Be aware that bigger drives have a higher failure rate than smaller drives.
In order to pick the "best", you have to answer best for what ? Is best the fastest ? ... is best the most reliable ? is best the lowest priced drive capable of what you plan do do with it
We stopped buying Hard Drives 7 years ago, all of our boxes are equipped with SSDs + SSHDs ... so far no SSHDs have failed. The Seagate SSHD is 50% faster than the WD Black in Gaming and 2.5 times faster than the Blue. For most of your stated usages, you do not need a high performance drive. A green, 5400 rpm drive would be just fine.
I am a bit confused about the stated "delete and install games ,, add movies delete movies ". There is no significance to performance in either case as these are done instantly in the case of deletion, and in the background generally otherwise. Unless of cours you stop usinmg the PC and stare at the progress bar while the disk is being written to.
Now "playing games" would appear to be your most significant usage. Here you would benefit with an SSHD substantially. IIRC, THGs test numbers in the gaming test were 9.73 MB/sec for the SSHD, 6.43 for the Black and 4.01 for the Blue.
From a reliability standpoint, over the last 3 years or so as a brand, Seagate has proven the most reliable (consumer drives in consumer boxes) .... I wouldn't put mush stock in the "brand" stats as they are all perty close. Data for last year currently available
HGST = 0.975%
Seagate = 0.825%
Toshiba = 0.930%
Western = 1.150%
What we should worry about are the individual model failure rates ... Of course for newer models, no data is available; the results of actual RMAs between 6 and 12 month of usage.
No 2 TB drive models had a failure rate over 2%
For 3 TB
5,08% WD Black 3 To
4,70% Toshiba DT01ACA300 3 To
2,09% WD Red 3 To
For 4 TB
2,95% WD Red 4 To
2,81% Seagate IronWolf 4 To
2,49% WD Purple Video surveillance 4 To
For 6TB
10,00% Seagate Desktop HDD 6 To
6,78% Seagate Enterprise NAS HDD 6 To
For the previous reporting period
3,42% Toshiba Toshiba X300 5 To
3,37% WD Red WD60EFRX
2,67% WD Green WD60EZRX
1,43% WD Red WD50EFRX
0,87% Seagate Enterprise NAS HDD ST6000VN0001
0,74% Seagate Desktop HDD ST6000DM001
0,00% Seagate NAS HDD ST6000VN0021
I included the full list here so you could be aware of how statistics work ... Note the Seagate has two NAS drives which showed 0.00% failures and 6.78% failures in consecutive periods. They have similar but not the same names. The Desktop HDD went from 0.74% to 10.00% in two consecutive periods. Significant point being, ya have to make sure you are looking at the same exact model.
Also, just because a drive was not listed, does not mean that it is a good drive.... in order to be considered valid statistically, there needs to be at least 100 units in the sampling size, as these are among the highest performing and highest proced drives, I would guess the reason neither was present was that neither passed this threshold.
Unfortunately no data on the pro model
Couldn't find any 6 TB reviews but storage review compared the 10 Tb version of the Seagate with the 6 TB WD and it wasn't close. The Black had much better I/O but for your stated usage, I/O is not of real significance; transfer rate comparisons were almost all in Seagate's favor.
https://www.storagereview.com/seagate_barracuda_pro_10tb_hdd_review
Anandtech, THG and DPreview stamped the "fastest desktop HD" moniker on the Seagate Pro.
The pro is rated for 300 TB of writes per year (perty high) and both the 6 TB and 10 TB are rated for theme transfer rate (220 MB/s) so speed differences between drive sizes should not be significant. The 12 TB is rated at 250 Mb/s
With the Pro at $219 and the Black at $239 (newegg) , if US based, you have as much data as i was able to find in 10 minutes. I could not find any noise data whereby both were in the same test but otherwise looked comparable.... I also did see a similar number of "noise issues" reported on forums for both.
)