• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Encourages Adoption of ATX12VO Standard on Alder Lake-S Motherboards

Uskompuf

Staff member
Joined
Mar 31, 2020
Messages
842 (1.91/day)
The ATX12VO power standard is a new specification for desktop power supplies which boasts greatly increased efficiency over regular desktop power supplies. The new standard requires a compatible motherboard with a 10-pin power connector along with a compatible power supply which only features 12 V rails. The standard requires that any voltage conversion above or below 12 V must be performed directly on the motherboard which increases the complexity and cost for motherboard manufacturers. Intel is interested in promoting the standard with their upcoming 600-series motherboards for Alder Lake-S however most enthusiast boards are unlikely to feature the standard. The standard may find higher adoption with entry-level motherboards for system integrators and pre-built suppliers who need to meet strict government power efficiency regulations.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
3,738 (1.12/day)
Intel's own numbers show that ATX12VO specification is more power-efficient at idle or low power loads. With a 20W load, an ATX12VO 500W 80 PLUS Gold power supply offers a power efficiency of up to 83%, compared to an ATX 500W 80 PLUS Gold unit's 64%.
 
Joined
Aug 11, 2014
Messages
775 (0.31/day)
Processor ryzen 5 5600x
Motherboard AB350m Pro4 with B450M Pro4-F bios
Cooling custom loop
Memory TEAMGROUP T-Force TXKD416G3600HC18ADC01 16gbs XMP
Video Card(s) HP GTX1650 super 4gb
Storage MZVLB256HBHQ-000H1 PM981a (256GB)/3TB HDD
Display(s) Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx
Case Rosewill CULLINAN
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Corsair 750w
Mouse Best Buy Insignia
Keyboard Best Buy Insignia
Software Win 10 pro
This is really bad timing for this. chip shortages, and supply line issues. sounds like its only going to drive cost up more. could intel pick a worse time for this?
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
3,408 (0.76/day)
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD RX480
Storage Samsung 750 Evo 250gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television)
Case antec 600
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
This is really bad timing for this. chip shortages, and supply line issues. sounds like its only going to drive cost up more. could intel pick a worse time for this?
Not entirely sure how that is related.
New motherboards have to be made anyway regardless of what the end up using.

New psu's for oem builds, again not sure how it would be a problem
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2016
Messages
1,526 (0.91/day)
System Name The de-ploughminator
Processor I7 9900K @ 5.1Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z370 Gaming 5
Cooling Custom Watercooling
Memory 4x8GB G.Skill Trident Neo 3600mhz 15-15-15-30
Video Card(s) RTX 3090 + Bitspower WB
Storage Plextor 512GB nvme SSD
Display(s) LG OLED CX48"
Case Lian Li 011D Dynamic
Audio Device(s) Creative AE-5
Power Supply Corsair RM1000
Mouse Razor Viper Ultimate
Keyboard Corsair K75
Software Win10
People are way more likely to reuse their PSU throughout multiple builds, so higher cost of PSU is justified.
For motherboard, especially on Intel platform where people have to change board every 2 gen, increasing the cost of motherboard is just moronic.
And the difference in power saving at idle is only a few watts even if efficiency improve by 20%
Classic Intel - stupid inside
 
Joined
Aug 11, 2014
Messages
775 (0.31/day)
Processor ryzen 5 5600x
Motherboard AB350m Pro4 with B450M Pro4-F bios
Cooling custom loop
Memory TEAMGROUP T-Force TXKD416G3600HC18ADC01 16gbs XMP
Video Card(s) HP GTX1650 super 4gb
Storage MZVLB256HBHQ-000H1 PM981a (256GB)/3TB HDD
Display(s) Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx
Case Rosewill CULLINAN
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Corsair 750w
Mouse Best Buy Insignia
Keyboard Best Buy Insignia
Software Win 10 pro
Not entirely sure how that is related.
New motherboards have to be made anyway regardless of what the end up using.

New psu's for oem builds, again not sure how it would be a problem

lots of components that go into building a motherboard dont just magically appear at the manufactures door step. same goes for the psu manufacturer. if the standard changes than the supply line has to adjust to it. it drives cost up more than if things where moving more freely. we are literally in the middle of a labor and chip shortage thats not looking to get better anytime soon.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
13,506 (4.65/day)
Location
USA
System Name GPD-Q9
Processor Rockchip RK-3288 1.8ghz quad core
Motherboard GPD Q9_V6_150528
Cooling Passive
Memory 2GB DDR3
Video Card(s) Mali T764
Storage 16GB Samsung NAND
Display(s) IPS 1024x600
This is really bad timing for this. chip shortages, and supply line issues. sounds like its only going to drive cost up more. could intel pick a worse time for this?
Actually, not really. This is an excellent time for this push. 12V PSU's are much simpler and easier to make than a standard PSU's and they are proving to be more efficient. Adding 5V and 3.3V circuitry to motherboards is an inexpensive and relatively easy task. Intel is on point with this push and I think it would be very positive the industry all around.

Intel isn't pushing this for their advantage, they're pushing this because it's a good thing for everyone. Whether you like Intel or not, this is something everyone should get behind.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
3,408 (0.76/day)
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD RX480
Storage Samsung 750 Evo 250gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television)
Case antec 600
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
lots of components that go into building a motherboard dont just magically appear at the manufactures door step. same goes for the psu manufacturer. if the standard changes than the supply line has to adjust to it. it drives cost up more than if things where moving more freely. we are literally in the middle of a labor and chip shortage thats not looking to get better anytime soon.
Yeah but those, not magically appearing, parts have to get there anyway wether its going to be a traditional z790 board or a z790 with this 10volt thing.

This change does require a bit of effort on the psu manufacturers side regarding adjusting the internals but that won't be affected by any shortages really.

So personally I still see no issue with releasing anything like this at this time

If anything this should decrease the cost of motherboards and increase the cost of psus
(EDIT, got this ^ indeed backwards, my bad, ignore that part)
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 11, 2014
Messages
775 (0.31/day)
Processor ryzen 5 5600x
Motherboard AB350m Pro4 with B450M Pro4-F bios
Cooling custom loop
Memory TEAMGROUP T-Force TXKD416G3600HC18ADC01 16gbs XMP
Video Card(s) HP GTX1650 super 4gb
Storage MZVLB256HBHQ-000H1 PM981a (256GB)/3TB HDD
Display(s) Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx
Case Rosewill CULLINAN
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Corsair 750w
Mouse Best Buy Insignia
Keyboard Best Buy Insignia
Software Win 10 pro
Actually, not really. This is an excellent time for this push. 12V PSU's are simpler and easier to make than a standard PSU's and they are proving to be more efficient. Adding 5V and 3.3V circuitry to motherboards is an inexpensive and relatively easy task. Intel is on point with this push and I think it would be very positive the industry all around.

Intel isn't pushing this for their advantage, they're pushing this because it's a good thing for everyone. Whether you like Intel or not, this is something everyone should get behind.
all im saying is that "I" believe its not a good time. the reasons i posted are why i believe that. you may be right or i may be. time will tell. i dont have a problem with the standard.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
13,506 (4.65/day)
Location
USA
System Name GPD-Q9
Processor Rockchip RK-3288 1.8ghz quad core
Motherboard GPD Q9_V6_150528
Cooling Passive
Memory 2GB DDR3
Video Card(s) Mali T764
Storage 16GB Samsung NAND
Display(s) IPS 1024x600
So personally I still see no issue with releasing anything like this at this time
Then you are not understanding the technical aspect of these changes. They reduce the complexity of PSU construction and thus cost, increase PSU reliability and reduce power consumption.

If anything this should decrease the cost of.motherboards and increase the cost of psus
You have that backwards. PSU's will be LESS expensive and motherboards might increase in cost to a minor degree.

This is an all win situation for everyone. Intel has no stake in the design, it's completely an open standard.

all im saying is that "I" believe its not a good time. the reasons i posted are why i believe that. you may be right or i may be. time will tell. i dont have a problem with the standard.
I hope that didn't seem like an attack. I only wanted to help with the understanding that this is a very positive change for the industry. It's a change this is both logical from a design perspective, but also a cost perspective. More efficient and less expensive equals a win for everyone.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 11, 2014
Messages
775 (0.31/day)
Processor ryzen 5 5600x
Motherboard AB350m Pro4 with B450M Pro4-F bios
Cooling custom loop
Memory TEAMGROUP T-Force TXKD416G3600HC18ADC01 16gbs XMP
Video Card(s) HP GTX1650 super 4gb
Storage MZVLB256HBHQ-000H1 PM981a (256GB)/3TB HDD
Display(s) Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx
Case Rosewill CULLINAN
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Corsair 750w
Mouse Best Buy Insignia
Keyboard Best Buy Insignia
Software Win 10 pro
Yeah but those, not magically appearing, parts have to get there anyway we there its going to be a traditional z790 board or a 790 with this 10volt thing.

This change does require a bit of effort on the pau manufacturers side regarding adjusting the internals but that won't be affected by any shortages really.

So personally I still see no issue with releasing anything like this at this time

If anything this should decrease the cost of.motherboards and increase the cost of psus
thats an interesting take. let me be clear tho, i dont mind the standard. i think it should have been this way long ago. on your last point, i actually think power supplys will come down in price. i mean, all the psu will be at this point is an ac to dc converter. a few capacitors and a components to control the 12v ripple and all is good. its really going to be upto the motherboard to handle anything else past this point. i can already picture some interesting mods for motherboard that switch over to this design.

Then you are not understanding the technical aspect of these changes. They reduce the complexity of PSU construction and thus cost, increase PSU reliability and reduce power consumption.

You have that backwards. PSU's will be LESS expensive and motherboard might increase in cost to a minor degree.

This is an all win situation for everyone. Intel has no stake in the design, it's completely an open standard.


I hope that didn't seem like an attack. I only wanted to help with the understanding that this is a very positive change for the industry. It's a change this is both logical from a design perspective, but also a cost perspective. More efficient and less expensive equals a win for everyone.
No worries. The way i responded to the topic set me up. Neither one of us attacked each others character and the replys have not been visceral. In fact, i believe my replies to ZoneDymo appeard much more aggressive than yours did to me. Its just they way things are when we are behind a computer. Sometimes things appear harsh and are not meant to be.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
13,506 (4.65/day)
Location
USA
System Name GPD-Q9
Processor Rockchip RK-3288 1.8ghz quad core
Motherboard GPD Q9_V6_150528
Cooling Passive
Memory 2GB DDR3
Video Card(s) Mali T764
Storage 16GB Samsung NAND
Display(s) IPS 1024x600
Its just they way things are when we are behind a computer. Sometimes things appear harsh and are not meant to be.
Yeah, I'm one of those. My posts sometimes come off much more aggressive than I intend them to be. No worries at all.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 19, 2018
Messages
394 (0.34/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Motherboard Asus ROG Crosshair VIII Hero WiFi
Cooling Corsair Hydro H115i
Memory 16Gb CL14 Ripjaws V @3666MHz
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX2070
Storage Samsung 970 EVO Plus SSD
Display(s) Korean Unbadged
Case Cooler Master Cosmos
Audio Device(s) O2 USB Headphone AMP
Power Supply Corsair HX850i
Mouse Logitech G703
Keyboard Crap!
So Intel will deliver a nice little motherboard tax with this. I wonder how much it will be... New PSU, new PSU 5v convertor cards/boxes for SATA and other peripherals... I don't think this will be cheap.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
13,506 (4.65/day)
Location
USA
System Name GPD-Q9
Processor Rockchip RK-3288 1.8ghz quad core
Motherboard GPD Q9_V6_150528
Cooling Passive
Memory 2GB DDR3
Video Card(s) Mali T764
Storage 16GB Samsung NAND
Display(s) IPS 1024x600
So Intel will deliver a nice little motherboard tax with this.
Once again, this is an OPEN STANDARDS change. Intel has no specific profit interest in the changes proposed. No royalties, nothing but a technological power delivery improvement and simplification...

New PSU, new PSU 5v convertor cards/boxes for SATA and other peripherals... I don't think this will be cheap.
That's a fair point. However, 12v->5v adapters are easily made and should be inexpensive for those of us still using SATA based components.
 
Joined
Jan 11, 2005
Messages
1,456 (0.24/day)
Location
66 feet from the ground
System Name 2nd AMD puppy
Processor FX-8350 vishera
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper TX2
Memory 16 Gb DDR3:8GB Kingston HyperX Beast + 8Gb G.Skill Sniper(by courtesy of tabascosauz &TPU)
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+;1450/2000 Mhz
Storage SSD :840 pro 128 Gb;Iridium pro 240Gb ; HDD 2xWD-1Tb
Display(s) Benq XL2730Z 144 Hz freesync
Case NZXT 820 PHANTOM
Audio Device(s) Audigy SE with Logitech Z-5500
Power Supply Riotoro Enigma G2 850W
Mouse Razer copperhead / Gamdias zeus (by courtesy of sneekypeet & TPU)
Keyboard MS Sidewinder x4
Software win10 64bit ltsc
Benchmark Scores irrelevant for me
for a saving of few watts on idle &low power load i don't know if is worth it

the mobo will be hotter as it will convert high amp 12v to high amp 5v and all other voltages.....cooling it will be more complex and what you save with psu (if will be cheaper?) you will spend on mobo and connectors..

is more like re-inventing the wheel by making it more complex but in the end with the same functionality and costs...
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
13,506 (4.65/day)
Location
USA
System Name GPD-Q9
Processor Rockchip RK-3288 1.8ghz quad core
Motherboard GPD Q9_V6_150528
Cooling Passive
Memory 2GB DDR3
Video Card(s) Mali T764
Storage 16GB Samsung NAND
Display(s) IPS 1024x600
the mobo will be hotter as it will convert high amp 12v to high amp 5v and all other voltages
Either the conversion happens in the PSU or the mobo. Motherboards have always been a better place to do voltage conversion as there's more room for components and cooling potential.
 
Joined
Apr 23, 2015
Messages
29 (0.01/day)
That's ankward. You strip away DC-DC from PSU to make them more efficient, and this is obvious, but then you need to make that conversion somewhere else with unknown efficiency or quality.

Nowadays less and less components uses 5V and 3,3V, and power requirement for those are really low, and i get that transition to 12V has started more than 10 years ago, but still i'm not confident of having increasing power on motherboards. If it is a matter of efficiency, we need now to measure a mobo efficiency too.
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
4,609 (0.86/day)
Location
Hong Kong
Processor Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Motherboard X399 Fatal1ty Professional Gaming
Cooling Custom loop water, 3x 420 Rad
Memory Team T-FORCE XCALIBUR RGB 4000 @3400 CL14
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 2080 Ti
Storage Samsung 960 Evo 500GB 3-way Raid 0
Display(s) Samsung C27HG70
Case Thermaltake Level 20 XT
Audio Device(s) EVGA Nu Audio
Power Supply FSP Aurum PT 1200W
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Either the conversion happens in the PSU or the mobo. Motherboards have always been a better place to do voltage conversion as there's more room for components and cooling potential.
Not so sure about that.... Motherboards these days are pretty crowded already, especially any where near the CPU socket.
As for cooling, the PSU has a dedicated cooling fan, IDK of any case that focus on cooling around the motherboard power connectors.
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2021
Messages
65 (0.51/day)
marketing number ....... at ide a gpu is 7 to 15 W minimum ....
20 W its a nuc ....

old psu golds v550 cooler master :

efficiency 86 % at 40 W 90 % at 60 W


2.842A​
0.500A​
0.475A​
0.200A​
39.76W​
87.85%​
585 RPM​
27.9 dBA​
0.668​
12.202V​
4.983V​
3.353V​
4.978V​
45.26W​
230.2V​
2
4.060A​
0.998A​
0.985A​
0.400A​
59.77W​
90.48%​
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
8,168 (1.35/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MXVI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro
Memory 32GB Viper Steel 3600 DDR4 @ 3800MHz 16-19-16-19-36
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 2080 Gaming OC 8G
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 2TB Viper VPN100, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 275Q
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/33u9si
Not entirely sure how that is related.
New motherboards have to be made anyway regardless of what the end up using.

New psu's for oem builds, again not sure how it would be a problem
Because this will require additional parts in the boards for all the extra power conversion. Parts that are already in tight supply. In fact, a lot of upcoming boards have had to be redesigned due to the power conversion IC makers killing of certain product lines to be able to provide enough parts of their more popular products.

Actually, not really. This is an excellent time for this push. 12V PSU's are much simpler and easier to make than a standard PSU's and they are proving to be more efficient. Adding 5V and 3.3V circuitry to motherboards is an inexpensive and relatively easy task. Intel is on point with this push and I think it would be very positive the industry all around.

Intel isn't pushing this for their advantage, they're pushing this because it's a good thing for everyone. Whether you like Intel or not, this is something everyone should get behind.
See my reply above. There's a huge shortage of those parts right now, so it's actually a terrible time to make this move. Also, the board makers and the PSU makers are not onboard with this standard, so it'll most likely be BTX 2.0 in terms of popularity outside the likes of Dell and HP.
 
Joined
Aug 12, 2020
Messages
312 (1.02/day)
Transition period will be painful regardless, but at some point gotta bite the bullet and go for it, as looking past obvious incompatibility with existing standard, it is change for the better.
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
4,609 (0.86/day)
Location
Hong Kong
Processor Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Motherboard X399 Fatal1ty Professional Gaming
Cooling Custom loop water, 3x 420 Rad
Memory Team T-FORCE XCALIBUR RGB 4000 @3400 CL14
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 2080 Ti
Storage Samsung 960 Evo 500GB 3-way Raid 0
Display(s) Samsung C27HG70
Case Thermaltake Level 20 XT
Audio Device(s) EVGA Nu Audio
Power Supply FSP Aurum PT 1200W
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Transition period will be painful regardless, but at some point gotta bite the bullet and go for it, as it is change for the better.
So far this seems like a solution to a problem that doesn't really exist.
All this does is moving parts of the PSU on to the motherboard.
Now instead of PSU makers having to achieve higher efficiency, the ball is just passed down to the Motherboard.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
4,187 (1.40/day)
So far this seems like a solution to a problem that doesn't really exist.
All this does is moving parts of the PSU on to the motherboard.
Not to mention doesn't cost Intel a darn cent, all the costs will be borne by their "partners" :rolleyes:

Unless of course they go full Atom & subsidize these parts :D
 
Joined
Aug 12, 2020
Messages
312 (1.02/day)
So far this seems like a solution to a problem that doesn't really exist.
All this does is moving parts of the PSU on to the motherboard.

Motherboards already have dedicated VRMs for tighter regulation and ripple suppression than what PSU can do. It's not like they're gonna take out secondary VRM boards from PSUs and put them onto mobos next to existing VRMs, it's not how things work lol.

This might increase requirements for the existing VRM designs (and hence cost to some extent), but that's about it.
 
Top