• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

i7 4790 Overclock Even Further

Joined
Jul 4, 2016
Messages
110 (0.04/day)
I have managed to overclock my non K CPU from 100 to 106.5 bclk. My current CPU speed is 4.22 GHz and the system is completly stable under this overclock. But if I set the bclk to 107 or up, it becomes unstable. Is it possible to overclock CPU even further by changing voltage or RAM timings or anything else?
 
Joined
May 31, 2016
Messages
4,323 (1.51/day)
Location
Currently Norway
System Name Bro2
Processor Ryzen 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite
Cooling Corsair h115i pro rgb
Memory 16GB G.Skill Flare X 3200 CL14 @3800Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) Powercolor 6900 XT Red Devil 1.1v@2400Mhz
Storage M.2 Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500MB/ Samsung 860 Evo 1TB
Display(s) LG 27UD69 UHD / LG 27GN950
Case Fractal Design G
Audio Device(s) Realtec 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic 750W GOLD
Mouse Logitech G402
Keyboard Logitech slim
Software Windows 10 64 bit
Well I think You might have hit the roof with your CPU. Without "K" version the OC is limited a lot. still that's not a bad result but compare to "K" it's like nothing. you can try Voltage change and maybe there's some other stuff that block your OC. MOBO, RAM etc. Good luck.
 
Joined
Jul 4, 2016
Messages
110 (0.04/day)
Well, that's a shame. I would have bought a K CPU but it was much more expensive back when I bought the parts and assembled my PC.

But to be completely honest, I don't see any difference in performance when gaming. If I overclock a GPU with afterburner, that's a whole different story.
 
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
1,871 (0.35/day)
Location
Heart of Eutopia!
System Name ibuytheusedstuff
Processor 5960x
Motherboard x99 sabertooth
Cooling old socket775 cooler
Memory 32 Viper
Video Card(s) 1080ti on morpheus 1
Storage raptors+ssd
Display(s) acer 120hz
Case open bench
Audio Device(s) onb
Power Supply antec 1200 moar power
Mouse mx 518
Keyboard roccat arvo
at your monitor resolution gtx 1080 is overkill and i dont see the need for overclocking your graphic card.
and 200mhz on your cpu will not make much diff while boosting to 4.0ghz standard
 

Tatty_Two

Gone Fishing
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
25,793 (3.88/day)
Location
Worcestershire, UK
Processor Rocket Lake Core i5 11600K @ 5 Ghz with PL tweaks
Motherboard MSI MAG Z490 TOMAHAWK
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120SE + 4 Phanteks 140mm case fans
Memory 32GB (4 x 8GB SR) Patriot Viper Steel 4133Mhz DDR4 @ 3600Mhz CL14@1.45v Gear 1
Video Card(s) Asus Dual RTX 4070 OC
Storage WD Blue SN550 1TB M.2 NVME//Crucial MX500 500GB SSD (OS)
Display(s) AOC Q2781PQ 27 inch Ultra Slim 2560 x 1440 IPS
Case Phanteks Enthoo Pro M Windowed - Gunmetal
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek ALC1200/SPDIF to Sony AVR @ 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic CORE GM650w Gold Semi modular
Mouse Coolermaster Storm Octane wired
Keyboard Element Gaming Carbon Mk2 Tournament Mech
Software Win 10 Home x64
When you increase the Bclk does it also increase the PCI-E speed? If so can you lock the PCI-e independently as that would/could cause instabilities. Additionally, is it playing with your ram speeds also?
 
Joined
Jul 4, 2016
Messages
110 (0.04/day)
at your monitor resolution gtx 1080 is overkill and i dont see the need for overclocking your graphic card.
and 200mhz on your cpu will not make much diff while boosting to 4.0ghz standard
Overkill? Tell that to GTA V grass quality or AC Syndicate PCSS shadows :D I mostly play demanding games on max settings (of course I want 60 FPS), but a lot of them are struggling to maintain 60 fps especially when I turn on anti-aliasing or similar resource hog settings. This is also a reason why I want to overclock my non-K CPU as highly as possible --> to get the most of my system.
When you increase the Bclk does it also increase the PCI-E speed? If so can you lock the PCI-e independently as that would/could cause instabilities. Additionally, is it playing with your ram speeds also?
I actually don't know. All my BIOS settings are at their default values except BCLK. Haven't really played with other things.
 
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
1,871 (0.35/day)
Location
Heart of Eutopia!
System Name ibuytheusedstuff
Processor 5960x
Motherboard x99 sabertooth
Cooling old socket775 cooler
Memory 32 Viper
Video Card(s) 1080ti on morpheus 1
Storage raptors+ssd
Display(s) acer 120hz
Case open bench
Audio Device(s) onb
Power Supply antec 1200 moar power
Mouse mx 518
Keyboard roccat arvo
106,5 is really high but it should be the end.
there is no hidden setting to push these cpu´s higher-if there is you would see it all over inet.
and some settings in game are not worth the lower frames but with nearly null visual effect-my2c.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,944 (0.65/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
Processor OCed 5800X3D
Motherboard Asucks C6H
Cooling Air
Memory 32GB
Video Card(s) OCed 6800XT
Storage NVMees
Display(s) 32" Dull curved 1440
Case Freebie glass idk
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser
Power Supply Don't even remember
Don't worry, haswell OCs like shit. Look at the worthless clocks I have. Screw intel.
These aren't the only pieces of shit I've encountered that maxed out this low.
 
Joined
Jul 4, 2016
Messages
110 (0.04/day)
Oh well, I will live with this OC. Maybe if I'll have the time I'll play with some other options in BIOS.
 
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
1,871 (0.35/day)
Location
Heart of Eutopia!
System Name ibuytheusedstuff
Processor 5960x
Motherboard x99 sabertooth
Cooling old socket775 cooler
Memory 32 Viper
Video Card(s) 1080ti on morpheus 1
Storage raptors+ssd
Display(s) acer 120hz
Case open bench
Audio Device(s) onb
Power Supply antec 1200 moar power
Mouse mx 518
Keyboard roccat arvo
the only thing i can think of is cache frenzy or how is this handled on non-k chips.
can ya up the multi on cache?
will not bring much but you are after every fps.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
20,780 (5.97/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor i7 8700k 4.6Ghz @ 1.24V
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Fractal Design Define R5
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse XTRFY M42
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W10 x64
Don't worry, haswell OCs like shit. Look at the worthless clocks I have. Screw intel.
These aren't the only pieces of shit I've encountered that maxed out this low.

The age of Monster OC"s is over anyway buddy. Intel and AMD already do it for us since Sandy Bridge and the margin for error gets tighter every new gen, and much tighter with every new process node.

Enter 16/14nm where you can see GPU's that auto-OC to within 5% of their maximum stable clocks...
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,944 (0.65/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
Processor OCed 5800X3D
Motherboard Asucks C6H
Cooling Air
Memory 32GB
Video Card(s) OCed 6800XT
Storage NVMees
Display(s) 32" Dull curved 1440
Case Freebie glass idk
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser
Power Supply Don't even remember
The age of Monster OC"s is over anyway buddy. Intel and AMD already do it for us since Sandy Bridge and the margin for error gets tighter every new gen, and much tighter with every new process node.

Enter 16/14nm where you can see GPU's that auto-OC to within 5% of their maximum stable clocks...

I know, but it's rather pathetic for haswell. You have to win the lottery if you want a good OC.
 

Tatty_Two

Gone Fishing
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
25,793 (3.88/day)
Location
Worcestershire, UK
Processor Rocket Lake Core i5 11600K @ 5 Ghz with PL tweaks
Motherboard MSI MAG Z490 TOMAHAWK
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120SE + 4 Phanteks 140mm case fans
Memory 32GB (4 x 8GB SR) Patriot Viper Steel 4133Mhz DDR4 @ 3600Mhz CL14@1.45v Gear 1
Video Card(s) Asus Dual RTX 4070 OC
Storage WD Blue SN550 1TB M.2 NVME//Crucial MX500 500GB SSD (OS)
Display(s) AOC Q2781PQ 27 inch Ultra Slim 2560 x 1440 IPS
Case Phanteks Enthoo Pro M Windowed - Gunmetal
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek ALC1200/SPDIF to Sony AVR @ 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic CORE GM650w Gold Semi modular
Mouse Coolermaster Storm Octane wired
Keyboard Element Gaming Carbon Mk2 Tournament Mech
Software Win 10 Home x64
Your 106.5 Bclk is the limit you can go simply because you are probably also overclocking the PCI-e and it's that causing the instability.
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
2,074 (0.49/day)
Location
Jacksonhole Florida
System Name DEVIL'S ABYSS
Processor i7-4790K@4.6 GHz
Motherboard Asus Z97-Deluxe
Cooling Corsair H110 (2 x 140mm)(3 x 140mm case fans)
Memory 16GB Adata XPG V2 2400MHz
Video Card(s) EVGA 780 Ti Classified
Storage Intel 750 Series 400GB (AIC), Plextor M6e 256GB (M.2), 13 TB storage
Display(s) Crossover 27QW (27"@ 2560x1440)
Case Corsair Obsidian 750D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150
Power Supply Cooler Master V1000
Mouse Ttsports Talon Blu
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 version 1803
Benchmark Scores Passmark CPU score = 13080
I have managed to overclock my non K CPU from 100 to 106.5 bclk. My current CPU speed is 4.22 GHz and the system is completly stable under this overclock. But if I set the bclk to 107 or up, it becomes unstable. Is it possible to overclock CPU even further by changing voltage or RAM timings or anything else?
That's not bad, and as you said, it's only a couple FPS in games when OCing. If you want a little bit more, higher memory clocks may help you get the most out of your CPU overclock. RAM prices are at an all-time low, 16GB of 2400MHz as low as $60 (same kit in 1600MHz is $55). This can also help reduce load times for games and levels. I recently was bored and decided to overclock my Adata 2400 kit, and got it up to 2666, completely stable. Every little bit helps... Maybe not very noticeable in games, but it certainly helps with all the other tasks (editing, rendering, compressing, converting video & audio, etc).
 
Joined
Jun 21, 2016
Messages
2,058 (0.73/day)
System Name AM4 / 775
Processor 2600x / C2D E7600
Motherboard B450 Aorus / ASUS P5G41C-M LX
Cooling TT Esports Duo / Chinesium cooler
Memory 16GB DDR4 3ghz / 4GB DDR2 800mhz
Video Card(s) 2060 Super / 5700-XT / GTX 650Ti
Storage 120GB + 1TB SSD / 160GB SSD
Display(s) Samsung CRG5 144hz QD
Case CiT shit chassis modded / Coolermaster Elite 430
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster FX / Audigy 2 ZX
Power Supply Superflower Leadex III GOLD / BeQuiet 450w bronze.
Mouse Razer Basilisk
Keyboard Read Dragon Kumara
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores 1 Billion
You are incredibly lucky to have even got it that far.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,147 (2.96/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
Bumping the bclk on the 4790 will increase the clock speed of the DMI between the PCH and the CPU as well as the PCI-E root complex on the CPU. Most PCI-E devices don't take too kindly to the bus frequency changing however, the PCH is a different story. You would probably get a different result if you removed or disabled every PCI-E device however, DMI is very similar to how PCI-E works.

IF the PCH is the limiting factor and not the PCI-E devices, increasing the PCH voltage might get you a little more out of it. However I say this with extreme warning as the PCH is passively cooled and pumping more voltage through it could prove to be unwise. Either way, @Tatty_One is correct, the PCI-E bus is usually the main reason why you can't get more out of the bclk on this generation of CPUs unless you have a CPU like Skylake with the independent clock gens or, with skt2011(or -3) with bclk straps (an internal multiplier if you will,) but even those are limited to around 5Mhz overclock over the strap (+/- 3Mhz.)

The PCH is a little odd because it usually has more than one voltage and it's uncertain to me which ones drive which components. Either way, I urge caution should you decide to muck around with PCH voltages.
 

Tatty_Two

Gone Fishing
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
25,793 (3.88/day)
Location
Worcestershire, UK
Processor Rocket Lake Core i5 11600K @ 5 Ghz with PL tweaks
Motherboard MSI MAG Z490 TOMAHAWK
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120SE + 4 Phanteks 140mm case fans
Memory 32GB (4 x 8GB SR) Patriot Viper Steel 4133Mhz DDR4 @ 3600Mhz CL14@1.45v Gear 1
Video Card(s) Asus Dual RTX 4070 OC
Storage WD Blue SN550 1TB M.2 NVME//Crucial MX500 500GB SSD (OS)
Display(s) AOC Q2781PQ 27 inch Ultra Slim 2560 x 1440 IPS
Case Phanteks Enthoo Pro M Windowed - Gunmetal
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek ALC1200/SPDIF to Sony AVR @ 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic CORE GM650w Gold Semi modular
Mouse Coolermaster Storm Octane wired
Keyboard Element Gaming Carbon Mk2 Tournament Mech
Software Win 10 Home x64
Bumping the bclk on the 4790 will increase the clock speed of the DMI between the PCH and the CPU as well as the PCI-E root complex on the CPU. Most PCI-E devices don't take too kindly to the bus frequency changing however, the PCH is a different story. You would probably get a different result if you removed or disabled every PCI-E device however, DMI is very similar to how PCI-E works.

IF the PCH is the limiting factor and not the PCI-E devices, increasing the PCH voltage might get you a little more out of it. However I say this with extreme warning as the PCH is passively cooled and pumping more voltage through it could prove to be unwise. Either way, @Tatty_One is correct, the PCI-E bus is usually the main reason why you can't get more out of the bclk on this generation of CPUs unless you have a CPU like Skylake with the independent clock gens or, with skt2011(or -3) with bclk straps (an internal multiplier if you will,) but even those are limited to around 5Mhz overclock over the strap (+/- 3Mhz.)

The PCH is a little odd because it usually has more than one voltage and it's uncertain to me which ones drive which components. Either way, I urge caution should you decide to muck around with PCH voltages.

Indeed, I am just about to pull the trigger on a Skylake 6400 (obviously non K) and try some Bckl overclocking, I have seen results of 4.7gig +.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,147 (2.96/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
Indeed, I am just about to pull the trigger on a Skylake 6400 (obviously non K) and try some Bckl overclocking, I have seen results of 4.7gig +.
I'm waiting for this awesomeness to find its way into the next HEDT socket. My 3820 is still plenty fine for the time being and always has that 125Mhz BCLK strap should I require more than 4.3Ghz. Maybe then we'll get to have some fun with Xeons again. :p
 
  • Like
Reactions: hat
Joined
Jul 4, 2016
Messages
110 (0.04/day)
Well to be completely honest, when I said I only changed BCLK the ram speeds also increased from 1600 MHz to about 1700 MHz even though my CPU can't support speeds above 1600 MHz.

That said, my PCI speed probably increased to but I haven't found where to check that or how to block this option from changing.
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
2,074 (0.49/day)
Location
Jacksonhole Florida
System Name DEVIL'S ABYSS
Processor i7-4790K@4.6 GHz
Motherboard Asus Z97-Deluxe
Cooling Corsair H110 (2 x 140mm)(3 x 140mm case fans)
Memory 16GB Adata XPG V2 2400MHz
Video Card(s) EVGA 780 Ti Classified
Storage Intel 750 Series 400GB (AIC), Plextor M6e 256GB (M.2), 13 TB storage
Display(s) Crossover 27QW (27"@ 2560x1440)
Case Corsair Obsidian 750D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150
Power Supply Cooler Master V1000
Mouse Ttsports Talon Blu
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 version 1803
Benchmark Scores Passmark CPU score = 13080
Well to be completely honest, when I said I only changed BCLK the ram speeds also increased from 1600 MHz to about 1700 MHz even though my CPU can't support speeds above 1600 MHz.

Your CPU can support any RAM speed, 1600 is just the starting point for minimum MHz. Your Asus Z97 P supports at least 3200MHz (per Asus specs). It doesn't matter if it's a K or non-K CPU, i7, i5, or i3. (I have run RAM@2400MHz on an Asus Z87 K with an i3-4130) - as long as your motherboard is Z87 or Z97 it has all settings for RAM speed and timings. The limiting factor is the chipset, and and since you splurged on a Z97 board, you're good to go. 1600MHz is the nominal (minimum) RAM speed, such as you'd run on a H87 or H97 board, which has no RAM dividers.
 
Joined
Jul 4, 2016
Messages
110 (0.04/day)
Well, to be honest I didn't know that. Thanks for sharing this info :)

Do you by any chance know where can I disable PCI-E speeds so they won't change when I overclock?
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,147 (2.96/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
Do you by any chance know where can I disable PCI-E speeds so they won't change when I overclock?
The clockgen for the bclk and PCI-E is the same. You can't decouple them. The best you could do would be to remove any PCI-E devices you have, which includes your GPU so, I would say it's probably not worth doing anything to it. If you can get more by over-volting your PCH, that's great, if you can't then this is the end of the line.
 

hat

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 20, 2006
Messages
21,731 (3.43/day)
Location
Ohio
System Name Starlifter :: Dragonfly
Processor i7 2600k 4.4GHz :: i5 10400
Motherboard ASUS P8P67 Pro :: ASUS Prime H570-Plus
Cooling Cryorig M9 :: Stock
Memory 4x4GB DDR3 2133 :: 2x8GB DDR4 2400
Video Card(s) PNY GTX1070 :: Integrated UHD 630
Storage Crucial MX500 1TB, 2x1TB Seagate RAID 0 :: Mushkin Enhanced 60GB SSD, 3x4TB Seagate HDD RAID5
Display(s) Onn 165hz 1080p :: Acer 1080p
Case Antec SOHO 1030B :: Old White Full Tower
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro - Bose Companion 2 Series III :: None
Power Supply FSP Hydro GE 550w :: EVGA Supernova 550
Software Windows 10 Pro - Plex Server on Dragonfly
Benchmark Scores >9000
Indeed, I am just about to pull the trigger on a Skylake 6400 (obviously non K) and try some Bckl overclocking, I have seen results of 4.7gig +.

I'm waiting for this awesomeness to find its way into the next HEDT socket. My 3820 is still plenty fine for the time being and always has that 125Mhz BCLK strap should I require more than 4.3Ghz. Maybe then we'll get to have some fun with Xeons again. :p

Until intel pulls the plug on you because you didn't spend $7000,0000 for the K edition. :banghead:
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
17,232 (2.63/day)
Well, to be honest I didn't know that. Thanks for sharing this info :)

Do you by any chance know where can I disable PCI-E speeds so they won't change when I overclock?

In a way, yes. Try like 125 BCLK, 166 BCLK, and dropping multiplier down

The clockgen for the bclk and PCI-E is the same. You can't decouple them. The best you could do would be to remove any PCI-E devices you have, which includes your GPU so, I would say it's probably not worth doing anything to it. If you can get more by over-volting your PCH, that's great, if you can't then this is the end of the line.

That actually depends on the board. Some boards feature external clockgen capable of doing much higher than other boards.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,147 (2.96/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
That actually depends on the board. Some boards feature external clockgen capable of doing much higher than other boards.
On a non-skylake board? I thought that wasn't done until the DC ship had sailed.
In a way, yes. Try like 125 BCLK, 166 BCLK, and dropping multiplier down
Doesn't he need to have BCLK straps for that to work? That's different than just adjusting the BCLK because it actually adjusts DMI and PCI-E clock multipliers. Just changing the BCLK as you suggest probably won't work unless you know something that I don't.
 
Top