• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

IDC Expects PC Shipments to Fall by -6% in 2014 and Decline Through 2018

Joined
Dec 6, 2011
Messages
4,785 (2.18/day)
Likes
1,187
Location
Still on the East Side
#1
Worldwide PC shipments fell by -9.8% in 2013, slightly better than a projected decline of -10.1%, but still the most severe contraction on record, according to the International Data Corporation (IDC) Worldwide Quarterly PC Tracker. Fourth quarter results were slightly better than expected, but the outlook for emerging markets has deteriorated as competition from other devices and economic pressures mount. In mature regions, the fourth quarter was also slightly ahead of expectations, although the improvement seems driven by short-term factors like a slight rise in XP replacements and is not expected to last long.

Show full news post
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Messages
9,791 (2.23/day)
Likes
3,778
Location
Manchester, NH
System Name Working on it ;)
Processor I7-4790K
Motherboard MSI Z97
Cooling Be Quiet Pure Rock Air
Memory 16GB 4x4 G.Skill CAS9 2133 Sniper
Video Card(s) Intel IGP (Dedicated GPU TBD)
Storage WD 320 / 500KS / 500KS / 640KS / 640LS / 640LS / 640LS / 1TBFAEX and a NAS with 2x2Tb WD Black
Display(s) 24" DELL 2405FPW
Case Rosewill Challenger
Audio Device(s) Onboard + HD HDMI
Power Supply Corsair HX750 (love it)
Mouse Logitech G5
Software Win 7 Pro
#2
Some estimates are that XP is still used on 30% of PC's - two years ago that number was about 46%. Wish I knew what % of that is business vs. personal but there are still going to be a lot of people upgrading PC's because of that.

http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-57619803-75/windows-xp-wont-die-without-a-fight/

Once XP is done, any and all flaws will be exploited. One winner in that might be a 3rd party that could keep up with patches/software to keep XP users "safe" We'll see and I digress.

In the meantime, IDC overestimated the decline in 2013, and probably will again in 2014.
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2013
Messages
895 (0.50/day)
Likes
114
#3
With the current economic invironment in the U.S., Europe and Asia PC sales are going to such for quite awhile until real jobs are created that pay a decent salary.
 
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
322 (0.19/day)
Likes
169
#4
It's not about XP, Windows 8.1, the current economic situation or anything else in the real world.

It's about the fact that Intel has mostly stopped innovating in the absence of real competition in the x86 sphere.

What are the gains from going from SB to Haswell? On average 10%? Do you remember what was happening 10 years ago? A year or two passed and CPUs became <b>two</b> times faster, also RAM grew exponentially.

What do we have now? I bought a new SandyBridge PC three years ago. It still has the same configuration - the same CPU, the same RAM, the same HDD.

Is there any reason to upgrade? Zero.

What about even older PC? Anything with two CPU cores and two gigs of RAM will run Windows 8.1 happily. I.e. almost any PC for the past eight years.

So, Intel should blame themselves for slowing down the PC industry. Or, maybe just maybe, we've come to the point when PCs are good enough, thus there's no reason to upgrade.

PCs are blazingly fast, they run every business application we throw at them, and only gamers feel the need to upgrade their GPUs since graphics is getter better and better, requiring more GPU power.
 
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Messages
766 (0.23/day)
Likes
414
Processor Intel Core i3-4370
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H
Cooling Zalman CNPS9500 AT
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3-1600
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GV-N75TOC-2GI GeForce GTX 750 Ti WindForce
Storage Crucial MX100 256GB SSD
Display(s) Acer G245HQ 23.6" LCD
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Black Pearl
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150
Power Supply Corsair CX600M
Mouse Logitech M500
Keyboard Lenovo KB1021 USB
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
#5
^ This. I wouldn't mind having a new CPU, but the performance benefits versus the cost (CPU + motherboard, in my case) isn't worthwhile. There just isn't anything that I must have in the upgrade, and my current CPU works well enough for my purposes.
 

rtwjunkie

PC Gaming Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
9,373 (2.73/day)
Likes
13,004
Location
Louisiana -Laissez les bons temps rouler!
Processor Core i7-3770k 3.5Ghz, O/C to 4.2Ghz fulltime @ 1.19v
Motherboard ASRock Fatal1ty Z68 Pro Gen3
Cooling All air: 2x140mm Fractal exhaust; 3x 140mm Cougar Intake; Enermax T40F CPU cooler
Memory 2x 8GB Mushkin Redline DDR-3 1866
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 980 Ti Gaming 6G LE
Storage 1x 250GB MX200 SSD; 2x 2TB WD Black; 1x4TB WD Black;1x 2TB WD Green (eSATA)
Display(s) HP 25VX 25" IPS @ 1920 x 1080
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Black w/Titanium front -windowed
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic X-850
Mouse Logitech G500
Keyboard Logitech G610 Orion mechanical (Cherry Brown switches)
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (Start10 & Fences 3.0 installed)
#6
It's not about XP, Windows 8.1, the current economic situation or anything else in the real world.

It's about the fact that Intel has mostly stopped innovating in the absence of real competition in the x86 sphere.

What are the gains from going from SB to Haswell? On average 10%? Do you remember what was happening 10 years ago? A year or two passed and CPUs became <b>two</b> times faster, also RAM grew exponentially.

What do we have now? I bought a new SandyBridge PC three years ago. It still has the same configuration - the same CPU, the same RAM, the same HDD.

Is there any reason to upgrade? Zero.

What about even older PC? Anything with two CPU cores and two gigs of RAM will run Windows 8.1 happily. I.e. almost any PC for the past eight years.

So, Intel should blame themselves for slowing down the PC industry. Or, maybe just maybe, we've come to the point when PCs are good enough, thus there's no reason to upgrade.

PCs are blazingly fast, they run every business application we throw at them, and only gamers feel the need to upgrade their GPUs since graphics is getter better and better, requiring more GPU power.
+1. Additionally, this is about pre-built PC's, which virtually no one I know buys anymore. They either build with parts, which is not acounted for in the sales figures, or they continue using their basically still adequate PC for average computing tasks. And finally, we have tablets everywhere, and smartphones that have near the computing power of PC's sold 7(+) years ago.
 
Joined
Mar 26, 2010
Messages
7,642 (2.71/day)
Likes
1,984
Location
Jakarta, Indonesia
System Name micropage7
Processor Intel G4400
Motherboard MSI B150M Bazooka D3
Cooling Stock ( Lapped )
Memory 16 Gb Team Xtreem DDR3
Video Card(s) Nvidia GTX460
Storage Seagate 1 TB, 5oo Gb and SSD A-Data 128 Gb
Display(s) LG 19 inch LCD Wide Screen
Case HP dx6120 MT
Audio Device(s) Stock
Power Supply Be Quiet 600 Watt
Software Windows 7 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Classified
#7
i just think that upgrading pc is long term, you can add ram, hdd or other so you dont need to buy a new one. if you use pc you can use it for 5 years or more before decide to buy a new one
so thats why selling chart of pc little slow down
its easier for tablet or phone since you cant ugrade for more. so people tend to buy a new phone than buy a new pc
and once more, today people dont need to buy pc or laptop for connecting to internet so they may not buy pc, like the other say that today mobile stuff has more power to do multi tasks and life style, where people prefer light and easy gadgets to do any task and they may not list buying pc at their first list