• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Core i5-12400F Allegedly Offers Ryzen 5 5600X Performance for 200 USD

Uskompuf

Staff member
Joined
Mar 31, 2020
Messages
1,404 (1.78/day)
Intel has recently released their first 12th Gen Core desktop processors with the 125 W TDP K-Series and they appear to be preparing to launch the mid-range 65 W TDP chips in the coming months. The i5-12400F is set to feature 6 cores and threads consisting entirely of high-performance cores without any efficiency cores as found in the existing lineup. The processor features a peak single-core clock speed of 4.4 GHz, while multi-core speeds are 4.0 GHz and 3.4 GHz at PL2 and PL1 power limits respectively. The chip features a 65 W TDP/PL1 power rating and an apparent Maximum Turbo Power PL2 value of 117 W.

This processor has reportedly been tested by French publication Comptoir Hardware where it consistently matched or surpassed the Ryzen 5 5600X in synthetic and gaming benchmarks. These benchmarks were run on Windows 11 with DDR5 memory running at an unspecified speed and an AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT GPU. We have recently seen a listing for the processor at a Canadian retailer which lists the i5-12400F for 249 CAD (200 USD) which if true would be a sizable jump from the 157 USD price of its predecessor but still significantly under the 280 USD Ryzen 5 5600X. The Intel Core i5-12400F is expected to be officially announced sometime in January 2022 possibly at CES 2022.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2015
Messages
1,174 (0.44/day)
System Name Legion
Processor i9-10850K
Motherboard Asus Prime Z490M Plus
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer 2 240mm AIO
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws V 32GB (2 x 16GB) DDR4-3200 F4-3200C16D-32GVK
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO Ultra
Storage Team Group MP33 Pro 2TB M.2 2280 PCIe NVMe 3.0 x4 + WD Blue 1TB SATA SSD
Display(s) Acer K272HUL 1440p / 34" MSI MAG341CQ 3440x1440
Case Lian Li 205M
Power Supply PowerSpec 650W 80+ Bronze Semi-Modular PS 650BSM
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 25
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys
Software Lots
Trades blows with 5600X, actually maybe a bit more wins.

Now Intel, do GPUs, so people have a reason to buy one.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2010
Messages
1,999 (0.48/day)
Location
Right where I want to be
System Name Miami
Processor Ryzen 3800X
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VII Formula
Cooling Ek Velocity/ 2x 280mm Radiators/ Alphacool fullcover
Memory F4-3600C16Q-32GTZNC
Video Card(s) XFX 6900 XT Speedster 0
Storage 1TB WD M.2 SSD/ 2TB WD SN750/ 4TB WD Black HDD
Display(s) DELL AW3420DW / HP ZR24w
Case Lian Li O11 Dynamic XL
Audio Device(s) EVGA Nu Audio
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Gold 1000W+750W
Mouse Corsair Scimitar/Glorious Model O-
Keyboard Corsair K95 Platinum
Software Windows 10 Pro
If only we could see this kind happening on the gpu side of things. I don't care for a CPU price war, but a GPU price war wouldn't be unwelcomed just saying.
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2019
Messages
506 (0.42/day)
Competition is always welcome, AMD will be pushed yo lower their Zen3 prices and launch new products to compete.
One question though, it seems to me that AMD is always very conservative when it comes to power, can't they "unlock" their Zen3 to consume more power and deliver more performance? Or is there some limitation that forbids this?
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2015
Messages
1,174 (0.44/day)
System Name Legion
Processor i9-10850K
Motherboard Asus Prime Z490M Plus
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer 2 240mm AIO
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws V 32GB (2 x 16GB) DDR4-3200 F4-3200C16D-32GVK
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO Ultra
Storage Team Group MP33 Pro 2TB M.2 2280 PCIe NVMe 3.0 x4 + WD Blue 1TB SATA SSD
Display(s) Acer K272HUL 1440p / 34" MSI MAG341CQ 3440x1440
Case Lian Li 205M
Power Supply PowerSpec 650W 80+ Bronze Semi-Modular PS 650BSM
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 25
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys
Software Lots
Competition is always welcome, AMD will be pushed yo lower their Zen3 prices and launch new products to compete.
One question though, it seems to me that AMD is always very conservative when it comes to power, can't they "unlock" their Zen3 to consume more power and deliver more performance? Or is there some limitation that forbids this?

If I understand it correctly, PBO2 unlocks them. There are 6.2Ghz all core 5950X's on Geekbench.
 
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
6,697 (2.33/day)
Location
SE Michigan
System Name Dumbass
Processor AMD FX-9370
Motherboard ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 +SB950
Cooling Artic Liquid Freezer 2 - 420mm
Memory G.Skill Sniper 16gb DDR3 2400
Video Card(s) GreenTeam 1080 Gaming X 8GB
Storage Samsung EVO 500gb & 1Tb, 2tb HDD
Display(s) 1x Nixeus NX_EDG27, 2x Dell S2440L (16:9)
Case Phanteks Enthoo Primo w/8 140mm SP Fans
Audio Device(s) onboard (realtek?) - SPKRS:Logitech Z623 200w 2.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1000i
Mouse Logitech G604
Keyboard Logitech G910 Orion Spark
Software windows 10
Benchmark Scores https://i.imgur.com/aoz3vWY.jpg?2
ahh the beginning of a new round of prices wars. :rolleyes:
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
1,125 (0.35/day)
Would it not compete with 6600X (Zen 3D model) when it's launched in January-February next year?
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
3,303 (1.70/day)
Processor R5 5600X
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX B550-I GAMING
Cooling Alpenföhn Black Ridge
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-2666 VLP @3800
Video Card(s) EVGA Geforce RTX 3080 XC3
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 2TB Intel 660p
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Corsair Ironclaw Wireless RGB
Keyboard Corsair K60
VR HMD HTC Vive
One question though, it seems to me that AMD is always very conservative when it comes to power, can't they "unlock" their Zen3 to consume more power and deliver more performance? Or is there some limitation that forbids this?
Power consumption curve that goes up like a wall at some point.
That 12900K power consumption leak with 330W at 5.2GHz also had a follow-up that 5.3GHz took 400W (+70W for 100MHz) and 4.9GHz ran at 230W (+100W for 300MHz compared to 5.2GHz).
Zen3 (or rather TSMCs N7) has a similar problem but at a slightly lower clock speed.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
285 (0.12/day)
I'm not sure if beating a 65W CPU with 120W os power consumption is beating at all.

I mean, sure, if you only look the performance charts, the 12900K sets score with the 5950X and even beats it on single core, but on the other hand, the 5950X is still limited to about 130W of power while the 12900K eats up almost 250W...

Pricing is of course another good viewpoint, but the plaing field is clearly not leveled. here. Just crank up a Ryzen to the same TDP levels where the Intel CPUs are and see the performance there for the buck.
 
Joined
Aug 12, 2020
Messages
548 (0.84/day)
Maybe it won't be affected by that "some DRM games not working" nonsense without those pesky E cores.
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2017
Messages
251 (0.13/day)
System Name The Cum Blaster
Processor R9 3900x
Motherboard Gigabyte X470 Aorus Gaming 7 Wifi
Cooling NH-D15S
Memory 4x8GB Crucial Ballistix @ 3800C16
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse 6800 XT 2.4ghz @ 1.0v GPU, 1.062v SOC
Storage Lots
Display(s) 4k60hz, 1440p180hz
Case Obsidian 750D Airflow Edition
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA G3 750W
finally, some proper fucking competition
 
Joined
Feb 5, 2016
Messages
168 (0.07/day)
Location
Sthlm
System Name Vamos
Processor Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard Gigabyte B450 I Aorus Pro WiFi
Cooling Dark Rock Slim
Memory 2x8GB XPG 3600MHz
Video Card(s) RX 5700 XT PowerColor
Storage WD SN550 1TB, Seagate 2TB HDD
Display(s) AOC CQ32G1
Case Jonsbo V8
Audio Device(s) Logitech G633, Presonus E3.5
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion SFX-L 650W Gold
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G513 Carbon
Software Win 10 Home
I'm not sure if beating a 65W CPU with 120W os power consumption is beating at all.

I mean, sure, if you only look the performance charts, the 12900K sets score with the 5950X and even beats it on single core, but on the other hand, the 5950X is still limited to about 130W of power while the 12900K eats up almost 250W...

Pricing is of course another good viewpoint, but the plaing field is clearly not leveled. here. Just crank up a Ryzen to the same TDP levels where the Intel CPUs are and see the performance there for the buck.
Sadly, nobody cares about power draw if it is intel that is using more of it.

If amd cranked up power people would bash them for so much power just to match intel performance.

On the other hand - thank you intel for bringing competition back and lower prices, now I can hopefully upgrade my am4 system for cheaper.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
285 (0.12/day)
Sadly, nobody cares about power draw if it is intel that is using more of it.

If amd cranked up power people would bash them for so much power just to match intel performance.

On the other hand - thank you intel for bringing competition back and lower prices, now I can hopefully upgrade my am4 system for cheaper.

Or nVidia. Somehow that two always set the terms and they really need to fail at all points for AMD to have a point. Like they did with Ryzen. Funny that people are crying for competition but they fail to set a level playing field when it comes to the showdown.

Well boo-hoo! What a trick to make a car with a few percent better performance while literally halving the mileage...

Yea, somthing I hoped for too. But still not sure if upgrade to 5600X or wait for Zen5 in 2023. Because no point in upgrading the CPU if I can't get a decent GPU at a non-scalper price. Not going to pay the same price I did for my Vega64 for a card that barely beats it 4 years later...
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2020
Messages
282 (0.45/day)
Location
Greece
Would it not compete with 6600X (Zen 3D model) when it's launched in January-February next year?
This is too much to ask. Theoretically 6600x (and 5600x) should compete with 12600k and maybe 12600 non-k. At the end this classification will be also determined by pricing.
 
Joined
Jun 7, 2019
Messages
42 (0.04/day)
Remember also about the platform cost. It doesn't really help to save $100 on a CPU if you have to spend an extra $150 on a motherboard, extra $50 on a CPU cooler, extra $50 on a PSU. Then if you decide to get DDR5....
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2021
Messages
839 (1.73/day)
Location
Alaska USA
Remember also about the platform cost. It doesn't really help to save $100 on a CPU if you have to spend an extra $150 on a motherboard, extra $50 on a CPU cooler, extra $50 on a PSU. Then if you decide to get DDR5....
Difficult to say atm what the pricing will be for the B660 boards.
 
Joined
Sep 4, 2021
Messages
18 (0.07/day)
Processor Intel i7 10700F
Motherboard Asus Prime Z490-P
Cooling Be Quiet Dark Rock TF
Memory 2x16GB Crucial Ballistix 3200MHz RGB (dual rank e-die)
Video Card(s) EVGA 3060 XC Gaming
Storage Patriot VPN100 256GB, Intel 710 300GB, Micron M500 960GB, Seagate Skyhawk 4TB
Display(s) AOC C24G1
Case Be Quiet Silent Base 800
Audio Device(s) X-fi HD
Power Supply Corsair RM550x (2018)
Mouse Asus Rog Sica
Keyboard Kingston HyperX Alloy FPS
I'm not sure if beating a 65W CPU with 120W os power consumption is beating at all.

I mean, sure, if you only look the performance charts, the 12900K sets score with the 5950X and even beats it on single core, but on the other hand, the 5950X is still limited to about 130W of power while the 12900K eats up almost 250W...

Pricing is of course another good viewpoint, but the plaing field is clearly not leveled. here. Just crank up a Ryzen to the same TDP levels where the Intel CPUs are and see the performance there for the buck.
Well, 65W (actually 88) vs. 117W doesnt really matter, since both can be easily cooled -most likely Intel is cooler because of the less dense node and monolithic design.
 
Joined
May 17, 2021
Messages
950 (2.53/day)
Processor Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard B550 Elite
Cooling Hyperx 212
Memory 32GB Fury Beast DDR4 3200Mhz
Video Card(s) 3060 ti gaming oc pro
Storage Samsung 970 Evo 1Tb plus some HDDs
Case Lian Li Lancool II performance
Power Supply MSI 750w
Mouse G502
Damn Intel keeps pulling their punches, i hope the Gen 4 Ryzens drop in price like crazy in the near future, and that's amazing for my upgrade

Remember also about the platform cost. It doesn't really help to save $100 on a CPU if you have to spend an extra $150 on a motherboard, extra $50 on a CPU cooler, extra $50 on a PSU. Then if you decide to get DDR5....

I think those mobo's prices will come down, and you don't need a new cooler or PSU or even DDR5, i don't get your point at all. There's free upgrades for most coolers, there's support for DDR4 and if your not doing anything very specific and most of us don't they don't consumer more then the current CPU's
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
16,498 (5.87/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor i7 8700k 4.6Ghz @ 1.24V
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Audio Device(s) Situational :)
Power Supply EVGA G2 750W
Mouse XTRFY M42
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W10 x64
Well, 65W (actually 88) vs. 117W doesnt really matter, since both can be easily cooled -most likely Intel is cooler because of the less dense node and monolithic design.

Of course it matters. It always did and always will, there are only good reasons to run CPUs at lower TDP.

Overclocked out of the box to meet a grossly inefficient frequency target is just not beneficial, its that simple. It only serves to win benchmarks and marketing. You won't notice an advantage anywhere. And higher TDP is not easily cooled. Anything over 100-110W becomes heavy air cooling territory especially on a moderately warm day.
 
D

Deleted member 215115

Guest
Well, 65W (actually 88) vs. 117W doesnt really matter, since both can be easily cooled -most likely Intel is cooler because of the less dense node and monolithic design.
It's not less dense. They're about the same. TSMC and Samsung have always been behind Intel in terms of density.

1636366236875.png


The monolithic design does help with having the hotspots in the center of the coldplate, though the der8auer and Arctic AIO offset mounts for AM4 help too.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
1,297 (0.88/day)
Location
London, UK
"Intel Core i5-12400F Allegedly Offers Ryzen 5 5600X Performance for 200 USD" using twice as much watts, fixed hehe

The truth is painful to intel fanboys, yes performance is there but using twice as much watts? come on Intel you can do better than that, this is netburst all over hehe

The funny thing is that okay 200 usd 5600 performance but will have to use an aftermarket cooler that dissipates 300 watts and that is very expensive hehe, I wonder if a 360 aio can hold its own x 12400, pay attention that 12400 is the lowest of the lowest, so will still use 300 watts using only few cores ehhe

why intel, why intel, nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo hehe
 

Attachments

  • woman-yelling.gif
    woman-yelling.gif
    513.1 KB · Views: 21
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 6, 2018
Messages
80 (0.05/day)
It's not less dense. They're about the same. TSMC and Samsung have always been behind Intel in terms of density.

View attachment 224333

The monolithic design does help with having the hotspots in the center of the coldplate, though the der8auer and Arctic AIO offset mounts for AM4 help too.
These maximum density numbers do not represent real world CPU density.
 
Top