• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel and TSMC Strike 3nm Deal, New Hsinchu Fab to Cater to Intel

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
42,335 (8.11/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
It looks like Intel and TSMC have a deal in place to manufacture 3 nm chips. The world-leading Taiwanese fab is setting up a new facility exclusively to cater to Intel, according to DigiTimes, citing industry sources. This facility will be located in the Baoshan area of Hsinchu, in northern Taiwan. The 3 nm node will enable Intel to keep its newfound cadence of launching new CPU microarchitectures with IPC increases each year. The annual IPC increase cadence in particular, would be faster than even the "Tick-Tock" cadence prior to 2015, as the company pushed IPC increases and foundry nodes each alternating year. The company faces stiff competition from AMD, which has been posting IPC increases each year since 2017, and leveraged TSMC 7 nm nodes to beat Intel in the IPC game for the first time in over 17 years.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2016
Messages
178 (0.10/day)
TSMC makes revenue almost at the level of Intel. Intel should have become fab only and sold all its chip IP to pay for new fabs with better capabilities. With no products of their own, fabless companies would have no problem going to them for production.

Instead, they gave too much money to shareholders and lowered R&D budgets. Their fabs sit idle with only a few barely producing enough 10 nm and below chips with horrible yields. They beg for government subsidies to build new crappy fabs. Because of this, they are taking away fab capacity from the competition while sabotaging the region by talking about instabilities between Taiwan and China.

I really really don’t like Intel.
 
Joined
Oct 12, 2005
Messages
325 (0.05/day)
I am glad that intel will introduce more competition in the GPU market and their CPU are now worth it and competitive.

But I am very disappointed that they are dragging behind in the foundry business. That just do not seems right. So many time in the past Intel didn't had competitive architecture and managed to fight back with amazing process.

I think the lack of competition in the foundry business will hurt the market long term.
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
2,033 (0.61/day)
TSMC makes revenue almost at the level of Intel. Intel should have become fab only and sold all its chip IP to pay for new fabs with better capabilities. With no products of their own, fabless companies would have no problem going to them for production.

Instead, they gave too much money to shareholders and lowered R&D budgets. Their fabs sit idle with only a few barely producing enough 10 nm and below chips with horrible yields. They beg for government subsidies to build new crappy fabs. Because of this, they are taking away fab capacity from the competition while sabotaging the region by talking about instabilities between Taiwan and China.

I really really don’t like Intel.
Um, why on earth would they do that when their IP is what sells?

And do you have a source for "fabs sitting idle"? Intel's fabs have been at capacity for years with 14nm products, they only fabs offline now are being upgraded to 10nm superfin.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
3,276 (1.80/day)
Processor R5 5600X
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX B550-I GAMING
Cooling Alpenföhn Black Ridge
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-2666 VLP @3800
Video Card(s) EVGA Geforce RTX 3080 XC3
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 2TB Intel 660p
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Corsair Ironclaw Wireless RGB
Keyboard Corsair K60
VR HMD HTC Vive
TSMC makes revenue almost at the level of Intel. Intel should have become fab only and sold all its chip IP to pay for new fabs with better capabilities. With no products of their own, fabless companies would have no problem going to them for production.

Instead, they gave too much money to shareholders and lowered R&D budgets. Their fabs sit idle with only a few barely producing enough 10 nm and below chips with horrible yields. They beg for government subsidies to build new crappy fabs. Because of this, they are taking away fab capacity from the competition while sabotaging the region by talking about instabilities between Taiwan and China.

I really really don’t like Intel.
The last sentence is probably the most correct part of this.
- Why should Intel have sold IP? If anything, selling fabs was the more speculated option.
- They had and have money to pay for new fabs, funding was not and is not the problem they have with fabs.
- Outside some small and quite separate things foundry business is a new thing for Intel that has not really started yet, you make it seem like they have done that for long time.
- Intel R&D budgets have constantly increased with a few very small exceptions. So has their CapEx.
- By all indications none of they fabs are sitting idle, they are churning out chips on all their available manufacturing capabilities. Some may be being updated for newer processes though.
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
1,022 (0.33/day)
I for one welcome this. With both AMD and Intel chips being manufactured on the same node by TSMC (albeit different factories) it is truly the case of "let the best architecture win".

Hopefully this finally shuts up those who say that AMD only beat intel because they used TSMC's node that was better. Sure it was and arguably is but AMD themselves needed to come up with a competitive architecture too. And Zen is no slouch being designed by Jim Keller originally and now iterated beyond that.

The only thing AMD really cant compete in is volume. Intel still ships much bigger volume of chips. Tho with using TSMC's node it does equalize things a bit between the two. Mainly because i doubt this one 3nm fab has the volume of all other Intel fabs combined.
 
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
37 (0.09/day)
I for one welcome this. With both AMD and Intel chips being manufactured on the same node by TSMC (albeit different factories) it is truly the case of "let the best architecture win".

Hopefully this finally shuts up those who say that AMD only beat intel because they used TSMC's node that was better. Sure it was and arguably is but AMD themselves needed to come up with a competitive architecture too. And Zen is no slouch being designed by Jim Keller originally and now iterated beyond that.

The only thing AMD really cant compete in is volume. Intel still ships much bigger volume of chips. Tho with using TSMC's node it does equalize things a bit between the two. Mainly because i doubt this one 3nm fab has the volume of all other Intel fabs combined.
You are wrong, soon there won't be AMD+TSMC. Intel will take the whole TSMC's production and will left AMD with Crapsung "4-5nm".
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
9,731 (2.24/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo/ Asus strix scar II/Trig
Processor Amd R5 5600G/ Intel 8750H/3800X
Motherboard Crosshair hero8 impact/Asus/crosshair hero 7
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu ek suprim Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in four sticks./16Gb/16GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire refference Rx vega 64 EK waterblocked/Rtx 2060/GTX 1060
Storage Silicon power 1TB nvme/8Tb external/1Tb samsung Evo nvme 2Tb sata ssd/1Tb nvme
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync.dellshiter
Case Lianli p0-11 dynamic/strix scar2/aero cool shiter
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi/Asus stock /850 watt ?
Mouse Roccat Kova/ Logitech G wireless
Keyboard Roccat Aimo 120
VR HMD Oculus rift
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy/ laptop Timespy 6506
You are wrong, soon there won't be AMD+TSMC. Intel will take the whole TSMC's production and will left AMD with Crapsung "4-5nm".
Perhaps you are partially right.

But AMD have Samsung to deal with and Samsung wants to out do Tsmc Soo


But only partially, these deals are not made in weeks, and companies don't usually get hung out to dry unless the people running them are fool's.

Lisa Su is no fool if she left tsmc 3Nm on the table it's because she had a plan.

Will it pan out , who knows but your wrong too soo.
 
Joined
Jul 7, 2020
Messages
49 (0.09/day)
I am glad that intel will introduce more competition in the GPU market and their CPU are now worth it and competitive.

But I am very disappointed that they are dragging behind in the foundry business. That just do not seems right. So many time in the past Intel didn't had competitive architecture and managed to fight back with amazing process.

I think the lack of competition in the foundry business will hurt the market long term.
Intel GPU seems also to be a TSMC product, so more Intel Arc GPU less AMD and future Nvidia chips.
Your wish is not what reality is shown:
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
1,022 (0.33/day)
You are wrong, soon there won't be AMD+TSMC. Intel will take the whole TSMC's production and will left AMD with Crapsung "4-5nm".
AMD is one of TSMC's top customers. I highly doubt that this will end even if Samsung is cheaper. Sure AMD may move some things to Samsung like APU's and console SoC's but im pretty sure they'll stick with TSMC regardless. Intel may have deep pockets but not enough to outbid everyone else. Apple will stay as TSMC's #1 customer and they have the deepest pockets.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
12,491 (3.42/day)
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
fabless companies
I don't think Intel is intending to go fabless. Their bigger nodes have good yields and are adequate for a lot of other things beyond top of the line CPUs and GPUs. It's not like ethernet, chipset, and storage requires bleeding edge processes. It sounds like Intel is going fabless for the things that they can't do well themselves.

So has their CapEx.
Who doesn't like tax deductions?
 
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
37 (0.09/day)
AMD is one of TSMC's top customers. I highly doubt that this will end even if Samsung is cheaper. Sure AMD may move some things to Samsung like APU's and console SoC's but im pretty sure they'll stick with TSMC regardless. Intel may have deep pockets but not enough to outbid everyone else. Apple will stay as TSMC's #1 customer and they have the deepest pockets.
Did you missed the TSMC's customers ranking? Intel has share as much as AMD's. Why do you think AMD is more important when intel can pay 10 times more. Just stay and watch how on the end of this year intel will have 13-14% while AMD barelly maintain their miserable 9%. The big difference is that AMD need cheap node to have profit, while as Intel mentioned before, they have billions which they are ready to sacrifice to beat/kill AMD.
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
1,022 (0.33/day)
Did you missed the TSMC's customers ranking? Intel has share as much as AMD's. Why do you think AMD is more important when intel can pay 10 times more. Just stay and watch how on the end of this year intel will have 13-14% while AMD barelly maintain their miserable 9%. The big difference is that AMD need cheap node to have profit, while as Intel mentioned before, they have billions which they are ready to sacrifice to beat/kill AMD.
I think you missed the ranking. Intel is nowhere near the top 3. Like i said - Intel can pay but this is not about money. There is not enough capacity to buy. Apple always gets priority including 3nm. Why do you think Intel bought 3nm instead of 5nm? - thats right - because no matter how many billions they have they cant outbuy capacity that's already sold. So relax. AMD is not going anywhere.
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2016
Messages
178 (0.10/day)
I don't think Intel is intending to go fabless. Their bigger nodes have good yields and are adequate for a lot of other things beyond top of the line CPUs and GPUs. It's not like ethernet, chipset, and storage requires bleeding edge processes. It sounds like Intel is going fabless for the things that they can't do well themselves.


Who doesn't like tax deductions?
I’m actually arguing that Intel should go chipless and be a fab only like TSMC. It seems crazy but TSMC has the same revenue as Intel so maybe not so crazy. I would love Intel to fix its fabs if they haven’t already done so then open them to the world. This is where we need more competition…the fab side. Intel will never be a good fab for third parties as long as they make their own chips and continue shady business practices. Its just not in their current shady best interests to see any other chip designer succeed…ever!
 
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
37 (0.09/day)
I think you missed the ranking. Intel is nowhere near the top 3. Like i said - Intel can pay but this is not about money. There is not enough capacity to buy. Apple always gets priority including 3nm. Why do you think Intel bought 3nm instead of 5nm? - thats right - because no matter how many billions they have they cant outbuy capacity that's already sold. So relax. AMD is not going anywhere.
Nowhere near top 3, while has almost same share as AMD https://www.statista.com/statistics/1247996/tsmc-revenue-share-of-leading-customers/
Intel bought 3nm because AMD can't secure it, they are fine with the 5nm now, but can you guess what will happen in 5 years? Intel's target was never to get more than Apple, their goal is to make impossible for AMD to get nodes, but I am not sure that you can get this, because you don't see beyond the current year.
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
1,022 (0.33/day)
Nowhere near top 3, while has almost same share as AMD https://www.statista.com/statistics/1247996/tsmc-revenue-share-of-leading-customers/
Intel bought 3nm because AMD can't secure it, they are fine with the 5nm now, but can you guess what will happen in 5 years? Intel's target was never to get more than Apple, their goal is to make impossible for AMD to get nodes, but I am not sure that you can get this, because you don't see beyond the current year.
5 years is a long time. A lot can happen. TSMC can royally screw up and Samsung could come out on top on 3nm. It's pointless to speculate that far ahead.
Plus it's not like TSMC will have the same fixed capacity 5 years from now. They too will expand and build more fabs. Who's to say they wont build an "AMD" fab somewhere?

And i doubt that Intel for all it's "financial horsepower" and volume has enough product to grab most of (Apple) leftover 3nm capacity to dry out AMD. but i guess we will see.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
9,731 (2.24/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo/ Asus strix scar II/Trig
Processor Amd R5 5600G/ Intel 8750H/3800X
Motherboard Crosshair hero8 impact/Asus/crosshair hero 7
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu ek suprim Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in four sticks./16Gb/16GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire refference Rx vega 64 EK waterblocked/Rtx 2060/GTX 1060
Storage Silicon power 1TB nvme/8Tb external/1Tb samsung Evo nvme 2Tb sata ssd/1Tb nvme
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync.dellshiter
Case Lianli p0-11 dynamic/strix scar2/aero cool shiter
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi/Asus stock /850 watt ?
Mouse Roccat Kova/ Logitech G wireless
Keyboard Roccat Aimo 120
VR HMD Oculus rift
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy/ laptop Timespy 6506
Nowhere near top 3, while has almost same share as AMD https://www.statista.com/statistics/1247996/tsmc-revenue-share-of-leading-customers/
Intel bought 3nm because AMD can't secure it, they are fine with the 5nm now, but can you guess what will happen in 5 years? Intel's target was never to get more than Apple, their goal is to make impossible for AMD to get nodes, but I am not sure that you can get this, because you don't see beyond the current year.
Listen, your getting excited.

See my post above yours about AMD signing a deal with Samsung, for 3Nm.

And pay mind not to stare so far you miss what's under your eye's.

Exactly how many GPUs has Intel sold btw, that capacity is for GPU , and it's a bet that it will be needed, IMHO at this rate it won't because Arc can't meet it's hype at this point and in three years when it's flopped it will get canned.
 

Tigger

I'm the only one
Supporter
Joined
Mar 20, 2006
Messages
13,835 (2.39/day)
System Name Dirty Fecker
Processor Intel I7 12700K 5ghz-P 3.9ghz-E 1.25vcore
Motherboard Asus Rog Strix Z690-A WiFi D4
Cooling EK 360 PE+EK 280 CE, FLT 240 D5, EK supremacy classic, Generic GPU block
Memory Teamgroup 8 Pack Edition T-Force Dark Pro 2x16gb 3735 16-16-16-38 Bdie
Video Card(s) MSI GTX980TI Gaming 6gb, 1475/8000 water cooled
Storage Silicon Power Gen3x4 256gb M.2, WD SN850 1TB M.2 NVME Gen4x4
Display(s) MSI 32" Optix AG32CV 1080p 165hz 1ms
Case Lian Li o11 Dynamic XL Rog
Audio Device(s) onboard/Logitech Z4
Power Supply Corsair TX750M 80% Gold
Mouse Razer Viper
Keyboard Anne pro II
Software Win 11 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores do they matter
GO Intel. Wow how much money have Intel got yikes.

ERR-There is not enough capacity to buy--->The world-leading Taiwanese fab is setting up a new facility exclusively to cater to Intel
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
37 (0.09/day)
Listen, your getting excited.

See my post above yours about AMD signing a deal with Samsung, for 3Nm.

And pay mind not to stare so far you miss what's under your eye's.

Exactly how many GPUs has Intel sold btw, that capacity is for GPU , and it's a bet that it will be needed, IMHO at this rate it won't because Arc can't meet it's hype at this point and in three years when it's flopped it will get canned.
-See my post above yours about AMD signing a deal with Samsung, for 3Nm.
You can't read or what? Just read the first word in your article - "Rumours". Nice sources.
-And pay mind not to stare so far you miss what's under your eye's.
What to miss? Cheap rumors, no thanks.
-Exactly how many GPUs has Intel sold btw, that capacity is for GPU , and it's a bet that it will be needed, IMHO at this rate it won't because Arc can't meet it's hype at this point and in three years when it's flopped it will get canned.
Intel have 68% of the GPU market if you are not aware
Don't underestimate their army of OEMs and marketing machine,curently they have only iGPUs, but in 2 years they will sell more dGPUs than AMD.
Also, Intel do not need to have competitive product, their marketing make the work
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
9,731 (2.24/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo/ Asus strix scar II/Trig
Processor Amd R5 5600G/ Intel 8750H/3800X
Motherboard Crosshair hero8 impact/Asus/crosshair hero 7
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu ek suprim Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in four sticks./16Gb/16GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire refference Rx vega 64 EK waterblocked/Rtx 2060/GTX 1060
Storage Silicon power 1TB nvme/8Tb external/1Tb samsung Evo nvme 2Tb sata ssd/1Tb nvme
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync.dellshiter
Case Lianli p0-11 dynamic/strix scar2/aero cool shiter
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi/Asus stock /850 watt ?
Mouse Roccat Kova/ Logitech G wireless
Keyboard Roccat Aimo 120
VR HMD Oculus rift
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy/ laptop Timespy 6506
-See my post above yours about AMD signing a deal with Samsung, for 3Nm.
You can't read or what? Just read the first word in your article - "Rumours". Nice sources.
-And pay mind not to stare so far you miss what's under your eye's.
What to miss? Cheap rumors, no thanks.
-Exactly how many GPUs has Intel sold btw, that capacity is for GPU , and it's a bet that it will be needed, IMHO at this rate it won't because Arc can't meet it's hype at this point and in three years when it's flopped it will get canned.
Intel have 68% of the GPU market if you are not aware
Don't underestimate their army of OEMs and marketing machine,curently they have only iGPUs, but in 2 years they will sell more dGPUs than AMD.
Also, Intel do not need to have competitive product, their marketing make the work
according to DigiTimes, citing industry sources, rock solid then eh.

Ah yes , the igpu markets strong , I think you're a share holder, and for that reason I will leave you to it.
And you started with
"You are wrong, soon there won't be AMD+TSMC. Intel will take the whole TSMC's production and will left AMD with Crapsung "4-5nm"."

Which lead to me pointing to alternative 3Nm sources , your idea you knew isn't as clear as your saying, and your link is not really about the same thing as the one I passed.

Until it's out it's not worth a shit, simple, ,see xeneos 2200 for proof.
lucky Intel has it's fans and OEM deals eh but they can't force people to buy them, they'll have to be actually good oh and out.
 
Last edited:

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
12,491 (3.42/day)
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
I’m actually arguing that Intel should go chipless and be a fab only like TSMC. It seems crazy but TSMC has the same revenue as Intel so maybe not so crazy. I would love Intel to fix its fabs if they haven’t already done so then open them to the world. This is where we need more competition…the fab side. Intel will never be a good fab for third parties as long as they make their own chips and continue shady business practices. Its just not in their current shady best interests to see any other chip designer succeed…ever!
I don't think that going 100% fabless is a good idea for Intel. They have a far more diverse portfolio than AMD and a lot of the tech that Intel produces isn't on bleeding edge nodes. This makes sense for their CPU and GPU development. Probably not for the rest of the portfolio though. Since they have the fabs, it's worth keeping control over that. There is a level of risk going 100% fabless. Diversity is important, but not if it's going to hamstring you.
 
Joined
Jul 3, 2019
Messages
256 (0.27/day)
Location
Bulgaria
Processor 6700K
Motherboard M8G
Cooling D15S
Memory 16GB 3k15
Video Card(s) 2070S
Storage 850 Pro
Display(s) U2410
Case Core X2
Audio Device(s) ALC1150
Power Supply Seasonic
Mouse Razer
Keyboard Logitech
Software 20H2
I see the usual "Intel will take over TSMC and kick AMD out" drivel. May i suggest some reading?
https://semianalysis.substack.com/p/tsmc-wants-to-make-intel-dependent

"Now, onto Intel. Let’s start by dispelling this fiction that Intel is buying up capacity to stiff AMD. AMD is getting the capacity they want from TSMC, on the time frame they want. Another fact, Bob Swan has long since agreed to some very large deals. This deal included capacity at N6, N5/4, and N3. This is nothing new.

TSMC is smart, calculated, and is playing the long game. Yes, TSMC could be helping Intel get back on the horse as Intel works through internal process node issues. TSMC has a longer-term vision, where only they can supply leading edge capacity. In 2022 and 2023, Qualcomm and Nvidia recognize this fully, but are keeping Samsung in the back pocket for the future. They want to do the same to Intel."
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 6, 2016
Messages
844 (0.44/day)
Location
NH, USA
System Name Lightbringer
Processor Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix X470-F Gaming
Cooling Enermax Liqmax Iii 360mm AIO
Memory G.Skill Trident Z RGB 32GB (8GBx4) 3200Mhz CL 14
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 5700XT Nitro+
Storage Hp EX950 2TB NVMe M.2, HP EX950 1TB NVMe M.2, Samsung 860 EVO 2TB
Display(s) LG 34BK95U-W 34" 5120 x 2160
Case Lian Li PC-O11 Dynamic (White)
Power Supply BeQuiet Straight Power 11 850w Gold Rated PSU
Mouse Glorious Model O (Matte White)
Keyboard Royal Kludge RK71
Software Windows 10
I for one welcome this. With both AMD and Intel chips being manufactured on the same node by TSMC (albeit different factories) it is truly the case of "let the best architecture win".

Hopefully this finally shuts up those who say that AMD only beat intel because they used TSMC's node that was better. Sure it was and arguably is but AMD themselves needed to come up with a competitive architecture too. And Zen is no slouch being designed by Jim Keller originally and now iterated beyond that.

The only thing AMD really cant compete in is volume. Intel still ships much bigger volume of chips. Tho with using TSMC's node it does equalize things a bit between the two. Mainly because i doubt this one 3nm fab has the volume of all other Intel fabs combined.
This isn't good in terms of long term competition....everyone seems to forget that Intel still dominates the market, has an R&D budget 650% larger than AMD's (which is also why anyone claiming "AMD is only winning because of process node" can stick it, because Intel's financial resources dwarf AMD's and 99% of the time, that determines everything, so regardless of process node, the fact that AMD is beating Intel with a shoestring budget is insanely impressive), has revenue over 800% greater than AMD and dominates the most lucrative markets of mobile (laptop) and enterprise, for all our sakes, we should want Intel to have to stick to their fabs for the next 5 years so AMD can continue to grow, but instead of Innovating, Intel is just throwing money at TSMC, which I guess is better than what Intel did the last time AMD threatened them which was bribe OEMs like Dell. Seriously, anyone concerned about long term competition should not like this development.
 
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
9,268 (3.49/day)
Location
USA
So why exactly is my tax payer money going to help Intel build new factories again in the USA if they are just going to outsource the latest and greatest anyway? So much for America being the latest and greatest lol
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
13,179 (4.97/day)
Location
Sunshine Coast
System Name Black Box
Processor Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5
Motherboard MSI E3 KRAIT Gaming v5
Cooling Tt tower + 120mm Tt fan
Memory G.Skill 16GB 3600 C18
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 970 Mini
Storage Kingston A2000 512Gb NVME
Display(s) AOC 24" Freesync 1m.s. 75Hz
Case Corsair 450D High Air Flow.
Audio Device(s) No need.
Power Supply FSP Aurum 650W
Mouse Yes
Keyboard Of course
Software W10 Pro 64 bit
A Chinese invasion of Taiwan will throw a spanner in the works for Intel, did they plan that far ahead?
 
Top