• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

I-O Data Intros 27-inch Full HD Monitor for Gaming and Entertainment

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
34,335 (9.23/day)
Likes
17,427
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name Long shelf-life potato
Processor Intel Core i7-4770K
Motherboard ASUS Z97-A
Cooling Xigmatek Aegir CPU Cooler
Memory 16GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3-1866
Video Card(s) 2x GeForce GTX 970 SLI
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590D 28-inch 4K
Case Cooler Master CM690 Window
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX850W
Mouse Razer Abyssus 2014
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro Creators Update
#1
I-O Data expanded its display lineup further with a new 27-inch full HD monitor that's best suited for gaming and entertainment. The I-O Data LCD-MF271XBR has a detachable stand that uses standard VESA mounts to hold the display, it lets you adjust the display's height, tilt and swivel. Being a full HD display it has a native resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, other display specs include response time of 2 ms, 1,000:1 contrast ratio (30,000:1 dynamic), and a maximum brightness of 330 cd/m². Display inputs include DVI, D-Sub and HDMI, while other features include 1.5W stereo speakers, and a 3.5 mm audio jack to connect your headset (relays input from your sound card). The new display will reach stores in Japan later this month.

Show full news post
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 17, 2008
Messages
2,184 (0.64/day)
Likes
1,027
Location
Minnesota, USA
System Name TIGRAlpha4
Processor i5 750 @ 3.6GHz
Motherboard ASRock P55 Deluxe
Cooling S1283 + FFB1212VHE
Memory 16GB DDR3 1800, 7-8-7-24
Video Card(s) 560 Ti
Storage 128GB Kingston SSD + 16TB RAID 6
Display(s) Dell P1130 + Samsung 275T
Case Antec Twelve Hundred
Power Supply Silverstone OP1000-E
#2
To LCD makers:

Please, less HD 1080 (1920x1080) monitors and more WUXGA (1920x1200) ones for all-around computer use (more area per diagonally-measured screen size). Yes, there are some who argue for 1920x1080 and I have heard all of the arguments. Overall, I still prefer 1920x1200 beyond a doubt.

And, at the 27" range, WQXGA (2560x1600) please!
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2008
Messages
2,312 (0.64/day)
Likes
715
Location
Switzerland
System Name Keep spending on me
Processor i7 4790K ( 4.4 Ghz stock )
Motherboard Maximus VII Impact z97
Cooling Corsair H90 140mm AIO
Memory 2x8 GB Corsair Dominator Platinum DDR3 1866 Mhz
Video Card(s) ASUS DUAL GTX 1060
Storage M.2 Samsung NVMe 960 Pro 512 GB
Display(s) AOC G2460 G-Sync 1080p
Case Cooler Master Mastercase 3
Audio Device(s) SupremeFX II Impact
Power Supply Corsair AX760
Mouse Razer Deathadder 2013
Software Win 10 64 Bit
Benchmark Scores Gaming at high performance is my priority
#3
i prefer the samsung 2770H same specs but better exterior looks.
 
Joined
Nov 8, 2008
Messages
626 (0.19/day)
Likes
88
Location
Finland (northern)
System Name Getting old!
Processor AMD Phenom II X4 965 @ 3,9Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-UD4H
Cooling About sufficient air cooling
Memory 4GB Dominator DDR2 1066 @1040Mhz
Video Card(s) Club 3D Radeon HD6950 1GB
Storage 120GB Kingston SSDNow 200V+, 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3
Display(s) Crossover 27Q LED-P (lovely!)
Case Antec Three Hundred
Audio Device(s) Integrated -> optical -> HELIX P DSP
Power Supply Corsair HX620W
Software Win7 64-bit
Benchmark Scores 3DMark11 P5285 WPrime 1.55 10,15 sec Super Pi Mod 1.5 17,920 sec
#4
To LCD makers:

Please, less HD 1080 (1920x1080) monitors and more WUXGA (1920x1200) ones for all-around computer use (more area per diagonally-measured screen size). Yes, there are some who argue for 1920x1080 and I have heard all of the arguments. Overall, I still prefer 1920x1200 beyond a doubt.

And, at the 27" range, WQXGA (2560x1600) please!
I have used an 21,5" iMac and its 1080. I really dont like it, feels like I cant squeeze anything there.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2007
Messages
3,684 (1.00/day)
Likes
402
Location
Smithfield, WV
System Name Felix777
Processor Core i5-3570k@stock
Motherboard Biostar H61
Memory 8gb
Video Card(s) XFX RX 470
Storage WD 500GB BLK
Display(s) Acer p236h bd
Case Haf 912
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Rosewill CAPSTONE 450watt
Software Win 10 x64
#5
is there any specific reason only 30" monitors are 2560x1600? i mean why not some 28" or 26"?

I mean 1920x1080 dominates from 20"-29", dunno why 2560x1600 can't start at 26" or 27"
 

OSWiz

New Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2010
Messages
43 (0.02/day)
Likes
5
System Name The Money Trap
Processor i7 930
Motherboard P6X58D-E
Cooling Swiftech H2O-220 Ultima XT
Memory G.Skill 3 x 2GB DDR3 2000 6-9-6-24
Video Card(s) 2 x EVGA GTX480SC SLI
Storage OCZ Vertex Turbo 60GB SSD
Display(s) Dell U2711 2560x1440 27"
Case Cooler Master HAF 932
Audio Device(s) X-Fi
Power Supply Antec TPQ-1200
Software Win7 Ultimate x64
Benchmark Scores [url=http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1335019][img]http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/13
#6
is there any specific reason only 30" monitors are 2560x1600? i mean why not some 28" or 26"?

I mean 1920x1080 dominates from 20"-29", dunno why 2560x1600 can't start at 26" or 27"
Well, I have the Dell U2711 2560x1440 27" and I love the real estate, but text becomes rather small. 2560x1600 on a 27" would be near unreadable, for me anyway.
 

WarEagleAU

Bird of Prey
Joined
Jul 9, 2006
Messages
10,809 (2.59/day)
Likes
529
Location
Gurley, AL
System Name Boddha Getta Boddha Getta Bah!
Processor AMD FX 6100 @ 4.432Ghz @1.382
Motherboard ASUS M5A99X EVO AMD 990X AMD SB950
Cooling Custom Water. EK 240MM Kit, Supreme HSF - Runs 35C
Memory 2 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance White LP @ 1.35V
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon HD 6870 980/1100
Storage WD Caviar Black 1.0TB, WD Caviar Green 1.0TB, WD 160GB
Display(s) Asus VH222/S 22: (21.5" Viewable) 1920x1080p HDMI LCD Monitor
Case NZXT White Switch 810
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek 5.1
Power Supply NZXT Hale 90 Gold Cert 750W Modular PSU
Software Windows 8.1 Profession 64 Bit
#7
I love my 1920x1080p 21.5" monitor but Id love something with even more res if I moved up to say 24 - 26"
 
T

TAViX

Guest
#8
To LCD makers:

Please, less HD 1080 (1920x1080) monitors and more WUXGA (1920x1200) ones for all-around computer use (more area per diagonally-measured screen size). Yes, there are some who argue for 1920x1080 and I have heard all of the arguments. Overall, I still prefer 1920x1200 beyond a doubt.

And, at the 27" range, WQXGA (2560x1600) please!
You're screaming and crying like a little baby for nothing. In case you didn't know the WUXGA resolution was dumped by producers and it's currently used only for very expensive professional monitors. They dumped that format because they agreed that there were to many formats available and in the near future you will only find 16:9 monitors/tv. 4:3 is dead, 16:10 is in clinical dead, get over with. :shadedshu

p.s.

Besides, 16:9 has it's advantages, like in movies (no black bars), and especialy games when you have extra space sideways. Biggest example is in Starcraft II:

:rockout:

Regarding the resolution, you guys probably never used a 27" incher with 1920x1200(1080) resolution. I have one, and even if the screen is big, the text is VERY SMALL for my taste. And the image is crystal sharp. So there is absolutely no need for a bigger res. Trust me. Better for games also.
 
Joined
Aug 17, 2008
Messages
2,184 (0.64/day)
Likes
1,027
Location
Minnesota, USA
System Name TIGRAlpha4
Processor i5 750 @ 3.6GHz
Motherboard ASRock P55 Deluxe
Cooling S1283 + FFB1212VHE
Memory 16GB DDR3 1800, 7-8-7-24
Video Card(s) 560 Ti
Storage 128GB Kingston SSD + 16TB RAID 6
Display(s) Dell P1130 + Samsung 275T
Case Antec Twelve Hundred
Power Supply Silverstone OP1000-E
#9
You're screaming and crying like a little baby....
How do you figure?

Regarding the resolution, you guys probably never used a 27" incher with 1920x1200(1080) resolution.
My primary monitor is a Samsung 275T. 27", 1920x1200.
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2008
Messages
2,470 (0.73/day)
Likes
613
Location
Hillsboro, Oregon, USA
System Name Dire Wolf II
Processor Intel Core i7 7820HQ (2.9Ghz, up to 3.9Ghz)
Motherboard HP 8275
Memory 32GB DDR4 2400Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire R9 Fury Nitro OC 4GB (Thunderbolt3 eGPU), nVidia Quadro M1200 (GTX750Ti) 4GB GDDR5
Storage HP NVMe 256GB
Display(s) HP Z27q (5120x2880) + Dell P2715Q (3840x2160)
Case HP ZBook 15 G4
Audio Device(s) Musiland Monitor 02 US, Skullcandy SLYR
Power Supply 150W HP PSU (for Laptop) + Corsair RM550x (for eGPU)
Mouse Logitech G400
Keyboard Corsair K95 RGB
Software Windows 10 Enterprise 64-bit
#10
Regarding the resolution, you guys probably never used a 27" incher with 1920x1200(1080) resolution. I have one, and even if the screen is big, the text is VERY SMALL for my taste. And the image is crystal sharp. So there is absolutely no need for a bigger res. Trust me. Better for games also.
Hmmm. Make your font settings larger?

What I really want, though, is a QSXGA (2560x2048) monitor....
 
Joined
Jan 1, 2010
Messages
68 (0.02/day)
Likes
12
#12
You're screaming and crying like a little baby for nothing. In case you didn't know the WUXGA resolution was dumped by producers and it's currently used only for very expensive professional monitors. They dumped that format because they agreed that there were to many formats available and in the near future you will only find 16:9 monitors/tv. 4:3 is dead, 16:10 is in clinical dead, get over with. :shadedshu

p.s.

Besides, 16:9 has it's advantages, like in movies (no black bars), and especialy games when you have extra space sideways. Biggest example is in Starcraft II: http://www.sc2blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/StarCraftRatios.gif
:rockout:.
Wow, I feel sad for everyone who has more pixels but gets to see less of the game. That's a twisted way of saying 16:9 has an advantage, silly developers. :banghead:


Edit: Sorry, didn't see this was a few days old. Let's blame my vacation. :)