• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Core i9-9900KS

Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
533 (1.18/day)
Location
California
System Name His & Hers
Processor i9 9900k @5ghz/ R9 3900X Stock
Motherboard Asus Maximus XI Code/ X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair h150i Pro Push/Pull. 5x Corsair ML120 + 4x Corsair LL120/ Corsair h115i Platinum
Memory 32 GB 4x8GB 3600mhz Corsair RGB Pro/ 32 GB 3200 CL14 @3800 CL16
Video Card(s) Asus ROG Strix 2080 ti/ Titan XP
Storage lots of SSD.
Display(s) Asus ROG PG278QR / MSI 27 inch VA panel.
Case Corsair 500D SE RGB/ Phanteks Evolv X
Audio Device(s) Arctis Pro + gaming Dac/ Corsair sp 2500/ Logitech Z 625
Power Supply Seasonic Ultra Prime Titanium 850w x2
Mouse Logitech G903 Lightspeed/ Logitech G Pro Hero.
Keyboard Corsair K95 RGB Platinum/ Logitech G Pro
What memory is that? Wouldnt you want that in the 4000mhz range??
its a garbage 3200 kit I now run at 3600..... Corsair RGB PRO CL16


I have a bdie kit that can do 4000 but I am too lazy to mess with it lol
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
443 (0.15/day)
Processor Intel core i9 9900ks @5.2ghz
Motherboard Asus Z390 Prime-A
Cooling Corsair h115i platinum push/pull
Memory 4x8gb Gskillz Trident Z Royal 4000mhz cl18
Video Card(s) asus Rog Trix rtx 2080
Storage 1x 1TB Samsung 860Evo,1x750Gb Seagate, 1x 1Tb Samsung 7k2 rpm
Display(s) Benq 2420te + Acer S230HL 23"
Case Corsair 760t White
Power Supply Corsair RM750i
Mouse Zowei ZA13
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow Ultimate
Maybe more expensive MB ? Im using the asus prime-a. All I do to oc is set to xmp, sync all core and set the voltage. Test in realbench and aida64.
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
21 (0.01/day)
When stress testing the 9900K(S) above 5ghz you can fit (2) 3700X systems in that power envelope
Funny part is that overclocking it doesn't even provide that much of a performance increase (when reflecting on the ridiculous efficiency), and it still loses to the 3900x in most CPU related tasks (aside from gaming). Such a silly product, IMHO. Plus, the 3950x is right around the corner.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
2,398 (1.57/day)
Location
Argentina
System Name Ciel / Yukino
Processor AMD Ryzen R3 1200 @ 3750MHz / Intel Core i3 5005U
Motherboard MSI B350M PRO-VDH / HP 240 G5
Cooling Wraith Stealth / Stock
Memory 2x 8GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200MHz @ 3466MHz / 2x 4GB Hynix + Kingston DDR3L 1600MHz
Video Card(s) Sapphire R9 270X Toxic 2GB / Intel HD 5500
Storage SSD WD Green 240GB M.2 + HDD Toshiba 2TB / SSD Kingston A400 120GB SATA
Display(s) HP w17e 1440x900 @ 75Hz/ Integrated 1366x768 @ 94Hz
Case Generic / Stock
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892 / Realtek ALC282
Power Supply Sentey XPP 525W / Power Brick
Mouse Logitech G203 / Elan Touchpad
Keyboard Generic / Stock
Software Windows 10 LTSC x64 + Arch Linux
At 1080P, only Sekiro and Farcry 5 show any significant difference between the 9900KS and the 3900X. Obviously this is some kind of game optimization for Intel. If you drop (or at least substitute for two others) these two games then the performance will be the same.

Am I missing something here?
Some games are more sensitive to latency, and Zen2 mitigated the problem, didn't solve it. Just because Zen2 is faster, that doesn't mean it will always be faster.
 
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
271 (0.07/day)
Location
Grand Prairie Texas
System Name Little Girl
Processor Intel Q9650 @ 3.6GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte x48 DQ6
Cooling liquid cooling
Memory 4gb (2x2) OCZ DDR2 PC2-9200
Video Card(s) Gigabyte HD6950 unlock to Asus 6970 specs
Storage Crucial CT128M225 128gb SSD
Display(s) Acer 27" LCD @ 2048x1152
Case DIY (spit & glue, ducktape, cardboard)
Audio Device(s) On-board HD Audio
Power Supply ABS Tagan 850w
Software Win7 64bit
I still see no reason to upgrade my 8700k. So sad, expected more.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2004
Messages
28 (0.01/day)
A lot of great cpu's to choose from! Makes me want to build a rig just for myself and start gaming again.

In all honesty though, until the base clock is 5.0 Ghz, I'm not impressed. This should have happened years ago.

Till then I'll just keep doing whatever with my old 4770k.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
2,849 (2.27/day)
Most comment authors missed the point as usual.
It's not about winning benchmarks. It's about winning in a particular niche. Because that's how OEMs and many consumers choose CPUs.

This is the fastest gaming CPU. End of story. Gamers who want to squeeze the most fps will buy this over a Ryzen - 9900K (even 9700K) was already good enough and this just adds a bit of margin over what AMD provides.

On the "working" front: 9900KS is going to be the fastest CPU available for many mainstream applications (like Photoshop), so Intel won't have any trouble selling these to OEMs - assuming there's any need (because gamers may suck the whole supply).
That said, 9900KS isn't vPro-compliant (unlike 9900K), so Intel is not targeting business-class workstations with this. It's only for gamers and prosumers.

And of course this is, by far and away, the fastest CPU with integrated graphics.
But that's nothing new since the fastest AMD's one is 3400G - basically half as fast, with countless Intel alternatives between them (even many mobile).
It means that at this point Intel is already faster than a theoretical maxed-out Zen2 AM4 APU (3700X + IGP). And they're going to add 2 more cores in the next 14nm generation.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
2,398 (1.57/day)
Location
Argentina
System Name Ciel / Yukino
Processor AMD Ryzen R3 1200 @ 3750MHz / Intel Core i3 5005U
Motherboard MSI B350M PRO-VDH / HP 240 G5
Cooling Wraith Stealth / Stock
Memory 2x 8GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200MHz @ 3466MHz / 2x 4GB Hynix + Kingston DDR3L 1600MHz
Video Card(s) Sapphire R9 270X Toxic 2GB / Intel HD 5500
Storage SSD WD Green 240GB M.2 + HDD Toshiba 2TB / SSD Kingston A400 120GB SATA
Display(s) HP w17e 1440x900 @ 75Hz/ Integrated 1366x768 @ 94Hz
Case Generic / Stock
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892 / Realtek ALC282
Power Supply Sentey XPP 525W / Power Brick
Mouse Logitech G203 / Elan Touchpad
Keyboard Generic / Stock
Software Windows 10 LTSC x64 + Arch Linux
That's the problem, next 14nm generation, again. This shit is too old by now, Skylake will be 5 years old by then.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
2,849 (2.27/day)
That's the problem, next 14nm generation, again. This shit is too old by now, Skylake will be 5 years old by then.
This may as well be 20 years old. Or it may be 320nm++++++. It's all just pointless numbers. It's not what computers are about.

You may buy a CPU because it's more modern or because it does better in reviews/benchmarks. But that's because you care about stuff other than actually using a PC. You care what's inside the case.
Some people on this forum openly admit that they're more interested in hardware than in software. I.e. they buy a PC as a collectors item or a DIY hobby - not as a tool (for the same reason many people here are against cloud in general).

Typical consumers are extremely pragmatic - simply because they don't know (and don't care) how a CPU is made or how it works. They only care what it does for them.
Most people don't even like PCs. A PC is something they're forced to use at work or at home.

Will someone like that consciously buy a 9900K(S)? Of course he won't. He doesn't even know what 9900K is.
But will he end up getting a 9900K(S) because he needs a PC to edit videos or do some scientific/engineering/financial computations? Likely yes.
 
Joined
Jun 8, 2011
Messages
5,591 (1.80/day)
Location
Somerset, UK
System Name Not so complete or overkill
Processor 5960X @ 4.20Ghz @ 1.06v - For Crunching!!
Motherboard MSI X99 Titanium Gaming
Cooling Custom loop with old bits and pieces that I need to replace
Memory G Skill TridentX 3466 non RGB..
Video Card(s) 2 x EVGA GTX 1080 Ti SC Black Edition
Storage Sandisk 120Gb SSD, 2 x 2Tb Sammy 3.5" drives - Need more drives!!
Display(s) 3 x 23" LG IPS panels (can't remember model!!)
Case 10mm thick MDF on plastic risers.. It's kinda a case??
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply EVGA T2 1200w
Mouse Corsair thingy
Keyboard Corsair thingy
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores It's not to bad.. More importantly, it works!!
Great review there @W1zzard :) It seems there's very little offering over the original 9900k which is a shame but if I was going to buy one, that would be my choice of CPU...

For 8 core 16 thread CPUs tho, the AMD's are amazingly good value. In the gaming tests that matter 1080P or greater, there's not masses in it and as it's been said before in the thread, they are the best value for money here.
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
3,582 (1.41/day)
Location
Jyväskylä, Finland
System Name Classified
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600 @ 4.05GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF B450 Plus Gaming
Cooling Custom loop by Alphacool
Memory G.Skill Value 16GB DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti FTW Gaming
Storage 2x256GB, 240GB & 480GB SSDs, 2TB HDD
Display(s) 2x 1920x1080 (23" & 22")
Case Corsair Carbide Air 740
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ Gold 750W
Mouse Logitech G400s
Keyboard Dell keyboard
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 19545 in Fire Strike with 290 Crossfire OC
Worst CPU since the 9000 series FX.
This is why they should've named this as 9900EE, "Emergency Edition" like they had those P4 and Pentium D EEs..
 
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
6,651 (2.40/day)
Location
Ovronnaz, Wallis, Switzerland
System Name Monster Panzer Max [MPM]/Nostalg33k/Fiio X5 3rd gen/Odroid C2/Honor View 20
Processor i5-6600K 3.9/E8500/RK3188/S905 4X1.5 A53/Kirin 980 2xA76 (2.6 GHz)+2xA76 (1.92)+4xA53 (1.8GHz)
Motherboard Gigabyte Z170X Gaming 7/XFX 650i Ultra/Fiio/Hardkernel Odroid C2/uh?
Cooling Corsair H115i /Alphacool Eisberg /uh?/Aluminum heatsink/Heatpipe
Memory 4x4gb HyperX Predator 2800 CL14/2gb DDR2 800/1gb/2gb LPDDR3/6gb LPDDR4X dual channel
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1070 ARMOR 8gb OC/Asus 8800 Ultra/Mali 400MP4/Mali 450MP5/Mali G76MP10
Storage 120gb OCZ VertexIII,1tb/8gb SSHD,2xToshiba 1tb/none/32gb+64gb/32gb/128gb UFS 2.1
Display(s) Medion X58222 32"5ms OC 75hz 2880x1620/Philips 273E3LHSB 27"1ms 1920x1080/~4" 480x800/6.4 inch FHD+
Case Cougar Panzer Max/none/Aluminum and tempered glass/None/alu frame +back/front glass
Audio Device(s) Fiio Q1 Mark II+Logitec Z333/SB Audigy2 Platinum/dual AK4490EN /Odroid HiFi Shield+/Trn V60/Fiio Fa1
Power Supply Seasonic M12II Evo 750 /Enermax Coolergiant 480/12v 1.5A/Aukey QC3.0 9-12V 1.96A
Mouse Asus ROG Spatha/touch/Minix Neo A2 Lite/touch
Keyboard GMMK TKL+Gateron Red+white keys/touch/Minix Neo A2 Lite/touch
Software Win10 64/none/Android 5.1.1 custom/Libreelec, Lakka 2.1 or Volumio 2.344/Android 9.1.0
Benchmark Scores bench...mark? i do leave mark on bench sometime, to remember which one is the most comfortable. :o
This is why they should've named this as 9900EE, "Emergency Edition" like they had those P4 and Pentium D EEs..
i thought it was "PE" : Physical Educa.... errrr Panic Edition

Most comment authors missed the point as usual.
It's not about winning benchmarks. It's about winning in a particular niche. Because that's how OEMs and many consumers choose CPUs.

This is the fastest gaming CPU. End of story. Gamers who want to squeeze the most fps will buy this over a Ryzen - 9900K (even 9700K) was already good enough and this just adds a bit of margin over what AMD provides.

On the "working" front: 9900KS is going to be the fastest CPU available for many mainstream applications (like Photoshop), so Intel won't have any trouble selling these to OEMs - assuming there's any need (because gamers may suck the whole supply).
That said, 9900KS isn't vPro-compliant (unlike 9900K), so Intel is not targeting business-class workstations with this. It's only for gamers and prosumers.

And of course this is, by far and away, the fastest CPU with integrated graphics.
But that's nothing new since the fastest AMD's one is 3400G - basically half as fast, with countless Intel alternatives between them (even many mobile).
It means that at this point Intel is already faster than a theoretical maxed-out Zen2 AM4 APU (3700X + IGP). And they're going to add 2 more cores in the next 14nm generation.
well ... i let the KS to the OEM, as an enthusiast on a budget (yes it does exist) i rather take 3fps less for 295$ less
 
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
3,936 (2.10/day)
Location
USA
30 fps faster at 1440p over my ryzen 3600 in far cry 5.

i wonder if older games like divinity original sin 2, or dragon age origins 1, 2, 3, etc also see these kinds of gains with intel. :/ might not matter though since those games are so old anyway my 3600 prob maxes them out anyway at 1440p 144hz
 
Joined
Dec 15, 2006
Messages
1,595 (0.34/day)
Location
Oshkosh, WI
System Name ChoreBoy
Processor 8700k
Motherboard Gigabyte Z390 Master
Cooling Silverstone HE01
Memory CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 2x8GB @ 3000Mhz
Video Card(s) EVGA 1080 SC
Storage 250GB Samsung 850 EVO and the trusty old 250GB Barracuda
Display(s) Pixio PX329 and Dell E228WFP
Case Fractal R6
Audio Device(s) On-Board
Power Supply 1000w Corsair
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores A million on everything....
$500-$600 for a "gaming" cpu. No wonder people love their consoles.
You could always buy an FX chip and an RX 570 if u want that sweet console experience on a PC. :roll:
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
20 (0.06/day)
Processor Intel Core i7-7700
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B250I Gaming
Cooling Corsair H55 + Coolermaster Masterfan Pro 120 AP
Memory 2x 8 GB HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 MHz CL15
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Gaming X
Storage 512 GB ADATA SU900, 512 GB ADATA SP600, 1+2 TB Seagate Barracuda 2.5"
Display(s) Samsung C24F396
Case Coolermaster Elite 130
Audio Device(s) Genius SP-HF160 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones
Power Supply Coolermaster G550M
Mouse Logitech M525
Keyboard MagicForce 68
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores 3DMark Time Spy: 6113, Superposition 1080p Extreme: 3426, Cinebench R20: 2048/365
Is this a test to see how far Intel fans are willing to go to buy the "latest" tech? (in captions because there is nothing "latest" about this processor)
 
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
3,936 (2.10/day)
Location
USA
Is this a test to see how far Intel fans are willing to go to buy the "latest" tech? (in captions because there is nothing "latest" about this processor)
I like Ryzen and own it. However, keep in mind, I am pretty sure Intel cpu's still hold a large lead in a lot of older games that are not tested by a good 20-30 fps.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
2,398 (1.57/day)
Location
Argentina
System Name Ciel / Yukino
Processor AMD Ryzen R3 1200 @ 3750MHz / Intel Core i3 5005U
Motherboard MSI B350M PRO-VDH / HP 240 G5
Cooling Wraith Stealth / Stock
Memory 2x 8GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200MHz @ 3466MHz / 2x 4GB Hynix + Kingston DDR3L 1600MHz
Video Card(s) Sapphire R9 270X Toxic 2GB / Intel HD 5500
Storage SSD WD Green 240GB M.2 + HDD Toshiba 2TB / SSD Kingston A400 120GB SATA
Display(s) HP w17e 1440x900 @ 75Hz/ Integrated 1366x768 @ 94Hz
Case Generic / Stock
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892 / Realtek ALC282
Power Supply Sentey XPP 525W / Power Brick
Mouse Logitech G203 / Elan Touchpad
Keyboard Generic / Stock
Software Windows 10 LTSC x64 + Arch Linux
This may as well be 20 years old. Or it may be 320nm++++++. It's all just pointless numbers. It's not what computers are about.

You may buy a CPU because it's more modern or because it does better in reviews/benchmarks. But that's because you care about stuff other than actually using a PC. You care what's inside the case.
Some people on this forum openly admit that they're more interested in hardware than in software. I.e. they buy a PC as a collectors item or a DIY hobby - not as a tool (for the same reason many people here are against cloud in general).

Typical consumers are extremely pragmatic - simply because they don't know (and don't care) how a CPU is made or how it works. They only care what it does for them.
Most people don't even like PCs. A PC is something they're forced to use at work or at home.

Will someone like that consciously buy a 9900K(S)? Of course he won't. He doesn't even know what 9900K is.
But will he end up getting a 9900K(S) because he needs a PC to edit videos or do some scientific/engineering/financial computations? Likely yes.
I see the numbers, more power consumption, the highest temps, and double the price than the 3700X for just a 11% improvement in gaming, this product is a fail even on it's own terms, no way around it. And don't even start to compare it to the more logical 3900X price-wise.
Skylake has to pass the torch already. This sounds exacly like someone defending the FX lineup.
 
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
3,936 (2.10/day)
Location
USA
I see the numbers, more power consumption, the highest temps, and double the price than the 3700X for just a 11% improvement in gaming, this product is a fail even on it's own terms, no way around it. And don't even start to compare it to the more logical 3900X price-wise.
Skylake has to pass the torch already. This sounds exacly like someone defending the FX lineup.
I mean 3770k to 4770k was only like a 5% jump in gaming benches, and same for every generation of chip from intel... 11% is actually decent, I am surprised they didn't just call this 10th gen.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
2,398 (1.57/day)
Location
Argentina
System Name Ciel / Yukino
Processor AMD Ryzen R3 1200 @ 3750MHz / Intel Core i3 5005U
Motherboard MSI B350M PRO-VDH / HP 240 G5
Cooling Wraith Stealth / Stock
Memory 2x 8GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200MHz @ 3466MHz / 2x 4GB Hynix + Kingston DDR3L 1600MHz
Video Card(s) Sapphire R9 270X Toxic 2GB / Intel HD 5500
Storage SSD WD Green 240GB M.2 + HDD Toshiba 2TB / SSD Kingston A400 120GB SATA
Display(s) HP w17e 1440x900 @ 75Hz/ Integrated 1366x768 @ 94Hz
Case Generic / Stock
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892 / Realtek ALC282
Power Supply Sentey XPP 525W / Power Brick
Mouse Logitech G203 / Elan Touchpad
Keyboard Generic / Stock
Software Windows 10 LTSC x64 + Arch Linux
I mean 3770k to 4770k was only like a 5% jump in gaming benches, and same for every generation of chip from intel... 11% is actually decent, I am surprised they didn't just call this 10th gen.
The 11% is against the 3700X, a CPU with lower gaming performance. The difference with the 9900K is only 5%, in 720p.
Plus, 10th gen is also Skylake, again.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
2,252 (0.42/day)
Location
United Kingdom
It may be desperate binning from Intel, but 8 cores holding steady at 5GHz is still a very impressive achievement, one that AMD is nowhere near matching even on a more advanced process. But... you've got to wonder, with volume production 10nm still more than a year away... how much more can Intel have in the tank that is Skylake? How much more can they wring out of 14nm so they don't look like they're losing totally to AMD?

Worst CPU since the 9000 series FX.
Except it actually has performance to go with it, unlike the FX-9000 series which was basically just a very inefficient way of converting electricity into heat (the actual CPU part was a side effect).
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
2,398 (1.57/day)
Location
Argentina
System Name Ciel / Yukino
Processor AMD Ryzen R3 1200 @ 3750MHz / Intel Core i3 5005U
Motherboard MSI B350M PRO-VDH / HP 240 G5
Cooling Wraith Stealth / Stock
Memory 2x 8GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200MHz @ 3466MHz / 2x 4GB Hynix + Kingston DDR3L 1600MHz
Video Card(s) Sapphire R9 270X Toxic 2GB / Intel HD 5500
Storage SSD WD Green 240GB M.2 + HDD Toshiba 2TB / SSD Kingston A400 120GB SATA
Display(s) HP w17e 1440x900 @ 75Hz/ Integrated 1366x768 @ 94Hz
Case Generic / Stock
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892 / Realtek ALC282
Power Supply Sentey XPP 525W / Power Brick
Mouse Logitech G203 / Elan Touchpad
Keyboard Generic / Stock
Software Windows 10 LTSC x64 + Arch Linux
Except it actually has performance to go with it, unlike the FX-9000 series which was basically just a very inefficient way of converting electricity into heat (the actual CPU part was a side effect).
Does it? it's faster than the 9900K, and gets the gaming crown, but that's as far as it can go.
 
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Messages
1,912 (0.52/day)
Location
Republic of Texas
Processor Ryzen 3900x
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix x470-F Gaming
Cooling NZXT Kraken X62 with CableMod
Memory 32gb Corsair Vengeance LPX @3200MHz
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 1080 Ti Strix OC
Storage Samsung 960 EVO Series - 500GB NVMe | Intel 660p 2TB NVMe
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 Curved IPS 3440x1440 G-Sync | Acer XB270H Abprz 27" G-Sync | Oculus Rift
Case Phanteks Enthoo Evolv TG
Audio Device(s) Objective2 Amp/DAC | AKG K612PRO and Beyerdynamic DT880 (600-ohm) | Blue Yeti Mic
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 750W with CableMod
Mouse Razer DeathAdder Elite
Keyboard Corsair K95 Platinum RGB "Cherry MX Brown"
Software Win 10 pro
This CPU went on sale immediately before I even bought it from Microcenter. The CPU war between Intel and AMD is more pronounced than the GPU war between AMD and Nvidia because AMD has no competition whatsoever for Nvidia on the high end, and only can score points on the low end for cheap budget builds.

This CPU is a beast. 5.0 GHz across all cores.

AMD can outperformit on paper or benchmarks...but there is no doubt who's on top when the GAMES start being played.

Most people want a Gaming computer and multitask to editing (like Youtubbers).

AMD CPU are for people who WORK on their computers rather than game.

Most games now are GPU intensive rather than CPU intensive and most gamers are running in 1080p or 1440p rather than 4K. It's easy to buy a powerful CPU with future proofing for a few years.

You can still game on an i5 or i7 4790 just fine with an RTX card.
Future proof when intel is known to keep changing sockets
 
Joined
Nov 26, 2010
Messages
17 (0.01/day)
A lot of great cpu's to choose from! Makes me want to build a rig just for myself and start gaming again.

In all honesty though, until the base clock is 5.0 Ghz, I'm not impressed. This should have happened years ago.

Till then I'll just keep doing whatever with my old 4770k.
Same here. Unless you need that gaming performance today, it's better to wait for a year or two for the fundamentally new core architecture. This processor performs well, but sucks way too much power. Reminds me of the late P4 processors.

EDIT:

Any, reasonably recent Intel 8T+ CPU is okay for non-competitive leisure gaming.

1573594077409.png
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
2,849 (2.27/day)
Does it? it's faster than the 9900K, and gets the gaming crown, but that's as far as it can go.
It's just a flagship for the DIY market. It doesn't need to go any further.
But it's the fastest CPU available for software that uses 8 cores or less - a fact you should stop ignoring all the time...

Yes, it's not very efficient or posh in your world. But it gets the job done faster than anything else.
 
Top