• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Confirms Soldered IHS for 9th Gen Core Series

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
36,796 (8.67/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard MSI B450 Gaming Pro Carbon AC
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Colorful iGame GTX 1070 Ti Vulcan X
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590 28-inch 4K UHD
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Antec EarthWatts Pro Gold 750W
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
Soldered integrated heatspreader has been a longstanding demand of PC enthusiasts for Intel's premium "K" mainstream-desktop processors. With AMD implementing it across all its "Summit Ridge" and "Pinnacle Ridge" Ryzen AM4 processors, just enough pressure for built on Intel. The company, in a leaked slide, confirmed the feature-set of its upcoming 9th generation "K" Core processors, which highlights "STIM" (soldered thermal interface material) for this chip. It shows that STIM could be exclusive to the "K" series SKUs, namely the i9-9900K, i7-9700K, and i5-9600K.

The slides also list out the clock speeds and cache sizes of the three first 9th generation desktop SKUs, confirming that the Core i7-9700K will indeed be the first Core i7 desktop SKU ever to lack HyperThreading. The TDP of the 8-core chips don't seem to breach the 95W TDP barrier Intel seems to have set for its MSDT processors. The slides also seem to confirm that the upcoming Z390 Express chipset doesn't bring any new features, besides having stronger CPU VRM specifications than the Z370. Intel seems to recommend the Z390 to make the most out of its 8-core chips.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
3,804 (5.83/day)
Location
Poland
System Name skurwiel szatan
Processor i7 5775c @4.3GHz/1.385v/EDRAM @2GHz
Motherboard Z97X Gaming 5
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP 1600 CL8 @2133 CL8
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio 2GHz
Storage SU900 128 (OS)/850 PRO 256+256+ 512,860 EVO 500,XPG SX950U 480 (games)/4TB of external HDDs (3+1)
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG dual monitor setup
Case Full tower
Audio Device(s) Mad Catz FREQ wireless
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
8c/8t and solder, 4.6GHz all core turbo out of the box, 9700K looks incredibly good.
 
Joined
Jan 2, 2018
Messages
98 (0.19/day)
There is some confusion tho.

The slides also seem to confirm that the upcoming Z390 Express chipset doesn't bring any new features
The author is wrong. The slides confirm, that there WILL be new features.

These slides were either made when original Z390 was planned, or they ARE actually adding new stuff into it.

It says Z390 will have integrated USB 3.1 G2 and Wifi (CNVi). So at this point its hard to say what will happen.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 4, 2016
Messages
55 (0.06/day)
Im sorry but... Intel confirms... would suggest that these are official slides from intel - they are not. There is no need to sensationalize the topics TPU. If i wanted that i could just go directly to videocardz.

"Leaked slides from Intel confirms soldered TIM on 9th gen unlocked processors.." would be just as fine and accurate - unlike this one.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (2.58/day)
8c/8t and solder, 4.6GHz all core turbo out of the box, 9700K looks incredibly good.
6 and 8 core CPU's without HT in 2018. Clock or not, this is incredibly poor. I have a 6 core CPU with 12 threads. Sure, it doesn't clock to 4.x out of the box, but come on, with manual overclocking, I have it at 4.5GHz and 12 freaking threads. TWELVE! The IPC gain is nowhere near as significant as some say it is on newer CPU's, it's basically just gains from higher clocks. 5820K is 4 years old. One would expect things from HEDT to finally trickle down to normies ranges by now. I guess Intel just can't get out of their skin...

9600K should be 6c/12t
9700K should be 8c/16t
9900K should be 10c/20t

With HEDT far beyond that starting at 16c/32t. Sigh.
 
Joined
Dec 3, 2012
Messages
323 (0.14/day)
Processor Intel 4690K @4.6Ghz
Motherboard Asus Maximus VII Hero Z97
Cooling BeQuiet Pure Rock
Memory 16GB HyperX 2133Mhz DDR3
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 2080
Storage 250GB Samsung SSD 3TB 7200 2TB 7200
Display(s) LG UK850 27in 4K Freesync/G-Sync/HDR 450
Case Corsair 450D
Audio Device(s) Corsair HS70 Special Edition Wireless Headphones & 7.1 Sound
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 650w
Mouse Corsair Glaive RGB
Keyboard HyperX Alloy Elite Mechanical RGB (Cherry Red)
Software Windows 10 Home
Intel seems to recommend the Z390 to make the most money for its board partners & licensing fees.
Fixed.
 

hat

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 20, 2006
Messages
20,583 (4.51/day)
Location
Ohio
System Name Starlifter :: Dragonfly
Processor i7 2600k 4.4GHz :: Athlon II x4 630 3.5GHz
Motherboard ASUS P8P67 Pro :: GIgabyte GA-770T-USB3
Cooling Corsair H70 :: Thermaltake Big Typhoon
Memory 2x4GB DDR3 1866 :: 2x1GB DDR3 1333
Video Card(s) 2x PNY GTX1070 :: none
Storage Plextor M5s 128GB, WDC Black 500GB :: Mushkin Enhanced 60GB SSD, WD RE3 1TB
Display(s) Acer P216HL HDMI :: None
Case Antec SOHO 1030B :: Old White Full Tower
Audio Device(s) Onboard - iLive IT153B Soundbar (optical) :: None
Power Supply EVGA 500w 80 Plus :: Wounded Corsair CX600
Software Windows 10 Pro - Plex Server on Dragonfly
Benchmark Scores >9000
Wow! NEW Solder Thermal Interface Material!
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
3,804 (5.83/day)
Location
Poland
System Name skurwiel szatan
Processor i7 5775c @4.3GHz/1.385v/EDRAM @2GHz
Motherboard Z97X Gaming 5
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP 1600 CL8 @2133 CL8
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio 2GHz
Storage SU900 128 (OS)/850 PRO 256+256+ 512,860 EVO 500,XPG SX950U 480 (games)/4TB of external HDDs (3+1)
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG dual monitor setup
Case Full tower
Audio Device(s) Mad Catz FREQ wireless
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
6 and 8 core CPU's without HT in 2018. Clock or not, this is incredibly poor. I have a 6 core CPU with 12 threads. Sure, it doesn't clock to 4.x out of the box, but come on, with manual overclocking, I have it at 4.5GHz and 12 freaking threads. TWELVE! The IPC gain is nowhere near as significant as some say it is on newer CPU's, it's basically just gains from higher clocks. 5820K is 4 years old. One would expect things from HEDT to finally trickle down to normies ranges by now. I guess Intel just can't get out of their skin...

9600K should be 6c/12t
9700K should be 8c/16t
9900K should be 10c/20t

With HEDT far beyond that starting at 16c/32t. Sigh.
Lol who wants HT for gaming if they can get a core count increase.

I get you CPU has TWELVE "friggin threads" :laugh:, but 8600K whips it in gaming so who cares about that.
 
Joined
May 31, 2017
Messages
103 (0.14/day)
Processor i7-4790k 4.6Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z97 Sniper.G1
Cooling Thermalright HR-02
Memory G.Skill 2400Mhz @ C10
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RX 580 Aorus
Storage Seagate Barracuda 2TB
Display(s) AOC G2260VWQ6
Audio Device(s) SB Recon 3Di
Power Supply Super Flower Golden Green HX 550w
Mouse Logitech G403
Keyboard Office Keyboard
Software W10 build 17763
8c/8t and solder, 4.6GHz all core turbo out of the box, 9700K looks incredibly good.
to me it looks ridiculous, disabling ht is just autistic for me.
 
Joined
May 31, 2017
Messages
103 (0.14/day)
Processor i7-4790k 4.6Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z97 Sniper.G1
Cooling Thermalright HR-02
Memory G.Skill 2400Mhz @ C10
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RX 580 Aorus
Storage Seagate Barracuda 2TB
Display(s) AOC G2260VWQ6
Audio Device(s) SB Recon 3Di
Power Supply Super Flower Golden Green HX 550w
Mouse Logitech G403
Keyboard Office Keyboard
Software W10 build 17763
Lol who wants HT for gaming if they can get a core count increase.

I get you CPU has TWELVE "friggin threads" :laugh:, but 8600K whips it in gaming so who cares about that.
I dont think you are too smart, he is just saying that at this point in 2018 almost every cpu show have ht independently of the core count, furthermore the 700k nomenclature should be already 8 cores and if they wanted to sell something else then 10c would make sense with the 900k nomenclature.

You are the cause why in 2k18 Intel is still selling 4c for 300$.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (2.58/day)
Lol who wants HT for gaming if they can get a core count increase.

I get you CPU has TWELVE "friggin threads" :laugh:, but 8600K whips it in gaming so who cares about that.
I guess you're one of those kind of people who like to get ripped off and they are even proud of it in the end. XD 4 years newer CPU barely "whips" it. Wow, what an achievement lol
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
2,426 (1.09/day)
6 and 8 core CPU's without HT in 2018. Clock or not, this is incredibly poor. I have a 6 core CPU with 12 threads. Sure, it doesn't clock to 4.x out of the box, but come on, with manual overclocking, I have it at 4.5GHz and 12 freaking threads. TWELVE! The IPC gain is nowhere near as significant as some say it is on newer CPU's, it's basically just gains from higher clocks. 5820K is 4 years old. One would expect things from HEDT to finally trickle down to normies ranges by now. I guess Intel just can't get out of their skin...

9600K should be 6c/12t
9700K should be 8c/16t
9900K should be 10c/20t

With HEDT far beyond that starting at 16c/32t. Sigh.
You might wanna rethink about that :banghead:
Red Hat strongly recommends that customers take corrective actions, including manually enabling specific kernel parameters or potentially disabling features like Intel Hyper-Threading, after the available updates have been applied. More details can be found in the Mitigations section of this article.
https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/L1TF
Another aspect of the risk in this area goes away if SMT is disabled, so keep it disabled!
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=153431475429367
 
Low quality post by noel_fs
Joined
May 31, 2017
Messages
103 (0.14/day)
Processor i7-4790k 4.6Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z97 Sniper.G1
Cooling Thermalright HR-02
Memory G.Skill 2400Mhz @ C10
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RX 580 Aorus
Storage Seagate Barracuda 2TB
Display(s) AOC G2260VWQ6
Audio Device(s) SB Recon 3Di
Power Supply Super Flower Golden Green HX 550w
Mouse Logitech G403
Keyboard Office Keyboard
Software W10 build 17763
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (2.58/day)
It's also cute how they make solder sound like it's some new exciting feature. You already had it, but you baboons also took it away and now trying to sell it it as best thing after sliced bread again. Great, they brought it back after years of bitching over it, but their PR department man...
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
2,426 (1.09/day)
Ah, and of course, after 5 years asking for soldered IHS they bring it, they already have stretched it enough to make nice benefits from filling their cpu's with clay


Another retard, its supposed that these cpu's already come hardware patched for this vulnerability type of thing
WTH are you talking about, these NG spectre vulnerabilities were reported this year. The hardware fixes aren't coming before ICL, at the earliest. And you might wanna tune up that language of yours!
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2012
Messages
414 (0.16/day)
Location
Sweden
Processor Intel Core i7 5960X - 4.5 Ghz
Motherboard Asus X99-E WS
Cooling 360 Monsta + 360 ST30 | 9 White EK Vardar
Memory 32GB Corsair LPX 3000Mhz
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1080 Ti FTW3
Storage Intel 750 400GB, Intel 750 1.2TB
Display(s) Asus PG279Q | 2 x Dell U2412M
Case Phanteks Enthoo Primo SE Black/White
Audio Device(s) Schiit Jotunheim - Xonar Essence One | Fostex TH-900, Fidelio X2 - KRK Rokit RP-6 G3
Power Supply Corsair AX1200i - Black/White Cablemod Sleeves
Mouse Logitech G303 Daedalus Apex
Keyboard Ducky Shine 1 - MX Brown
Software Windows 10
Disabling HT for end-users is absolutely not needed. It's for cloud-based servers.

I suggest you read on what the reason for it is.

The precise impact of L1TF to Hyper-Threading depends upon the specific use case and the virtualization environment being used. In some cases, it may be possible for public cloud vendors (who have often built special purpose hardware to assist in isolation) to take steps to render Hyper-Threading safe. In other cases, such as in a traditional enterprise environment featuring untrusted guest virtual machines, it may be necessary to disable Intel Hyper-Threading.
https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/deeper-look-l1-terminal-fault-aka-foreshadow
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
2,426 (1.09/day)
Joined
Jan 31, 2011
Messages
1,762 (0.58/day)
System Name TeraUltima 7
Processor Intel Core i7 3770K @4.2Ghz
Motherboard ASRock Z68 Pro3-M
Cooling Cryorig H7
Memory Kingston Hyper X 16GB DDR3 1866
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce GTX 1070 Super JetStream 2Ghz
Storage Crucial MX100 256GB SSD + 1TB Seagate HDD
Display(s) LG 23MP68VQ-P IPS 75HZ 23" 1080p MONITOR
Case Aerocool Dead Silence Black Edition Cube
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek ALC892 7.1 HD Audio/Nvidia HD Audio
Power Supply OCZ Stealth X Stream II 600W
Mouse Logitech G400S | Wacom Intuos CTH-480
Keyboard A4Tech G800V Gaming Keyboard
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit SP1
Benchmark Scores http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9470441
Joined
Jan 2, 2018
Messages
98 (0.19/day)
All vulnerabilities are about virtualization. This means that this only applies to enterprise, who are using these cpu's for their servers.
The gamers and the majority of the consumers of these cpus, will most likely never have such situation, thus vulnerability is meaningless and turning off HT is pointless.

The next vulnerability about the 'code' from one browser tab reaching memory of the other tab may happen at the computers of the majority of these users, but again, i think it was not related to HT at all.
Besides, what stops you from closing the browser, reopening it freshly and then navigating to your bank account. Its not like people have tabs of pron open at the same time as internet bank tabs.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
2,426 (1.09/day)
All vulnerabilities are about virtualization. This means that this only applies to enterprise, who are using these cpu's for their servers.
The gamers and the majority of the consumers of these cpus, will most likely never have such situation, thus vulnerability is meaningless and turning off HT is pointless.

The next vulnerability about the 'code' from one browser tab reaching memory of the other tab may happen at the computers of the majority of these users, but again, i think it was not related to HT at all.
Besides, what stops you from closing the browser, reopening it freshly and then navigating to your bank account. Its not like people have tabs of pron open at the same time as internet bank tabs.
Say that again? SGX isn't about virtualization, you might wanna reread CVE-2018-3615, CVE-2018-3620, CVE-2018-3646.
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2012
Messages
414 (0.16/day)
Location
Sweden
Processor Intel Core i7 5960X - 4.5 Ghz
Motherboard Asus X99-E WS
Cooling 360 Monsta + 360 ST30 | 9 White EK Vardar
Memory 32GB Corsair LPX 3000Mhz
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1080 Ti FTW3
Storage Intel 750 400GB, Intel 750 1.2TB
Display(s) Asus PG279Q | 2 x Dell U2412M
Case Phanteks Enthoo Primo SE Black/White
Audio Device(s) Schiit Jotunheim - Xonar Essence One | Fostex TH-900, Fidelio X2 - KRK Rokit RP-6 G3
Power Supply Corsair AX1200i - Black/White Cablemod Sleeves
Mouse Logitech G303 Daedalus Apex
Keyboard Ducky Shine 1 - MX Brown
Software Windows 10
Disabling HT will reduce the avenues where such spectre vulnerabilities affect current Intel processors, and no it's not just about VM. IIRC the first reveal earlier this year also suggested disabling HT in extreme cases where security was paramount.
It's all about virtualization. If you run on physical hardware only the software patches are the only ones needed.

It was only OpenBSD that decided they preventatively disabled HT.

In particular, it is ill-advised to run different security domains (address spaces) on a pair of hyperthread CPUs," he said. "Maybe there are other ways to resolve this problem, but Intel isn't sharing solutions with us. We have selected the expedient approach of disabling hyperthreading until we know more.
https://www.itwire.com/security/83301-openbsd-disables-hyperthreading-support-for-intel-cpus-due-to-likely-data-leaks.html

Intel themselves said that disabling HT is not a mitigation.
However, the general mitigations described in this paper should still be applied as disabling hyperthreading does not in itself provide mitigation for L1TF. Mitigation is also not required in situations where step 2 in the L1TF Limiting Factors section has been entirely mitigated, such as on systems with mitigations in the bare-metal OS that do not run virtual machines.
https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/insights/deep-dive-intel-analysis-l1-terminal-fault

It's fearmongering to suggest that you turn off HT as a normal consumer. If you know that you are affected by this CVE you already know what to do.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 14, 2014
Messages
569 (0.30/day)
Processor i7-4790K 4.4GHz @1.18v
Motherboard ASUS Maximus Hero VII Z97
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S
Memory G. Skill Trident X 2x8GB 2133MHz
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 970 SC @ 1442MHz
Storage OS on 120GB Kingston SSDNow V300, Samsung 850 Pro 512GB , 3TB Hitachi HDD, 2x5TB Toshiba X300
Display(s) Lenovo y27g
Case Fractal Design Define R4
Audio Device(s) AKG Q701's w/ O2+ODAC (Sounds a little bright)
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 850w
Mouse OG Steelseries Rival
Keyboard Rosewill Full Size. Red Switches. Blue Leds. RK-9100xBRE - Hate this. way to big
Software Win10
Benchmark Scores 3DMark FireStrike Score : 10299
I want that 9700K designed with no iGPU in mind, not a disabled P version. HEDT is too damn expensive..
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
1,261 (1.51/day)
Processor i7-6700k
Motherboard asus z170i pro gaming
Cooling ekwb custom loop for cpu/gpu running on d5 and 480 rad
Memory 2*16gb ddr4-2400
Video Card(s) msi geforce gtx 1080 ti aero
Storage 250gb 950 pro, 2*500gb samsung 850 evo
Display(s) asus pg279q, eizo ev2736w
Case thermaltake core p5
Power Supply seasonic platinum 660
Mouse logitech g700
Keyboard corsair k60
I have a feeling that security plays a larger role than Intel is willing to admit in these non-HT SKUs. No specific hidden meaning, simply reducing potential attack surface.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
2,426 (1.09/day)
It's all about virtualization. If you run on physical hardware only the software patches are the only ones needed.

It was only OpenBSD that decided they preventatively disabled HT.


https://www.itwire.com/security/83301-openbsd-disables-hyperthreading-support-for-intel-cpus-due-to-likely-data-leaks.html

Intel themselves said that disabling HT is not a mitigation.


https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/insights/deep-dive-intel-analysis-l1-terminal-fault
Again it's not, CVE-2018-3615 is about SGX. Though the other two vulnerabilities affect VM's more than anything else. I may have linked just that one article from Redhat, but the broader point still remains.

Yes, then again software patches are the only mitigation for current gen hardware.

This is twice, IIRC they said the same about some of the original smeltdown vulnerabilities or was it someone from Linux :confused:

It's not the only mitigation, but perhaps the easiest one. Software mitigation btw is OS dependent.
 
Top