- Joined
- Oct 12, 2008
- Messages
- 12,676 (2.23/day)
(someone may want to brush that up a little).
Don't need no brushing...
I was sorta in a rush this morning and did not really make a clear post.
It sorta came across wrong, since, I left out a little.
My point, to Jan Kyster, was supposed to be; that, with the larger cache and all else being close in specs... that drive should at least get reads as good as I and not have a decrease in read speed at the higher data transfer.
It really should stay consistent.
He had a drop of read speed at 64MB and it did not recover, until it hit 8192mb, so I suggested he may wish to check it.
Thanks for your concern, though.
EDIT
Perhaps you too!
http://i189.photobucket.com/albums/z15/subject_rod/Desktop/WDcompare.jpg
Apart from 4 to 16kB blocks our Writing speed is about the same.
Up to 8kB blocks my Readings are way faster than yours...
For blocksize from 64 kB and up yours is 20MB/s faster...
Running onboard Marvell 91xx 6GB controller using Marvell driver 1.0.0.1036 from 17-03-2010.
And connected with the black special SATA3 cable that came with the ASUS board
^SEE ABOVE THE EDIT^
So, you can overlay all you want, it don't change your drives reads!
Last edited: