- Jun 1, 2011
- 3,811 (0.85/day)
- in a van down by the river
|Processor||faster than yours|
|Motherboard||better than yours|
|Cooling||cooler than yours|
|Memory||smarter than yours|
|Video Card(s)||better performance than yours|
|Storage||stronger than yours|
|Display(s)||bigger than yous|
|Case||fancier than yours|
|Audio Device(s)||clearer than yours|
|Power Supply||more powerful than yours|
|Mouse||lighter than yours|
|Keyboard||less clicky than yours|
|Benchmark Scores||up yours|
Your entire argument is basically "people who only upgrade every 5-6+ years don't care about playing modern games"
If you can't see how absurd that logic is, there's no point discussing further. Some people will and some won't. For those that will, paying >MSRP is not an unreasonable possibility.
Not really surprising you failed to understand my point (it's not an argument) which is;
"people who only upgrade every 5-6+ years
are more likely than not already fine with
1080p medium settings 30fps
especially if they are only two years into that cycle and getting much better results than what you mentioned above. As well as the absurdity of anyone stating to anyone else that their gaming enjoyment
because it doesn't meet your specific desire of performance.doesn't count.