Wireless / Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum
Keyboard K68 RGB — CHERRY® MX Red
Software Win10 Pro \ RIP:Win 7 Ult 64 bit
I read the whole article, I just don't agree with their methods. I believe it makes their numbers in-accurate. Something can't fail more than once, if the replacement fails then that is still only a 100% failure rate. The replacement drive counts as a new drive in the study.
............ but will run flawlessly in a desktop.

It seems that you just want to insist that they (Backblaze) produced the results of this study to influence people into buying or not buying a series of drives. This is a long running blog of a company dedicated to "our cloud storage", as referred in the opening paragraph. They had a drive shortage, as many did, they had to source many drives from many different companies to keep up with their demand, and they decided to keep track of the drives replaced, and, in their experience, the drives' real-world MTBF, in a Cloud Environment:
"In the Backblaze environment..."
"Some drives just don’t work in the Backblaze environment"

This is an Online Cloud Storage/Backup company. They have no apparent desire to influence people to purchase one series of drives over another, and in fact, several times stated the have a preference for the WD reds, which they don't portray as having many of at all:
"Our other favorite is the Western Digital 3TB Red (WD30EFRX)."
"We wish we had more of the Western Digital Red 3TB drives (WD30EFRX)"
They do speak highly of the Hitachi drives they have ("If the price were right, we would be buying nothing but Hitachi drives"), but again, people reading this blog are made aware UP FRONT (if for some reason they assumed instead of reading) that this is in a Cloud Storage environment, not a bank of desktop computers.

Simply put, this blog shows a wide variety of drives in a large databank cloud storage environment, larger than most of us could dream of at this point, but just on a larger scale than what many of us have in our house or place of business. As such, it is highly interesting to me that the WD Red, designed for the RAID environ, scored worse than the equivalent Hitachi Desktar.

Western Digital Red
(WD30EFRX)3.0TB __________346_______________0.5_______________3.2%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000
(HDS723030ALA640)3.0TB ___1027_____________2.1________________0.9%


As for " the replacement fails then that is still only a 100% failure rate.", that's just playing with numbers. As a computer tech in this forum, I had absolutely no problem understanding that that meant they had drives fail and be replaced in less than a year's time. If someone didn't understand that, they were reading the wrong blog, and meant to be reading about Paddington Bear, not Backblaze. (Plainly, how would you explain that they bought **for instance** 100 drives, and had 120 fail in one year, on average? I understood it...)

What's the issue here? It almost sounds like a fanboi rant from you, which I'm sure you aren't. The company provided some serious real-world data, description of the environment used, reasoning behind the layout and build structure, and their experience with several different drive types. They appear to have no hidden agenda, no company affiliation beyond their own, I don't see any harm done that anyone who cares to read these type articles could possibly experience. If Joe Public decides to read it, and then decides to buy a Hitachi over a Western Digital or Seagate, who is harmed? If it's a question of "Seagate's not that bad!!!", Tom's Hardware readers appear to disagree, and if any of us are going to take someone's word over another, what does it matter that there's another dissenting opinion?

To the educated reader, all the information explaining the parameters of the "test" are in plain text. To the uneducated, they're still wondering if their microwave is spying on them for the NSA.....
 
Last edited:

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,472 (4.25/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
I think I've made myself very clear. This isn't a fanboy rant, I'm just stating my opinion.

Measuring drive failures at more than 100% makes the numbers inaccurate in my opinion(and it seems I'm not the only one). And in fact in statistical studies as well. In medial studies, if the patient is cured, then relapses and is cured again they don't call that a 200% success rate. If a patient dies, and is revived, and then dies again it isn't a 200% failure rate. To be really accurate, the new drives, even if they were replacements for failed drives, should be counted as a separate drive.

Also, releasing the brands of the drives only leads to people taking the study's information incorrectly, and why most companies that release numbers like this don't release the specific brands of the drives. The information is interesting for sure. However, to release the brand names only serves to try to influence people's buy decisions. And just as expected you have sites like TechReport and others picking these numbers up and presenting them as if they were desktop failure rates, and people here believing that. You can't use these numbers to predict desktop failure rates. These were drives put into conditions they weren't meant for, they would likely have very different failure rates in a desktop system.

And the Hitachi Deskstar drives are very well built drives with rock solid firmware. Hitachi actually approves them for RAID use. So it isn't surprising they are doing well and even outperforming the RED drives(which are just Green drives with TLER enabled). But that is the point too. Hitachi doesn't really have an enterprise class drive, their standard desktop drive fills that niche too. So they write their firmware to be RAID compatible. Seagate and WD on the other hand don't write the firmware for their desktop drives to be RAID compatible. But remember, there was a time when the Deskstars weren't that great, which is why they earned the nickname Hitachi Deathstars.
 

Ahhzz

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 27, 2008
Messages
8,708 (1.48/day)
System Name OrangeHaze / Silence
Processor i7-13700KF / i5-10400 /
Motherboard ROG STRIX Z690-E / MSI Z490 A-Pro Motherboard
Cooling Corsair H75 / TT ToughAir 510
Memory 64Gb GSkill Trident Z5 / 32GB Team Dark Za 3600
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2070 / Sapphire R9 290 Vapor-X 4Gb
Storage Hynix Plat P41 2Tb\Samsung MZVL21 1Tb / Samsung 980 Pro 1Tb
Display(s) 22" Dell Wide/24" Asus
Case Lian Li PC-101 ATX custom mod / Antec Lanboy Air Black & Blue
Audio Device(s) SB Audigy 7.1
Power Supply Corsair Enthusiast TX750
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed Wireless / Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum
Keyboard K68 RGB — CHERRY® MX Red
Software Win10 Pro \ RIP:Win 7 Ult 64 bit
I think I've made myself very clear. This isn't a fanboy rant, I'm just stating my opinion.
....snip..... But remember, there was a time when the Deskstars weren't that great, which is why they earned the nickname Hitachi Deathstars.

Homer: "I agree with you in theory...."

So, patient recovery rates aside, how would you indicate that you purchased 100 drives, and over the course of a year, had 120 drive failures? I think they explained their numbers sufficiently for anyone to understand.

I don't think either one of us can speak to "only leads to people taking the study's information correctly....". I understood it. You understood it. Several people here understood it. We can't correct everyone :)


I absolutely remember the Deathstars, well old enough for that, and remembering the IBM tags on hard drives, and several other defunct names, *shudder* maxtor included. I also didn't know that about the greens and reds. I had read some about them back when I got my baby NAS over here, I think, but didn't see that info. Checking Freenas right now for more info, thanks :)
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,472 (4.25/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Homer: "I agree with you in theory...." So, patient recovery rates aside, how would you indicate that you purchased 100 drives, and over the course of a year, had 120 drive failures? I think they explained their numbers sufficiently for anyone to understand.

It is simple, if the 100 drives they purchased died, then it is a 100% failure rate. If the drives are replaced, then that is a new drive in the study. So if they had 120 drives fail, then the had 120 drives. You can't have 120 drive fail if you didn't have 120 drives.

I don't think either one of us can speak to "only leads to people taking the study's information correctly....". I understood it. You understood it. Several people here understood it. We can't correct everyone

The fact that we've already seen techreport mis-reporting the information, and people here talking about the information like it applies to desktop applications. Yes, if you read the whole study you get all the information, but most people won't, most people won't even read the entire TechReport article. Most people will look at the pretty graph and that is it.
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2007
Messages
29 (0.00/day)
Are there any explanations for the different failure rates?

Russia's StoreLab agreed about Hitachis being best but thought post 7200.11 model Seagates were fine.
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2012
Messages
12,062 (2.77/day)
Location
Gypsyland, UK
System Name HP Omen 17
Processor i7 7700HQ
Memory 16GB 2400Mhz DDR4
Video Card(s) GTX 1060
Storage Samsung SM961 256GB + HGST 1TB
Display(s) 1080p IPS G-SYNC 75Hz
Audio Device(s) Bang & Olufsen
Power Supply 230W
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD+
Software Win 10 Pro
Yes, if you read the whole study you get all the information, but most people won't, most people won't even read the entire TechReport article. Most people will look at the pretty graph and that is it.

Then in that case they deserve to be horribly misinformed and advance absolutely nowhere in their technical adventures.
I find all the information useful, regardless of how confusing the case study was carried out. Somebody has finally given us a useful report to base our HDD failure complaints on, and specifically outlines certain drives that cannot hack it when it comes to heavy duty data storage use.
All in all, GG Hitachi.
 
Top