• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Core i7-9700K Overclocked to 5.5 GHz on Water, Cinebenched

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
41,085 (8.27/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
Intel's upcoming Core i7-9700K processor is the first Core i7 SKU to lack HyperThreading, but that isn't stopping the chip with 8 physical cores from edging past its predecessor posting strong multi-threaded performance. Chinese publication ZOL managed to overclock the chip to 5.50 GHz under liquid cooling with all its cores enabled, by simply dialing up the unlocked multiplier to 55.0X, and a rather high 1.535V core voltage.

The overclocked i7-9700K was put through Cinebench R15, where it scored 250 points in the single-threaded test, and 1827 points in the multi-threaded one, a 7.31x multiprocessing ratio. A current-generation 6-core/12-thread Core i7-8700K typically manages around 1550 points at stock speeds (at least 4.30 GHz all-core Turbo Boost frequency), in the multi-threaded test. The i7-9700K could hence be less ahead of its predecessor than hoped. It's the 8-core/16-thread Core i9-9900K, which could grab enthusiasts' attention (and monies).



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2010
Messages
4,809 (1.22/day)
Core i7-8700K typically manages around 1550 points at stock speeds

A typical stock 8700K will score 1220-1275 points in CB R15 today. MCE will make it go to 1400-1450 area.

This 5.5Ghz is a nice POC OC, showing temperature is more controllable with the new STIM.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
4,107 (1.39/day)
The annual hit job PR spin from Intel, we've seen this with 4790k, 5775c, 7700k, 8700k.
What Intel won't tell you, obviously, is that only a handful of these chips will ever get close to 5.5GHz even with exotic cooling :rolleyes:
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (2.27/day)
Cinebench results are rather meaningless for this CPU which is clearly aimed at gamers. 8 real cores, no HT, stupid high clocks with water. Would be much more interesting seeing how it performs in games than Cinebench, compared to older gen CPU's like 8700K or 7700K...
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
4,600 (0.86/day)
Location
Hong Kong
Processor Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Motherboard X399 Fatal1ty Professional Gaming
Cooling Custom loop water, 3x 420 Rad
Memory Team T-FORCE XCALIBUR RGB 4000 @3400 CL14
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 2080 Ti
Storage Samsung 960 Evo 500GB 3-way Raid 0
Display(s) Samsung C27HG70
Case Thermaltake Level 20 XT
Audio Device(s) EVGA Nu Audio
Power Supply FSP Aurum PT 1200W
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
The annual hit job PR spin from Intel, we've seen this with 4790k, 5775c, 7700k, 8700k.
What Intel won't tell you, obviously, is that only a handful of these chips will ever get close to 5.5GHz even with exotic cooling :rolleyes:
This chip is running well over 1.5V for that OC, not really a usable OC either way.
 

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
4,304 (0.90/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 2600X
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 OC 4 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 19.04 LTS
This chip is running well over 1.5V for that OC, not really a usable OC either way.

Keep in mind they say "on Water" but fail to specify if it's "regular" or "chilled" water cooling: in light of that of that famous 28 cores @ 5GHz presentation, i'd bet it's the latter, albeit with a "smaller" chiller, specially considering that voltage.
 
Joined
Jun 15, 2016
Messages
1,041 (0.58/day)
Location
Pristina
System Name My PC
Processor 4670K@4.4GHz
Motherboard Gryphon Z87
Cooling CM 212
Memory 2x8GB+2x4GB @2400GHz
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon RX 580 GTS Black Edition 1425MHz OC+, 8GB
Storage Intel 530 SSD 480GB + Intel 510 SSD 120GB + 2x500GB hdd raid 1
Display(s) HP envy 32 1440p
Case CM Mastercase 5
Audio Device(s) Sbz ZXR
Power Supply Antec 620W
Mouse G502
Keyboard G910
Software Win 10 pro
Intel is really trying hard to impress us but in reality he is failing miserably due to inability to pull head out of *ss. :)
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
1,503 (0.39/day)
Location
State College, PA, US
System Name My Surround PC
Processor Intel Core i9 9900KS
Motherboard Gigabyte Z390 Designare
Cooling Swiftech MCP35X / XSPC Rasa CPU / EK GPU block / XSPC 480mm w/ Corsair Fans
Memory 32GB (2 x 16 GB) Team DDR4-3200 CL16-18-18-38
Video Card(s) Gigabyte AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Waterforce WB Xtreme Edition
Storage Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB, 4 x 4TB HGST NAS HDD in RAID 10
Display(s) Viotek GFI27QXA 27" 4K 120Hz + LG UH850 4K 60Hz + Acer K272HUL 27" 2.5K 60Hz
Case NZXT Source 530
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar DX + Sony MDR-7506 / Logitech Z-5500 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic X-1250 1.25 kW
Mouse Patriot Viper V560
Keyboard Logitech G15
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores Mellanox ConnectX-3 10 Gb/s Fiber Network Card
Still, if it hits 5GHz at lower voltages, it is a good choice for gamers if priced properly.
The chip's turbo speed is 4.9GHz, so if it's like other Intel CPUs I've used, you can just set the all-core turbo multiplier 49 and it will work flawlessly at stock turbo voltage. An additional 100MHz shouldn't be that hard to achieve.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (2.27/day)
It's not exactly the same voltage. Coz even on Auto, it'll bump it up by itself. But generally, if board isn't some cheap crap, it would work rather easily with that setting.

What AMD needs to do now is release CPU with 2 full CCX units (8 cores), no HT and clock it higher. This seperation of gaming and productivity CPU's is smart on Intel's part. Games always need higher clocks. So, tweak gaming grade CPU's to deliver that. Productivity feels comfy with lower clocks but many threads. Obviously, it's hard to achieve both on same CPU.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
14,842 (6.10/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor i7 8700k 4.6Ghz @ 1.24V
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Audio Device(s) Situational :)
Power Supply EVGA G2 750W
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II (Best K/B ever... <3)
Software W10 x64
Still, if it hits 5GHz at lower voltages, it is a good choice for gamers if priced properly.

I dont see why it would. 9th gen is just a tweaked CFL for +2 cores and the solder keeps it further away from Tjmax which allows one to push destructive volts through. 1.5v is exceeding Intel max spec and far beyond recommended.
 
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
871 (0.19/day)
Location
Copenhagen, Denmark
System Name Ryzen/Laptop/htpc
Processor R9 3900X/i7 6700HQ/i7 2600
Motherboard AsRock X470 Taichi/Acer/ Gigabyte H77M
Cooling Corsair H115i pro with 2 Noctua NF-A14 chromax/OEM/Noctua NH-L12i
Memory G.Skill Trident Z 32GB @3200/16GB DDR4 2666 HyperX impact/24GB
Video Card(s) TUL Red Dragon Vega 56/Intel HD 530 - GTX 950m/ 970 GTX
Storage 970pro NVMe 512GB,Samsung 860evo 1TB, 3x4TB WD gold/Transcend 830s, 1TB Toshiba/Adata 256GB + 1TB WD
Display(s) Philips FTV 32 inch + Dell 2407WFP-HC/OEM/Sony KDL-42W828B
Case Phanteks Enthoo Luxe/Acer Barebone/Enermax
Audio Device(s) SoundBlasterX AE-5 (Dell A525)(HyperX Cloud Alpha)/mojo/soundblaster xfi gamer
Power Supply Seasonic focus+ 850 platinum (SSR-850PX)/165 Watt power brick/Enermax 650W
Mouse G502 Hero/M705 Marathon/G305 Hero Lightspeed
Keyboard G19/oem/Steelseries Apex 300
Software Win10 pro 64bit
useful for people running 1080p @ 120/140Hz only gaming configs. everyone else is fine with ryzen.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2016
Messages
155 (0.09/day)
System Name Purple Stuff
Processor Intel Core I7-8700K @ 5.0 Ghz
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix Z370-F Gaming
Cooling NZXT Kraken X62
Memory Corsair Vengence 16 GB DDR4 @ 3600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus ROG Strix GTX 1080 TI
Storage Samsung EVO 960 500 GB, HDD 4TB WD Black, SSD Crucial MX400 1TB
Display(s) Acer Predator XB271HU 27" x2
Case Phanteks Enthoo Evolv ATX Tempered Glass
Power Supply Seasonic Focus + Platinum 850 W
Mouse Steelseries Rival 700
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow Chroma V2
Software Win 10 Pro
I dont see why it would. 9th gen is just a tweaked CFL for +2 cores and the solder keeps it further away from Tjmax which allows one to push destructive volts through. 1.5v is exceeding Intel max spec and far beyond recommended.

The max voltage Intel is mentioning in their documentation for 8th gen CPUs is 1.52 (https://www.intel.com/content/www/u...core/8th-gen-core-family-datasheet-vol-1.html), of course that wouldn't be safe for 24/7 usage but still. The leaked bench is dodgy, but even so, if it hits 5Ghz across 8 cores this would still be impressive.
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2009
Messages
350 (0.08/day)
Location
NYC
Processor Intel Core i7 8700K
Motherboard ROG STRIX Z370-G GAMING AC
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro RGB
Memory G.Skill Trident Z RGB 16GB DDR4 3200Mhz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1070 G1
Storage Samsung 970 Evo 500GB
Display(s) Dell S2417DG 165Hz
Case NZXT H400i
Power Supply Corsair AX760
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard Cooler Master - Masterkeys Pro L RGB
Software Windows 10 Pro 64Bit
A typical stock 8700K will score 1220-1275 points in CB R15 today. MCE will make it go to 1400-1450 area.

This 5.5Ghz is a nice POC OC, showing temperature is more controllable with the new STIM.

At stock speeds (4.3ghz) i get 1350 with a bunch of chrome tabs, steam and a few other programs open...
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2016
Messages
155 (0.09/day)
System Name Purple Stuff
Processor Intel Core I7-8700K @ 5.0 Ghz
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix Z370-F Gaming
Cooling NZXT Kraken X62
Memory Corsair Vengence 16 GB DDR4 @ 3600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus ROG Strix GTX 1080 TI
Storage Samsung EVO 960 500 GB, HDD 4TB WD Black, SSD Crucial MX400 1TB
Display(s) Acer Predator XB271HU 27" x2
Case Phanteks Enthoo Evolv ATX Tempered Glass
Power Supply Seasonic Focus + Platinum 850 W
Mouse Steelseries Rival 700
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow Chroma V2
Software Win 10 Pro
New CPU and new GPU generations but when PCI-E 4.0 will start appearing on motherboards ?


If it does PCI-E 5.0 is due in Q2 2019 so 4.0 would be short lived. No point, there aren't any GPUs for consumers to saturate PCI-E 3.0 anyway.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
5,563 (1.57/day)
Processor Intel Core i7 3770k @ 4.3GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V LK
Memory 16GB(2x8) DDR3@2133MHz 1.5v Patriot
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity
Storage 59.63GB Samsung SSD 830 + 465.76 GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO + 2TB Hitachi + 300GB Velociraptor HDD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Anker
Software Win 10 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
4,107 (1.39/day)
If it does PCI-E 5.0 is due in Q2 2019 so 4.0 would be short lived. No point, there aren't any GPUs for consumers to saturate PCI-E 3.0 anyway.
I doubt we'll get PCIe 5.0 in consumer space quickly if Intel/AMD launch the 4.x revision anytime in the next year or two. PCIe 4.0 will suffice for the vast majority whilst PCIe 5.0 could be relegated to enterprise, again depending on when the next revision (5.x) comes out.
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2014
Messages
1,278 (0.49/day)
Location
Grunn
System Name Indis the Fair
Processor R5 3600 (PBO 150/130/130, 73c temp limit, FCLK/UCLK 1866)
Motherboard Asus Prime X470 Pro
Cooling Heatkiller VI Pro, VPP755 V.3, XT45 240mm, 2xA12x25, Arctic P14 case fans
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws V 2x16GB 4000 16-19-19 (b-die@3733 14-15/9-13-26-36 1.45v)
Video Card(s) EVGA 2080 Super Hybrid (A12x25 fan)
Storage 860EVO 500GB, 660p 1TB, WD Blue 3D 1TB, Sandisk Ultra 3D 2TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2430T, Dell P2417H
Case Phanteks Enthoo Pro M
Audio Device(s) DT770 Pro, Topping A50, Focusrite Scarlett 2i2, Røde VXLR+, Modmic 5
Power Supply Seasonic 860w Platinum
Mouse Razer Viper Mini, Razer Gigantus
Keyboard GMMK Fullsize v2 (Gateron Browns)
Software Win10 x64/Win7 x64/Ubuntu
200+ watts coming down on your cheapo motherboard VRMS!!! :D:D:D:D:D:D:D
 
Joined
Mar 13, 2018
Messages
53 (0.05/day)
My Ryzen 2700X that is 100% stock does 1830 in multi thread. Good catching up.
 
Joined
Sep 26, 2009
Messages
80 (0.02/day)
Location
North Central Ohio
System Name Custom build - I built it for gaming and some content creation
Processor Intel i9 9900KS on air, delidded by silicon Lottery & Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut applied
Motherboard Gigabyte Z390X Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S
Memory 32GB G.Skill Flare X DDR4 [8GB x 4]
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 3090 SUPRIM X
Storage SSD: Sabrent Rocket 2TB, Samsung 970 EVO 1TB, SSD Samsung 860 EVO 1T
Display(s) 55" Samsung Q80T 120Hz at 4K [on my desk]
Case Cooler Master 922 HAF [with a 3rd 200mm fan in door]
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic Focus Platinum PX-850
Mouse Corsair M55 RGB Pro
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit [most difficult OS I have had to debug and fix since Win 95]
Benchmark Scores [Graphic Scores] Time Spy Extreme: 14 021, Fire Strike Ultra: 11 529
Cores and more cores for gaming. How many cores are needed? Six cores seems to be the sweet spot. Because AMD has hammered Intel over the head with good performing multi-cores Intel is going nuts trying to figure out how to respond.

What is next? You need 32 cores to play WoW!
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2014
Messages
1,278 (0.49/day)
Location
Grunn
System Name Indis the Fair
Processor R5 3600 (PBO 150/130/130, 73c temp limit, FCLK/UCLK 1866)
Motherboard Asus Prime X470 Pro
Cooling Heatkiller VI Pro, VPP755 V.3, XT45 240mm, 2xA12x25, Arctic P14 case fans
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws V 2x16GB 4000 16-19-19 (b-die@3733 14-15/9-13-26-36 1.45v)
Video Card(s) EVGA 2080 Super Hybrid (A12x25 fan)
Storage 860EVO 500GB, 660p 1TB, WD Blue 3D 1TB, Sandisk Ultra 3D 2TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2430T, Dell P2417H
Case Phanteks Enthoo Pro M
Audio Device(s) DT770 Pro, Topping A50, Focusrite Scarlett 2i2, Røde VXLR+, Modmic 5
Power Supply Seasonic 860w Platinum
Mouse Razer Viper Mini, Razer Gigantus
Keyboard GMMK Fullsize v2 (Gateron Browns)
Software Win10 x64/Win7 x64/Ubuntu
Yes, really the optimal I'd say is around where the current 6 core i7s are. Keep hyperthreading of course... 8 cores without HT will use more power and from this looks to be slower too, intel really trying to push people up to the new price brackets where the i9 sits.

Unfortunately, while the 2700x is a very good chip it is out-haloed by this i9 just because of intel's advantage in IPC per core. That said power draw is of course better for the AMD stuff, but if you know history you will know that AMD sticking to a cheaper, inferior product just will not work. Ryzen sold so well early on because it was better than anything intel offered, now a lot of people will probably just go back to the same perception that AMD's products are cheap, second class things so people with more money than time to read reviews will just snatch up the intel stuff and pay whatever they get asked.
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2015
Messages
2,930 (1.30/day)
Location
Long Island
I think that Ryzen and TR are very significant technical achievements ... But what I am finding is that the area where AMDs shines are not the tasks that most folks use their PCs for. As a result, their accomplishment just isn't having a significant impact on the market place. Yes, Ryzen was better in a small market niche (i.e. I game a lot and spend 30% of my time video editing) and certainly pent up demand for anything "red" led to a nice bump in sales ... but it was short lived.

When the olympic silver medalist finishes 0.1 seconds behind the gold, no one can even remember the silver medal winner's name a month later. That's an amazing accomplishment, but folks will remeber who won the Gold as, if for nothing else, his name and picture are on the Wheaties Box. The problem is, for the tasks that PCs are far and away most used, Intel has the edge. It's not a big edge .... but the result has not been good for AMD which had 10.7% more market share in Q3 2017 (22.30%) then they do now in Q3 2018 (20.15%)
 
Top