• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel 11th Gen H35 Processors Launched: Fastest Single-Threaded Laptop Performance

Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
5,398 (0.97/day)
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k -> 12600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0 -> Gigabyte Z690 Auros Elite DDR4
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120 -> Custom Watercoolingloop
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz -> Crucial (8x2) 16gb 3600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD RX480 -> ... nope still the same :'(
Storage Samsung 750 Evo 250gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb -> 2tb MVMe SSD
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television) -> Dell S3220DGF
Case antec 600 -> Thermaltake Tenor HTCP case
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
It is trendy to hate on Intel and support the underdog. The ones that increased a 6c/12t chip price from the usual 220€ to 320€.

The whole Ryzen 5000 line up it's a joke, but let's keep atracking Intel, right?

Intel sucks and single threaded performance is useless. We all do professional render for a living, more cores = better, even at dual channel memory

yeah thats it, lets just forget how intel completely stalled on any form of progress when competition fell away, and rereleased the same processor 4 times just tweaking a bit and adding 2 more cores and the same igpu when they were, when AMD's Ryzen 8cores for 500 bucks etc came out (kinda wrecks that 6 core and up is only for the 1000+ "extreme editions" doesn it?)
oh and of course the uhh...the background deals to make sure OEM's dont use AMD hardware....

no no its all purely about "supporting the underdog".

also imagine a company asking an insanely low price for their cpu's just to gain some cred back, then when they have the performance crown back on EVERY LEVEL asking for more money for the efforts, insanity I tell ya.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 18, 2017
Messages
688 (0.26/day)
Yeah yeah, of course! :D

It is trendy to hate on Intel and support the underdog. The ones that increased a 6c/12t chip price from the usual 220€ to 320€.

The whole Ryzen 5000 line up it's a joke, but let's keep atracking Intel, right?

Intel sucks and single threaded performance is useless. We all do professional render for a living, more cores = better, even at dual channel memory
Wow. I really pity you.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
11,878 (2.30/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo/ Asus strix scar II
Processor Amd R5 5900X/ Intel 8750H
Motherboard Crosshair hero8 impact/Asus
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu ek suprim Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in four sticks./16Gb/16GB
Video Card(s) Powercolour RX7900XT Reference/Rtx 2060
Storage Silicon power 2TB nvme/8Tb external/1Tb samsung Evo nvme 2Tb sata ssd/1Tb nvme
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync.dell shiter
Case Lianli 011 dynamic/strix scar2
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi/Asus stock
Mouse Roccat Kova/ Logitech G wireless
Keyboard Roccat Aimo 120
VR HMD Oculus rift
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy/ laptop Timespy 6506
Well I thought they had turned a corner after seeing there much better presentation at CES than AMD, with regards to specification listing and clarity IE testing disclosure.
Seems they saw their strangled market gain's and ran back round the corner dropping a turd on the way (the turds the pr piece not intel or this chip as that's yet to be discovered) before the tribe attack.

No M1 fans on here today, surprised.
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2019
Messages
143 (0.09/day)
System Name Mirkwood
Processor AMD RYZEN 7 3800X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Crosshair VII Hero (Wi-Fi) AM4 AMD X470
Cooling Noctua D15S with additional Noctua NF-A12x25 FLX fan
Memory G.SKILL Flare X Series CL16 3200Mhz 16GB (4 x 8GB)
Video Card(s) GIGABYTE Radeon RX 570 DirectX 12 GV-RX570GAMING-4GD 4GB
Storage Crucial MX500 M.2 2280 500GB SATA III; WD Black 1TB Performance Desktop Hard Disk Drive
Display(s) Philips 246E9QDSB 24" Frameless Monitor, Full HD IPS, 129% sRGB, 75Hz, FreeSync
Case Corsair Graphite Series 780T
Audio Device(s) Klipsch R-41PM powered monitors and SVS SB-2000 sub
Power Supply Corsair HX650
Mouse Logitech Wireless Performance Mouse MX
Keyboard Old Logitech keyboard
Software Windows 10 Pro 64Bit
Way to go Intel, comparing last gen AMD 4900 series to you latest and greatest! Put that hot (pun fully intended) new chip against a new AMD 5000 series and those wins will be margin of error wins or lose to your competitor...
 
Joined
Jan 18, 2021
Messages
3 (0.00/day)
Go Intel, been good to me as a gamer, rock solid fps consistantly.

Can't stand the heat? then get out of the kitchen.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
7,921 (3.15/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD 7900X3D
Motherboard Asus X670E E Strix
Cooling In Win SR36
Memory GSKILL DDR5 32GB 5200 30
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse 7900XT (Watercooled)
Storage Corsair MP 700, Seagate 530 2Tb, Adata SX8200 2TBx2, Kingston 2 TBx2, Micron 8 TB, WD AN 1500
Display(s) GIGABYTE FV43U
Case Corsair 7000D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Deepcool 1000M
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 11 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 46183 Time Spy: 25121
This was already announced by Lisa Su at CES.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2020
Messages
107 (0.07/day)
yeah thats it, lets just forget how intel completely stalled on any form of progress when competition fell away, and rereleased the same processor 4 times just tweaking a bit and adding 2 more cores and the same igpu when they were, when AMD's Ryzen 8cores for 500 bucks etc came out (kinda wrecks that 6 core and up is only for the 1000+ "extreme editions" doesn it?)
oh and of course the uhh...the background deals to make sure OEM's dont use AMD hardware....

no no its all purely about "supporting the underdog".

also imagine a company asking an insanely low price for their cpu's just to gain some cred back, then when they have the performance crown back on EVERY LEVEL asking for more money for the efforts, insanity I tell ya.

Did I Say otherwise? Right now Intel is the best option for almost every user:

1- zen3 is expensive. Most ppl buy 10400f or 10600k for gaming. They are cheaper than 5600x

2- zen3 incredibly hard to find

3- 5800x 480€, 10700kf 340€, easy choice

4- you need 12 cores? 16 cores? Go quad channel then, seems you make more money from a hedt platform

5- whea errors

6- more whea errors
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,046 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
Are you surprised?
I really am, it should be trivial to get those benchmark results. and they need some results to establish a baseline, even to estimate things
 
Joined
Sep 2, 2020
Messages
1,478 (1.11/day)
System Name Chip
Processor Amd 5600X
Motherboard MSI B450M Mortar Max
Cooling Hyper 212
Memory 2x 16g ddr4 3200mz
Video Card(s) RX 6700
Storage 5.5 tb hd 220 g ssd
Display(s) Normal moniter
Case something cheap
VR HMD Vive
zen3 incredibly hard to find
zen 2 is still around and are still some hella good chips
i would easy get a ryzen 3600 if i was upgrading cpu
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
11,687 (1.73/day)
System Name Compy 386
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus
Cooling Air for now.....
Memory 64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Video Card(s) 7900XTX 310 Merc
Storage Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs and over 10TB spinning
Display(s) 56" Samsung 4K HDR
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Razer
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
5Ghz for a fraction of a second during boot, then thermal throttle unless sitting outside in -20 temps
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
13,210 (3.80/day)
Location
Sunshine Coast
System Name Black Box
Processor Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5
Motherboard MSI E3 KRAIT Gaming v5
Cooling Tt tower + 120mm Tt fan
Memory G.Skill 16GB 3600 C18
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 970 Mini
Storage Kingston A2000 512Gb NVME
Display(s) AOC 24" Freesync 1m.s. 75Hz
Case Corsair 450D High Air Flow.
Audio Device(s) No need.
Power Supply FSP Aurum 650W
Mouse Yes
Keyboard Of course
Software W10 Pro 64 bit
5Ghz for a fraction of a second during boot, then thermal throttle unless sitting outside in -20 temps
Agreed, they might not be lying about those figures, but it certainly is a stretch of the truth meant to confuse consumers.
Same issue arises with audio speakers and marketing using PMPO instead of RMS, because the bigger figure appears more appealing to the clueless.
 
Joined
May 3, 2018
Messages
2,288 (1.05/day)
Intel will sells his mother and beat a baby to death these day just to beat AMD by 1 fps. Will scream WINNING while being on fire and barely alive.
Exactly and that's the only reason the mini nuclear reactor also known as Rocket Lake exists. And utterly pathetic product that has no reason to exist. They could have waited for Alder Lake, but the need to just one-up AMD by a few fps in 1080p gaming at any power level is simply pathetic. Alder Lake could be an excellent product and why waste resources on trying to backport Ice Lake cores to 14nm. That money should have gone to the graphics division.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2008
Messages
14 (0.00/day)
Right now INTEL cpu are a power hog and if you need a heater in the cold winter also you can get an intel CPU XD, come on competition is good and the blue team work hard to break competition not by innovation but by business tactics; thats poor
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
5,400 (0.92/day)
Location
Australia
System Name Night Rider | Mini LAN PC | Workhorse
Processor AMD R7 5800X3D | Ryzen 1600X | i7 970
Motherboard MSi AM4 Pro Carbon | GA- | Gigabyte EX58-UD5
Cooling Noctua U9S Twin Fan| Stock Cooler, Copper Core)| Big shairkan B
Memory 2x8GB DDR4 G.Skill Ripjaws 3600MHz| 2x8GB Corsair 3000 | 6x2GB DDR3 1300 Corsair
Video Card(s) MSI AMD 6750XT | 6500XT | MSI RX 580 8GB
Storage 1TB WD Black NVME / 250GB SSD /2TB WD Black | 500GB SSD WD, 2x1TB, 1x750 | WD 500 SSD/Seagate 320
Display(s) LG 27" 1440P| Samsung 20" S20C300L/DELL 15" | 22" DELL/19"DELL
Case LIAN LI PC-18 | Mini ATX Case (custom) | Atrix C4 9001
Audio Device(s) Onboard | Onbaord | Onboard
Power Supply Silverstone 850 | Silverstone Mini 450W | Corsair CX-750
Mouse Coolermaster Pro | Rapoo V900 | Gigabyte 6850X
Keyboard MAX Keyboard Nighthawk X8 | Creative Fatal1ty eluminx | Some POS Logitech
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 | Windows 10 Pro 64 | Windows 7 Pro 64/Windows 10 Home
Go Intel, been good to me as a gamer, rock solid fps consistantly.

Can't stand the heat? then get out of the kitchen.

You best get out of the kitchen then

 
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
1,444 (0.71/day)
Yeah yeah, of course! :D


Wow. I really pity you.
He's got a point, regardless what most might think, AMD pricing on their 5000 series Ryzen is pure BS, starting at 300$ for a 6 core, yet people not saying a thing and swallow it, if intel charged more, people will riot, the bias is clear, AMD took advantage of its lead to charge more and out intel'd themselves as a result, in the end remember that neither AMD nor Intel are your friends, if they saw an opportunity to get more out of you and get away with it, they will do it in a heart beat :(.

I generally avoid conversations like this, but hypocritical bias with a straight face gets under my skin

also imagine a company asking an insanely low price for their cpu's just to gain some cred back, then when they have the performance crown back on EVERY LEVEL asking for more money for the efforts, insanity I tell ya.
So by that definition its ok when companies charge more just because they'r in the lead ?
Would you agree that Nvidia outrages pricing is ok just because for a long time AMD has not been competitive ?
Would you agree that paying 20% - 50% more for Samsung SSDs is acceptable despite competition charging less and performs the same ?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 6, 2016
Messages
1,575 (0.58/day)
Location
NH, USA
System Name Lightbringer
Processor Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix X470-F Gaming
Cooling Enermax Liqmax Iii 360mm AIO
Memory G.Skill Trident Z RGB 32GB (8GBx4) 3200Mhz CL 14
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 5700XT Nitro+
Storage Hp EX950 2TB NVMe M.2, HP EX950 1TB NVMe M.2, Samsung 860 EVO 2TB
Display(s) LG 34BK95U-W 34" 5120 x 2160
Case Lian Li PC-O11 Dynamic (White)
Power Supply BeQuiet Straight Power 11 850w Gold Rated PSU
Mouse Glorious Model O (Matte White)
Keyboard Royal Kludge RK71
Software Windows 10
Did I Say otherwise? Right now Intel is the best option for almost every user:

1- zen3 is expensive. Most ppl buy 10400f or 10600k for gaming. They are cheaper than 5600x

2- zen3 incredibly hard to find

3- 5800x 480€, 10700kf 340€, easy choice

4- you need 12 cores? 16 cores? Go quad channel then, seems you make more money from a hedt platform

5- whea errors

6- more whea errors

Just to interject, but if you are going to make sweeping claims and assumptions, Im going to need some empirical evidence (like sales figures or reviews citing these errors)...no offense, but random people's opinions don't mean anything

He's got a point, regardless what most might think, AMD pricing on their 5000 series Ryzen is pure BS, starting at 300$ for a 6 core, yet people not saying a thing and swallow it, if intel charged more, people will riot, the bias is clear, AMD took advantage of its lead to charge more and out intel'd themselves as a result, in the end remember that neither AMD nor Intel are your friends, if they saw an opportunity to get more out of you and get away with it, they will do it in a heart beat :(.

I generally avoid conversations like this, but hypocritical bias with a straight face gets under my skin


So by that definition its ok when companies charge more just because they'r in the lead ?
Would you agree that Nvidia outrages pricing is ok just because for a long time AMD has not been competitive ?
Would you agree that paying 20% - 50% more for Samsung SSDs is acceptable despite competition charging less and performs the same ?
Bias is clear? on pricing? When Intel was charging $1000 for the 5960x, there weren't any riots...in fact, nobody made a peep. Also, your assessment of the 5000 series pricing is completely divorced from context. The 1700x debuted at $500, wasn't close to the fastest single threaded performance, and then just two generations later, the 5800x debuts, is the fastest in EVERY category, and is $450, $50 cheaper than the 1700x while being at least 40% faster....now, name the last time intel provided a 40% boost in performance over that short of time while charging $50 less....i'll save you the time because you can't. When people whine about 5000 series pricing, they NEVER mention the context, because it's completely justified...instead they blindly compare it to 3000 series which wasn't the fastest and was therefore priced accordingly. Want to talk about bias? How about the biased expectation that for some inexplicable reason, AMD should sell their product at cost even when they're literally the best that can be bought? Where does that biased expectation and sense of entitlement come from?
 
Joined
Oct 14, 2017
Messages
210 (0.09/day)
System Name Lightning
Processor 4790K
Motherboard asrock z87 extreme 3
Cooling hwlabs black ice 20 fpi radiator, cpu mosfet blocks, MCW60 cpu block, full cover on 780Ti's
Memory corsair dominator platinum 2400C10, 32 giga, DDR3
Video Card(s) 2x780Ti
Storage intel S3700 400GB, samsung 850 pro 120 GB, a cheep intel MLC 120GB, an another even cheeper 120GB
Display(s) eizo foris fg2421
Case 700D
Audio Device(s) ESI Juli@
Power Supply seasonic platinum 1000
Mouse mx518
Software Lightning v2.0a
it come from whea errors :x
do you know whay when someone look at intel they only look performance and watts and.... the rest of the important things ? it becuase they are used to it :), to what ? to 0 BIOS problems, stability...intel ucode/BIOS is always polished, even today the latest zen 3 still have many software problems. intel people compare with focus on things at front is becuase with intel all you have to look at is the front (performance, watt, cores whatever). on the other hand with AMD - you always have to "look over the shoulder", look backwards (will this mobo/model/ram combo be stable - are the first question AMD user ask), while intel user first ask: will this program run normal on this cpu....
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
9,857 (5.12/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name Nebulon-B Mk. 4
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard MSi PRO B650M-A WiFi
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock 4
Memory 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance EXPO DDR5-6000
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7800 XT
Storage 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 2 TB Corsair MP600 R2, 4 + 8 TB Seagate Barracuda 3.5"
Display(s) Dell S3422DWG, 7" Waveshare touchscreen
Case Kolink Citadel Mesh black
Power Supply Seasonic Prime GX-750
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G413 SE
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R23 single-core: 1,800, multi-core: 18,000. Superposition 1080p Extreme: 9,900.
I'm only wondering: what makes this CPU a Special Edition?
 
Joined
Oct 14, 2017
Messages
210 (0.09/day)
System Name Lightning
Processor 4790K
Motherboard asrock z87 extreme 3
Cooling hwlabs black ice 20 fpi radiator, cpu mosfet blocks, MCW60 cpu block, full cover on 780Ti's
Memory corsair dominator platinum 2400C10, 32 giga, DDR3
Video Card(s) 2x780Ti
Storage intel S3700 400GB, samsung 850 pro 120 GB, a cheep intel MLC 120GB, an another even cheeper 120GB
Display(s) eizo foris fg2421
Case 700D
Audio Device(s) ESI Juli@
Power Supply seasonic platinum 1000
Mouse mx518
Software Lightning v2.0a
I'm only wondering: what makes this CPU a Special Edition?
5000 mhz in laptop for less than 1 seconds before it burned
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2016
Messages
476 (0.17/day)
I was like oooh this must be against AMD's 5000 Series of Mobile CPU's then when I looked at the graphs its against a yr old 4000series, like wtf? LOL

Yep exactly. In fact, Intel's latest here is still worse than AMD's mobile 4000-series as Intel's cherry-picked leads in single core are almost margin of error slim but they lose badly in multi-core, power draw/efficiency and price as still too many vendors have the inferior Intel specced variant as the higher priced models.
 
Joined
Sep 2, 2020
Messages
1,478 (1.11/day)
System Name Chip
Processor Amd 5600X
Motherboard MSI B450M Mortar Max
Cooling Hyper 212
Memory 2x 16g ddr4 3200mz
Video Card(s) RX 6700
Storage 5.5 tb hd 220 g ssd
Display(s) Normal moniter
Case something cheap
VR HMD Vive
It annoys me people are going Ryzen 5000 is too expensive
you know what has happen Amd is on top and they can charge tons of money IF it doesnt sell they will drop the price and then you will know it was to expensive
but in the mean time they have shipped more then 1million cpus
 
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
1,669 (0.64/day)
Location
Tanagra
System Name Budget Box
Processor Xeon E5-2667v2
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Pro
Cooling Some cheap tower cooler, I dunno
Memory 32GB 1866-DDR3 ECC
Video Card(s) XFX RX 5600XT
Storage WD NVME 1GB
Display(s) ASUS Pro Art 27"
Case Antec P7 Neo
'Results are estimated'. What does that even mean? Did they actually run benches or did they just make up numbers out of this air? If Intel are serious about getting competitive products they need to lower prices significantly, otherwise there is no point in buying Intel processors. They are slower in general, more expensive, consume more power, on limited upgradability path and generally way more locked in terms of overclocking, memory overclocking and just good mobo features on the lower end mobo's.
Maybe they are so hard to obtain that even Intel didn’t have a sample to test.
 
Top