- Jan 14, 2019
- 1,597 (1.52/day)
- Midlands, UK
|System Name||Nebulon-B Mk. 3|
|Processor||Intel Core i7-11700 @ ASUS Optimized (200 W)|
|Motherboard||ASUS TUF Gaming B560M-Plus (WiFi)|
|Cooling||be quiet! Silent Loop 2|
|Memory||2x 8 GB Kinston Fury Beast 3200 MHz CL16|
|Video Card(s)||EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 Black|
|Storage||512 GB ADATA SU900, 1 TB Crucial P5, 1 TB Crucial P2, 1 TB Seagate Barracuda 2.5"|
|Display(s)||Samsung C24F390, 7" Waveshare touchscreen|
|Case||Corsair Crystal 280X black|
|Audio Device(s)||Genius SP-HF160, AKG Y50|
|Power Supply||Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum 550W|
|Mouse||Cherry MW 8|
|Software||Windows 10 Pro|
|Benchmark Scores||Cinebench R23 multi core: 14,000, single core: 1,500. Superposition 1080p Extreme: 5,200.|
I understand the difference, but it's minor! It's not like comparing Intel's X299 and Z470 that are fundamentally different. We're talking about a few extra PCI-e 4.0 lanes and a slightly different USB layout, which in my eyes, cannot make the difference between "enthusiast" and "mid-range". CPU support is the same, RAM support is the same, BIOS/UEFI features are essentially the same (e.g. overclocking support), and they're both targeted at desktop users.lol...I can't help that your head cannot separate a platfrom definition from the features. BUt they are absolutely NOT inaccurate if you actually understand how platforms are defined (as most 'enthusiasts' can).
Good luck to you...we'll agree to disagree.
EDIT: Here is a great article showing all of the differences between the platforms....
.This includes the intent of the 500-series chipsets to support Zen 3 architecture (reminder: that’s not the same as Ryzen 4000 mobile, nor is it the same as Ryzen 3000 desktop), while the existing B450 and X470 boards are left to cap-out at Ryzen 3000 series (Zen 2) parts. -www.gamersnexus.net
But ok, let's agree to disagree.